Harts vs 太子明慧 vs樂沛兒 pn班 - 幼校討論

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1494

61^#

發表於 17-10-31 08:40 |只看該作者

POPS 寫左收到2016 DEC B ,
但HARTS 記憶中佢寫只收到 2016AUG 定2016SEP ....

Rank: 4


	731

62^#

發表於 17-10-31 09:20 |只看該作者

vickling 發表於 17-10-31 08:40
POPS 寫左收到2016 DEC B ,
但HARTS 記憶中佢寫只收到 2016AUG 定2016SEP ....

Harts寫到 31/8 2016

jani.l

Rank: 4


	965

63^#

發表於 17-10-31 09:50 |只看該作者

回覆樓主

Application form 寫收2016 出生，但入學時要夠兩歲

jani.l

Rank: 4


	965

64^#

發表於 17-10-31 09:53 |只看該作者

MissPuffs 發表於 17-10-30 21:58
剛收到信面試，12月2日

一樣

EggEgg08

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1884

65^#

發表於 17-10-31 10:24 |只看該作者

回覆樓主

Harts都會收細B的

big_cow

禁止訪問


	133

66^#

發表於 17-10-31 10:29 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

SarahGil

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1740

67^#

發表於 17-10-31 10:41 |只看該作者

回覆 big_cow 的帖子

Harts' teachers are very experienced. Many of them have been teaching in HKPS for many years and then transferred to here. Their teachers' retention rate is 99% which I doubt how many other private kindergartens can reach that.

My daughter is studying K2 at Harts. Apparently more homework then K1 but still manageable and overall very balanced. Academic wise, I have been to LH Open Day couple of years before (when finding a PN school for my daughter) and remember that LH is quite focused on Chinese comprehension and it's even for K2's students homework (correct me if I am wrong as I am not LH user). I don't see anything like that in Harts yet (but I am not sure as now is only first term of the year) but my guessing is that LH would be more "academic" than Harts.

I totally agree what other users have shared about Harts above.

big_cow

禁止訪問


	133

68^#

發表於 17-10-31 11:03 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

SarahGil

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1740

69^#

發表於 17-10-31 11:26 |只看該作者

回覆 big_cow 的帖子

I of course know this incident. My gal was studying K1 in HKPS before then transferred to Harts in K2. Nothing wrong with their arrangement. I would say parents need to face this risk anyway if they are studying private kindergartens as they mostly rent the premises from the landlord. LH Hung Hom has also closed down with similar background. I think amongst those well-known kindergartens, only York has its own premises in KLT. Or kindergartens that share the campus with their associated primary schools next door, e.g. SPK, SPN, GH, PC, RC...

Rank: 4


	731

70^#

發表於 17-10-31 11:31 |只看該作者

樂沛兒行STEAM, 高思維教學, 的確很吸引, 我在學校的facebook報導中讀到他們推行STEAM的活動, 活動真的設計得很好, 而且聽聞推行得不錯, 另外,暫時亦未發現其他校有高思維教學。

Harts, 除了招牌reading scheme吸引, 最讓我欣賞的地方是學校重視培養小朋友對體育和藝術方面的興趣。上次我參與fun day時, 藝術老師帶的活動給我的印象很深刻, 她不並是要小朋友做出什麼製成品或圖工, 而是讓小朋友感受以植物作畫的樂趣. 我覺得這點很好, 而且學校有小提琴, 又有專科老師設計體育活動, 這我感到學校的教育關顧到孩子各方面的發展。

我相信樂沛兒和Harts都是很好的學校, 然而每所學校都有自己的強項和側重點, 要睇家長如何取捨, 和自己的小朋友究竟較適合那一種教學模式。

最重要係學校肯收我個仔先有得揀, 大家一齊努力啦!

EggEgg08

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1884

71^#

發表於 17-10-31 14:23 |只看該作者

big_cow 發表於 17-10-31 10:29
我就覺得好一般喇..太COMMERCIAL, 去過佢吔簡介會,同埋啲老師太GREEN,有乜太多經驗。我應該都會選樂沛兒喇 ...

可唔可以具體分享下有d乜野太commercial？

big_cow

禁止訪問


	133

72^#

發表於 17-10-31 16:33 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 4


	731

73^#

發表於 17-10-31 16:49 |只看該作者

big_cow 發表於 17-10-31 16:33
价錢巳經貴人一截喇.HKD6,800半日未包書薄雜費，而且校舍重要細
玩乜都係講錢.
所以我都唔會考慮。

除左6800學費，請問仲有咩費用要交？

EggEgg08

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1884

74^#

發表於 17-10-31 18:16 |只看該作者

回覆樓主

$6800 但係一年只交10期學費，比其他私幼 pn(如St Cat, LH, York, Think...etc）其實都差不多咋喎，有d 甚至貴過Harts.

學校沒有茶點費但已經包每天茶點，不用自備，書簿費也只是$1xxx 一學期，沒有其他費用。

學校學費明碼實價，沒有其他逐少逐少的收費。咁當然如果呢個價錢負擔不到的就不是個好選擇。