- 在線時間
- 742 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-2-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 17708
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-10-31
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 14632
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 32340
- UID
- 1049305
|
引用:Why+bother+to+revive+a+thread+that+has+b
原帖由 tingtingting 於 14-09-24 發表
Why bother to revive a thread that has been subjected to abuse by irrational ISF haters?
Anyhow, ha ... For some reasons, the school seems to be a flame war magnet around here.
I don't think the name "International School" is very important. But when I give it some thoughts, I am not convinced we should determine the "international-ness" of a school by measuring their students. IMO, International School is characterized by offering education typical of a foreign country in Hong Kong. For example, I don't think anyone would dispute AIS, FIS are International Schools. We call them IS for many many years in HK not because they offer balanced Eastern and Western education, it is because they offer American and French education respectively (adapted to local needs slightly) in HK.
What is important to me is the education philosophy and the execution of that philosophy by the school. Not the name of a school. Does the name international school alone makes me feel better? No.
Anyone can disagree with me on the above definition. However, it is harder for someone to disagree the notion that we should look at the education being offered to the students instead of whether students like Plato and ancient Chinese culture simultaneously.
Don't get me wrong, I am not a ISF hater. I think ISF is a innovative school, trying to strike a balance between the East and the West, which HK needs more of.
|
|