2014-P6家長會(新校長大改革),今年小六家長請進

wongwm

Please be aware choosing option 5 does not mean old system/no change.
Option 5 only means 3 exams only.

But the exam papers are the new system. Reason I say this is because the memo is written very badly. Too many gray areas. So again don't trust it.

So here is what a lot of parents are going to do especially P4 and below. Doesn't choose any of the options but attach a letter complaining and stating what they want.

wongwm

Ok after receiving some feedback, I need to clarify my suspicions.

Look at page 2 of the memo. It has option 1 and option 2 exam paper /mark calculation.

Return slip has 5 options. Does option 5 mean with option 2 of mark calculation.

Or is it the headmistress wants to make everything confusing so people tick option 2 by mistake.

The exam mark calculation really should have used Option A and Option B.

The memo as a legal document is flawed and pointless.

bestmummy

The way she designed such notice showed how the principal poorly managed  everything and how the situation has been complicated by the her. Yes, she might intentionally cause such confusion! How do u all feel about her integrity?

wongpm

昨晚亞仔同我講，話他好多野想，他好驚改革令他考得差。我聽完都覺得好傷心，唔通我真係選错左學校

pauline_c

原帖由 wongpm 於 14-09-03 發表
本帖最後由 wongpm 於 14-9-3 21:12 編輯

昨晚亞仔同我講，話他好多野想，他好驚改革令他考得差。我聽完 ...

阿仔昨晚亦向我表示憂慮，我之前沒有向他透露太多細節，怕他感受到我的壓力，加大他的壓力。似乎要溝通多些。我告訴他，我們只要努力，即使上不了中學部，仍會找到合適的中學，愉快上學。我們盡力為孩子爭取合適他們的，亦同時預備迎接改變的挑戰，只要盡了力，便無悔了。小朋友須要我們的支持，共勉~~

wongpm

我非常同意pauline的說話，我都同亞仔講，只要盡力考，無論是否升回中学，我們都已是勝利者，盡了力便算！希望真的令仔仔釋懷。

Ronniemei

回覆 tsmama 的帖子

Tsmama

我是今年小五家長, 你說13/14年高小全級頭10名有4個同學升回中學部, 想問全級頭10名報出面比較有名的中學(如皇仁, St. Joseph, King's, 華仁) 機會大嗎?  我囝上年全級4-5, 聽聞選校時一定要在甲部同乙部選中學部, 否則就會入唔番.  

如成績一路keep 到頭10名內, 想博吓其他好d 中學, 如甲部唔選中學部, 只在乙部第3志願選中學部, 派不到的話再回來扣門有機嗎?  阿囝比較被動, 擔心甲部interview不好, 所以想在乙部博下大抽獎, 但又怕唔好彩抽不到, 到時想入番中學部扣門又唔收 (因為只在乙部第三志願), 都唔知博唔博好......

13/14高小d 同學仔好叻呀, 一共有5個入皇仁, 應是高小近年極少見的佳績, 抵讚.

wongwm

Well more updates and they are all bad news.

SMC and Catholic Church Education department are both in support with the changes the headmistress proposed. They even had powerful people present to suppress any opposition.

P5 and P6: The questionnaire counting was not a 90% victory. There was around 20% minimum which didn't choose option 5. So you can guess the administrators are very happy.

P1 to P4: You are doomed. You have absolutely no say.

All counting was done internally, no one over saw the process.

wongwm

What is everyone's view of the bridging class? They are making it compulsory to attend maths. But there is a problem.

Bridging course is an extra activity and not part of EDB curriculum. So it being set inside school time is inappropriate and probably broke a few rules. I need to find out and read into the guidelines but instinct tells me something is not right.
Anyhow my reply to the notice will be, attend none of the class. Not going to tick any of their boxes.

bestmummy

Did anyone aware about this?

今日星島曰報見有家長投訴高小

http://www.edu-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2899048&extra=page%3D3

RoseRose1980

Ronniemei 發表於 14-9-4 17:18
回覆 tsmama 的帖子

Tsmama

華仁同高記的dse成績差唔多,如係華仁的話我情願留番高記,話哂多小學同學仔同聲同氣,開心d

Ronniemei

回覆 YYmommom 的帖子

YYmommom

你意思是乙一如不選高記=自動放棄聯繫位...... 那麼之前在13-14年兩位大抽獎入皇仁的同學也是放棄了聯繫位 (因應是在乙一選了皇仁)? 全級考40+那位咁博?  

那麼, 所有不升上中學部而被派到比較好的津校同學都要博....博個抽籤No.前?

亦即是說......除非在自行面試的兩間已ok, 否則就要靠運氣, 如抽籤No.後, 就好大機會唔知派左去邊?

每年小學部都有30+人入了其他比較好的中學, 那除了直資外, 所有走的人都要靠運氣?  點敢博?  

其實如果全級頭十名, 乙一如不選高記, 派不好回頭扣門的機會有幾大? or 因 乙一不選他們, 扣門的機會也沒有? 知否有沒有成功例子?

這樣的派位制度真令人費解.....

樓主, 對不起, 佔用了這版問升中問題

likim8160

回覆 wongwm 的帖子

I think the bridging clase is just a waste of time.  The primary school curriculum is enough.  If there is really a need for bridiging class, it should be organised by the secondary school during the summer vacation of P6.

No.Three

wongwm 發表於 14-9-5 19:34
What is everyone's view of the bridging class? They are making it compulsory to attend maths. But th ...

我也沒有讓我仔仔上呢個"bridging class", 真太長時間和太辛苦了!
聽聞小朋友只係在堂上做返以已往p5的練習, 何苦 苦了學生又苦了老師呢!!!!!