- 在線時間
- 741 小時
- 最後登錄
- 20-9-29
- 國民生產力
- 8
- 附加生產力
- 3924
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-8-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1684
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 5616
- UID
- 788348
|
本帖最後由 jolalee 於 14-5-29 18:32 編輯
shadeslayer 發表於 14-5-29 13:39
YC is definitely an IS in the traditional or EDB sense. the definition of IS is academic, not reall ...
The quality of the education each institution provides definitely depends on the school itself and not whether it is IS or PIS status. No doubt about that (and ICS is a great school, which was one of the top on my list). I'm just intrigued by whether they are technically defined by the student mix in accordance to poonseelai's findings:
"The major difference is I believe the student mix. International school - max 30% local children whereas private independent school - at least 70% local children."
I browsed through the list and found that CAIS has 32.0% HK locals and SIS has 32.2%, which has exceeded the limit by a little, which is fine. However, KCIS has 39.8% HK locals, Concordia 42.3%, YCIS 55.5%, Kingston Int'l School has 63.7%, which all exceeded the 30% limit by a large chunk. Quite alarming, it is (well, at least they are honest about it). How is that possible, while they are being listed as International School instead of PIS? (All these schools are listed as Int'l Schools on the EDB publication i've posted above)
[On a minor note, since i was going through the figures anyway, I also noticed that Sears Rogers has 31.3% Chinese nationals, and Norwegian Int'l School has 50.0%, but I suppose China passport are considered non-locals, right? That is definitely opening up a can of worm for HK....]
|
|