Is St Paul's college a good college compare to King's? - 升中派位

tttw1

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1871

62^#

發表於 14-4-1 13:22 |只看該作者

回覆：andrewpapa 的帖子

絕對同意。公開試係靠自己實力。學校的幫助還是其次。唔通B3就冇人入U咩?

Jackieson

子爵府

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	13885

63^#

發表於 14-4-1 15:40 |只看該作者

回覆 talent2000 的帖子

學界比賽裡, 用喝采聲, 打氣聲去鼓勵及振奮軍心時常有, 那些年我打學界時都係咁. 但你講到咁, 未免太跨, 令人難以相信吧! 我嘗試找當日的比賽片段, 但無, 只有少少... 學界足球比較多...
SPC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDmPj9fMp9M
QC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jHqPYk0wSY
近幾年港島區D1羽毛球學界, QC & SPC在ABC Grade碰頭互有輸贏, 但連續4年overall 都係QC(1), SPC(2), 今年都應該係, 確有皇者霸氣, 但都要厚度D, 唔好失禮令郎的學校.

在上月的Music Festival, St Paul 仔咁寫:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8vwoC_-Pik
//Both the Senior Choir and the Intermediate Mixed Choir have done a great job in today's competition. The Intermediate Mixed Choir with Good Hope School received a Second place in the Foreign Language section of the Intermediate Mixed Choir ⋯⋯while the Senior Choir received a Third place in the Foreign Language section of the Senior Boys' Choir.

We thank all the singers from both schools for their hard work, as well as all the teachers involved

Congratulations to DBS and HYS for their championship in the Intermediate Mixed Choir competition and DBS for their championship in the Senior Boys' Choir competition.//

作為家長們, 我們亦應該做好榜樣. 好似版主咁講, 兩間都係好學校, 各有捧場客亦可以理解, 何必針鋒相對呢? 請保持理性討論

點評

王家爸爸

發表於 14-4-5 15:11

thenewipad

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	4071

64^#

發表於 14-4-1 15:58 |只看該作者

Jackieson 發表於 14-4-1 15:40
回覆 talent2000 的帖子

學界比賽裡, 用喝采聲, 打氣聲去鼓勵及振奮軍心時常有, 那些年我打學界時都係咁. ...

他在EK 是很有名的, 好多次都係無數據空口講白話. 無謂爭辯

根本是晒氣

tcmsung


	11592

65^#

發表於 14-4-1 18:19 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽

cathyming1

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	327

66^#

發表於 14-4-1 18:52 |只看該作者

回覆：tcmsung 的帖子

埃我唔好拉飛出來回應，講笑傘但版主係最快，果句對言論負責係最有用。

chubby2688

別墅

Rank: 4


	766

67^#

發表於 14-4-5 10:21 |只看該作者

回覆：Is St Paul's college a good college compare to King's?

這個問題實在太好笑...

我有朋友畢業於KC，現在三四十歲，我都問過佢這個問題，佢就答梗係SPC，點解？

佢話KC d舊同學大多普通階層，父母都無咩support，SPC d父母環境好d，識多個有錢同學好過識字......笑咗！

talent2000


	9300

68^#

發表於 14-4-5 15:10 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽

tttw1

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1871

69^#

發表於 14-4-6 00:55 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 tttw1 於 14-4-6 00:57 編輯

SPC頂多Band 2 頭?? 咁即係同DSE有9成合格率就是B1中學的理論一樣----自我感覺良好,請睇清楚,係合格率唔係入U率.真係高人.拜服.

點評

elbar 我竟然忘了統計 2級或以上比率而做了33222級或以上比率

發表於 14-4-6 19:22

hogwarts

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3744

70^#

發表於 14-4-6 08:49 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 hogwarts 於 14-4-6 09:07 編輯

Although I don't like the abc vs. xyz discussion, it is the simplest format of any comparison research.

I do learn one thing from the latest abc vs, xyz type discussions, not only this discussion, but also other similar discussions in EK, both for primary and secondary schools. The learning is that you can judge the schools in questions by reading the responses from their parents.

With the Rule of different ruler scale still applies, because my apple is not necessary others apples.  Then the next important question asked should be; what are the values of education of my child's future fellow student's parents?  It is undoubtedly affecting my child's development as well because my child will spend many years  with children being affected by parents with that kind of value systems. Then such discussions do offer a mean or as least some indication to learn those parents' views, only those were in discussions, not only in education but also in many other ways.

Then I need to be thankful to all these discussions, even it is usually uncomfortable to read those abc vs. xyz, I must admit it is an useful tool to analysis who were the current parents or even myself.

Last but not least, I do feel we, as parents, are behind our children when comparing with their behaviour in 名校 secrets.  Or, sadly, when in the processes of growing up, with all those competitive pressures in the society, slowly have changed us all.

點評

HK4integritas

Agree More on Constructive Discussion.
I know some SPC and King's old boys from work
Common : Proud of their school
Difference: SPC old boys mentioned more about their school 發表於 14-4-10 14:05

tttw1 其實比較根本就是沒意思.只是不明為什麼這麼多人喜歡扭曲事實或自我感覺良好發表於 14-4-6 13:19

talent2000


	9300

71^#

發表於 14-4-10 05:21 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽

talent2000


	9300

72^#

發表於 14-4-10 05:43 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽

hogwarts

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3744

73^#

發表於 14-4-10 09:40 |只看該作者

回覆：talent2000 的帖子

Dear talent2000,

When bloggers are doing abc vs. xyz, people seldom use "好差" to describe other school.  As growth-ups, we have friends either graduates or parents of those so-called famous band 1 schools. Even we do not use traceable name in EK, closed circle of friends and relatives, more or less know who we are.  Friends and relatives will give us very hard time for illogical or emotional comments.  So, we, all members of EK friends, are careful.

I would like to invite you to use our talents to face a problems the boys are facing in to-day's HK education.  Why in equal resources, say HYS vs. SPC ( ah! U cannot avoid vs.  in life), DGS vs. DBS or BPS vs. KC.  The girls, in the last few years, did better than boys. We, as parent, shall think of that and might come up with some good suggestion for our government.

By the I recalled an article from economist dating back in 2001 or 2002?  Did have forth warned that urban male was
Going to fall behind girls.

Would u like to join this discuss? If yes, please start a discussion forum I'm EK.

Best regards,

Hogwarts

hogwarts

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3744

74^#

發表於 14-4-10 09:45 |只看該作者

引用：Dear+talent2000,++ When+bloggers+are+do

原帖由 hogwarts 於 14-04-10 發表
Dear talent2000,

When bloggers are doing abc vs. xyz, people seldom use "好差" to describe other ...

Sorry for 1999 and all those typos Theron.

Chowwy

別墅

Rank: 4


	648

75^#

發表於 14-4-10 10:03 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 Chowwy 於 14-4-10 10:05 編輯

SPC同King's都係百年老校，生存到而家，一定有其特色。為兒子選校，或可從邊間學校比較「適合兒子」角度去思考。我兒去年是九龍城band 1生，最後讀了SPC, 學校的閱讀氣氛提昇了小兒的閱讀質素，有次，他放學走去聽張曉風教授的講座（在校舉辦），常在學校的書展中買書，現在還選了卡夫卡的小說來看。與兒子商量一下，看看你的兒子喜歡哪間中學。若他喜歡，很多學習都會「自動波」。

點評

tcmsung 人哋兒子已入了龍頭名校，該校出了許多知名校友，黃仁龍，沈祖堯.........還有高官橋王許仕仁！發表於 14-4-10 11:37

tcmsung


	11592

76^#

發表於 14-4-10 10:47 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽