培養孩子創意思維 - 教育講場

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	23048

41^#

發表於 13-4-15 15:06 |只看該作者

回復 shadeslayer 的帖子

客觀比較 IBDP 和 DSE，應該 ANChan 最有資格。

**** ****
一般Anchan 的见解比较客观持平, 说ANChan 最有資格, 是有点个人崇拜! 事非必要唔好摆佢上神台啊!

ANChan59

珊瑚宮

Rank: 14


	112788

42^#

發表於 13-4-15 20:46 |只看該作者

回覆：annie40 的帖子

多謝妳的公道說話。

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

JL3

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1548

43^#

發表於 13-4-15 21:03 |只看該作者

引用：多謝妳的公道說話。 +

原帖由 ANChan59 於 13-04-15 發表
多謝妳的公道說話。

其實係香港，IB 課程上大學的人佔多少% 呢？我一直以為是絕少數！

shadeslayer

珍珠宮

Rank: 11


	32340

44^#

發表於 13-4-15 21:19 |只看該作者

引用：多謝妳的公道說話。+

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 13-4-15 23:31 編輯

原帖由 ANChan59 於 13-04-15 發表
多謝妳的公道說話。

他D網誌一早上左神枱，不用我擺了。

點評

annie40 是,吗? 我又唔多觉播! 發表於 13-4-16 15:01

The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Annie123


	3367

45^#

發表於 13-4-15 21:45 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

ANChan59

珊瑚宮

Rank: 14


	112788

46^#

發表於 13-4-15 22:06 |只看該作者

回覆：shadeslayer 的帖子

我都明白，言者無心，聽者有意，唔一定跟你有關，Annie只是善意提醒。

點評

shadeslayer Of course, you and Anne are the few EK parents who I have great respect. 發表於 13-4-15 23:33

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.


	9300

47^#

發表於 13-4-15 22:09 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	21683

48^#

發表於 13-4-15 22:20 |只看該作者

回復 talent2000 的帖子

Why would 45 years of history be considered short? Or are you referring to the MYP or PYP programs?

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素，但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易！

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	21683

49^#

發表於 13-4-15 22:23 |只看該作者

回復 talent2000 的帖子

What is the key point in this survey that you are referencing?

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素，但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易！


	9300

50^#

發表於 13-4-15 22:33 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽


	9300

51^#

發表於 13-4-15 22:37 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽


	9300

52^#

發表於 13-4-15 23:15 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽

shadeslayer

珍珠宮

Rank: 11


	32340

53^#

發表於 13-4-15 23:35 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 13-4-15 23:44 編輯

talent2000 發表於 13-4-15 22:33
45 years? It is just a flash in our educational history. I am not specialist in it but I have read s ...

Alas, the HK DSE is 44 years behind.

The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	21683

54^#

發表於 13-4-15 23:47 |只看該作者

回復 talent2000 的帖子

I never said the IB system is perfect in HK. I just want to know why you are so critical of it as a curriculum. In the article you posted, the author actually gave IB a slight edge over AP. And there doesn't look to be much alternatives. It is interesting that schools are experimenting with their own programs, but I don't think a school in HK experimenting with its own program will go very far in getting students to the top universities in the world.

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素，但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易！


	9300

55^#

發表於 13-4-15 23:53 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽


	9300

56^#

發表於 13-4-15 23:55 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

簽名被屏蔽

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	21683

57^#

發表於 13-4-15 23:57 |只看該作者

回復 talent2000 的帖子

Direct quotes from the article:
"Most objective observers tend to give the edge to the IB because it is a fully-developed program encompassing academic athletic, cultural, and social development components. Seasoned education observer Jay Mathews of The Washington Post contends that “both programs are top notch.” When pressed to choose one over the other, he gave a slight edge to the IB"

"After helping to introduce the IB at Upper Canada College in 1997 and heading both a leading Canadian AP school and a leading IB school, I would also rate the IB as superior in terms of promoting deeper learning and student engagement"

An open question doesn't mean that one of the two alternatives cannot have an edge over the other. It is just that a conclusion has not been reached.

點評

talent2000 Sorry, please read it carefully. Please check yourself how the readers' response to this article.
s 發表於 13-4-16 00:04

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素，但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易！

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	21683

58^#

發表於 13-4-16 00:06 |只看該作者

回復 talent2000 的帖子

The whole discussion started since you were highly critical of the IB, especially as it is applied in HK schools, and I thought you have something meaningful, insightful or intelligent to say. While IB is not a panacea for HK curriculum problems, it is highly popular for good reasons.

點評

talent2000 I am quite emphasized on its commercialization in Hong Kong. 發表於 13-4-16 00:30

shadeslayer What was more distasteful, was talent's being so rude to, and critical of, comments with good intention. 發表於 13-4-16 00:20

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素，但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易！

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	21683

59^#

發表於 13-4-16 00:12 |只看該作者

回復 talent2000 的帖子

I actually have read through most of the responses after I finished the articles. I do believe in streaming and I don't worry much about dyslexic. Not in the last few months, but some time ago, I have gone through the truthaboutib website as well.

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素，但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易！

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	21683

60^#

發表於 13-4-16 00:15 |只看該作者

回復 talent2000 的帖子

I don't know why DBS IB program is part of the discussion. There are many schools that offer IB in HK. I do think highly of the IB DP program though it is not for everyone. The MYP and PYP programs, on the other hand, are a lot more controversial and definitely not as high quality.

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素，但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易！