關於Net 12男仔排位,請賜教!

daisy17772

I have several questions, hope that someone could give me more info:

1.  If either WY or St. Jo is put as choice 1, which of the following schools, in your opinions, has better chance in choice 2 ,could you please indicate better chance from 1-4.

Hennessy Am
Hennessy Pm
St. James
Precious Blood

2.  Anyone knows if it is true that for St. James and Hennessy Am, if they're not put as choice 1, they won't accept me " knocking door"?  If this is true, then this means it is useless to put them as choice 2, right?

3.  Is Precious blood academically stronger (i.e. better secondary placement in the past) than 李賜豪小學  for boys?

4.  Are Hennessy Am and PM still having 聯係 relationship with QC?  Is this relationship remained unchanged after they are converted into full day school?  Is Hennessy Pm a traditional type of school?

5.  For filling out Central Allocation form, if I omit some of the schools (e.g. either WY and St. Jo is chosen, then Hennessy Am is useless to put as choice 2), is it true that the form would not be completely filled out?  Learnt from other ppl that it is highly recommended all choices should be filled in.

Thanks in advance.

Charlotte_mom

1. 軒上要堅好運至有份, ST JAMES應該第一都入唔晒, 軒下或寶血機會大D
2.  你擺第2, 唔止係FOR叩門掛, 唔通無叩門機會=直接唔揀?
3.  答唔到, 近年李賜豪上位中, D卷都好深下
4.  聯係QC應該仲有, 而家都未轉全日, 我估無人答到你以後既事, 軒下係傳統
5. 填唔晒, 如果TOUCHWOOD真係咁黑, 咪是但派一間"剩蔗"LOR, 講真, 同你派20志願無分別架WOR........

tommythumb

Charlotte_mom 發表於 13-1-7 17:22
1. 軒上要堅好運至有份, ST JAMES應該第一都入唔晒, 軒下或寶血機會大D
2.  你擺第2, 唔止係FOR叩門掛, 唔 ...

版主已經講左好多。
淨係想講：下午校搬左之後，同 QC 關係無變，一樣有番咁多聯繫位，因為如果係搬走左就無左連繫，咁就唔使搞咁耐要搵番同區校址先搬。不過，會唔會基於其他原因(除左搬校之外)而減少連繫位就唔敢講。
北角官小上下午校分家都無影響中學連繫。

daisy17772

Charlotte_mom 發表於 13-1-7 17:22
1. 軒上要堅好運至有份, ST JAMES應該第一都入唔晒, 軒下或寶血機會大D
2.  你擺第2, 唔止係FOR叩門掛, 唔通無叩門機會=直接唔揀?

Charlotte_mom and others:

1.  Which means St.James is even more popular than Hennessy am?  

2.  The situation is if I decide to put either WY or St. Jo as first, then for choice 2,  I have to choose a school that

a) it still has certain chance for getting in
b) in case of failure, it allows me to "knock door" as long as they have rule like "They're being put among my first 3 choices" or similar rule.  

As such, if Hennessy AM doesn't accept "knocking door" application if it is not first choice, and the chance for getting in as choice 2 is zero / minimal, then it doesn't make sense to choose it as choice 2.  Same for St. James, since if it is true that even chosen as choice 1 doesn't guarantee a place, it shouldn't be in choice 2 either.

Any more comments?

4)  Heard that Hennessy pm is more activities approach, is this true only when comparing to Hennessy am?  Or I have mistaken something here.  Please correct me.

Thanks.

Charlotte_mom

1.  如果我無記錯派位情況的話, 事實係咁
2.  如果你揀佢第2, at least you have a chance of getting in. 如果純粹因為無得叩門而直接放棄, 你唔覺得本末倒置嗎? 難道你寧願揀一間有得叩門而唔係心水既, 就只因為有得叩門?
4)  no, 軒下傳統過軒上
  

daisy17772

Charlotte_mom 發表於 13-1-8 10:10
1.  如果我無記錯派位情況的話, 事實係咁
2.  如果你揀佢第2, at least you have a chance of getting in. 如果純粹因為無得叩門而直接放棄, 你唔覺得本末倒置嗎? 難道你寧願揀一間有得叩門而唔係心水既, 就只因為有得叩門?
4)  no, 軒下傳統過軒上

Thanks Charlotte_mom:

Seems in recent years, St. James become similar to St. Jo and WY, if it's not First choice, chance for 2nd is zero, so it's not practical to put it as second choice, although I like it over Precious Blood and Hennessy.  But I have to face the reality. If St. James is more popular than Hennessy am/pm, then it's more safe to put Hennessy  as 2nd choice.

BTW, does Hennessy am have certain chance as 2nd choice?  I used to think Hennessy am has better chance to go to QC for boys due to it's more traditional, so my impression was wrong.  Is it the Hennessy pm has 精英 class then? Or both am/pm has got it?  I actually prefer Hennessy am since its chance to QC seems better than pm, and am school is preferred.  However, since in 2015, both will be chanced to full day, so the latter consideration becomes less essential.  Is picking Hennessy pm as 2nd better than Hennessy am then?

Thanks again.

BabyAndre

I think you have to consider the no. of seats available for lucky draw in each school as well. For Precious Blood, there are only 37 - 38 seats available. If there are more than 38 applications put the school as 1st choice, even you put it as 2nd choice chance is also slim though I won't say zero. If Henenssy am or pm have more seats for lucky draw, maybe it is better to put them as 2nd choice. My 2 cents only.

daisy17772

BabyAndre 發表於 13-1-8 13:41
I think you have to consider the no. of seats available for lucky draw in each school as well. For P ...

Are the no. of seats published yet on EDB?  I wish to know the figures too.  Thanks.

BabyAndre

daisy17772 發表於 13-1-8 13:55
Are the no. of seats published yet on EDB?  I wish to know the figures too.  Thanks.

http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/TC/Content_1519/2013dpnet-12r1.pdf

You should have this during the 1st round application, rule is 50% of seats will be used for 自行收生， it means the number of seats available for June lucky draw of each school is same. Therefore number of vacancies available for lucky draw is 63 for both Hennessy am and pm, but if during 1st round 自行收生 they need more vacancies, it is possible that number of seats available for lucky draw will be less than 63. For Precious Blood and 李賜豪, they have 38 seats for 自行收生, but if these 38 seats cannot be filled up during 自行收生 stage, it means that more than 38 seats will be availabe for lucky draw. I do not know the case of 李賜豪, but I know for Preciou Blood, all 38 seats are already filled up at 自行收生 stage.

Hope this helps.

Charlotte_mom

而家連寶血都咁搶手......哎, 遊戲越黎越難玩
有個網有講小一自行QUOTA VS實際收生 (睇完似乎仲心驚)
http://www.myschool.hk/education-2-15.php

樓主, 我UNDERSTANDING係軒上活動D, 軒下傳統+有精英班, 既然入QC機會一樣(因為有聯繫位原因), 咁緊係去間輕鬆D, 而且家長一般覺得上晝班時間好用D (有錯請更正)

daisy17772

Thanks Charlotte_mom.  This is what I wanna know, i.e. the exact number of places available for lucky draw.  But will there be an official numbers from EDB available for public's view, so to plan for lucky draw? 李賜豪 is not there either.  From the table, 番禺會所華仁小學 doesn't specify am/pm, I suppose it has am and pm session which run by gov't allotment independently, right?  Even 寶覺小學 has no places left in first phase.  Really hectic!

cyhh

如果1. st jo，2.軒下，3.李賜豪，咁樣會太進取嗎？雖然我小朋友只係k1，但我心目中打算2年後係咁排。。。

daisy17772

Just found this info on EDB website: 二○一三年度各小一學校網內的官立及資助小學名冊

http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManage ... 19/2013canet-12.pdf

darkbson

點解軒上有62個位，而軒下只得58個位用來抽獎？
應該軒上熱門過軒下！？

cyhh

原帖由 darkbson 於 13-01-09 發表
點解軒上有62個位，而軒下只得58個位用來抽獎？
應該軒上熱門過軒下！？



  ...

今年軒下世襲多d

daisy17772

I have a question, if I definitely won't want my son go to Buddhist school, should I still fill in them?  Is it if I fail in getting a seat at my higher priority schools (e.g. Choice 1-5), and I don't fill in any other boys / co-ed schools Choice 5, then if I can't get a seat within choice 1-5, I will be getting a seat from a schools that's still have seats available in any of the areas in HK?

Thanks

zeno1213

tommythumb 發表於 13-1-7 17:58
版主已經講左好多。
淨係想講：下午校搬左之後，同 QC 關係無變，一樣有番咁多聯繫位，因為如果係搬走左就 ...

基本上軒上同ST JAMES都唔會有CHANCE, 頭3位應該可試軒下李賜豪及寶血..

zeno1213

李賜豪我覺幾好, 我仔自行收生己經入左! 佢自行收生全部38個位都FULL!

zeno1213

daisy17772 發表於 13-1-14 20:12
I have a question, if I definitely won't want my son go to Buddhist school, should I still fill in t ...

如果你入左間唔想讀既學校, 只可去考其他仲有位既小學!

daisy17772

Even though I won't let my boy to go to these 3 schools:  寶覺、李陞、嘉道理, should I still fill in their names in the form?