用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 看完德望中學年報, 你會選讀德望, 還是九龍塘宣小? ...
樓主: Jackie310
go

看完德望中學年報, 你會選讀德望, 還是九龍塘宣小? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 4


777
81#
發表於 11-3-4 16:37 |只看該作者
再說一遍,我對Good Hope 無偏見!我瞭解每年都有可能有人去外國,但6%真的太大。我自己沒有遇過,所以我才查Heep Yunn St. Mary。她們的數字告訴我6% 是不正常的。如果那6%是發生在中五畢業生升上中六, 我會認同。

至於留班,我用一個例子。(2007-2008S5 只有155人。這班在中4本來有195人。如果說有40人留班,他們應該會留在 2007-2008)的 S4 內。本來 2007-2008)的S4 (有227人) 2006-2007)的S3 236人。本來只是不見了9人。但如果有40個留班生, 2007-2008S4 227人便是有40個留班生, 2006-2007)的S3 同學能升上S4的便只有187人了,不見了49人。

不見了的學生數字始終沒變!

原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-4 16:09 發表
then why can't it be overseas studies / going to other schools? and repeat too?

i think these 2 are the chief factors ... just that I don't understand why it is 1%. That's why i ask how the exist ra ...

[ 本帖最後由 DGJS 於 11-3-4 17:19 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


799
82#
發表於 11-3-4 19:58 |只看該作者
I know ... I actually never feel that you have bias towards GHS ar ... I'm also just talking about the data, not really commenting on the schools as well. If for any lines that I have made you feel bad, I;ve to appologize.


原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-4 16:37 發表
再說一遍,我對Good Hope 無偏見!我瞭解每年都有可能有人去外國,但6%真的太大。我自己沒有遇過,所以我才查Heep Yunn 和 St. Mary。她們的數字告訴我6% 是不正常的。如果那6%是發生在中五畢業生升上中六, 我會認同。

至於 ...

Rank: 4


799
83#
發表於 11-3-4 20:13 |只看該作者
If that is the 1st year of turning to DSS, then it might be one of the reasons explaining the high exsit rate.

1. Parents are more well-off, then can afford sending their children to overseas.

2. Some of the parents are forced to pay school fee in sec. (As when they first admitted to ghs primary, they did not prepare to pay in secondary) so they might choose to change to other band 1 schools (equally good or even better schools) where they did not have to pay school fee.

well.... a wild guess. I don;t mean to offend anybody here

Talking about "repeat", I mean there are F.5 students repeating to F.4 and at the same time, there are also F.4 students repeating to F.3 and so on and then at the same time, we never know the exact amount of F.1 intake each year. That's why it's abit difficult to find out the exact no. of students leaving from the table.

Again .... a wild guess, my maths isnt good anyways.


原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-4 16:37 發表
再說一遍,我對Good Hope 無偏見!我瞭解每年都有可能有人去外國,但6%真的太大。我自己沒有遇過,所以我才查Heep Yunn 和 St. Mary。她們的數字告訴我6% 是不正常的。如果那6%是發生在中五畢業生升上中六, 我會認同。

至於 ...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-4 20:35 編輯 ]

Rank: 6Rank: 6


7393
84#
發表於 11-3-4 21:00 |只看該作者
我樓下的女仔也是讀德望,最終只讀到中三就出國留學了。我問她媽媽,她媽媽說對德望很失望,女兒整體成績不是太好,只有英文較為客觀;她又說中文科竟然將中文、中史、普通話合為一科,很奇怪!

Rank: 4


648
85#
發表於 11-3-4 23:06 |只看該作者
error, not sure what happened!

[ 本帖最後由 icbb1230 於 11-3-4 23:14 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


648
86#
發表於 11-3-4 23:13 |只看該作者
其實成日討論GH,大家覺唔覺都係聽呢個講,聽

Rank: 4


648
87#
發表於 11-3-4 23:16 |只看該作者
why can't type whole message in chinese!  give up!

Rank: 4


777
88#
發表於 11-3-5 16:38 |只看該作者
The first year is 2002-2003. The result of this year's candidate was fine.

http://www.ghs.edu.hk/GHS/DSS/DSS_info1.htm

The school fee set at that time was:-
School Fee :
  • F.1 - F.3 : $35,000 per annum
  • F.4 - F.5 : $45,000 per annum
  • F.6 - F.7 : $50,000 per annum



From the school fee structure, it seems that school management had defined a structure that no. of higher form students would be less than that of lower form.



原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-4 20:13 發表
If that is the 1st year of turning to DSS, then it might be one of the reasons explaining the high exsit rate.

1. Parents are more well-off, then can afford sending their children to overseas.

2. S ...

[ 本帖最後由 DGJS 於 11-3-5 16:43 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


799
89#
發表於 11-3-6 22:37 |只看該作者
you mean public exam results of that year?

In 2002-2003, only F.1 students need to pay school fee, so it wouldn't affect the F.2-7 students

I mean if 2009-2010 was the 1st batch of DSS students taking AL exam..... sorry for the confusion made

btw, if the HKCEE results of this batch of students were not that bad (I haven't checked it), the poor uni entrance result of that year might be due to the fact that many good students left after F.5....


原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-5 16:38 發表
The first year is 2002-2003. The result of this year's candidate was fine.

http://www.ghs.edu.hk/GHS/DSS/DSS_info1.htm

The school fee set at that time was:-
School Fee :
F.1 - F.3 : $35,000 per an ...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-7 23:01 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


777
90#
發表於 11-3-7 09:27 |只看該作者
AL result of the year 2009-2010 was comparatively bad. You guess it might be due to the fact that 2003-2004 was the first year of DSS. Then I checked and found that the first year of DSS was 2002-2003. After the 2002-2003 students promoted to F.7, the AL result of them was good.

Anyway, my emphasis was not on the above. I always concern about the ~6% early exit rate per year. The school fee structure gives me some hint that Good Hope school management designs this kind of class structure. That is to say, the school allows ~6% of pupil to leave the school in each year in each form!

Other DSS famous schools (e.g. SPCC, DGS, DBS, St. Stephen) with stable of student do not have school fee varation.   



原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-6 22:37 發表
you mean public exam results of that year?

In 2002-2003, only F.1 students need to pay school fee, so it wouldn't affect the F.2-7 students

I mean if 2009-2010 was the 1st batch of DSS students ta ...

[ 本帖最後由 DGJS 於 11-3-7 09:29 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


292
91#
發表於 11-3-7 10:23 |只看該作者
這裡是"小一選校",我想知多一點德望小學的情況,特別是教學質素、老師態度、學生操行、課程深淺等。希望多D德望小學家長分享一下!

我認識的德望小學女生,很乖很有禮貌,每天功課10多樣都可以自已處理,我都很欣賞。

不過,不少德望小學女生都會中途轉校,在BK都看到不少。

BK上有人報料,話德望中學會轉校長,希望新人士新作風,可以重發2003年前德望中學的風采。

Rank: 4


799
92#
發表於 11-3-7 11:45 |只看該作者
I guess I understand what you mean now


btw .... yes.. may be we better focus more on primary school disucssion rather than secondary school discussion... sorry for that!

原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-7 09:27 發表
AL result of the year 2009-2010 was comparatively bad. You guess it might be due to the fact that 2003-2004 was the first year of DSS. Then I checked and found that the first year of DSS was 2002-2003 ...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-7 11:46 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1551
93#
發表於 11-3-7 11:57 |只看該作者
GH開始call waiting list未?有無waiting list已註冊嘅幸運兒?

或者,因為GH呢排咁多新聞,就算waiting入到都會放棄?

Rank: 4


777
94#
發表於 11-3-7 12:23 |只看該作者
The reason why we have been emphasizing on the secondary because of this thread.

It is true that this section is for P.1 selection. Let's move on in another thread.

樓主的標題是從中學年報開始探討, 如果希望從其他角度去談, 是否應該另起標題討論。(不喜勿插)


原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-7 11:45 發表
I guess I understand what you mean now


btw .... yes.. may be we better focus more on primary school disucssion rather than secondary school discussion... sorry for that!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


124
95#
發表於 11-3-7 13:49 |只看該作者
其實我係好想知道大家對兩間學校(GH/APS)既睇法, GH 小學既賣點係有佢既中學back-up, 唔駛6年後煩考中學. 雖然我地預計唔到佢既中學會唔會係6年後變番以往既成績, 但目前黎講, 佢既小學都有唔少好既評價.

Rank: 4


777
96#
發表於 11-3-7 15:28 |只看該作者
兩間都是很好的小學。她們有分別,如:-
1.1. 上課時間 GH早半小時)
2.2. 宗教背景 (基督 vs 天主)
3.3. 男女校 vs 女校
4.4. 校網

APS明顯比Good Hope academic(至小 P.4開始係)。APS偏向學樂器。GH general
D


你的標題其實有道理的。不然,我也不會花時間去研究。如emolly 所說是事實的話,9成人會升讀Good Hope 中學。即是只有約20人會升往其他中學。Good Hope 中學應該被研究。

Good Hope 中學一直是我心中的band 1 中學。這亦是我心偏向其小學的重要原因之一。

原帖由 Jackie310 於 11-3-7 13:49 發表
其實我係好想知道大家對兩間學校(GH/APS)既睇法, GH 小學既賣點係有佢既中學back-up, 唔駛6年後煩考中學. 雖然我地預計唔到佢既中學會唔會係6年後變番以往既成績, 但目前黎講, 佢既小學都有唔少好既評價. ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


292
97#
發表於 11-3-7 17:36 |只看該作者
Hi DGJS

I have to say you are really good in sharing your comments with good reasons and analysis. I honestly appreciate and respect your contributions to this thread. MY HAT OFF TO YOU!

Hi All

As far as I know, there are around 20 pupils who will move to other primary schools (e.g. DGJS, MCS and HY) each year, while taking some pupils from other primary schools.

I am still keen to see more GH parents to share their first-hand information on GH Primary Section. Thanks!





原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-7 15:28 發表
兩間都是很好的小學。她們有分別,如:-
1.1. 上課時間 (GH早半小時)
2.2. 宗教背景 (基督 vs 天主)
3.3. 男女校 vs 女校
4.4. 校網

APS明顯比Good Hope 谷 academic(至小 P.4開始係)。APS偏向學樂器。GH 就general
D。

你 ...

Rank: 4


799
98#
發表於 11-3-7 22:59 |只看該作者
deleted.......

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-7 23:12 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


799
99#
發表於 11-3-7 23:19 |只看該作者
You're really very resourceful! I can see that you've spent a lot of time and effort in analysing the data and share it in BK without bias. Your effort is much appreciated!

Hope to see your analysis about other schools in other threads too


原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-7 12:23 發表
The reason why we have been emphasizing on the secondary because of this thread.

It is true that this section is for P.1 selection. Let's move on in another thread.

樓主的標題是從中學年報開始探討,  ...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-7 23:21 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


124
100#
發表於 11-3-8 00:11 |只看該作者
DGJS: 好多謝你一直比好多分析同意見比我0地啲媽咪, 其實我會等埋大抽獎先再決定比囡囡讀邊間小學, 如果囡囡派唔到心儀既小學, 我先會比佢讀私小, 但距離大抽獎放榜仍有點時間搜集多啲意見, 希望唔好選錯學校比佢.....

另外, 我知APS啲學生到P.4開始谷, 特別係上到P.5,P.6仲會遲放學, 同埋學費會貴啲...

原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-7 15:28 發表
兩間都是很好的小學。她們有分別,如:-
1.1. 上課時間 (GH早半小時)
2.2. 宗教背景 (基督 vs 天主)
3.3. 男女校 vs 女校
4.4. 校網

APS明顯比Good Hope 谷 academic(至小 P.4開始係)。APS偏向學樂器。GH 就general
D。

你 ...
‹ 上一主題|下一主題