用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 拔萃女小學 del del del
樓主: lawsonmoon
go

del del del [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
21#
發表於 10-11-25 18:33 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:20 編輯

del del del
原帖由 Loso 於 10-11-25 06:30 PM 發表
越嚟越矛盾!學校為保障自己,惊人報假地址呃學校,咁做法唔係即係等於學校"關注"地址囉!若果DG唔睇地址,就冇所謂"惊人報假地址呃學校"囉。不過請不要太敏感,我冇話DG睇地址揀學生;而以為報富貴地址可以有着數亦可能係一些家長 ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
22#
發表於 10-11-25 18:36 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:21 編輯

del del del
原帖由 eemum 於 10-11-25 06:31 PM 發表


No one will stop you think this way.  Every year there are people raising such an issue.  I just want to say definitely there are DGJS girls not living in those so call precious district, not even a ...

[ 本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-25 23:35 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


164
23#
發表於 10-11-25 18:40 |只看該作者
Thank you !

原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-25 18:33 發表
u r the one who understand University Philosophy 101 "Introduction of Logic".
Good!

Rank: 2


81
24#
發表於 10-11-25 19:32 |只看該作者
真搞笑...

如果覺得咁有問題,甚至"違反教義",又或因為 "educated in western country" 而接受唔到哩d local 學校的入學程序,咁咪唔好報囉。

不過話時話,香港佔大多數既官津學校報讀時都要check 地址,而好多直資學校都同DGJS一樣要 check 一次 (instead of "不斷要求")地址,如果平機會要查,都先查左EDB 先喇。

平機會職在調查 sex discrimination, disability discrimination, race discrimination 及 family status discrimination, 香港 d local 法律有無制定 address discrimination? 我都想知..



原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-25 12:08 發表
DGJS 兩次 interview 後, 雖然未有結果, 但有感而發。

校長多次在媒體說取錄與否純看小孩面試表現。但由交報名表開始,不斷要求提供住址證明(水、電費單etc.)。我心想取錄小孩子同他們住什麽地方有何關係? 何需大費周 ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
25#
發表於 10-11-25 20:51 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:21 編輯

del del del
原帖由 W211 於 10-11-25 07:32 PM 發表
真搞笑...

如果覺得咁有問題,甚至"違反教義",又或因為 "educated in western country" 而接受唔到哩d local 學校的入學程序,咁咪唔好報囉。

不過話時話,香港佔大多數既官津學校報讀時都要check 地址,而好多直資學校都同 ...

[ 本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-25 20:52 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


172
26#
發表於 10-11-25 22:22 |只看該作者
原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-25 20:51 發表
係呀, 雖然小女未被取錄, 但會withdraw了, 感覺中這些傳统學校未必適合一些太有個性的女孩;兩次interview見到的在學女孩好像倒模一樣。

坦白講本人畢業於DBS,那個年代是9年免費教育,人人有機會入DBS;學校好像社會縮影,是 ...


you have so much character!  you should send your daughter to educate in the western country as it appears the game in Hong Kong is not suitable for you - no privacy, no logic.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


472
27#
發表於 10-11-25 22:31 |只看該作者
ithink if I got accept I will not let my daughter study at this school because too 白鴿眼 ant traditional


5462
28#
發表於 10-11-25 22:34 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


2788
29#
發表於 10-11-25 22:58 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
30#
發表於 10-11-25 23:19 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:23 編輯

del del del
原帖由 KKLmama 於 10-11-25 10:58 PM 發表
My daughter is also finished the 2nd interview and waiting the result from DGJS. We are not a rich family and can be categorized as below average (against the usual DGJS kids' family) as far as we thi ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
31#
發表於 10-11-25 23:21 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:23 編輯

del del del
原帖由 wootaitai 於 10-11-25 10:34 PM 發表


why.... my husband is also DBS old boy and he hates DGS too..?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
32#
發表於 10-11-25 23:26 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:24 編輯

del del del

原帖由 mictwin 於 10-11-25 10:31 PM 發表
ithink if I got accept I will not let my daughter study at this school because too 白鴿眼 ant traditional ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


147
33#
發表於 10-11-25 23:46 |只看該作者
原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-25 23:26 發表
but don't ruin her chance if your daughter is smart and suitable. 細路之間冇嘢的、大人的問題啫。


Not really agree.....Kid's will grow up and learn the value system (first from parents).  So if the adult already think that's a problem, it'll easily be passed to the children and then kids will starts to have those valuation problem.  

So, parents need to learn how to live with that environment.  I know a parent with girl in DGJS, they are not really concern on the girl's academic result (as long as she can keep in median level), the most concern is her valuation and they spends most of time in educating the girl on getting the right valuation and personality while living in such environment.

Rank: 2


67
34#
發表於 10-11-25 23:51 |只看該作者
It is really unnecessary to check the address during the interview process if the school really do not care.  The logic is simple.
After you are being admitted of course then you need to have your address proof but that is another story.....administration reason.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
35#
發表於 10-11-26 00:08 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:24 編輯

del del del
原帖由 chei05 於 10-11-25 02:10 PM 發表
I think only SPCC asked for the proof of home address...DGJS do not asked for this .

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
36#
發表於 10-11-26 00:11 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-3-13 14:25 編輯

del del del
原帖由 ChuLuLu 於 10-11-25 02:29 PM 發表
SPCC : Copy address proof must be submitted together with the application form. No checking of original or copy address proof at 2nd-in.

DGJS : Copy address proof must be submitted together with the  ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


307
37#
發表於 10-11-26 09:50 |只看該作者
Who are you going to believe?

Someone said DGJS cares about the residential address of appliant because the applicant had to present the proof of address before the 2nd interview.

Someone said DGJS cares about the birth hospital of applicant because the applicant had to present the original birth certificate before the 2nd interview.

Someone said DGJS cares about the kindergarten of applicant because the applicant had to present the original kindergarten report before the 2nd interview.

Someone said DGJS cares about the religion of applicant because the applicant had to present the original certificate of baptism of SKH before the 2nd interview.

Someone said DGJS just cares about the abilities of applicant because her little girl was accepted by the school even she did not live in luxury apartment, did not born in private hospital, did not study in CCKG and without religion. The only thing she has got is always trying to strive for excellent.

原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-26 00:11 發表
I didn't apply spcc, so according to your info, SPCC people have the same mentality as DGJS, they care about the address.

[ 本帖最後由 k.kung 於 10-11-26 15:38 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2239
38#
發表於 10-11-26 10:17 |只看該作者
Not being part of their administration, I am unable to say definitively why SPCC (or DGJS) should have concerns about the truthfulness of the residential addresses declared in the application forms. As I see it, it is difficult to generalize in matters of this nature. But if you go to read the posts in the SPCC Result thread at page 5 of this forum, you will see that against all the odds and contrary to their very pessimistic expectation, 2 "less well off" families eventually received offers from SPCC (my heartfelt congratulations to them!!). My perception arising from our dialogue with the Headmistress is that they are primarily looking for kids who are likely to be capable of satisfactorily completing primary education in the 1st 5 years, and that that is why siblings of SPCC students (obviously having the same family background) have no assurances of getting admitted.

原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-26 00:11 發表
I didn't apply spcc, so according to your info, SPCC people have the same mentality as DGJS, they care about the address.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


307
39#
發表於 10-11-26 11:12 |只看該作者
閣下的邏輯論完全建基於"校長多次在媒體說取錄與否純看小孩面試表現"。請問你是從那些媒體多次看到上述資料呢?


原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 10-11-25 12:08 發表
DGJS 兩次 interview 後, 雖然未有結果, 但有感而發。

校長多次在媒體說取錄與否純看小孩面試表現。但由交報名表開始,不斷要求提供住址證明(水、電費單etc.)。我心想取錄小孩子同他們住什麽地方有何關係? 何需大費周 ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1319
40#
發表於 10-11-26 11:19 |只看該作者
Hahah....

I think that you still don't understand the point that Lawsonmoon is talking about.  

The argument is about the submission of the address proof, which is no need to be part of acceptance consideration.  They should purely assess on the capability of the kids and how they performed during the interview.....

Clear and understand ??




原帖由 eemum 於 10-11-25 18:31 發表


No one will stop you think this way.  Every year there are people raising such an issue.  I just want to say definitely there are DGJS girls not living in those so call precious district, not even a ...
.........No worry.... Be Happy !!!  : )
‹ 上一主題|下一主題