用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 英華,男拔,喇沙點排名????
樓主: mimi2004
go

英華,男拔,喇沙點排名???? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


367
21#
發表於 09-11-25 15:27 |只看該作者
原帖由 siufu 於 09-11-25 15:14 發表
我只有近三年 10A 狀元數目..
1. 喇沙書院 - 8 個 (09 - 1 個, 08 - 4 個, 07 - 3 個)
2. 拔萃男書院 - 5 個 (09 - 2 個, 08 - 2 個, 07 - 1 個)
3. 皇仁書院 - 4 個 (09 - 1 個, 08 - 1 個, 07 - 2 個)
4. 拔萃女書 ...


What are the averages?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2670
22#
發表於 09-11-25 15:35 |只看該作者
雖然YW 名氣比較低
但係要入YW 都唔易, interview 困難程度跟DBS 有得揮
LS 只要你有爸爸呀哥係LS仔, 再住同一區就一定入

Rank: 3Rank: 3


219
23#
發表於 09-11-25 15:38 |只看該作者
"LS 只要你有爸爸呀哥係LS仔"

呢樣對好多人黎講先係最難...

原帖由 fsforth 於 09-11-25 15:35 發表
雖然YW 名氣比較低
但係要入YW 都唔易, interview 困難程度跟DBS 有得揮
LS 只要你有爸爸呀哥係LS仔, 再住同一區就一定入

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6851
24#
發表於 09-11-25 15:38 |只看該作者
Where can you get that info? Thanks.


原帖由 siufu 於 09-11-25 15:14 發表
我只有近三年 10A 狀元數目..
1. 喇沙書院 - 8 個 (09 - 1 個, 08 - 4 個, 07 - 3 個)
2. 拔萃男書院 - 5 個 (09 - 2 個, 08 - 2 個, 07 - 1 個)
3. 皇仁書院 - 4 個 (09 - 1 個, 08 - 1 個, 07 - 2 個)
4. 拔萃女書 ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


219
25#
發表於 09-11-25 15:43 |只看該作者
我自己在 Google 逐年 search 然後自己整理的, 太舊的真係找不到了.

原帖由 ysnmama 於 09-11-25 15:38 發表
Where can you get that info? Thanks.



1972
26#
發表於 09-11-25 17:21 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 4


509
27#
發表於 09-11-25 17:50 |只看該作者
you are wrong.聖約瑟英文書院 with one 10A HKCEE in 2009

Rank: 4


691
28#
發表於 09-11-25 17:55 |只看該作者
論名氣,LS & DBS 當然勁過Ying Wah.  

但我認為,LS小學同好幾間傳統名小學已經比人廢了一半武功,因為收生一半靠舊生(世襲),一半係搞珠,新生基半上係無挑選過,收生平均水準可能仲差過TSL, 港同,英華,甚至播道呢d新準直資小學。

大家可以想像一下,2000個蘋果挑選150個同2000個蘋果隨機抽150個0既分別。

[ 本帖最後由 fatgoat 於 09-11-25 23:18 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


219
29#
發表於 09-11-25 18:20 |只看該作者
其實我唔相信六歲孩子能力及質素差異會好大, 而且部署得抽喇沙的應該都是願意用心栽培孩子的父母. 相信這些孩子和那些被私校/直資取錄的那些分別應該不大 (甚至有為數不少被私校/直資所取錄的學生如果抽中喇沙的話都會取喇沙而放棄私校/直資的學位).

原帖由 fatgoat 於 09-11-25 17:55 發表
論名氣,LS & DBS 當然勁過Ying Wah.  

但我認為,LS小學同好幾間傳統名小學已經比人廢了一半武功,因為收生一半靠舊生,一半係搞珠,新生基半上係無挑選過,收生平均水準可能仲差過TSL, 港同,英華,甚至播道呢d新準直資小學。

大 ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


141
30#
發表於 09-11-25 18:33 |只看該作者
原帖由 siufu 於 09-11-25 18:20 發表
其實我唔相信六歲孩子能力及質素差異會好大, 而且部署得抽喇沙的應該都是願意用心栽培孩子的父母. 相信這些孩子和那些被私校/直資取錄的那些分別應該不大 (甚至有為數不少被私校/直資所取錄的學生如果抽中喇沙的話都 ...


But in most cases - those elite kids accepted by DSS / private already denied the chance for lucky draw.

So usually those accepted thru lucky draw are those NOT accepted by good DSS /private - i.e only because they are lucky and that's why most subsidised school has elite class.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


397
31#
發表於 09-11-25 18:35 |只看該作者
每年LS都有人被勸喻離校,一間學校在收生上無主權,仍然維持高質素,有很多學生要付出代價的。人們看到的精英成績,又睇唔睇到其他沉底學生的慘況。每年仲會收好成績插班生...6歲人仔都可以分別好大..



原帖由 siufu 於 09-11-25 18:20 發表
其實我唔相信六歲孩子能力及質素差異會好大, 而且部署得抽喇沙的應該都是願意用心栽培孩子的父母. 相信這些孩子和那些被私校/直資取錄的那些分別應該不大 (甚至有為數不少被私校/直資所取錄的學生如果抽中喇沙的話都 ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


141
32#
發表於 09-11-25 18:41 |只看該作者
原帖由 4in1family 於 09-11-25 18:35 發表
每年LS都有人被勸喻離校,一間學校在收生上無主權,仍然維持高質素,有很多學生要付出代價的。人們看到的精英成績,又睇唔睇到其他沉底學生的慘況。每年仲會收好成績插班生...6歲人仔都可以分別好大..



...


Yes, I think this apply to essentially most, if not all, top-tier subsidised school eager to keep their reputation- St Jo also

Rank: 4


533
33#
發表於 09-11-25 18:55 |只看該作者
I know one boy not accepted by any Dss or Private school not even have a chance for 2nd interview but luckily he got accepted by La Salle. However i think there will be some smart kids luckily got accepted by La Salle too.

原帖由 waiwaibaba 於 09-11-25 18:33 發表


But in most cases - those elite kids accepted by DSS / private already denied the chance for lucky draw.

So usually those accepted thru lucky draw are those NOT accepted by good DSS /private - i.e  ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2413
34#
發表於 09-11-25 20:17 |只看該作者
My comment:
1. I know some not-smart one get to both DBS and YW by relationship.
2. I also know some non-smart one get to LS by lucky draw. "因為收生一半靠舊生,一半係搞珠". This is also not correct as you can check LS web site. ~ 40% in round 1 get more than 25 points. ie. less than 20% from 舊生.
3. All three schools will get rid of those below standard one at P6. (but not every year & keep on taking in good one). The school cannot kick the boys out unless has conduct problem. No parent will let their son go even the school asking.
4. DBS - if your grade cannot reach the min standard, you are not allowed to get to F.1.
5. LS- all the band 2 & 3 boys cannot get to F.1
6. YW - it just changed to DSS recently, no reference case.
7. For Ranking, DBS & LS are definitely better.

Anyways, it is good news if get a place among these schools.
原帖由 Oscarmom 於 09-11-25 18:55 發表
I know one boy not accepted by any Dss or Private school not even have a chance for 2nd interview but luckily he got accepted by La Salle. However i think there will be some smart kids luckily got acc ...

[ 本帖最後由 InitialD 於 09-11-25 20:28 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


228
35#
發表於 09-11-25 21:56 |只看該作者
大家不要只看會考狀元, 要看整体的成績和水平. 有收生自主權的直資學校, 如St. Paul Co-ed, DGS, DBS, 水準一直保持得唔錯.

但喪失收生自主權的華仁, LASA, 甚至皇仁, 成績已大幅下滑. 這是不爭的事實.

所以, 好的學校為了保持競爭力, 只能轉為直資, 這個趨勢將會持續下去.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


174
36#
發表於 09-11-25 22:31 |只看該作者

It may not be the truth.


My son had given up TSL and private school offer in order to get a place in LS thro' lucky draw.  As I known from the current classmates of my son, most of them had given up more than 1 offer in order to get in LS.  


And, after performing the first term test, the Headmistress of LS noticed us from her experience that the average performance is very good this year. Nearly 90% kids getting B or above which may even be better than last year’s.


I believe that over 90% of kids that studying in LS are coming from the similar family profile of other DSS or private schools.  For those families that are previous 'LS' members, most of their kids are very well prepared.  They have not gone for the interview process of other schools just because they are not necessary, which not implies they are not capable.  For those families that are going thro' lucky draw, they usually hold on hand more than 1 offers of other schools in order to ensure that they can put LS as the first priory during the draw. So, as fast as I know, the student profile is still very good in LS now.


I hope my information can explain the real situation to those parents who really want to choose LS for their kids.

原帖由 waiwaibaba 於 09-11-25 18:33 發表


But in most cases - those elite kids accepted by DSS / private already denied the chance for lucky draw.

So usually those accepted thru lucky draw are those NOT accepted by good DSS /private - i.e  ...



[ 本帖最後由 ryohga 於 09-11-25 22:38 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1707
37#
發表於 09-11-25 23:23 |只看該作者
I think most kids at the age of 5 or 6 are quite similar.  It's really sad to label them as "smart" or
"bad" at this young age.  Besides, while parents now still refer to public exams as reference, in reality, the secondary school curriculum has changed completely now. Next year is the last batch of students going through HKCEE. I wonder if the teachers in most local secondary schools are really qualified enough to conduct the NSS curriculum. What're your thoughts?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2581
38#
發表於 09-11-26 10:27 |只看該作者
原帖由 siufu 於 09-11-25 12:49 發表
同喇沙拔萃比, 太抬舉了英華了吧?


絕對同意!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2413
39#
發表於 09-11-26 10:34 |只看該作者
同意!
原帖由 jeremyphlam 於 09-11-26 10:27 發表


絕對同意!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


104
40#
發表於 09-11-26 12:05 |只看該作者
原帖由 hui916 於 09-11-25 21:56 發表
大家不要只看會考狀元, 要看整体的成績和水平. 有收生自主權的直資學校, 如St. Paul Co-ed, DGS, DBS, 水準一直保持得唔錯.

但喪失收生自主權的華仁, LASA, 甚至皇仁, 成績已大幅下滑. 這是不爭的事實.

所以, 好 ...



Entirely agree.

1.   DBS  -  Academic & conduct good
2.   La Salle - Academic good
3.   Ying Wa - Conduct good
‹ 上一主題|下一主題