ST Catherine 對兒童照顧不足

rainbowbb

原帖由 Minniechung 於 09-5-15 21:28 發表


其實我都唔知架.  學校有乜學術好,  只係有朋友和親戚D仔女讀過話好,  好的係小朋友自立,  唔依賴, 名小學鍾意ST CAT 的學生等等.   不過,  我都會照俾女女讀.  開頭開學一個月我會番學校觀察下教師和學生學習既情 ...

如果咁唔想讀就選擇第二間, 中途轉學唔易

rainbowbb

學校有出通告給家長可選擇做或唔做?食塵?條街少車過銅鑼灣/旺角, 係銅鑼灣/旺角行街和等車咪仲食塵

原帖由 hongchung 於 09-5-15 21:02 發表



咁的學校都有，幾歲大坐在街邊食塵數車？？？學統計？當時空氣污染指數是幾多？坐在馬路邊數車對幾歲大的幼稚園生好嗎？
你証明年年做即是佢學校唔改善，年年去食塵，吸毒氣，不知進取，每年因循做乜就做乜。點解無家長投訴校方的？正如上 ...

[ 本帖最後由 rainbowbb 於 09-5-15 22:49 編輯 ]

Yanamami

Parents filled in a form before and agreed to let their kids attend this special activity.  If many parents agree that this activity is OK for many years, I think it's quite fine and the Kindergarten should keep doing it.  In other words, if the Kindie keeps doing it for many years, it means no/ not many parents complained about it.  If the parent thinks it is dangerous and bad for the kid's health, he/she may not allow the kid join the activity by filling the form.

It means the kids are well behaved and know what's the purpose of that activity.  They are very unlikely to rush out of the road or do anything that's dangerous.  I'm sure the Kindie would assess the suitability of such activity.  If it's dangerous, it won't take the risk to hold such activity as it has to be responsible for the kids' safety.

原帖由 hongchung 於 09-5-15 21:02 發表



咁的學校都有，幾歲大坐在街邊食塵數車？？？學統計？當時空氣污染指數是幾多？坐在馬路邊數車對幾歲大的幼稚園生好嗎？
你証明年年做即是佢學校唔改善，年年去食塵，吸毒氣，不知進取，每年因循做乜就做乜。點解無家長投訴校方的？正如上 ...

[ 本帖最後由 Yanamami 於 09-5-16 10:16 編輯 ]

Mqchris

學校出通告問家長是否同意... 講真有邊個會真的反對.. 不反對的原因可能是怕唔比參與，咁自己小朋友好特出及到時無得玩怕自己小朋友唔開心，另外，可能真的不知人手比例及詳細的情況...

我就反而覺我學校應該想下.. 如真的要數車呀..畫車又好呀... 可以用下其他的方法... 坐路邊確實對太細的小朋友不好，亦有風險，如果唔係點會出通告，將「同意」這比個責任交返比家長...
st.cat小學好唔好真的唔知. 不過我都有知道st.cat仔, 一間心儀的直資小學(一般那些)考不到...

Yanamami

There is really no pressure to join / not to join any activity at the Kindie.  My daughter didn't join the Ocean Park outing due to some reason and no one felt uncomfortable about it.  I suppose if the current parents are comfortable with the Kindie, it's fine.  If not, they will certainly reflect their concern to the Kindie.

原帖由 Mqchris 於 09-5-16 11:38 發表
學校出通告問家長是否同意... 講真有邊個會真的反對.. 不反對的原因可能是怕唔比參與，咁自己小朋友好特出及到時無得玩怕自己小朋友唔開心，另外，可能真的不知人手比例及詳細的情況...

我就反而覺我學校應該想下.. 如真 ...

BH_2

我個仔 n1 (朗思) 都有一節在街邊數車, 朗思(LT)的位置在內街, 我又唔覺得太危險, st. Cat 就近路邊D. 但st cat 最細都 k1, 應該比 n1 的仲定d.  只要安全, 我又覺得此些活動幾好, 幾生動.

我個仔今年都會入 st. cat K1, 不過我都不期望st.cat 好似朗思可以照顧得好, 始終學校大. 所以小朋友要多學習照顧自己.  

考小學方面, 學校不是一切, 何況只是番3小時..   其實已選 st. cat的家長都心中有數選st. cat 的原因.  香港不同的學校有不同的賣點,   我唔覺得入左st cat 會好巴閉, 只是覺得相對. 選一間比較合自己孩子的性格及我們期望他發展的方向.

Yanamami

Agreed with BH_2.

Btw, they are K2 students.

原帖由 BH_2 於 09-5-16 23:47 發表
我個仔 n1 (朗思) 都有一節在街邊數車, 朗思(LT)的位置在內街, 我又唔覺得太危險, st. Cat 就近路邊D. 但st cat 最細都 k1, 應該比 n1 的仲定d.  只要安全, 我又覺得此些活動幾好, 幾生動.

我個仔今年都會入 st. c ...

Chumeiying

Dear all,
I think one reason for education is to learn what is appropriate behaviour.  
We do not need to keep danger away from the kids if the kids know what danger is.
St Catherine is an ideal school if you wish to let go all the unnecessary protection and worries and trust the kids will be educated to be a sensible individual.

Yanamami

原帖由 Chumeiying 於 09-5-17 21:44 發表
Dear all,
I think one reason for education is to learn what is appropriate behaviour.  
We do not need to keep danger away from the kids if the kids know what danger is.
St Catherine is an ideal schoo ...

joeyma

我個囡囡讀ST CAT. 雖然我唔知照顧成點，但只知我個囡好鍾意返學，又好鍾意佢班主任。咁我已經覺得好足夠。

puibpuib

我個囝黎緊會入讀St. Cat K1..雖然預左一班好多人,但係我覺得學校/老師都應該有責任細心留意小朋友的行為（有無受傷）情緒（係咪適應學校生活，有無異常情緒)。我唔覺得學術好就等於要”預左”犠牲呢樣野喎...
如果係個別老師的問題還算吧,但如果是學校的方針是這樣我覺得有問題。
但唔知St. Cat在回應家長投訴呢方面係認真對待定敷衍了事?

[ 本帖最後由 puibpuib 於 09-5-18 17:12 編輯 ]

beetoy

Agree. This is a kindergarten not a university. Kids attending St. Cat are just normal kids who are vulnerable and needs proper attention.

Dont think the strong academic background is an excuse for not giving normal proper attention to kids' safety, such as keeping an eye on the kids and report any injury to the parents.

qingbb

我女兒讀St Cat，以下是親身經歷：

上星期，女兒在課室跌倒，之後乘校車回家，我們甫進家門，即收到老師來電，告知情況和道歉。

女兒黑皮鞋的魔術貼失效，老師主動提醒我，以免發生危險。共兩次（兩對皮鞋）。

開學不久，老師即注意到女兒的小毛病，主動致電給我了解情況。

女兒主要乘搭校車，我間中親自接送，遇見老師，老師都很樂意跟我傾談。

[ 本帖最後由 qingbb 於 09-5-24 00:29 編輯 ]

鎧惠

原帖由 Mqchris 於 09-5-16 11:38 AM 發表
學校出通告問家長是否同意... 講真有邊個會真的反對.. 不反對的原因可能是怕唔比參與，咁自己小朋友好特出及到時無得玩怕自己小朋友唔開心，另外，可能真的不知人手比例及詳細的情況...

我就反而覺我學校應該想下.. 如真 ...

我2個小朋友都讀SC，大的今年畢業，這活動已多年，據我了解，她們會將小朋友分成幾組，每組大約5-8人，由一個老師一個校工帶着，目的是訓練小朋友觀察環境，學習統計、分類和合作精神，可能你哋會話學呢Ｄ嘢可以用其他方法，這樣會有危險，其實這活動會在K2進行，小朋友在SC訓練已一年，而且班主任對自己班的小朋友好清楚，若認為會有危險，如班裏有比較頑皮的小朋友，會事前特別向該小朋友作多次解釋，再請班裏一位比較定和乖的同學和他一組，用互相合作為理由，讓他在責任下定定哋做完個報告。

其實SC一向是互動式教學，小朋友做project多，佢哋慣咗不用坐定，一向他們的自制能力都唔錯，唔需要像看牛仔般對待，這種training亦是SC學生一般都不會太怕羞和大方得體的原因，這當然亦有例外，但作為一個SC學生家長，SC對照顧小朋友方面，大致上我不覺有問題，但如以上家長的情況，我從未聽過，若真有其事，我反而覺得家長要和學校如實反影，才能令學校精益求精，照我所知，SC明年會在課程上有Ｄ改革，相信只要你由衷表達意見，學校唔會唔理的，這樣亦能令大家一同成長，這位家長的小朋友既然已在SC讀書，我真心地希望你能和學校携手令SC的學生繼承一貫傳統，繼續成為一向以來公認的傳統名校，為自己的小朋友能成為SC的學生而自豪。

最後，閣下提及有SC仔無一間直資學校收，我不會奇怪，因為學校叻唔叻根本不是用這樣作標準，小朋友叻唔叻更加不是用這樣作標準，只有家長才能對自己的小朋友作出評價，究竟學校對自己小朋友的訓練，是否已令自己小朋友成長了不少？而自己是否能在各面配合？只有我們自己最清楚。

kwklam

yes, I heard that my friend's gal studied K1, didn't attend school for a week coz sick (sent to hospital), teacher didn't phone the family at all

鎧惠

原帖由 kwklam 於 09-6-8 12:10 AM 發表
yes, I heard that my friend's gal studied K1, didn't attend school for a week coz sick (sent to hospital), teacher didn't phone the family at all

我細女的同学在早前亦有手足口病，當時班主任並無即時通知家長，只在放學後發通告，因為我是自己送返學的，所以我比較早知道，當時知道學校立即清潔、消毒班房，但我礙於此病有７天潜伏期，所以女兒都沒上學好几天，在這几天內，真的再有一個小朋友發病，這件事上，SC確有未完善的地方，我亦有向學反影，這正是我覺得我們家長應有的態度，才能令學校更趨完善。

Minniechung

原帖由 kwklam 於 09-6-8 00:10 發表
yes, I heard that my friend's gal studied K1, didn't attend school for a week coz sick (sent to hospital), teacher didn't phone the family at all

小朋友無番一個星期學校都唔俾個電話,  甘的確有少許過份.  我女女在某間番緊.  無番一日,  學校即刻打哩, 實必問有無發燒,  咳, 或流鼻水.

mmmmm

SC is not a good school. I really feel disappointed after my son studied there. His English teacher only attend the class ~15-20 each day. And most important thing is: his so call NET teacher always sick leave. Her attendence is at most 50%. Most of the English was teached by the chinese teacher or relieving NET.
SC is very commercial and there is really no garrantee on Primary.