用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 陳守仁second in
樓主: phoebelau
go

陳守仁second in [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1014
41#
發表於 08-10-31 06:32 |只看該作者
(2006-2008) is an one year SSPA result posted on 8th July 2008 and revised on 14 July, 2008.

2006-2007 ---> P5 (2nd term)
2007-2008 ---> P6 (1st and the 2nd term)




原帖由 Heiyingleefamil 於 08-10-31 01:27 發表
Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08).  That's really makes me think twice on this school.  

Any comments??

Rank: 3Rank: 3


114
42#
發表於 08-10-31 09:18 |只看該作者
同意Heiyingleefamil的說法。

陳守仁的擇生比例為16:1, 理論上可進入陳守仁都應是精英,但經過6年的教化,派位結果(產出)似乎不太理想。

另一間我有强烈保留的學校就是GT,雖然那些家長一昧唱好,但一日未見會考成績,我都不敢貿貿然將囝囝送入去。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
43#
發表於 08-10-31 09:18 |只看該作者
That's a good point.  But I would wait until our kids are admitted by this school and have other offers in hand at the same time to make the final decision.  

原帖由 Heiyingleefamil 於 08-10-31 01:26 發表
Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08).  That's really makes me think twice on this school.  

Any comments??

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
44#
發表於 08-10-31 09:25 |只看該作者
I think TSL only became popular among P1 applicants in the past 3-4 years.  The recent graduates were admitted when the school just switched to a DSS.  
I also heard that their South Asian students generally are not very academically smart compared to the local students, and their secondary school allocation has not been very satisfactory.  Having about 20% of those students, the overall allocation data may not look very impressive.  It would be interesting to look at the data for the local students alone, but the school may not be willing to release them as they may be accused of "discrimination".  

原帖由 ansonl 於 08-10-31 09:18 發表
同意Heiyingleefamil的說法。

陳守仁的擇生比例為16:1, 理論上可進入陳守仁都應是精英,但經過6年的教化,派位結果(產出)似乎不太理想。

另一間我有强烈保留的學校就是GT,雖然那些家長一昧唱好,但一日未見會考成 ...

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-10-31 09:27 編輯 ]


706
45#
發表於 08-10-31 09:27 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


322
46#
發表於 08-10-31 11:52 |只看該作者

回覆 # 的文章

Totally agree with you.  It would be good to see how the Chinese Stream perform in the past years......My daughter got into second interview too, but I have reservation about this school, mainly (1) the Secondary School allocation results were not as impressive as expected, (2) I am not sure what is the cultural difference between South Asian Students and our children, not sure if they will bring good or bad influence to each other........????? any one have comments? do you worry the same too??

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
47#
發表於 08-10-31 12:26 |只看該作者
Overall the Chinese students there are very presentable and confident, at least for those who helped out on their Open Day.  Interestingly, if 20% of their students are caucasians (instead of South Asians), I guess nobody would be concerned about the "cultural differences".  I believe their South Asian students are mainly from middle class family rather than having their dads working as security guards we see on the street everyday.  The well-educated south asians and their kids speak fluent english (although with a strong accent).  Some work as NET teachers in all levels of schools.  A number of them actually hold high-ranking positions in places like where I work!  
In general, however, they don't push their kids as much as chinese parents.  This may be why they don't perform as good in the exams.  


原帖由 bird-bird 於 08-10-31 11:52 發表
Totally agree with you.  It would be good to see how the Chinese Stream perform in the past years......My daughter got into second interview too, but I have reservation about this school, mainly (1) t ...

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-10-31 12:28 編輯 ]

Rank: 8Rank: 8


19613
48#
發表於 08-10-31 12:38 |只看該作者
原帖由 kaifu 於 08-10-31 12:26 發表
Overall the Chinese students there are very presentable and confident, at least for those who helped out on their Open Day.  Interestingly, if 20% of their students are caucasians (instead of South As ...


認同!!!

唔好睇人膚色去界定人!

再者, 升中派位點好, 我都唔敢講自己可以谷到佢去做BAND 1學生。中學可以自行收生考兩間, 有本事自己去考都得啦!

Rank: 1


25
49#
發表於 08-10-31 13:11 |只看該作者
我個仔都有份2nd in, 其實大家所講架事情我估每一間學校都發生緊, 不過大家按小朋友及家庭情況去選擇學校, 每一個社會都會有人說好有人說不好, 最重要系小朋友開心健康.

Rank: 4


874
50#
發表於 08-10-31 13:44 |只看該作者
My twins also got seats at this schoold last year, however we gave up at the end.


原帖由 Heiyingleefamil 於 08-10-31 01:26 發表
Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08).  That's really makes me think twice on this school.  

Any comments??

Rank: 4


620
51#
發表於 08-10-31 16:11 |只看該作者
Hi Wendyyy

Can you share with us why you finally give up this school and what's the main reason behind?


9
52#
發表於 08-10-31 17:01 |只看該作者
請問2nd in.會考D咩呢?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


128
53#
發表於 08-10-31 17:41 |只看該作者
我問過早兩年有份second in既朋友, 佢話入到去會叫小朋友用英文介紹自己, 然後砌puzzle, 跟住會叫小朋友形容一下puzzle入面既野
不過我諗考既野可能每年都唔同

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2658
54#
發表於 08-10-31 19:23 |只看該作者
原帖由 ansonl 於 08-10-31 09:18 發表
同意Heiyingleefamil的說法。

陳守仁的擇生比例為16:1, 理論上可進入陳守仁都應是精英,但經過6年的教化,派位結果(產出)似乎不太理想。

另一間我有强烈保留的學校就是GT,雖然那些家長一昧唱好,但一日未見會考成 ...


陳守仁轉直資到今年7月畢業係第三屆直資生,唔係六年!讀陳守仁的學生我相信大部分都唔係車望政府派位!看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來!如入得陳守仁我好相信他們第日升中,一樣好似以往師兄師姊一樣在六年後靠自己實力在自行或叩門時努力!我想講講今年叩門都有2個入dbs!1個入喇沙!2個入Sj!2個入華仁!2個入瑪利曼!4個入qes!可能有家長覺得TSL學生叩門不外如是!但我就心感高興!

Rank: 4


595
55#
發表於 08-11-1 00:32 |只看該作者
看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來!唔係靠派位!

還有這是基本常識 用來上中學的數據是兩年度的, 即五年級和六年級的成績, 所以是2006-2008年度!(請上教育局網頁check)

而且入TSL是想讀得開心又有d成績, 如果想靠派位, 今時今日就唔應該入31網. 不過如果keep唔到競爭力 , 咁係一條龍就著數d ke . 但如此下去, 去到社會點競爭 .


原帖由 minicat 於 08-10-31 19:23 發表


陳守仁轉直資到今年7月畢業係第三屆直資生,唔係六年!讀陳守仁的學生我相信大部分都唔係車望政府派位!看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來!如入得陳守仁我好相信他們第日升中,一樣好似以往師兄師姊一樣在六 ...

[ 本帖最後由 mamimummy 於 08-11-1 00:44 編輯 ]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


174
56#
發表於 08-11-1 15:19 |只看該作者
我個仔都入到2nd in. 我都是剛剛先知道. 我太太前兩天已問我有冇上網check TSL結果, 我那時連check都唔想check, 因為1st in時我個仔只係in咗5分鐘,  全部最早行番出來就係佢, 心想一定唔得, 仲以為俾佢呃咗50蚊.  其實我覺得校揀人, 人揀校. 沒offer係手, 任何一間收都要讀, 有其他offers先有得決定讀唔讀邊間邊間...

當然, 最後一間都考唔到o既, 咪大抽獎law.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2658
57#
發表於 08-11-1 20:03 |只看該作者
原帖由 ryohga 於 08-11-1 15:19 發表
我個仔都入到2nd in. 我都是剛剛先知道. 我太太前兩天已問我有冇上網check TSL結果, 我那時連check都唔想check, 因為1st in時我個仔只係in咗5分鐘,  全部最早行番出來就係佢, 心想一定唔得, 仲以為俾佢呃咗50蚊. ...


我之前都有同面試後家長講過!往年都有d學生在面試時唔多出聲但到最後都過關或入讀!今年都有咁既情況出現! 恭喜家長呀!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


174
58#
發表於 08-11-1 20:51 |只看該作者
原帖由 minicat 於 08-11-1 20:03 發表


我之前都有同面試後家長講過!往年都有d學生在面試時唔多出聲但到最後都過關或入讀!今年都有咁既情況出現! 恭喜家長呀!


係啦, 如果根據我個仔每次in完俾我個report來看, TSL都算係佢in得較差o既一間. 可能TSL係睇本幼稚園手冊多過睇interview performance...

亦可能根本係運氣...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2658
59#
發表於 08-11-1 21:03 |只看該作者
原帖由 ryohga 於 08-11-1 20:51 發表


係啦, 如果根據我個仔每次in完俾我個report來看, TSL都算係佢in得較差o既一間. 可能TSL係睇本幼稚園手冊多過睇interview performance...

亦可能根本係運氣... ...


面試都係想揾一d合心水學生,間間都唔同既!tsl以我所知應該係鍾意d有自信學生!可能你小朋友表現出自信性格!家長!自信性格型小朋友大多都係自小從家長身上學會的!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


322
60#
發表於 08-11-3 10:14 |只看該作者
wow, you are all so knowledgable, I haven't done any research for Secordary School yet. THanks for sharing.

But I was thinking, 6 years later, if I still have to worry about Secondary School allocation, or to prepare my daughter for Secondary School interview (like what we are doing now), and prepare to "KNOCK DOOR",  I guess this would be a lot of pressure for both the parent and children.  

Would this be one of the reason why the twin mother gave up their seats last year??


原帖由 mamimummy 於 08-11-1 00:32 發表
看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來!唔係靠派位!

還有這是基本常識 用來上中學的數據是兩年度的, 即五年級和六年級的成績, 所以是2006-2008年度!(請上教育局網頁check)

而且入T ...
‹ 上一主題|下一主題