- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 14-11-17
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 86
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 13-3-15
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 66
- 主題
- 7
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 152
- UID
- 1153637
|
回覆:selialee 的帖子
Do u hv the same thoughts as ur hubby's, planning to send ur kid to US? if so, dun choose LH. LH is strong at eng curriculum compared to many local kinda. however, it doesn't mean it is on the same level of int'l sch. i'm pretty sure that none of the local sch r able to train a student up to be like a native eng speaker even though it's... maryknoll or st.paul coed except the kid has eng family background. i share ur feeling that anfield is deficient in chi. some else r chi oriented like esf or kingston (my sister's son is studying there). what kind of chi do u wanna ur kid to hv? i really hope u to know under the effect of DSE (the new exam replacing HKCEE ), the local sch r forced to teach students more & more unrealistic chi..somethg like chi linguistics,focusing on tricky thgs&testing candidates' exam skills only. if u want him/her to be proficient at practical chi for communication, u shd stick to int'l sch but at the same time, get ur kid more exposure on chi. try to understand more about DSE chi syllabus. u'll know what i'm saying.
|
|