- 在線時間
- 15 小時
- 最後登錄
- 14-4-4
- 國民生產力
- 11
- 附加生產力
- 157
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-2-5
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 188
- 主題
- 14
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 356
- UID
- 701884
|
To add onto your points, 著重啟發 doesn't necessary mean not getting good result. 著重啟發 has to be supported by motivated to learn, learn the way to learn, understand the concepts and also do the actual work (e.g. exercises, collect info, analyze info, understand and memorize the facts etc.). In this case, why wouldn't they get good results in a few years time?
The main reason for not getting good result, I think, is parents in general quite 'hea' and think 'do the school work will be ok. The school says my boy/girl is ok and I think it is ok', without actually cultivating the learning culture and leading the children forward.
In short, for KY, even parents are quite lay back, the students still learn sth which last for life vs for other traditional 谷 schools, apart from the hard-core factual info from the books (note:I do not use the word knowledge here), there seems to be very little left.
It is you, the parents' ultimately choice.
If you are not secure and think only 死谷 schools will => lead you to band 1 secondary school => lead you to good university => lead you to top company and have a good life...then, I feel very sorry for you... I think in reality, the world doesn't operate like this these days.
原帖由 Nique 於 11-11-1 13:14 發表
選得救恩好大程度都係認同佢教學理念, 就係著重啟發, 而唔係死谷, 而要明白, 咁一定就有trade off, 就係短時間內唔會好top, 即係唔會個個派到top band 1學校, 但如果放眼將來, 就會明白呢種教學模式係令個學生終生受 ... |
|