- 在線時間
- 27 小時
- 最後登錄
- 13-10-4
- 國民生產力
- 12
- 附加生產力
- 16
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-1-3
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 235
- 主題
- 12
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 263
- UID
- 37510
|
Dear Parent,
There is no point to keep on arguing. For CKY, it is the fact it cannot provide track record for public examination result. Regarding the expenses, CKY is still much lower than that of real IS. For language issue, Chinese (PTH) must better than IS, English is in between of IS and local school. Whether English standard is higher or lower than the traditional elite school is up to individual student. I would say CKY already done quite well. For teaching approach, I don't think it should elaborate more. For student chance to practising any kind of presentation, I feel it is fair and school already try their best. For DGJS, I have no idea so can't make any comment and may be some DGJS parent can provide the necessary information.
ps. I had two kids studying in CKY, you may think I am biased, but that's my feeling and hope it can help those parent who are interested in CKY. |
|