- 在線時間
- 742 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-2-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 17708
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-10-31
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 14632
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 32340
- UID
- 1049305
|
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 12-12-18 01:36 編輯
huba 發表於 12-12-18 00:54
回復 shadeslayer 的帖子
Although I also see reading an important and beneficial activity for childr ...
Yeah, everyday we make decisions based on our resources, constraints, preference, etc. That does not mean that all decisions are equal. I don't think parents who put leisure reading to the last has the right information for the decision making. I don't think they know a lot of exercises and tuition are NOT required for good English. I have seen many many cases to support this.
I strongly believe prioritizing leisure reading to the last is a mistake, which many of the parents do everyday. Reading should be at least ahead of English exercises, English tuition classes (in primary years at least) and even ahead of some of the English revision for dictation/test, etc, if you want the child to achieve English proficiency.
Next time, when you see children having good English without any of the exercises and drilling, nor any tuition classes or long hours of revision, you know their parents have made good decisions. Other parents who made "conscious" decisions have to keep asking what are the best exercises, the best teachers for tuition class and asking why their children do not like reading.
|
|