教育王國

標題: 大埔羅定邦好唔好? [打印本頁]

---

作者: katietsui0322    時間: 20-7-5 15:34     標題: 大埔羅定邦好唔好?

想問吓大埔羅定邦好唔好? 行咩學製?
如果讀IS今年yr6，幾時要考?

---

作者: Poyau    時間: 20-7-5 20:16     標題: 回覆樓主:

羅定邦B2直資考DSE

---

作者: katietsui0322    時間: 20-7-5 20:51

Poyau 發表於 20-7-5 20:16
羅定邦B2直資考DSE

但我睇佢地網頁，佢地有S1中文 & 中史?
有冇 IGCSE 班?

---

作者: Unicornring    時間: 20-7-12 14:51

(emoji)(emoji)大家好!早兩天已經到羅定邦中學註冊,感覺良好,期待小朋友加入這大家庭(emoji)。

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-15 23:34



The banding of LTPSS is dropping (before 2012,LTPSS is one of the Band1 aided EMI school in TaiPo) and their public examination results  are not that good as before since 2013 DSE. Also, LTPSS have very high turnover rate of the teaching staffs and their students is not well behaved since the student support works is not enough. Not suggested!

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-15 23:40

Poyau 發表於 20-7-5 20:16
羅定邦B2直資考DSE

They also offered GCE but not many students will choose it. And their Students are very weak in Chinese language & Mathematics with referring to their public examination / Pre s1 datas

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-15 23:52



Most of the teaching staffs in LTPSS is lack of experience and not able to handle DSE curriculum, since most of them are fresh grad and they don’t even know how to mark the past papers with following marking scheme provided by HKEAA. And it is very hard for LTPSS to employ good teachers, cause their reputation is bad in the education industry, teachers with high ability will not apply the position from ltpss.

---

作者: estw    時間: 20-7-16 11:15

Fanny_ma 發表於 20-7-15 23:52
Most of the teaching staffs in LTPSS is lack of experience and not able to handle DSE curriculum, si ...

照咁睇，大埔b2生仲可以點揀呢？

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-16 12:20

estw 發表於 20-7-16 11:15
照咁睇，大埔b2生仲可以點揀呢？

If you are Band2, LTPSS is a good choice for you. Their public examination results are mostly perform better than all BAND2 CMI schools in Tai Po( includes Kau Yan College). However, it’s not suitable for the Band1 students cause they should aim higher (The banding of LTP have been dropped from band1C to band2A-B) , but you should put extra consideration on their staff turnover rate.

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-16 12:23

estw 發表於 20-7-16 11:15
照咁睇，大埔b2生仲可以點揀呢？

雖然我覺得羅定邦差了，但是大埔區比它更差的學校多的是，俗些講句「睇餸食飯」。

---

作者: estw    時間: 20-7-16 14:14

Fanny_ma 發表於 20-7-16 12:23
雖然我覺得羅定邦差了，但是大埔區比它更差的學校多的是，俗些講句「睇餸食飯」。 ...

嘜大埔真係差成咁

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-16 14:55

estw 發表於 20-7-16 14:14
嘜大埔真係差成咁

Yes... 羅定邦成績尚算見得人，爛鐵仲有三分釘，但沒津中時這麼好。雖然現在不好，但總比讀中中好。

---

作者: little_yolky    時間: 20-7-16 15:03

estw 發表於 20-7-16 14:14
嘜大埔真係差成咁

係呀，如果唔係我駛乜攀山越嶺6年跨出九龍喔。

---

作者: little_yolky    時間: 20-7-16 15:03

Fanny_ma 發表於 20-7-16 14:55
Yes... 羅定邦成績尚算見得人，爛鐵仲有三分釘，但沒津中時這麼好。雖然現在不好，但總比讀中中好。 ...

我覺得佢問題係出響校長度。

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-16 16:01

little_yolky 發表於 20-7-16 15:03
我覺得佢問題係出響校長度。

校長不懂用人，教學方法出錯，所以埋下跌banding惡果，以前羅定邦在我年代是大埔名校，只會收全級Top20%的學生。

---

作者: estw    時間: 20-7-16 21:31

little_yolky 發表於 20-7-16 15:03
係呀，如果唔係我駛乜攀山越嶺6年跨出九龍喔。

咁我都要認真諗下，不過我吾想跨太遠，撘幾個站就算。

---

作者: Poyau    時間: 20-7-17 02:07

estw 發表於 20-7-16 14:14
嘜大埔真係差成咁

大埔區中學選擇有限 羅不失為出路

2019年 3322 | 22222 | 4+ | 2+ (主科)
---------------------------------------------------------
迦密柏雨 93.8% | [•] | [•] | [•]
莫壽增 83.2% | 97.6% | 67% | [•]
王肇枝 78.8% | 97.4% | 57% | 98.4%
---------------------------------------------------------
沐恩 65.1% | 98.1% | [•] | [•]
---------------------------------------------------------
恩主教 [•] | [•] | [•] | 95%
圓玄第二 [•] | [•] | 32% | 93% (91.9%)
孫方中 [•] | [•] | [•] | 91.3% (91.1%)
何郭佩珍 [•] | [•] | [•] | [•] ([>88.75%*])
---------------------------------------------------------
救恩2014年3322 30% 整體2+ 86.5%
---------------------------------------------------------
康樂 14.8% | 41.7% | [•] | [•]
迦密聖道 14.4% | 50% | [•] | 77.6%

* 中/數/通2+ >90% 英2+ >85%

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-17 02:57

Poyau 發表於 20-7-17 02:07
大埔區中學選擇有限 羅不失為出路

2019年 3322 | 22222 | 4+ | 2+ (主科)

如派入何郭或圓二，take 羅記算。

---

作者: estw    時間: 20-7-17 08:32

Poyau 發表於 20-7-17 02:07
大埔區中學選擇有限 羅不失為出路

2019年 3322 | 22222 | 4+ | 2+ (主科)

咁羅記同沙田培基有冇得比

---

作者: Poyau    時間: 20-7-17 10:57

estw 發表於 20-7-17 08:32
咁羅記同沙田培基有冇得比

培基2019年成績有B2A-1C水平較佳

中文4+|2+ 31.8% | 100%
英文4+|2+ 50.4% | 97.7%
數學4+|2+ 43.4% | 100%
通識4+|2+ 48.1% | 100%
主科4+|2+ 43.4% | 99.4%
整體4+|2+ 45.4% | 98.5%
33222: 68.2%
22222: 96.9%

Report on the HKDSE Results (2019)
https://www.spkc.edu.hk/spkc-diary/report-on-the-hkdse-results-2019/

The results of the HKDSE Examination (2019) were promising as 68.2% of our students attained the requirement for university admission (33222) which is far higher than the Territory Average of 42.1%. The percentage that is eligible to sub-degree programmes (22222) was 96.9%. The overall subject pass rate was 98.5% while the percentage of attaining level 4+ was 45.4%.

The pass rates of 17 subjects including the 4 core subjects were all above the average in Hong Kong. The pass rates of the 4 core subjects were English Language (100%), Chinese Language (97.7%), Mathematics (98.4%) and Liberal Studies (100%). Other 11 subjects with 100% pass rates were Biology, BAFS(Accounting), BAFS(Business Management), Chinese History, Geography, History, Information and Communication Technology, Literature in English, Physics, Visual Arts and Music.

Among these, the 10 subjects with higher percentage of attaining level 4+ than those in Hong Kong were listed as below:

Subject SPKC HK
Biology 56.0% 47.3%
BAFs (Business Management) 41.7% 29.8%
Chinese Language 31.8% 30.7%
Economics 66.7% 47.6%
English Language 50.4% 27.5%
ICT 69.2% 30.3%
Liberal Studies 48.1% 40.0%
Mathematics (Compulsory Part) 43.4% 39.7%
Music 100% 52.7%
Visual Arts 63.6% 26.7%

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-17 11:15

Poyau 發表於 20-7-17 10:57
培基2019年成績有B2A-1C水平較佳

中文4+|2+ 31.8% | 100%

羅定邦同培基完全冇得比，我覺得培基還比沐恩好，而且很多人爭。

---

作者: little_yolky    時間: 20-7-17 11:25

Fanny_ma 發表於 20-7-17 11:15
羅定邦同培基完全冇得比，我覺得培基還比沐恩好，而且很多人爭。

係囉！

---

作者: estw    時間: 20-7-17 14:26

Fanny_ma 發表於 20-7-17 11:15
羅定邦同培基完全冇得比，我覺得培基還比沐恩好，而且很多人爭。

點解嘅？我見佢DSE表現同沐恩差吾多，但就要俾學費

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-17 14:53

estw 發表於 20-7-17 14:26
點解嘅？我見佢DSE表現同沐恩差吾多，但就要俾學費

Deleted

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-17 14:54

estw 發表於 20-7-17 14:26
點解嘅？我見佢DSE表現同沐恩差吾多，但就要俾學費

你要計返中一收生水平，培基六年前有一定數量嘅Band two學生，沐恩就主要收Band one學生。情況就好似救恩同羅定邦，兩間成績差唔多，但係羅定邦六年前就有少量Band three學生，救恩一定冇，結果羅定邦成績仲好過救恩少少。所以計發展潛力，培基會更好。

---

作者: estw    時間: 20-7-17 15:03

Fanny_ma 發表於 20-7-17 14:54
你要計返中一收生水平，培基六年前有一定數量嘅Band two學生，沐恩就主要收Band one學生。情況就好似救恩 ...

明白。咁六年前冇辦法之下而入培同羅嘅學生，原來係冇入錯到。如果冇過去嘅數據，又有冇方法可以睇到一間學校未來進展呢？

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-17 15:05

estw 發表於 20-7-17 15:03
明白。咁六年前冇辦法之下而入培同羅嘅學生，原來係冇入錯到。如果冇過去嘅數據，又有冇方法可以睇到一間 ...

收生成績不多或少會影響學校六年後的成績，所以你可以留意學校每年的收生水平，推算未來六年後的發展。

---

作者: Fanny_ma    時間: 20-7-17 15:06

但是我認為大埔區的學校排名，多年來已經stabilise了，未來也不會有太大的變動。

---

作者: estw    時間: 20-7-17 15:36

Fanny_ma 發表於 20-7-17 15:06
但是我認為大埔區的學校排名，多年來已經stabilise了，未來也不會有太大的變動。 ...

不過要入到頭嗰幾間都吾容易，如果係最top嗰間就更要開香賓慶祝。

---

歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/)

Powered by Discuz! X1.5