教育王國

標題: HKU Admission Scores 2017 仲未出? [打印本頁]

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-10-31 11:24 標題: HKU Admission Scores 2017 仲未出?

今個星期六係 HKU Information Day, 好似仲未出 2017 admission scores.

請問有冇人有?

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-10-31 11:32

好奇怪, 今年特別遲, 其他院校好早已出了

作者: ym403 時間: 17-10-31 11:33

Its website says

"Admissions Information for 2018 JUPAS Admissions will be available in late October, stay tuned!"

http://www.aal.hku.hk/admissions ... ns-information-2018

But it is not yet announced as on 31 Oct 2017

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-10-31 12:05

ym403 發表於 17-10-31 11:33
Its website says

"Admissions Information for 2018 JUPAS Admissions will be available in late Octobe ...

Thanks (emoji)

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-10-31 13:35

ym403 發表於 17-10-31 11:33
Its website says

"Admissions Information for 2018 JUPAS Admissions will be available in late Octobe ...

還有十多個鐘頭！

見哂其他大學數據，可能用一些特別表達方式呢！

作者: ym403 時間: 17-10-31 14:03

回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

still have 10 hours

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-10-31 14:08

本帖最後由 cmamum 於 17-10-31 14:08 編輯

回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

等極未有, 有d心急啫

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-10-31 15:21

cmamum 發表於 17-10-31 14:08
回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

等極未有, 有d心急啫

I am just kidding.

作者: ym403 時間: 17-11-2 09:02

好奇怪,等極未有

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-11-2 10:26

ym403 發表於 17-11-2 09:02
好奇怪,等極未有

本帖最後由 cmamum 於 17-11-2 12:47 編輯

Yes ~ would that be a "BIG SURPRISE" ?! - I mean the actual scores results ....

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-11-3 08:21

ym403 發表於 17-11-2 09:02
好奇怪,等極未有

本帖最後由 cmamum 於 17-11-3 15:15 編輯

明天 info day, 今日都未出上年收生成績, 真係史無前例

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-3 10:47

cmamum 發表於 17-11-3 08:21
聽日info day, 今日都未出上年收生成績, 真係史無前例

成绩公报先后，跟资讯冇乜必然关系，都预咗去听讲座，学校会讲，你亦可以发问。

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-11-3 11:12

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-3 10:47
成绩公报先后，跟资讯冇乜必然关系，都预咗去听讲座，学校会讲，你亦可以发问。
...

我都明白，只係覺得奇怪。

而且有時都需要因應收生分數，取捨相同時間嘅講座。

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-3 11:18

cmamum 發表於 17-11-3 11:12
我都明白，只係覺得奇怪。

而且有時都需要因應收生分數，取捨相同時間嘅講座。

咁擔心，今年中六？

我又咁睇，舊年個分應該幾有代表性，可作參考，不用太擔心。

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-11-3 11:20

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-3 11:18
咁擔心，今年中六？

我又咁睇，舊年個分應該幾有代表性，可作參考，不用太擔心。

係呀今年中六，當然緊張啦

作者: THRY 時間: 17-11-3 17:34

http://www.aal.hku.hk/sites/default/files/HKDSE-Scores-17.pdf

作者: LingChiBaBa 時間: 17-11-3 17:44

THRY 發表於 17-11-3 17:34
http://www.aal.hku.hk/sites/default/files/HKDSE-Scores-17.pdf

Thanks.

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-11-3 17:53

THRY 發表於 17-11-3 17:34
http://www.aal.hku.hk/sites/default/files/HKDSE-Scores-17.pdf

Thanks

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-3 19:40

Medicine 勁升

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 17-11-3 21:30

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-3 17:44
Thanks.

有無non jupas 版？

作者: LingChiBaBa 時間: 17-11-3 22:25

Ruby1219 發表於 17-11-3 21:30
有無non jupas 版？

我諗要聽日去admission talk 問。

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 17-11-3 22:44

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-3 22:25
我諗要聽日去admission talk 問。

Ok! Plan to go anyways

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-4 15:55

THRY 發表於 17-11-3 17:34
http://www.aal.hku.hk/sites/default/files/HKDSE-Scores-17.pdf

Copy my presentation method years back.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-4 15:55

ANChan59 發表於 17-10-31 13:35
還有十多個鐘頭！

見哂其他大學數據，可能用一些特別表達方式呢！

I am correct.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-4 15:58

nhi 發表於 17-11-3 19:40
Medicine 勁升

Read the remark and small print.

Best of 6, not 4C + 2X.

You can't compare with other university easily.

作者: 駱瑪莉 時間: 17-11-4 16:18

THRY 發表於 17-11-3 17:34
http://www.aal.hku.hk/sites/default/files/HKDSE-Scores-17.pdf

Bar Chart 圖示的分數，除
看到中位數外，上下限是最高及最低收生分敷? 抑或是最高及最低申請人分數?

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 17-11-4 16:31

駱瑪莉發表於 17-11-4 16:18
Bar Chart 圖示的分數，除
看到中位數外，上下限是最高及最低收生分敷? 抑或是最高及最低申請人分數?
...

Just left the open day, A level requirement for Engineering is AAA including Phy and Math, if taking four subjects.

作者: LingChiBaBa 時間: 17-11-4 19:07

本帖最後由 LingChiBaBa 於 17-11-5 09:37 編輯

Ruby1219 發表於 17-11-4 16:31
Just left the open day, A level requirement for Engineering is AAA including Phy and Math, if takin ...

MBBS

國際預科文憑:
43分（31%）
44分（50%）
45分（19%）

英國高考
3A* （56%）
4A*（41%）
5A* （3%）

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-11-4 19:18

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-4 15:55
I am correct.

Yes

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-4 19:26

cmamum 發表於 17-11-4 19:18
Yes

Every year, they are the last one for info day, they have time to manipulate the data to make it looks better.

作者: MC1128 時間: 17-11-4 19:51

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-4 19:26
Every year, they are the last one for info day, they have time to manipulate the data to make it loo ...

城大的計法亦不是簡單計best 5 / best 6
每科都有不同weighting
同様不可以同其他大學直接比較分數
每間大學按各自考量表達收生分數並無不可，最重要是學生得到所需資料

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-5 09:18

本帖最後由 nhi 於 17-11-5 09:19 編輯

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-4 19:07
國際預科文憑:
43分（31%）
44分（50%）

Does it mean that students with 42 in IB cannot get into hku this year?Is 43 the lowest score?

作者: LingChiBaBa 時間: 17-11-5 09:35

本帖最後由 LingChiBaBa 於 17-11-5 09:36 編輯

nhi 發表於 17-11-5 09:18
Does it mean that students with 42 in IB cannot get into hku this year?Is 43 the lowest score?

Sorry. Something missed. It is for MBBS.

The data was shown on the admission talk yesterday.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-5 10:34

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-5 09:35
Sorry. Something missed. It is for MBBS.

The data was shown on the admission talk yesterday.

What’s the admission number of students ?

作者: LingChiBaBa 時間: 17-11-5 10:44

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-5 10:34
What’s the admission number of students ?

It had not been mentioned in detail.

But no of candidate admitted through Jupas is 169, so Non-Jupas should be 235-169=66.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-5 10:56

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-5 10:44
It had not been mentioned in detail.

But no of candidate admitted through Jupas is 169, so Non-Jup ...

Someone said the cap is 25%, 66 is 28%.

It means after press release, still the same 28%.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-5 10:58

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-5 10:44
It had not been mentioned in detail.

But no of candidate admitted through Jupas is 169, so Non-Jup ...

I also want to know the split of IB vs GCEAL student numbers.

作者: cheeful88 時間: 17-11-5 11:45

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-4 19:26
Every year, they are the last one for info day, they have time to manipulate the data to make it loo ...

In fact your comments are very biased towards HKU while often protective towards CU, this doesn't fair at all.
If HKU admission is based on best 6, and they present data in this way, what's wrong with this presentation method, why you comment "manipulate the data"? It's so biased.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-5 11:59

cheeful88 發表於 17-11-5 11:45
In fact your comments are very biased towards HKU while often protective towards CU, this doesn't fa ...

Why keep on changing presentation method?

Only one outcome, looks higher admission scores. Am I correct ?

I may be biased against medical schools not universities.

作者: cheeful88 時間: 17-11-5 12:11

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-5 11:59
Why keep on changing presentation method?

Only one outcome, looks higher admission scores. Am I co ...

If admission criteria changed, of course they need to change the presentation format so as to provide a better picture for students reference. Think it’s an enhancement while the admission information is very clear in the admission booklet in fact!

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-5 13:24

本帖最後由 nhi 於 17-11-5 13:30 編輯

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-4 19:07
MBBS

國際預科文憑:

3A* for hku medic, seems unexpectedly low this year!
The interview thresold for cu medic is 4A*
I expect the grades for hku to be higher as the number of their non-jupas quota is less.

作者: ChiChiPaPa 時間: 17-11-5 13:28

cheeful88 發表於 17-11-5 12:11
If admission criteria changed, of course they need to change the presentation format so as to provi ...

沒有像過往般同時提供每科的Best 5和4C+2X數據，與其他大學數據的可比性降低了。如果所有大學都減低公開資料的可比性，到時就難以知道每個學科那間大學收生較高。

作者: LingChiBaBa 時間: 17-11-5 14:54

本帖最後由 LingChiBaBa 於 17-11-5 21:31 編輯

回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

There is no definite figures for this. See below pie charts.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-6 01:58

ChiChiPaPa 發表於 17-11-5 13:28
沒有像過往般同時提供每科的Best 5和4C+2X數據，與其他大學數據的可比性降低了。如果所有大學都減低公開資 ...

你明白我講乜！

就是唔想你跟到同其他三大的比較，眾人皆知最佳六科一定高於 4C+2X！

作者: cmamum 時間: 17-11-7 08:07

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-6 01:58
你明白我講乜！

就是唔想你跟到同其他三大的比較，眾人皆知最佳六科一定高於 4C+2X！

Yes, agreed. I would much prefer HKU’s presentation method of previous years.

Now, it’s just hard to compare the actual scores with other universities in Hong Kong.

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 08:35

回覆 nhi 的帖子

This year is the first patch of students result after A-level reform in 2015. Roughly, students with 3A* or more is among 1% of all students in A level exam. HKU’s figures reflect most up-dated information.

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 14:29

Approximately 3A* is equivalent to IB score 44 this year.

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 15:24

Sorry typing mistake. Should be 43-44.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-7 17:18

Choisumwong 發表於 17-11-7 15:24
Sorry typing mistake. Should be 43-44.

Did you check the expert report of UCAS?

AL vs IB.

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 17:34

回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

You mean 2017? Sorry, I didn't check. I am very thankful if you can give me information.

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-7 17:41

Choisumwong 發表於 17-11-7 08:35
回覆 nhi 的帖子

This year is the first patch of students result after A-level reform in 2015. Rough ...

But the admission grade of cu medic was kept at 4A* with UMS >95%. CU admitted more NJ students, that is why I think hku should have higher admission grades.

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 18:04

回覆 nhi 的帖子

4A* with UMS>95% is only for years before A-level reform. A-level for science subjects from 2017 onwards only show grades and no UMS (except maths and further maths ). That is why HKU only counts number of A*. I know one school still asked for UMS and seemed to know nothing about A-level reform since 2015.

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-7 18:08

Choisumwong 發表於 17-11-7 18:04
回覆 nhi 的帖子

4A* with UMS>95% is only for years before A-level reform. A-level for science subje ...

So CU is telling lies on its website!

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 18:14

回覆 nhi 的帖子

You can only say its information is not yet updated!

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-7 18:21

回覆 Choisumwong 的帖子

Yes Just updated a few days ago!

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 18:23

回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

To be more specific, I would like to know AL vs IB by expert report of UCAS after A-level reform. Thanks!

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-7 22:19

Choisumwong 發表於 17-11-7 18:23
回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

To be more specific, I would like to know AL vs IB by expert report of UCAS af ...

I didn’t check this year.

I asked you just for curiosity. The expert report is more in-depth to explain the rationale behind the equivalence.

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-7 22:43

回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

Thanks for your reply. I think this year is particularly difficult to compare A-level with IB. My personal experience is that I can only compare those students admitted to medicine (HKU/CU) and from the same college with similar academic performance since middle school. Some students went to UK since grade 9 and others remained in the same college. It turned out some got 3-5A* in A-level and some got 43-45 in IB this year. Most IB students went to CU and most A-level students went to HKU.

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-7 23:24

Choisumwong 發表於 17-11-7 22:43
回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

Thanks for your reply. I think this year is particularly difficult to compare ...

Yes from Hku figures, the number of IB students is small.Do you know the rough / absolute figures of IB/AL students going to medicine of cu or hku?
CU claimed it had admitted 10 (45) and 25(44), but the ultimate median was only 43, I think some did not turn up when school term starts.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-7 23:43

回覆 nhi 的帖子

Those numbers included GPS and MBChB.
Median 43 for MBChB and not GPS.

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-8 05:21

回覆 ANChan59 的帖子

You are rightThx

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-8 08:23

回覆 nhi 的帖子

Roughly, I guess 15 students from IB and 15 students from A-level in HKU. I have no idea for CU. I guess more than 50 students from IB. Maybe I am wrong.

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-8 08:43

Choisumwong 發表於 17-11-8 08:23
回覆 nhi 的帖子

Roughly, I guess 15 students from IB and 15 students from A-level in HKU. I have no ...

From the pie charts, many more students from GCE than IB for hku medicine.

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 17-11-8 08:51

回覆 nhi 的帖子

I think the pie chart is not proportional. It said only 5 graduate students in 2017, but it looks like the same proportion as IB in the pie chart.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-8 09:07

nhi 發表於 17-11-8 08:43
From the pie charts, many more students from GCE than IB for hku medicine.

My info may be outdated, HKU preferred GCEAL as some government officials and professors’ kids were studying boarding schools in UK with or without overseas educational allowance. (From two professors of HKU medical school. )

Therefore more GCE than IB for some years. Relatively less graduate students.

In CUHK, the % of IB much more than GCE, also for graduate students (15).

CUHK prefers graduate students as they are generally more mature and the attitude of studying is better than high schools students, no matter what curriculum they come from.

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-8 09:35

Choisumwong 發表於 17-11-8 08:51
回覆 nhi 的帖子

I think the pie chart is not proportional. It said only 5 graduate students in 2017 ...

I did not intend to say that you are wrongBut is it possible that it is a misunderstanding of the genuine number for graduate students? A number of 5 is just too small to believe!

作者: nhi 時間: 17-11-8 09:36

ANChan59 發表於 17-11-8 09:07
My info may be outdated, HKU preferred GCEAL as some government officials and professors’ kids wer ...

Fo you mean 15 graduate students for cu thick year? This number is also very small!

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-8 09:45

nhi 發表於 17-11-8 09:36
Fo you mean 15 graduate students for cu thick year? This number is also very small!

我以前有問到相關教授，他的解釋是部分畢業生可能第一個學士學位已經有資助，不能第二個學士學位又再得政府資助，所以這類學生一直數目不能太多，兩間醫學院都傾向不會收太多，從而影響其他學生的機會，始終香港不是美制收醫科生。

我自己識的兩個 graduate students 都是美國畢業，第一個學位沒有資助。

作者: LingChiBaBa 時間: 17-11-8 10:28

本帖最後由 LingChiBaBa 於 17-11-8 10:28 編輯

如果pie chart比例同figure係啱，我估分佈如下。

HKDSE : 169人
GCEAL : 29人 (5A*x1, 4A*x12, 3A*x16)
IB : 16人 (45分x3, 44分x8, 43分x5)
Graduates : 16人
Others : 5人

作者: ANChan59 時間: 17-11-8 10:53

LingChiBaBa 發表於 17-11-8 10:28
如果pie chart比例同figure係啱，我估分佈如下。

HKDSE : 169人

合理好多。

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)