教育王國

標題: ----------------------- [打印本頁]

作者: loop 時間: 17-10-20 14:51 標題: -----------------------

本帖最後由 loop 於 19-7-12 09:22 編輯

May i know if anyone has receive the conditional offer for entry year 2018/19) ?

作者: PenguinQQ 時間: 17-10-20 15:15

loop 發表於 17-10-20 14:51
May i know if anyone has receive the conditional offer for entry year 2018/19) ?

According to my friends and my kid's experience, they usually give CO at a later date, say early January.

作者: PenguinQQ 時間: 17-10-20 15:17

loop 發表於 17-10-20 14:51
May i know if anyone has receive the conditional offer for entry year 2018/19) ?

LSE usually reject the application very early if they find you are not their prospective applicants. 所以早收通知反而係Rejected 呀！

作者: loop 時間: 17-10-20 15:22

that means late submission will be much better ? thanks for your advice

作者: PenguinQQ 時間: 17-10-20 15:29

loop 發表於 17-10-20 15:22
that means late submission will be much better ? thanks for your advice

I do not mean late submission is better. My point is if they find the applicants are not their prospective students, they will reject their application at an early stage. My kid's school friend applied for LSE before the deadline of Oct last year. And she was notified by LSE her application was not successful in November. I am not sure if it is a single case or not.

作者: 1998Ruby1998 時間: 17-10-20 16:55

回覆 loop 的帖子

LSE will reject students at a very early stage if you are not their prospective students, regardless of the date you applied. If you apply in October, you might be rejected in November, if you apply in early January, you might be rejected in late January. My cousin was among them.The odds for different submission time are the same.

作者: loop 時間: 17-10-20 17:13

1998Ruby1998 發表於 17-10-20 16:55
回覆 loop 的帖子

LSE will reject students at a very early stage if you are not their prospective st ...

Thanks all for the quick response. I just concern the CO is limited. Heard some one say so.... they got CO at the early stage, if 100 students applied at the early stage, 60 students are their prospective students, the last 40 students will less of competitive power due to limited offer.

作者: loop 時間: 17-10-20 17:15

回覆 PenguinQQ 的帖子

apply early seems with more advantage if the CO is limited.

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 17-10-20 17:38

PenguinQQ 發表於 17-10-20 15:29
I do not mean late submission is better. My point is if they find the applicants are not their pros ...

Oh but my friend’s son didn’t get the rejection until Feb/Mar last year

作者: 1998Ruby1998 時間: 17-10-20 17:49

回覆 Ruby1219 的帖子

My cousin was also rejected really late, but her friends were rejected right at the beginning. Judging from their performances, we deduce that those who aren't LSE's cup of tea would immediately be rejected. We also speculate that if your fee status is international, the chance of you getting conditional offer might be higher, though the offer might be out of your league.

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 17-10-20 18:07

1998Ruby1998 發表於 17-10-20 17:49
回覆 Ruby1219 的帖子

My cousin was also rejected really late, but her friends were rejected right a ...

My friend’s son is paying international fee and not applied early in the oxbridge round.

There was a hearsay that LSE deliberately de-prioritise those who applied early in October round ie likely Oxbridge applicants, as LSE does not want to be positioned as the second choice to Oxbridge.

作者: Chole 時間: 17-10-24 22:39 標題: 回覆樓主

Got the email yesterday saying that decision will be made in approximately 8 weeks so will hear from LSE before Christmas.

作者: Shootastar 時間: 17-10-25 14:46

My son submitted the UCAS before 15 October about 10 years ago because in addition to LSE, he also applied for Oxford. He was rejected in December by Oxford but received an offer from LSE in mid-March. He eventually graduated from LSE.

作者: Wnnieng 時間: 17-10-25 15:18

Chole 發表於 17-10-24 22:39
Got the email yesterday saying that decision will be made in approximately 8 weeks so will hear from ...

no need to interview?

作者: Chole 時間: 17-10-25 16:28

Wnnieng 發表於 17-10-25 15:18
no need to interview?

No interview, though I have heard from an LSE admission seminar that they would seriously consider interview in future.

作者: loop 時間: 18-1-21 16:41

Has any one receive offer from LSE ? passed of the initial assessment now

作者: Macau媽媽 時間: 18-1-21 18:57

本帖最後由 Macau媽媽於 18-1-21 18:58 編輯

請問如果4月先申請, 仲有冇機會呢?因囡囡朋友1月先開始她的課程

她最想入LSE, 之前在澳洲讀書, 今年1月先趕到入學英國

作者: bobbycheung 時間: 18-1-21 22:40

https://info.lse.ac.uk/staff/ser ... uments/uGAdmPol.pdf

https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=5103106

作者: Chole 時間: 18-1-23 21:55

回覆 loop 的帖子

My daughter got it in the second week of December. Her classmate applied in DEC and got it in 2/3 weeks' time.

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 18-1-23 22:14

Chole 發表於 18-1-23 21:55
回覆 loop 的帖子

My daughter got it in the second week of December. Her classmate applied in DEC a ...

Congrats

作者: Chole 時間: 18-1-23 23:33

Ruby1219 發表於 18-1-23 22:14
Congrats

Congratulations to you and your son too! Well done!

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 18-1-24 00:11

Chole 發表於 18-1-23 23:33
Congratulations to you and your son too! Well done!

Thanks!
She will firm LSE ?

作者: loop 時間: 18-1-24 09:37

回覆 Chole 的帖子

Congrats !!!!!!!! your daughter must be very outstanding & impressive !!!

May i know which subject your daughter applied ? Econ or Law ?
Your girl's classmate got offer so quick !!!!!

We are passing the initial screening and waiting for the result of final stage.

作者: Chole 時間: 18-1-24 12:54

Ruby1219 發表於 18-1-24 00:11
Thanks!
She will firm LSE ?

Most likely. She doesn't want to take the HKU offer but I'd prefer to pay the deposit just in case she changes her mind.

作者: Chole 時間: 18-1-24 12:55

本帖最後由 Chole 於 18-1-24 12:57 編輯

loop 發表於 18-1-24 09:37
回覆 Chole 的帖子

Congrats !!!!!!!! your daughter must be very outstanding & impressive !!! :hand ...

Thank you! She has 3 classmates getting LSE offers, all of the subjects are different.
Hope your kid will get the offer soon!

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 18-1-24 16:16

Chole 發表於 18-1-24 12:54
Most likely. She doesn't want to take the HKU offer but I'd prefer to pay the deposit just in case ...

good mum!

我孤寒同懶，收咗imperial 同Manchester 嘅CO 後，見都achievable, 就叫阿仔唔洗報HKU 同HKUST.

你介意講阿囡LSE 同 HKU 嘅CO 嗎？

作者: Chole 時間: 18-1-24 17:58

Ruby1219 發表於 18-1-24 16:16
good mum!

我孤寒同懶，收咗imperial 同Manchester 嘅CO 後，見都achievable, 就叫阿仔唔洗報HKU 同HKUS ...

38/45 n 38/42.

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 18-1-24 19:11

Chole 發表於 18-1-24 17:58
38/45 n 38/42.

Oh LSE CO is really generous! Even much lower than HKU!

作者: Chole 時間: 18-1-24 20:08

Ruby1219 發表於 18-1-24 19:11
Oh LSE CO is really generous! Even much lower than HKU!

Exactly! That's why my daughter doesn't want to pay HKU deposit as it's not a backup at all. But I will wait and see their entrance scholarship which is still under consideration.

作者: Dean2013 時間: 18-1-26 14:14

神校頹科，　會易入好多

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-14 13:58

Just got offer but thinking about if Warwick will be better ? employment rate seems not good as the school reputation for undergraduate in England. Subject : Economics.

作者: Ruby1219 時間: 18-3-14 15:11

loop 發表於 18-3-14 13:58
Just got offer but thinking about if Warwick will be better ? employment rate seems not good as the ...

我見身邊朋友響讀Econ 都係首選Oxbridge 同LSE, 然後UCL, Warwick; 佢哋話iBank 同consulting firms 都係鍾意同優先揀Oxbridge, LSE, ICL 啲學生，點解你會話Warwick 好似好過LSE? 兩個CO 爭幾遠？

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-14 15:50

本帖最後由 loop 於 18-3-14 15:51 編輯

回覆 Ruby1219 的帖子

https://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings?s=Economics

作者: bobbycheung 時間: 18-3-14 15:55

本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 18-3-14 16:00 編輯

Ruby1219 發表於 18-3-14 15:11
我見身邊朋友響讀Econ 都係首選Oxbridge 同LSE, 然後UCL, Warwick; 佢哋話iBank 同consulting firms 都係 ...

I think loop is talking about tables like this one
https://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings?s=economics

But there are other tables like this that rank LSE higher
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/these-are-europes-16-most-elite-economics-degrees-a6958746.html

I guess you can't really rely on these ranking completely.

Personally and without taking anything away from Warwick, I would probably go for LSE.

作者: ninmum 時間: 18-3-14 15:59

回覆 Ruby1219 的帖子

Agree with Ruby1219. 香港人或公司可能只識 warwick, 其實 LSE 在外國果名係響好多, 所以一般國際級公司或在港外資公司都係優先考慮 LSE, Oxbridge, ICL, UCL more than warwick. 老實講真係唔同級數. 如你放棄 LSE offer 日後在職場上會後悔的. 請慎重考慮!!

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-14 16:09

回覆 Ruby1219 的帖子

Both LSE's & Warwick's CO no big difference and similar much lower then HK. My son have confidence to achieve. Saw the topic in hk discussion forum, a lot of LSE BSc graduate cannot find a job in banking & finance industry in UK as easy like before.

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-14 16:15

本帖最後由 loop 於 18-3-14 16:18 編輯

回覆 ninmum 的帖子

其實兒子心儀LSE 多於其他, 只係老豆我多心, 見到LSE 近來跌左幾個Grade, 還被英國政府評為第三流大學

三流大學　都是緊次Oxbridge, ICL, UCL

作者: bobbycheung 時間: 18-3-14 16:23

loop 發表於 18-3-14 16:09
回覆 Ruby1219 的帖子

Both LSE's & Warwick's CO no big difference and similar much lower then HK. My ...

Not sure if it has something to do with Brexit.

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-14 16:25

Brexit 對升學／就業有關係嗎？

作者: bobbycheung 時間: 18-3-14 16:29

本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 18-3-14 16:33 編輯

loop 發表於 18-3-14 16:25
Brexit 對升學／就業有關係嗎？

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-latest-news-uk-city-job-losses-move-eu-frankfurt-paris-luxembourg-banks-europe-sam-woods-a8104176.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-latest-updates-banking-job-lossses-city-london-leave-eu-a8148186.html

Sorry, just google "UK hiring held back by Brexit uncertainty" and you will see the stories.

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-14 16:35

回覆 bobbycheung 的帖子

ＯＭＧ

作者: Lasalleboy 時間: 18-3-14 16:36

My son is studying Economics in UCL

作者: JustAParent 時間: 18-3-14 17:28

loop 發表於 18-3-14 16:15
回覆 ninmum 的帖子

未到4月1號，你就開玩笑。如果LSE都係三流大學，那麼英國除了牛劍稱得上做大學，其他應該都係野雞。

你咪玩啦

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-15 13:07

回覆 JustAParent 的帖子

英名牌大學LSE被評「三流」

15,938

[url=]適中字型[/url]
[url=]較大字型[/url]

■倫敦政治經濟學院

英國政府為當地大學的本科生教學質素進行評級，傳統頂級學府如倫敦政治經濟學院（LSE）、修咸頓大學和利物浦大學均被列為「三流」。

只參考本科教學質素

當局日前公佈在「教學卓越架構」（TEF）推行下的首份大學評級，衡量各院校學生對授課、評核質素和學業支援的滿意度、退學率和畢業生出路等因素後，將它們分為金、銀、銅三級。有「英國長春藤聯盟」之稱、由24校組成的「羅素集團」有21校參與評核，其中8間獲評為最高的金等，但LSE、修咸頓大學和利物浦大學則落入銅等之列。
一般大學排名榜研究評分都佔重要部份，TEF則純看本科教學質素，冀改變教師只埋首研究而無心教學，未來只有獲列為金或銀等的院校才有資格按通脹調整學費。此外，部份名氣不及羅素集團大學的院校如白金漢大學亦獲評為金等，與牛津劍橋平起平坐。
英國《泰晤士報》

作者: JustAParent 時間: 18-3-15 13:32

loop 發表於 18-3-15 13:07
回覆 JustAParent 的帖子

本帖最後由 JustAParent 於 18-3-15 13:34 編輯

首先，呢個唔係對大學各方面嘅整體評級。第二，新聞標題 "LSE被評三流" 哇眾取寵，有誤導之嫌。第三，如果你或你仔女選大學最重要考慮係校園生活、宿舍設施、教學質素學生滿意程度等等，一開始就唔應該報LSE.LSE賣點係乜？憑什麼可以比牛劍還低的取錄率但仍吸引到大量各國頂尖學生報考，你仔女很清楚吧。

作出重大決定前最重要對自己老實，認清自己追求什麼。毋忘初心，何須比幾篇無關痛癢新聞干擾。

作者: bobbycheung 時間: 18-3-15 14:15

本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 18-3-15 14:16 編輯

loop 發表於 18-3-15 13:07
回覆 JustAParent 的帖子

Many of the universities that were given Gold rating were ranked 601 to 800 in the World University Ranking. One was even ranked >800. I don't think you can get much lower than that. Yet it's given Gold. If I were you, I wouldn't even looked at this so-called government-backed assessment.
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/teaching-excellence-framework-tef-results-2017

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-15 14:27

回覆 bobbycheung 的帖子

u are absolutely right !

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-15 14:29

回覆 JustAParent 的帖子

其實我，無咩讀過書。少壯不努力果ＴＹＰＥ。　　兒子比我清晰，　只係我庸人自擾

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-15 14:31

JustAParent 發表於 18-3-15 13:32
本帖最後由 JustAParent 於 18-3-15 13:34 編輯

首先，呢個唔係對大學各方面嘅整體評級。第二，新聞標 ...

作出重大決定前最重要對自己老實，認清自己追求什麼。毋忘初心，何須比幾篇無關痛癢新聞干擾。

以上呢段好金石良言！　毋忘初心，　兒子一直很堅定，開心左幾日，ＤＡＹ　１　已經決定要出發，係我Ｇ　Ｇ　左左　而已

作者: ninmum 時間: 18-3-15 14:39

回覆 loop 的帖子

節錄: 維基百科，自由的百科全書

至2016年為止，倫敦政治經濟學院的校友、教員及前教員之中包括了18名諾貝爾獎得獎者、34名各國政壇領袖、31名英國下議院議員及42名上議院議員。[5] 在2013至2018年的QS世界大學排名中，倫敦政治經濟學院在社會科學及管理學的排名上已連續六年榮登世界第二、歐洲第一。[6] 其管理學碩士亦在2018年QS管理學碩士排名中名列全球第七。[

由於倫敦政經申請人數眾多，它和牛津劍橋一起，是全英三個從來沒有進入大學入學（UCAS）最後補錄程序（Clearing）的三所大學。

以上資是從維基百科出來, 不是我或 LSE 作, 想詳細了解可上維基百科睇全文.

一間大學能教出18名諾貝爾獎得獎者和眾多國會議員都叫 "三流" 學校, 甘真係無話可說!!

作者: loop 時間: 18-3-15 16:15

回覆 ninmum 的帖子

Cannot agree more

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)