教育王國

標題: International School [打印本頁]

作者: poly1220 時間: 16-3-18 07:39 標題: International School

本帖最後由 poly1220 於 16-3-18 12:55 編輯

deleted

作者: NoahArk 時間: 16-3-18 09:56

I guess you don't have anything better to do.

作者: torunpoland 時間: 16-3-18 10:09

I do not mean to be offensive or rude. What is the point of having a chart like this? A conclusion that XXX tops, and YYY follows with ZZZ next in the table. Then? Does it mean that XXX students are better academically, and YYY and ZZZ are weaker in this arena? Or, XXX has a superior management while YYY is relatively poorly administered?

You mentioned, it is for discussion. What is the underneath area which prompts you to initiate discussion? Is it that what makes XXX the best interests you? Or is it what YYY and ZZZ lack to their counterparts? A discussion of this sort, which seems more substantial, is considerably meaningful yet a definite conclusion cannot be reached.

A successful IS (in a Hong Kong context) is one which helps kids to grow, and if possible, to excel in certain area(s).

Again, and sincerely, I do not mean to be offensive or rude. I am just skeptical about how a ranking like this does any good to EK members here. If my words are too strong, please pardon me.

作者: Shootastar 時間: 16-3-18 10:24

Every IS has its own strength and weakness. In fact, each school is an epitome of the society. It is difficult to compare an IS with a general ranking. If you want to compare different schools, you can compare their public examination results if they adopt the same education system (such as IB or AL). You can also compare their college placements. Yet, such rankings only reflect their academic strength; it does not compare their weakness such as the number of drug cases happened in a year.

In short, it is meaningless to set a ranking for IS.

作者: muimui2012 時間: 16-3-18 10:35 標題: 引用：I+do+not+mean+to+be+offensive+or+rude.+W

原帖由 torunpoland 於 16-03-18 發表
I do not mean to be offensive or rude. What is the point of having a chart like this? A conclusion t ...

Can't agree more.

作者: samsam123321 時間: 16-3-18 11:46

本帖最後由 samsam123321 於 16-5-22 23:34 編輯

del...

作者: 964000 時間: 16-3-18 11:51 標題: 回覆：International School Rankings

We choose IS because we don't believe in the Local system, which is obsessed in ranking individual students and schools. We believe everyone is unique and has his own strength and we respect each individual student and his own choice of school and there is really not much point to rank the schools.

作者: elmostoney 時間: 16-3-18 11:59

唔同is都有唔同特點, a覺得好, b可能覺得唔好, 最緊要係啱自己小朋友. 小學我個人鍾情細間d的學校, 但大校有大校好, 都係個人喜好. 純粹係觀點與角度, 呢種ranking對家長選校其實冇物幫助.

作者: Rachel710 時間: 16-3-18 12:48 標題: 回覆：International School Rankings

I wish EK have a "like" function! So I can "like" all of your replies!!

作者: 964000 時間: 16-3-18 13:35 標題: 回覆：International School

嚇到樓主delete了主題Tim

作者: Jane1983 時間: 16-3-18 13:58

可能樓主係新手，想收吓料，但人地重視也野，點排學校，對你可能無参考價值。搞吓搞吓，又變嘈交post，好簁氣。

作者: nintendo 時間: 16-3-18 14:07

搞到我好鬼好奇，樓主問邊幾間？

作者: torunpoland 時間: 16-3-18 14:32 標題: 回覆：nintendo 的帖子

樓主話（大概）：就他/她觀察所得，唔計ESF, 香港IS有以下排名。接著他就列出1係邊間，2係邊間，3係邊間⋯⋯好像排到7，之後問各位意見，有沒有補充之類。

作者: canteen31 時間: 16-3-18 14:42

I am really sick of the fact that Hong Kong likes to rank EVERYTHING! Stop trying to use your kitchen scale to weigh an elephant! It's meaningless.....

作者: lovecasey 時間: 16-3-18 15:21

回覆 canteen31 的帖子

welcome to HONG KONG

作者: nintendo 時間: 16-3-18 16:00

torunpoland 發表於 16-3-18 14:32
樓主話（大概）：就他/她觀察所得，唔計ESF, 香港IS有以下排名。接著他就列出1係邊間，2係邊間，3係邊間⋯ ...

嘩，七間咁多？
佢咁叻叻豬，熟悉七間？

作者: lui 時間: 16-3-18 20:54 標題: 引用：Quote:torunpoland+發表於+16-3-18+14:32+

原帖由 nintendo 於 16-03-18 發表
嘩，七間咁多？
佢咁叻叻豬，熟悉七間？

冇American international tim

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)