教育王國

標題: 德望不參與TSA [打印本頁]

作者: SoLM 時間: 15-11-4 17:55 標題: 德望不參與TSA

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: tingshun0135 時間: 15-11-4 18:12 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: HK2009 時間: 15-11-4 18:21 標題: 回覆：tingshun0135 的帖子

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

作者: 細芝麻 時間: 15-11-4 18:44 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

德望本身都好谷

作者: lauwingtai 時間: 15-11-4 20:09 標題: 回覆：SoLM 的帖子

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 21:00

Their P.1 homework is already much more difficult compare to P.3 TSA requirement

作者: LWTbb 時間: 15-11-4 21:27 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 21:33

LWTbb 發表於 15-11-4 21:27

how good? i had friend study P.1 now at good hope, their level is so high

P.3 TSA? their P.1 level is already more difficult then that

wake up parents! there is no heaven!

作者: Amymichelle 時間: 15-11-4 21:41 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

作者: LWTbb 時間: 15-11-4 21:42

CY0212 發表於 15-11-4 21:33
how good? i had friend study P.1 now at good hope, their level is so high

P.3 TSA? their P.1 level ...

家長選擇得GH就預左進取, 每人都有自己選擇權, 我朋友女學術程度高, 佢完全可應付, 睇過佢d功課亦不見得高過出面P3咁誇張, 何解要叫人wake up??

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 21:45

LWTbb 發表於 15-11-4 21:42
家長選擇得GH就預左進取, 每人都有自己選擇權, 我朋友女學術程度高, 佢完全可應付, 睇過佢d功課亦不見得高 ...

When i had time i will upload their homework for P.1 this year here.. and u can compare to TSA

i doubt you are telling the truth u know their level or not

as you say, it's parent's choice, not matter of whether TSA

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 21:46

Amymichelle 發表於 15-11-4 21:41

another simple minded parent without ever understand the logic behind here, good hope their academic standard is already very high

TSA or not doesn't matter

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 21:51

本帖最後由 CY0212 於 15-11-4 21:52 編輯

follow the simple minded parent's logic, we should protest against good hope... to stop them running their school with so high academic requirements

anyone going to open fb group and go protest against good hope?

作者: LWTbb 時間: 15-11-4 21:53

CY0212 發表於 15-11-4 21:45
When i had time i will upload their homework for P.1 this year here.. and u can compare to TSA

i d ...

課程有幾深, 我相信GH家長最清楚, 亦不需外人upload上黎，有人讀得到亦有人覺得追得辛苦, 唔明點解俾個LIKE都有人追住我黎回

作者: Amymichelle 時間: 15-11-4 21:55

CY0212 發表於 15-11-4 21:46
another simple minded parent without ever understand the logic behind here, good hope their academic ...

我明白吖,TSA已經變質,根本已經唔係原本嗰樣嘢!我亦知道德望程度非淺!只係高興又多一間學校唔需要花時間係呢d試卷上啫!絕冇其他意思!

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 21:59

回覆 LWTbb 的帖子

it's because as parent i hate politician use education title to fullfill their own evil agenda

and also as parent i hate some parent's are just so simple minded and is being used by those politician

TSA is non-issue

if anyone who willing to sit down and use brain to think about the issue we saw , it's all caused by parent's own demand

e.g.
let kid to attend two kinder
let kid to attend 5,6,7,8,9, 10 interests class
cambridge exam
all those other practice driven class
etc

作者: Mares 時間: 15-11-4 22:00 標題: 引用：Quote:CY0212+發表於+15-11-4+21:46+anothe

原帖由 Amymichelle 於 15-11-04 發表
我明白吖,TSA已經變質,根本已經唔係原本嗰樣嘢!我亦知道德望程度非淺!只係高興又多一間學校唔需要花時間係 ...

你講得好啱, 有好多人真係諗多咗冇謂嘢。

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 22:01

回覆 Amymichelle 的帖子

it's because good hope student already need to spend effort to meet high academic requirement, with or without TSA need

it's like you know a-z , will you bother to test whether you know a-z or not?

you will likely aim at higher target

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 22:03

回覆 Mares 的帖子

the source of problem is not TSA

good hope student no need to attend TSA, do you think they are more relax in studying?

answer is NO

so, shall we need to organize protest against good hope as their student need to study hard too?

作者: kennycwk 時間: 15-11-4 22:07 標題: 引用：Quote:LWTbb+發表於+15-11-4+21:27+how+goo

原帖由 CY0212 於 15-11-04 發表
how good? i had friend study P.1 now at good hope, their level is so high

P.3 TSA? their P.1 level ...

太跨張了

作者: LWTbb 時間: 15-11-4 22:07 標題: 引用：Quote:CY0212+發表於+15-11-4+21:46+anothe

原帖由 Amymichelle 於 15-11-04 發表
我明白吖,TSA已經變質,根本已經唔係原本嗰樣嘢!我亦知道德望程度非淺!只係高興又多一間學校唔需要花時間係 ...

對呀！大家只係對多一間小學取消TSA而讚好，希望這風氣會繼續！其他深層次問題係另一topic!!

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 22:13

回覆 LWTbb 的帖子

stop participate in TSA doesn't mean problem solved

the demand from parent keep the same, school don't need to attend TSA will had other practice to do the same thing

no different for student

conclusion is the whole argument to stop P.3 TSA is wrong

we should back to basic, focus on parent's problem

good hope student spend alot of effort to keep up their level, their life is not easier compare to school who need to take part in TSA

did you see the point?

作者: siden 時間: 15-11-4 22:16 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

唔see the point 果班人係隔離thread, 你過去點醒佢地把la

作者: kennycwk 時間: 15-11-4 22:21 標題: 引用：唔see+the+point+果班人係隔離thread,+你過

原帖由 siden 於 15-11-04 發表
唔see the point 果班人係隔離thread, 你過去點醒佢地把la

He/she has been there already

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-4 22:30

kennycwk 發表於 15-11-4 22:07
太跨張了

example...

one of their english P.1 homework (this year), give u sth like worksheet

their is a picture , and some words in it

then kid need to answer few questions base on their understanding on the picture, with full english sentence (written)

easy?

don't think so

my feeling it's like S1 homework in my good old day!

作者: kennycwk 時間: 15-11-4 22:45 標題: 引用：Quote:kennycwk+發表於+15-11-4+22:07+太跨

原帖由 CY0212 於 15-11-04 發表
example...

one of their english P.1 homework (this year), give u sth like worksheet

似乎這是錯配的例子，所以點解EK師兄姐經常提醒我們，不要因為學校名氣報名，要了解學校的理念，尤其報直資私校，這是有選擇的。

作者: frederickw 時間: 15-11-4 22:54 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: WKFai 時間: 15-11-4 22:59 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

之前選校沒有做好功課的結果，真係錯配。學校總不能為一少撮人的程度不足，理念不同而改變現有行之有效的政策。

作者: Tintin926 時間: 15-11-4 23:39

本帖最後由 Tintin926 於 15-11-4 23:40 編輯

LWTbb 發表於 15-11-4 21:53
課程有幾深, 我相信GH家長最清楚, 亦不需外人upload上黎，有人讀得到亦有人覺得追得辛苦, 唔明點解俾個LI ...

佢個名已透露佢係'梁粉'啦

作者: SoLM 時間: 15-11-5 03:35 標題: 引用：+本帖最後由+Tintin926+於+15-11-4+23:40+

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: SoLM 時間: 15-11-5 03:38 標題: 引用：Quote:LWTbb+發表於+15-11-4+21:27+how+goo

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: SoLM 時間: 15-11-5 03:53 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lauwingtai 時間: 15-11-5 04:42 標題: 引用：壓力會使人進步，但太大的壓力使人迷失⋯+

原帖由 SoLM 於 15-11-05 發表
壓力會使人進步，但太大的壓力使人迷失⋯ 學習是否見效才是重點！如果這樣多人反對，何不聽聽公眾意見？不 ...

作者: bobo101^*^ 時間: 15-11-5 08:45 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

作者: micmicmic123 時間: 15-11-5 08:49 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

佢跟本不需要參加

作者: 4001cc 時間: 15-11-5 08:53

CY0212 發表於 15-11-4 21:45
When i had time i will upload their homework for P.1 this year here.. and u can compare to TSA

i d ...

希望真係可以睇睇GH既作業,比對一下. 對正反都公道.

作者: Yanamami 時間: 15-11-5 08:55

CY0212 發表於 15-11-4 22:30
example...

one of their english P.1 homework (this year), give u sth like worksheet

GH从來唔容易，但家長唔係矇茶茶去為女女報讀？大家都清楚GH係点？無人被逼去報名？既然你情我願，有乜好呻又难又忙？HK仲有好多唔同程度同风格既学校~

作者: Ling2014 時間: 15-11-5 09:33

my daughter is good hoper and studying in GH now. I don't know the standard of other school. But my daughter can finish homework within an hour everyday. She likes the school and join different school team now.

You can use 3 to 5 words to form a sentence. for example, I like apple. I like to play basketball. I don't know whether this is difficult or not. But my daughter can do homework by herself.

The school teacher encourages reading. Apart from academic achievement, the school also focus on sports/ teamwork/ discipline.

For my point of view, GH is a good school and my girl is lucky to get the offer.

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-5 11:38

Tintin926 發表於 15-11-4 23:39
佢個名已透露佢係'梁粉'啦

係呀,. 我中文名叫黎知鷹... 講事實唔夠人講, 就想上鋼上線, 有心人好强呀

作者: CY0212 時間: 15-11-5 11:42

SoLM 發表於 15-11-5 03:35
不過佢d論點又好一般⋯好似得個「鬧」字⋯anyway, just me the past me.

...

係呀, 得個鬧字... 繼將我個用户名上鋼上線之後, 你地呢d 有心人就再扣我帽子

呢d 手祛, 師承一班人

作者: beagoodman 時間: 15-11-5 12:45 標題: 回覆：Ling2014 的帖子

識得考入德望的，都係K1、K2已谷學術還有其他興趣班，否則根本好難在考小一時脱穎而出。這些小朋友和她們的家長入到去會馬上鬆懈嗎？可能性甚低！

換言之，TSA根本唔會改變佢地已經行緊的"turbo" mode, 而佢地嘅要求亦絕不止TSA咁簡單。所以取消考TSA，只因真係對佢地無意思，唔好誤解。

作者: Mares 時間: 15-11-5 13:12 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

其實GH 一早就唔參加TSA, 唔係現在先話唔參加, 點解咁多槍口對住GH。

作者: IloveJJ 時間: 15-11-5 13:19 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: bubuG 時間: 15-11-5 13:35 標題: 引用：德望本身啲卷深過TSA多多聲啦！參加唔參加

原帖由 IloveJJ 於 15-11-05 發表
德望本身啲卷深過TSA多多聲啦！參加唔參加都無關係啦！

德幼同德小個gap 真係好大。

作者: ILOVEBEAN 時間: 15-11-5 16:43

回覆 bubuG 的帖子

Agreed. It's true.
公道點講句，今年小一課程比起上一、二年真的深佐，谷佐.功課多佐. （自從新Sister上仼後計）.對一啲一心諗住GH過往2年課程變得輕鬆佐嘅家長來說真係有啲吃力.
如果話入佐St. Mary, 天神而投訴課程深、趕就無話可說. 因為一向如此.

作者: 05baby 時間: 15-11-6 09:05 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

澄清一點，德望的課程根本沒有教深教快，全部用該年級的課本。學校的德育做得很好，相信是很多家長欣賞的。順帶一提，請不要將學校的教學資料上網，學校的課程不用給非用家評論吧 !

作者: winnietingting 時間: 15-11-6 09:13

kennycwk 發表於 15-11-4 22:07
太跨張了

Heard that cambridge mover is P2/P3 English level. Now many K3 child to struggle into DSS/private primary school have equipped with cambrige mover level. P1 child with P3 English level is not amazing!

作者: glo000 時間: 15-11-6 09:14 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

本帖最後由 glo000 於 15-12-9 16:31 編輯

我好鐘意德望，學校教得好，自動自覺做功課，學生有禮貌，德育做得好好。

作者: kennycwk 時間: 15-11-6 09:54 標題: 引用：Quote:kennycwk+發表於+15-11-4+22:07+太跨

原帖由 winnietingting 於 15-11-06 發表
Heard that cambridge mover is P2/P3 English level. Now many K3 child to struggle into DSS/private ...

我認為這是一個誤解，考到Movers甚至Flyers，不一定達到香港學制P3的程度。

作者: happybibi 時間: 15-11-6 12:41

呢度有好多家長話德望程度深, 小一已有小三程度(好誇張!), 而且功課量多, 其實有幾多是用家?

小女讀P3, 和阿仔(曾讀官小, 現上中學)的功課量比較, 完全唔覺德望功課多及深, 我放工回家前, 已完成功課, 只要我點齊就OK了, 默書+QUIZ 亦少. 阿女好亨受學校生活, 成日都話好彩唔使跟阿哥讀官小.

Sister講過佢唔讚成補習, 尤其是操練式的, 因此小女亦沒上補習班. 亦沒有考任何公開試.

作者: shadeslayer 時間: 15-11-6 14:23 標題: 引用：Quote:CY0212+發表於+15-11-4+21:46+anothe

原帖由 Amymichelle 於 15-11-04 發表
我明白吖,TSA已經變質,根本已經唔係原本嗰樣嘢!我亦知道德望程度非淺!只係高興又多一間學校唔需要花時間係 ...

你以為 GH 以前有操 TSA? 佢地使鬼操 TSA.

作者: skkeung 時間: 15-11-6 20:03 標題: 回覆：細芝麻的帖子

德望的程度遠遠超越TSA, 不用操TSA!

作者: bartsimpson0317 時間: 15-11-7 00:28 標題: 回覆：德望不參與TSA

其實好多名校都無乜點操求其一兩本練習。家長自理

作者: skkeung 時間: 15-11-8 12:07 標題: 回覆：bartsimpson0317 的帖子

是! 學校課程大大超越同齡, 但無人話是操! 樂於接受, 又不去示威!

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)