教育王國

標題: 耀中 kingston 邊間好？ [打印本頁]

作者: ccyung 時間: 15-10-9 02:15 標題: 耀中 kingston 邊間好？

耀中就一條龍，有哂幼稚園，小學，中學，同埋中學先買債卷

Kingston 1歲班要俾10萬發展費 no refund, 小學再俾十萬，中學要走入沙頭角。有冇家長中學去其他學校讀？

聽聞依家一定要1歲讀班開始讀，如果唔係就有排等，咁你地講得邊間好？

同埋係唔係兩間學校都係雙語？

作者: momo_cheung 時間: 15-10-9 10:20

本帖最後由 momo_cheung 於 20-4-16 21:52 編輯

....

作者: oooray 時間: 15-10-9 10:39 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

我想講嘅係：教育係十幾二十年嘅事，唔使諗太遠，途中變數太多，你自己要求一路會變，冇必要一歲未夠就把所有路線定落黎。
路係自己行出黎。十年前我都唔知咩叫國際學校，今天就變左一個番過7，8個playgroup,4，5間幼稚園，2間小學，一間中學嘅家長。
今天你做完功課，覺得邊間適合咪去試下囉。

作者: Sandrawcr 時間: 15-10-18 09:09 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

My son now in Kingston and YCIS playgroup , I think I will keep going those 2 school till K1, when we have to choose one of them, think I will go for YCIS. YCIS primary school is better than Kingston, and obviously my son is very happy in Kingston as well. And I still want him to be in Mandarin&English environment

作者: momo_cheung 時間: 15-10-18 18:45

本帖最後由 momo_cheung 於 20-4-16 21:51 編輯

....

作者: Sandrawcr 時間: 15-10-19 12:30 標題: 回覆：momo_cheung 的帖子

My son stayed in Kingston for 2 months and YCIS less than 1 month, quite difficult to compare now, we would compare them after CNY and see which one we prefer

作者: ccyung 時間: 15-10-30 01:30 標題: 回覆：耀中 kingston 邊間好？

Push 苦惱中

作者: Sandrawcr 時間: 15-11-2 14:22 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

Personally for kindergarten, I prefer Kingston

作者: Jumboshrimp 時間: 15-11-2 15:16 標題: 引用：Personally+for+kindergarten,+I+prefer+Ki

原帖由 Sandrawcr 於 15-11-02 發表
Personally for kindergarten, I prefer Kingston

May we know why ?

作者: sweetorange0000 時間: 15-11-2 15:23

本帖最後由 sweetorange0000 於 15-11-2 15:51 編輯

I think Kingston is way too commercial. As for YC, I was told that it takes in more students than they are allowed. Does any body know their class size, teacher to student ratio etc?

作者: etpianist 時間: 15-11-2 16:02 標題: 回覆：sweetorange0000 的帖子

I went to the school for visit. They have 8-12 students in class with 2 teachers (one western and one eastern) plus one auntie. I don't think the ratio is bad at all. This is for year 2 classes. I believe more students in the am class vs pm. But seems 12 is max.

作者: Sandrawcr 時間: 15-11-2 16:47 標題: 回覆：Jumboshrimp 的帖子

Compare with Kingston, YCIS kindergarten quite messy...the toilet isn't clean enough, classroom and toys not clean enough, compare with Kingston, and they speak Cantonese mostly in school. YCIS is definitely more commercial than Kingston. My son learns a lot in Kingston but nothing in YCIS...and u can see all helpers together with the kids in YCIS pg but half number of kids having class with their parent in Kingston pg. Very surprise that, in Kingston, every staffs, even the reception, they all remember each child's name within the first week of school! We can see they do pay lot of afford into the school and eduction. But anyway, YCIS is good in primary and secondary school

作者: Sandrawcr 時間: 15-11-2 16:51 標題: 回覆：etpianist 的帖子

I'm not upset is that, in YCIS, I didn't see more professional behaviors from the Chinese teacher.. Exactly the same as auntie, and both of the just play with the kids, just free playing, nothing systemic. I think YCIS is more free for kids to play and know this world, that's good in terms of nature development. My boy has been stimulated in Kingston for personally development and got very good improvements, can see the big gap between him and the YCIS kids now

作者: Sandrawcr 時間: 15-11-2 16:53 標題: 回覆：Sandrawcr 的帖子

I was about to say "I'm a bit upset..." Typed wrongly

作者: etpianist 時間: 15-11-2 18:54 標題: 回覆：Sandrawcr 的帖子

Totally agree in terms of pg so really depends what you are looking for. We also attends the pg in HLYIS which is also free play. I believe the western way of pg may be different than what some HK people would consider "good" or expect. But don't judge on pg experience alone. Most IS have a completely different program for kindy and primary.

作者: Jumboshrimp 時間: 15-11-2 21:09 標題: 引用：+本帖最後由+sweetorange0000+於+15-11-2+1

原帖由 sweetorange0000 於 15-11-02 發表
本帖最後由 sweetorange0000 於 15-11-2 15:51 編輯

I think Kingston is way too commercial. As for Y ...

21 -22 students with 3 teachers

作者: Bearbearlight 時間: 15-11-2 22:02 標題: 引用：+本帖最後由+sweetorange0000+於+15-11-2+1

原帖由 sweetorange0000 於 15-11-02 發表
本帖最後由 sweetorange0000 於 15-11-2 15:51 編輯

I think Kingston is way too commercial. As for Y ...

In what way is Kingston way too commercial?

作者: etpianist 時間: 15-11-3 08:47 標題: 回覆：Jumboshrimp 的帖子

This ratio is for what grade?

作者: Paulstella 時間: 15-11-3 09:13 標題: 回覆：etpianist 的帖子

24 students with 2 Cantonese teachers and 1 English teacher and 1 auntie for 2 year old class.

作者: sweetorange0000 時間: 15-11-6 10:10

回覆 Bearbearlight 的帖子

they charge 100 k development fee when you enrol, no refund.

作者: VVhuilee 時間: 15-11-6 18:24 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

我係Kingston嘅家長，好滿意，亦覺得仔仔開心上學，玩得來又學到野。普通話同英文都有講。

我當初我亦有報Anfield, TT, YCIS, 有去過YCIS info. session, 最後選擇Kingston主要係info. session時Kingston感覺很親切，強調著重語言發展，零功課，小朋友開心學習。

其實你問Kingston家長實會話Kingston好，問YCIS家長實話YCIS好。你應該去哂兩個info. session, 覺得點？

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)