教育王國

標題: 讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？ [打印本頁]

作者: ccyung 時間: 15-5-26 23:11 標題: 讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

如果我想幼稚園俾小朋友讀esf or kingston ,轉番出黎讀傳統學校係唔係好難會收？

作者: Patfi 時間: 15-5-26 23:23

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: oooray 時間: 15-5-27 00:30 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

你僅有嘅佢唔buy,佢要嘅你多數冇……
咁你覺得咁做有咩好處？

作者: FennieMan 時間: 15-5-27 05:42 標題: 回覆：讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

大抽獎實入到傳統小學，你自己去考就睇小朋友嘅表現，同考咩！入到要小朋友適應做功課先慘. Esf 幼稚園讀2年，冇K3, 所以你要諗埋K2後轉去邊間幼稚園讀K3

作者: Radiomama 時間: 15-5-27 06:47 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

若三心兩意，只會苦了孩子。

作者: himmamme 時間: 15-5-27 07:05

我估Kingston容易一點，因為中文強d.

作者: 964000 時間: 15-5-27 09:12 標題: 回覆：讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

Kingston還可以，因為有中文，但你只可派位，考直資會蝕底。
ESF轉傳統，真係會好辛苦，D中數追吾到，又慣了自由冇咁多規矩。
如果舉棋不定可考慮Victo

作者: ccyung 時間: 15-5-28 01:00 標題: 引用：Kingston還可以，因為有中文，但你只可派位

原帖由 964000 於 15-05-27 發表
Kingston還可以，因為有中文，但你只可派位，考直資會蝕底。
ESF轉傳統，真係會好辛苦，D中數追吾到，又慣 ...

Okok thanks

作者: zcbb 時間: 15-7-20 18:21

回覆 964000 的帖子

請問為甚麼考直資會蝕底呢?

作者: MewB 時間: 15-7-20 19:23 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

為甚麼當初要讀IS 既幼稚園？

作者: 964000 時間: 15-7-20 19:40 標題: 引用：回覆+964000+的帖子請問為甚麼考直資會蝕

原帖由 zcbb 於 15-07-20 發表
回覆 964000 的帖子

請問為甚麼考直資會蝕底呢?

而家直資考好多學術，又計數又重組句子

作者: lui 時間: 15-7-20 23:27 標題: 引用：回覆+964000+的帖子請問為甚麼考直資會蝕

原帖由 zcbb 於 15-07-20 發表
回覆 964000 的帖子

請問為甚麼考直資會蝕底呢?

直資考中英數小一程度，國際幼稚園冇可能追到！英文讀或者得既。唔好玩啦，為乜呢？

作者: nintendo 時間: 15-7-21 11:42 標題: 引用：如果我想幼稚園俾小朋友讀esf+or+kingston+

原帖由 ccyung 於 15-05-26 發表
如果我想幼稚園俾小朋友讀esf or kingston ,轉番出黎讀傳統學校係唔係好難會收？

...

Esf 只有 k1 k2，即係要讀一年 year 1。但 esf year 1 要考要 interview，唔係直升。然後，year one 一開學你又要安排考直資，到時又唔知收唔收。esf 始終中文弱，寫字又少。係你等派位，派位一定有得比你讀。如果唔打算一路讀上去，無謂入國際幼稚園。

作者: joycheung801 時間: 15-7-21 13:17 標題: 回覆：讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

esf同kingston你估容易入咩？咁難考到入去又唔一路上為乜？本地同國際2個唔同世界，你咁樣盞玩死自己個細路，一係你就上晝本地下晝國際，讀2年睇下點再決定，但小朋友一定辛苦

作者: 964000 時間: 15-7-21 13:42 標題: 回覆：讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

Kingston一入year1又要再比10萬debenture, 一年後又吾讀好浪費喎

作者: picture 時間: 15-7-21 19:14 標題: 回覆：讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

Why not ESF 搭Kentville.

有齊中、英、數，……

just kidding.

作者: 964000 時間: 15-7-21 19:25 標題: 引用：Why+not+ESF+搭Kentville. 有齊中、英、數

原帖由 picture 於 15-07-21 發表
Why not ESF 搭Kentville.

有齊中、英、數，……

有人做緊，not kidding

作者: picture 時間: 15-7-21 19:32 標題: 引用：Quote:原帖由+picture+於+15-07-21+發表Why

原帖由 964000 於 15-07-21 發表
有人做緊，not kidding

Oh my god.

Two extremely different styles. How does the child adapt from being Happy chirpy on the morning to have to glue himself on the chair in the afternoon?

作者: lovecasey 時間: 15-7-21 20:16

回覆 picture 的帖子

I have a friend is doing both local and international kindy, and compliant nothing is being taught at the international .

作者: tibbar2011 時間: 15-7-21 20:35

May I ask why you had such an idea? it doesn't sound like you are 舉棋不定 or else you would send your child to both local and international kindies right? sounds like you have a plan, but would be curious to know why so.. thanks!

作者: picture 時間: 15-7-21 21:48 標題: 引用：回覆+picture+的帖子 I+have+a+friend+is+

原帖由 lovecasey 於 15-07-21 發表
回覆 picture 的帖子

I have a friend is doing both local and international kindy, and compliant noth ...

Yeah hear that complaint often too from "tiger parents" who wish to go international route for.education but their mindset don't match up.

作者: nintendo 時間: 15-7-22 09:33 標題: 引用：回覆+picture+的帖子 I+have+a+friend+is+

原帖由 lovecasey 於 15-07-21 發表
回覆 picture 的帖子

I have a friend is doing both local and international kindy, and compliant noth ...

Exactly what she wants? Learn calculas and quantim physics in K1?
Fact is: a few of the kids in the same IS kindergarten is going to stanford and cambridge in 15 years' time.

作者: lovecasey 時間: 15-7-22 16:08

Learn English at the international kindergarten for 2-3 years then go to local primary

作者: wadh0988 時間: 15-7-23 00:08 標題: 回覆：ccyung 的帖子

Kingston better but still tough for kids. Friend's daughter went to a local school thru lucky draw after Kingston. Had a real hard time and had to repeat p1

作者: nintendo 時間: 15-7-23 12:10

lovecasey 發表於 15-7-22 16:08
Learn English at the international kindergarten for 2-3 years then go to local primary

Ha ha. Greedy parent. Believing that she can get the best of both worlds.
What she expect her child can benefit from merely 2-3 years?
Language is all about immersion. Long term immersion. 2-3 years is too short to have benefit.
I know a lot of people put their children in LS and IS kindergarten at the same time.
They might see that their children seem to be more advanced in terms of english level when they are in P1 (when compared to their peers). However, most children will lose their advantage (of being "better" in english) once they are in P3.

作者: bomani 時間: 15-7-30 00:52

nintendo 發表於 15-7-23 12:10
Ha ha. Greedy parent. Believing that she can get the best of both worlds.
What she expect her chil ...

Nintendo, I can't agree more.

作者: 964000 時間: 15-7-30 16:10 標題: 回覆：讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

If you target local and just want to attend another IS kinder to learn English, I suggest you to take some english based interest class like music, Legos, sports etc.

作者: licpd 時間: 15-7-30 17:39

lovecasey 發表於 15-7-22 16:08
Learn English at the international kindergarten for 2-3 years then go to local primary

This sounds viable to me. after switching to ls, you can keep up her English at home and send her to local schools that has non chinese students. I know people who do that but mind u chinese is also very demanding even in local English primary.

作者: sky_chan88 時間: 15-8-2 00:56 標題: 回覆：讀開國際幼稚園係唔係好難轉傳統小學？

My son goes to IS. But some of my fd's send their kids to local kinder and go to kbck in the afternoon. So far works quite well. KBCK no uniform, no homework buy 100% English environment. You can consider that.

作者: bbchu2013 時間: 15-8-17 17:29 標題: 回覆：sky_chan88 的帖子

Sorry what is kcbk?

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)