教育王國

標題: Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands [打印本頁]

作者: discuss 時間: 14-5-2 13:56 標題: Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

If we divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands, I only know CIS and GSIS will belong to band 1, how about the others? Please share your opinion.

作者: friendlyguy 時間: 14-5-2 14:00

crazy idea

作者: annie40 時間: 14-5-2 14:08

Shall we grade parents into 3 to 5 brands????

作者: munich 時間: 14-5-2 14:31 標題: 回覆：annie40 的帖子

Hahahaha!! Love your reply!

作者: NoahArk 時間: 14-5-2 14:37

Alert! Monster parents invading international schools forum.

作者: 田心 時間: 14-5-2 14:43 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

What is the purpose of it?

作者: Artie 時間: 14-5-2 14:58

NoahArk 發表於 14-5-2 14:37
Alert! Monster parents invading international schools forum.

香港真係好鬼好玩。

TGIF，HA HA

作者: FattyDaddy 時間: 14-5-2 16:28

Does band 1 stand for "most expensive"?

作者: Shummamapapa 時間: 14-5-3 09:37 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

o_O Its ok to have such idea, although I dont like the idea. I think we need to think abt the rationale and value behind the banding policy in mainstream school. It is just some technical means /technique for resource distribution. As far as I met, parents from IS are very reflective parents.

作者: annie40 時間: 14-5-3 10:51

回覆 Shummamapapa 的帖子

十分同意IS內特別多reflective parents.自己也算是也。
樓主的孩子應該十分年幼吧！新手家長對IS認識不多，常見是「想把最好的」給孩子，容易憂心忡忡。原意是希望孩子讀書少壓力，卻成了家長的「大壓力」，無情情的把壓力帶進生活中。好事變成壞事了。

自己是傳統教育的逃兵，逃出來的大享受就是看到孩子的純真友愛，他們的世界十分公正和平，不會攀比，亦少見自我菲薄。這些是萬金難換的素質，一比就輸了。

找間正常架構，合適家庭價值觀，又覺得十分舒服的國際學校便是了。所謂band one學校，也不一定是制造大量band one孩子的地方，就算是，剛好不是自己孩子，那又怎樣，魯忙的把學校分類，如同草率的把孩子分類，就算孩子入了人人羡慕的學校，如果未能保持赤子之心，必然產生格格不入的感覺，很快便自我迷失了。

作者: ikerberg 時間: 14-5-3 11:07

annie40 發表於 14-5-3 10:51
回覆 Shummamapapa 的帖子

十分同意IS內特別多reflective parents.自己也算是也。

very well said, Annie40!

作者: andrewwcng 時間: 14-5-3 11:47

annie40 發表於 14-5-3 10:51
回覆 Shummamapapa 的帖子

十分同意IS內特別多reflective parents.自己也算是也。

Choose the suitable, but not the best!!!

作者: GorC9 時間: 14-5-3 14:43 標題: 引用：Quote:annie40+發表於+14-5-3+10:51+回覆+S

原帖由 andrewwcng 於 14-05-03 發表
Choose the suitable, but not the best!!!

其實揀主流同 IS 都應該同等道理，揀最適合的就是了。

作者: ngwy 時間: 14-5-3 15:19 標題: 引用：If+we+divide+the+international+secondary

原帖由 discuss 於 14-05-02 發表
If we divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands, I only know CIS and GSIS will belong ...

Discuss不如選本地學校，有banding給你reference，唔使搞到在論壇比人笑。

作者: Jane1983 時間: 14-5-3 17:13

樓主如果好重視學術成績，可以爬吓舊文，有有心網友整理舊年各學校的IB成績，可以參考吓，又或者上學校網站睇吓university placement的結果，香港IS就幾十間，吾花好多時間。

每個人想法吾同，個個家長自己對吾同學校多少有點看法，甲之熊掌，乙之砒霜，你可以自行分等級。

作者: FattyDaddy 時間: 14-5-3 17:39

Seriously, I think a table listing out the costs (real and hidden) of all IS in Hongkong is more useful, at least it will allow parents to properly gauge which are the ones they can afford.

作者: feipow 時間: 14-5-3 19:16 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: mrshoho 時間: 14-5-3 20:11 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

Why and how?

作者: jolalee 時間: 14-5-3 20:57

Some parents here have checked on our dear "Discuss" as well --
註冊時間14-5-2 13:42
This thread was made 14 minutes after registration. If the thread starter thinks this is such a grand idea, he/she wouldn't have to use a new account to do so.... (and newbies don't start such type of thread either)

作者: ngwy 時間: 14-5-3 21:39 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

Where's discuss? ?????

作者: gm0824 時間: 14-5-4 09:52 標題: 回覆：annie40 的帖子

很喜歡那句"—比就輸了"

作者: Choisumwong 時間: 14-5-4 10:21

If your children have special needs, brand 1 schools will become brand 3 schools. I don't think so called brand 1 schools will provide much help. So, make no sense to compare schools. Only local 'tiger' parents do ! So sad !

作者: RayEE 時間: 14-5-4 18:30 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

It's never weird to have this kind of idea in mind and why asking such a question here resulted being teased as "monster parents invading.." and blah blah...

There are a lot of parents here answering others using "top tier IS", "second tier IS"... Are these top tier, second tier schools the same as band 1,2 and 3?

作者: ANChan59 時間: 14-5-4 19:12 標題: 引用：Shall+we+grade+parents+into+3+to+5+brand

原帖由 annie40 於 14-05-02 發表
Shall we grade parents into 3 to 5 brands????

Not enough, 9 bands can be better.

作者: Littleho 時間: 14-5-4 19:59 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

One should not compare schools linearly . There are many aspects you can compare , say academics , extra-curricular , facilities , etc . Only ants look linearly .

作者: sharons 時間: 14-5-5 00:39

樓主，不論主流還是國際，愉快或趨谷學習，任何一間學校能真正欣賞你家小孩，因材施教，那就是最適合你的band 1學校了

作者: oooray 時間: 14-5-5 10:42

Dear Monster parents,
It is much challenging to rank your children in his/her/their own class/school; and who are the top and the worst students in your class/school. Then, take actions (not just talk only) to defeat those who are better than your children and ignore those are worse than your children.
Being the best student in your school should feel more comfortable than just being a student in the best school (unless you are still the best of the best school).
Regards,
A EK parent

作者: 紅紅 時間: 14-5-5 16:40 標題: 回覆：Let's divide the international secondary schools into 3 bands

以我所知，其實LS的成績banding不是在於學校本身，分banding的是學生，所以所謂band 1學校成績好，其實都是因為學生本身比較優秀，很多時真的和學校的教學無關，所以LS or IS都好，school banding真的冇乜意思。

作者: JTmom 時間: 14-5-5 17:40

回覆 annie40 的帖子

Great comment!

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)