教育王國
標題: 看到偷曲奇餅廣告,再想起之前偷情廣告真是忍無可忍 [打印本頁]
作者: luluhaha 時間: 14-1-21 23:33 標題: 看到偷曲奇餅廣告,再想起之前偷情廣告真是忍無可忍
本帖最後由 luluhaha 於 14-1-21 23:46 編輯
今時今曰社會風氣真是將得不到就“偷“視爲常物(慣常事物),多數人看到就“平常心“或“正常“論?我看到將偷偷吃主題做廣告真是突眼,先不提創意者才盡,單是基本是非觀也沒,如果是電視劇情有非法或有違道德的情節,至少會有批判或糾正的情節跟進,廣告即沒預告及“家長指引“也無社會責任感時,讓家長與小朋友如何何自處?之前有男星拍的偷食廣告:本是同女士約會,突然接另一空姐電話即飛奔回家扮在家,這類講大話爲主題廣告居然堂而皇之,似社會風氣將專一男才視為無物或無能的價值觀戀愛觀婚姻觀都一一
一腐烂、怎樣創造一個正確道德觀給小朋友難道只是父母的責任嗎?不怪得這裏有家長總強調品德最重要,因為太多人己基本的是非己不分,如果識分,就不會有人假離婚拿公屋,還大大聲講“別人也如此做“,就不會認為講真話沒朋友,其實誠實與無禮貌是兩回事
我跑題,呻完。
作者: luluhaha 時間: 14-1-21 23:35
請問怎樣投訴電視垃圾廣告?
作者: huba 時間: 14-1-21 23:55 標題: 引用:請問怎樣投訴電視垃圾廣告?
原帖由 luluhaha 於 14-01-21 發表
請問怎樣投訴電視垃圾廣告?
http://www.coms-auth.hk/tc/complaints/procedures/tv_radio/lodging/index.html

作者: luluhaha 時間: 14-1-22 00:06
多謝、呼籲所有兒童及媽咪都抵制罷買這兩款産品,“殘忍的不止施暴者,更有靜默的旁觀者“
作者: luluhaha 時間: 14-1-22 00:08
我想我又是荷爾蒙不紊乱又要來了
作者: Jane1983 時間: 14-1-22 00:11
你是講丹x曲奇餅個廣告?
作者: huba 時間: 14-1-22 00:24 標題: 引用:我想我又是荷爾蒙不紊乱又要來了
原帖由 luluhaha 於 14-01-22 發表
我想我又是荷爾蒙不紊乱又要來了
夜啦,不要太激,瞓醒再繼續吧!

作者: Yanamami 時間: 14-1-22 08:27
本帖最後由 Yanamami 於 14-1-22 08:27 編輯
所以電視都喺唔好睇太多,且要家長指引。果d財務公司廣告更恐怖,借錢去shopping、travel、追女仔。。。。睇得多會中毒。
作者: 天瑜 時間: 14-1-22 08:53 標題: 回覆:Yanamami 的帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Yanamami 時間: 14-1-22 09:09
天瑜 發表於 14-1-22 08:53 
只提及易借,借完買多幾件靚衫;
好似唔驶還;
有楼就按埋層楼。
話呢個女友要送限量版手袋,果個又要去歐洲travel,另一個又點點點。。。。個朋友介紹他去按左層樓找卡數!OMG~~~拜托!另一個廣告,唔洗出街都借到錢,乜證明都唔洗。。。。too good to be true吧!
作者: awah112 時間: 14-1-22 11:17
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: MrBeast 時間: 14-1-22 12:34
我好耐冇睇tv.
何不turn them into teaching moments,不過咁就要陪細路睇tv,其實lei d ads pm 有冇十番?
作者: 20120808 時間: 14-1-22 14:17
http://big5.china.com/gate/big5/bbs123.blog.china.com/201311/12411944.html
韓媒:北韓數十人因偷看韓劇遭槍決
南韓傳媒稱,北韓本月稍早公開處決約80人,其中許多人是因觀賞走私進口的南韓電視劇而遭處決。
南韓《中央日報》引述熟悉北韓內政、近期才從北韓返國的消息人士表示,這80人是于11月3日在7座城市遭到處決。
這名消息人士引述目擊者說,在東部的元山市,當局聚集1萬人到體育館,在眾目睽睽下槍決8人。
被處決的人多數被控觀賞禁看的南韓劇集,部分則是被控賣淫。
一個由脫北者經營的南韓網站“北韓知識分子團結組織”表示,他們的線人數月前已通報北韓將有一波處決計劃。
在北韓,觀看未獲批准的外國電影或電視,特別是來自南韓的節目,屬於嚴重罪行。不過由於科技發達,愈來愈多人暗帶DVD與MP3播放器等入境北韓,當局難以控制。除了韓劇,據稱如《慾望師奶》等美劇也有北韓民眾追看,雖屬小眾,但都十分熱中。
作者: HKTHK 時間: 14-1-22 14:43
回覆 Yanamami 的帖子
係呀,所以我每次見到廣告,都會叫佢地睇下,諗下究竟人哋賣緊乜嘢,跟住個廣告商想佢地買啲乜嘢
作者: HKTHK 時間: 14-1-22 14:58
回覆 Yanamami 的帖子
Definitely! I like books on this topic, particularly liked Robert Cialdini's Influence
作者: 20120808 時間: 14-1-22 15:05
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Cialdini
Robert Cialdini
6 key principles of influence by Robert Cialdini - Reciprocity – People tend to return a favor, thus the pervasiveness of free samples in marketing. In his conferences, he often uses the example of Ethiopia providing thousands of dollars in humanitarian aid to Mexico just after the 1985 earthquake, despite Ethiopia suffering from a crippling famine and civil war at the time. Ethiopia had been reciprocating for the diplomatic support Mexico provided when Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1935. The good cop/bad cop strategy is also based on this principle.
- Commitment and Consistency – If people commit, orally or in writing, to an idea or goal, they are more likely to honor that commitment because of establishing that idea or goal as being congruent with their self-image. Even if the original incentive or motivation is removed after they have already agreed, they will continue to honor the agreement. Cialdini notes Chinese brainwashing on American prisoners of war to rewrite their self-image and gain automatic unenforced compliance. See cognitive dissonance.
- Social Proof – People will do things that they see other people are doing. For example, in one experiment, one or more confederates would look up into the sky; bystanders would then look up into the sky to see what they were seeing. At one point this experiment aborted, as so many people were looking up that they stopped traffic. See conformity, and the Asch conformity experiments.
- Authority – People will tend to obey authority figures, even if they are asked to perform objectionable acts. Cialdini cites incidents such as the Milgram experiments in the early 1960s and the My Lai massacre.
- Liking – People are easily persuaded by other people that they like. Cialdini cites the marketing of Tupperware in what might now be called viral marketing. People were more likely to buy if they liked the person selling it to them. Some of the many biases favoring more attractive people are discussed. See physical attractiveness stereotype.
- Scarcity – Perceived scarcity will generate demand. For example, saying offers are available for a "limited time only" encourages sales.
作者: Moneyy太 時間: 14-1-28 17:19
廣告有好有壞,但要教小朋友識分辨,而唔係所有都話唔比,應該教小朋友有critical thinking,當然父母都可以斷絕唔比佢接觸,但沒有好與壞,哪有好壞的差別呢?
作者: annie40 時間: 14-1-28 22:07
成人已經中毒,有人認同,才有這樣的廣告!商品的廣告愈多,證明利錢愈深厚,愈是無實用的高利潤產品。九成九點九九的推廣目標是誤導社會價值,催眠群眾。
應該避之則吉,少看電視為上策
作者: mesmerising 時間: 14-1-29 09:48
WHICH AD? WE DON'T EVEN WATCH TV, EXCEPT LIMITED DISCOVERY, PAID CARTOON AND SPORTS.
作者: 20120808 時間: 14-1-29 12:26
商業廣告如果设有誤導人類最高價值,我可以接受; 相反如果高舉道德價值而侵犯言論自由時,自己會反對。。。。。。。。。。。。

作者: Giraffa 時間: 14-1-29 13:01
最離譜係叩人按層樓去吃喝玩樂, 教壞人...
仲要大人細路都教壞個隻WOR~
細路就更加la, 由細個就洗腦"教育"按樓借$係好普通gei一件事, 灌輸歪理
歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |