教育王國

標題: Anfield vs Tutortime??? [打印本頁]

作者: Koeda 時間: 13-11-13 00:06 標題: Anfield vs Tutortime???

Why people all choose anfield not Tutortime?
Isn't Tutortime has more Chinese than anfield?
Which school has better academic record?

作者: G-girl 時間: 13-11-13 00:33 標題: 回覆：Koeda 的帖子

I think many people choose Anfield over Tutor Time because Anfield has primary school for back up.

作者: Mrslot 時間: 13-11-13 09:10 標題: 引用：I+think+many+people+choose+Anfield+over+

原帖由 G-girl 於 13-11-13 發表
I think many people choose Anfield over Tutor Time because Anfield has primary school for back up.

...

Agree, if not, tt would surely be a better choice

作者: minirat 時間: 13-11-13 09:39

本帖最後由 minirat 於 13-11-13 09:40 編輯

Mrslot 發表於 13-11-13 09:10
Agree, if not, tt would surely be a better choice

Did you have experiences with both Anfield and TT? Few parents I know whose kids attended both prefer Anfield over TT, not due to primary school backup. Anyway Anfield kindergarten students do not have direct entry to Anfield Primary.

作者: Mrslot 時間: 13-11-13 09:45 標題: 引用：+本帖最後由+minirat+於+13-11-13+09:40+編

原帖由 minirat 於 13-11-13 發表
本帖最後由 minirat 於 13-11-13 09:40 編輯

No but Chinese learning is much better in tt.
Although there is no guarantee of a place in primary, k students have some sort of priority? many ppl feel more safe with this arrangement maybe.

作者: Koeda 時間: 13-11-13 09:52 標題: 回覆：minirat 的帖子

Oh really?! They attend both school's playgroup or nursery class? Can u advise some details why Anfield is better. In deed, I think Anfield kids are more discipline than tt but surely the Chinese standard is higher than Anfield..'

作者: minirat 時間: 13-11-13 10:04

Koeda 發表於 13-11-13 09:52
Oh really?! They attend both school's playgroup or nursery class? Can u advise some details why An ...

Sorry, I am not saying Anfield is better but that was what I understand from parents who attended both before. My boy never attended TT, so I cannot comment. It is true that Anfield is an international kindergarten with disciplines. In terms of Mandarin exposure, there is only 30mins per day indeed but my boy can sing few Mandarin songs and utter few Mandarin words after attending Nursery for 2 months. This is good enough for me. Let's put it this way. It is the same 3 hours per day for each school. It is just different proportions of Mandarin and English. I seriously do not think it will make a great deal of difference in result. If it does, it is the teaching approaches. I have no question on Anfield in this aspect.

作者: hubbyhubby 時間: 13-11-13 22:34

My boy is studying pg in TT (Suffolk campus), I quite like the school, majority of the teachers there r quite gd, only one or two of them r bad.... U may search more info in EK regarding TT pg

作者: 964000 時間: 13-11-13 22:57

I think both schools are equally good but TT is more for LS and Anfield is more for IS.

作者: G-girl 時間: 13-11-13 23:25 標題: 回覆：964000 的帖子

Most of the students in TT go to IS.

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)