教育王國

標題: 有無人知今年 IB 成績如何? [打印本頁]

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-7 02:17 標題: 有無人知今年 IB 成績如何?

有無人知今年 IB 成績如何?

作者: big-boy 時間: 13-7-7 12:01

If you are a Logos parent , you should get this information from the school personally.

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-7 12:39

回復 big-boy 的帖子

I don't think there should be any doubts that both of us are Logos parents, based on the previous discussions and exchanges of opinions we made in this forum.

Sorry, I will not take your advice to ask the school directly. I also cannot find the announcement from the school website.

Please don't be too sensitive and take it too personal when you see some questions and suggestions put to the school here.

My enquiry above is of no bad will at all.

You are not the only one who wants to protect the school here. Since 2005/06, 武航 ,KenBaBa, deniset, I and several other Logos parents have been here to protect the images of Logos, but not blindly and with a different attitude.

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-7 13:14

本帖最後由武航於 13-7-7 13:28 編輯

I will say the result is very good for a new IB school. It's even better than some elites' first IB results last year. I left for school's formal announcement.

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-7 17:33

First of all, congratulations!

但唔明點解，咁多年來，學校有好成績，校方和家長都是隱隱悔悔，不大方說出來。

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-7 18:19

過去的安排我不清楚，Ib在昨晚8時始開估，今日星期天，現時網絡上個別學校的成績還是口口相傳未有官方公佈的。
我所知的我校成績還是轉傳過來的，因此還是由學校官方公佈較為合適。

作者: littlefaith 時間: 13-7-7 22:44

本帖最後由 littlefaith 於 13-7-7 23:12 編輯

今天從其他真道家長口中得知，真道最高分考生為44分，其次為43、42、40…… 平均考生得38.XX分，有待查實。
以一間嚴重欠缺資源，又在外界家長眼中並非正統IB school (因為沒有PYP同MYP)的IB school，加上教育當局以“行動”“不鼓勵”真道開IB，得到此成績，已經超出預期目標。真道人，繼續努力，不要被人看扁！

作者: fostermak 時間: 13-7-7 23:39 標題: 回覆：littlefaith 的帖子

摘自uncle dos，成績見得人，為我們初小家長打左支強心針
[attach]10874[/attach]

作者: littlefaith 時間: 13-7-8 00:00

還有一樣值得一提的是，真道的IB考生都是「自家製」的，十一年前由FS1讀上去的。不似某些學校，IB老師是用雄厚財力吸納，學生大多是從外界吸納過來。我記憶中真道都曾有學生中途被這些學校吸納過去。
DSE可以短時間「谷」個成績出來，IB則不然。IB是不可能在一兩年內「谷」到成績，是要從小訓練，這亦說明真道縱然並非正式PYP、MYP，但小學行IB的教育模式，是有其意義的。

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-8 00:38

回復 littlefaith 的帖子

Thanks for the sharing.

Congratulations to all of our students, teachers and parents!

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-8 01:30

本帖最後由武航於 13-7-8 09:06 編輯

回復 littlefaith 的帖子

http://www.uncledos.hk/blog/?p=7909
超出預期目標

消息真快，小弟認為"嚴重缺乏經驗" 是真，"部份資源錯配"亦是真；"嚴重缺乏資源"則不太認同；"成績超出預期目標" 確是喜出望外。

感謝老師﹑校方過去栽培，兒子終於畢業了，並會繼續升學。11年來在同一個環境成長，過程當中的沙石是很好的磨練。

一班相識於微時的總角小兒，共同經歷了11年的時光，一同見證這個11年不一樣的中小學一條龍教育，縱歷幾許風雨，大家由孩提時代一同踏上大學之路，情景實在令人感動。

祝願dse 的同學有美好成績!

作者: Valy 時間: 13-7-8 10:26

回復武航的帖子

恭喜!

作者: natnat519 時間: 13-7-8 21:35 標題: 引用：+本帖最後由+武航+於+13-7-8+09:06+編輯+\

原帖由武航於 13-07-08 發表
本帖最後由武航於 13-7-8 09:06 編輯

回復 littlefaith 的帖子

請問幾時有dse成績公布？

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-8 22:59

回復 BB144 的帖子

http://www.logosacademy.edu.hk/t ... xamination-results/

學校官方公佈了，星期六放榜，星期一出公告不算慢了。

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-9 00:28

回復武航的帖子

Thanks again for the good news!

Have your son decided to study abroad or stay at HK?

BTW, one thing I get confused is why there is 100% bilingual diploma. Maybe my previous understanding of the language requirements is incorrect.

作者: joyjoyparent 時間: 13-7-9 08:29

CONGRATULATION to Logos!
The home grown kids got flying colours in their first IB attempt. Well done!
We should all give thanks to the Holy One, the principal and the teachers!

作者: joyjoyparent 時間: 13-7-9 08:31

Logos has already posted the IB results on the school web. Let's celebrate with the students, teachers and parents!

作者: rosebud 時間: 13-7-9 09:53

武航發表於 13-7-8 22:59
回復 BB144 的帖子

http://www.logosacademy.edu.hk/tw/2013-07-08-ib-examination-results/

對一啲好似我一樣小朋友會在9月入讀FS1嘅家長黎講, 呢個公怖幫我地打了一支強心針

作者: 寶貝嵐嵐 時間: 13-7-9 17:31

恭喜.真道........ 100%入 U

是否讀 IB 著數過 DSE 呢 ???

作者: big-boy 時間: 13-7-9 23:34

可喜可賀，亦是對所有質疑真道教育理念的教署高官和其他開辦同類課程的名校的最有力反擊。
我們大部份都是來自基層家庭，沒有名車接送，沒有專科補習老師。靠的就是吃苦精神，老師、學生和家長共同努力，一分耕耘，一分收獲。

這 -- 就是 "真道人" !!

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-10 01:28

big-boy 發表於 13-7-9 23:34
可喜可賀，亦是對所有質疑真道教育理念的教署高官和其他開辦同類課程的名校的最有力反擊。
我們大部份都是 ...

請不要挑起無謂爭端，正所謂「滿招損，謙受益。」，我認識的真道人精神不是這樣的。請不要像一個「新發財」！

作者: Nozomi 時間: 13-7-10 03:01 標題: 回覆：有無人知今年 IB 成績如何?

本帖最後由 Nozomi 於 13-7-10 03:20 編輯

年多以來沒有帖文了，但今天也讓我來衷心恭賀！

2010年11月，小妹曾在此版看到真道的負面報導，審計報告，翻來覆去，在此平心討論一下，卻錯被有心人以為我偏幫真道，教訓幾句，十分可笑，曾有真道家長在此說我仗義執言，小妹感激不盡。2011年4月真道獲得IB accredited ,小妹討論幾句，又引來有心人教導我什麼是IB？

今回IB 放榜，取得不錯成績，那年的一口烏氣，隨著IB 放榜今回一次過吐了出來。

我是局外人，未必知道你們學校什麼，祇是本著多些關愛，少一點指責的心態在此理性討論，那時狂轟貴校的人的帖文，刻意中傷貴校的人的帖文，今回在你們兒女IB 成績的鐵證下，已經變成笑話。

大家也是為人父母,每個孩子也可教,就是這一顆同理心,今回喜聞貴校IB取得好成績，衷心祝賀!

繼續努力！力爭上游!

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-10 09:54

回復 Nozomi 的帖子

Yes, we remember your support and fair and good words. Thanks again!

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-12 22:58

本帖最後由 BB144 於 13-7-12 23:07 編輯

Just come back from the Parents' Evening.

Logos decided that, starting from the new IBDP Year 1 this September, students can choose either English B(Higher Level) or English A(Standard Level). This is a good move and remedy the present weakness of the IB curriculum.

School's representative said that they have read the web information.

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-13 00:02

BB144 發表於 13-7-12 22:58
Just come back from the Parents' Evening.

Logos decided that, starting from the new IBDP Year 1 thi ...

Those lower forms 師弟 should thank you as you did raise a good argument to the school with significant supporting regarding the weakness of ENG B.

I never though this informal internet channel is also powerful.

Anyway, it is a great move. parents need choices!!

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-13 03:31

本帖最後由 BB144 於 13-7-13 04:08 編輯

One more observation from the Parents' Evening last night.

The list of offers (universities + degree programmes) was shown to the parents. To be honest, with the excellent results achieved by our boys and girls this year, the list is not so appealing.

Maybe it is due to the actual choices of the students and parents, or the limitation of the English Language subject itself.

Vice-Principal did ask our IB students (at the previous Parents' Evening held in April this year) to take IELTS as the UK universities may not consider English B to meet their English language proficiency requirement.

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-13 03:46

本帖最後由 BB144 於 13-7-13 04:11 編輯

武航發表於 13-7-13 00:02
Those lower forms 師弟 should thank you as you did raise a good argument to the school with signific ...

But some big guy just thinks that I am criticising the school and ask me to get out.

http://www.edu-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2498895&extra=page%3D1
(13#)

In fact, I am getting out (but not due to his cruel remarks above) and last night will be my last attendance to Logos' parents' evenings.

Good-bye and good luck to all Logosians!

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-13 14:08

本帖最後由武航於 13-7-13 20:46 編輯

回復 BB144 的帖子

All the best anyway.

For the offers the MS4 made, they are not the most prestige programs for sure. However I believe it is not the matter of their competences but their interests. In fact, 40+ should have high chance for those prestige, aren't they? I suppose both of us watch the film '3 idiots', we respect and support what our children really like！ For my child, he opt. for Econ rather than GBUS （application of GBUS is still pending at the moment）and I am happy with his choice.

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-13 14:14

本帖最後由武航於 13-7-13 20:59 編輯

One more remark for IELTS. Even the students with ENG A like those from LPC take the IELTS. It is not strictly because of taking Eng A or B. FYI, IELTS is needed for GBS CUHK no matter taking Eng A or B.

http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/globe/admission.html

Besides, I do agree Eng A is harder than B but I don't agree an Eng B is 2 marks inferior than Eng A. Let's use IELTS be the standard benchmark, our student with "7" in Eng B got "8" in IELTS, students with "6" in Eng B got "7.5" in IETLS which are not bad at all. It's not talking about 1 or 2 candidates in Logos but almost the whole class. So, there should be a difference, but is it really significant?

I personally appreciate your points raise to the school and accelerate the set up of Eng A in Logos.

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-14 02:30

本帖最後由 BB144 於 13-7-14 02:37 編輯

武航發表於 13-7-13 14:08
回復 BB144 的帖子

All the best anyway.

For the offers the MS4 made, they are not the most prestige programs for sure. However I believe it is not the matter of their competences but their interests. In fact, 40+ should have high chance for those prestige, aren't they? I suppose both of us watch the film '3 idiots', we respect and support what our children really like！ For my child, he opt. for Econ rather than GBUS （application of GBUS is still pending at the moment）and I am happy with his choice.

Well, it is sure that we need to respect the choices of the students. My point is English B, even with a score of 40+, will limit the choices of the students. None of them want to enter a prestige program and try to make an application??

My comment is 40+ should have a high chance for a prestige program, but with only English B, some universities may made a devaluation. I am not aware of this limitation before until Vice-Principal reminded all the students to take IELTS. After that, I did some investigations and confirm the worry is valid.

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-14 02:33

本帖最後由 BB144 於 13-7-14 02:42 編輯

武航發表於 13-7-13 14:14

One more remark for IELTS. Even the students with ENG A like those from LPC take the IELTS. It is not strictly because of taking Eng A or B. FYI, IELTS is needed for GBS CUHK no matter taking Eng A or B.

As a general rule, English A to take IELTS is "additional", while English B to take IELTS is a "must".

I noted GBS(CUHK)’s admission requirement before, but the fact is they did intake some EAS students without IELTS.

By the way, “7.5” in IELTS is not such high actually.

I am afraid I have talked too much, especially people know that I am leaving Logos. I have to end my comments on Logos here.

作者: 武航 時間: 13-7-14 08:42

As the admission talks by HKU / CU made last year in school emphasized they accept ENG B for all their programs (until you show to us it is not for LLB HKU), so I suppose the ENG B is not a factor for our children for their program selection.

I am not saying "7.5" in IELTS is high, I am using IELTS as a benchmark compare the standard between A & B. A "6" in ENG B is roughly equal to "7.5" in IELTS, so the student with ENG A can make a fair comparison.

Well, nice to discuss with you. Let's end here.

作者: big-boy 時間: 13-7-15 21:50

本帖最後由 big-boy 於 13-7-21 17:02 編輯

回復 BB144的帖子

呵呵! 實力才是王道。一間新校最能得到外界認同和支持的方法就是良好的學生成績，有實力就要爭取相應的教學資源，這樣學校就能良性發展。如果成績失準，你相信外界那些批評學校的人不會落井下石嗎？不要天真的講甚麼謙虛和厚道，這是教小孩子的課文。

你自己把在真道讀書的子女，轉去Li Po Chun，本來無可厚非。但、你卻在此評論甚麼才是真道精神，請問你有甚麼資格？

本來我並不打算再寫甚麼，但看你的文章，由開始對我的批評大方回應，到後來處處找機會對我口誅筆伐，最後更為恐天下人不知的將有關句子標貼出來，如此手法足見你是一個陰險、虛偽和小氣之人，比起那些黑白分明的網上鬥咀，我更為卑視你。

你那篇港大法律學系的回信，我其實不相信。就好像是作文一樣，內容頭尾不連貫，亦無詳細資料去核實。

作者: JoJo 時間: 13-7-16 08:49

版主按: 請會員能冷靜及理性討論, 請勿在版面作出挑釁言詞, 如會員漠視版主/管理員警告, 違規會員會被禁言/封戶, 敬請注意!

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-22 11:44

本帖最後由 BB144 於 13-7-22 11:51 編輯

回復 big-boy 的帖子

對你的惡言指控，感覺「非常之沉重」。原本不值得回應，亦見你在受到「超級版主」警告後在17/7删去留言，但昨天你又貼回留言。另外，我有一名好友多番提醒我，認為不可繼續沉默，因為你的指控是極之不合理及帶有人身攻擊。〔在此，請問版主:會員在收到警告後先删去挑釁言詞，但數天後，會員又再貼上一篇內容挑釁言詞，是不是算作漠視警告？〕

首先，我不是因為女兒轉校，便開始向真道的課程安排作出批評和建議。在這幾年間，當我覺得校政有不足之處或有改善空間，我都會在家長晚會及Parents’ Forum 作出建議或批評。反之，當發現有家長在BK Forum 向真道作出無理攻擊，我都會和其他家長(如KenBaBa, deniset, 武航,等等)聯手捍衞校譽。但大家都是採取「擺事實，講道理」的態度，不會盲目反擊及惡言相向。對所有批評是「有則改之，無則加勉」。我們知道若下下惡言相向，反而損害學校形象，引來更多批評和指責。

所以，當我見到你那句「(20#) 對所有…..和其他開辦同類課程的名校的最有力反擊」，我便立刻叫停，就是不想引起無謂爭端。若有開罪，對你的感受有損，敬請原諒。

至於我引用你之前叫我「get out」的留言，牽引出我真的要離開真道大家庭，本意原是作一個小小的自我幽默。但可惜技術粗疏，可能又一次激怒了你，深表遺憾。

說回我當初為何要向HKU Law Faculty 提問他們對IB English Language B 的睇法，是源於彭副校在家長晚會建議IB 同學要報考IELTS(這事件我在另一留言已經講述)。當我知道HKU的要求後，因LAParents’ Forum已經closed，便在BK Forum 留言，通知其他真道家長，目的是讓大家知道有關資訊，大前提都是以真道學生利益出發。至於你懷疑有關e-mails是作假，我的回應是「真的假不了，假的真不了」，有HKU Law Faculty的e-mail address 和日期，不難查証，還我公道，所謂真金不怕洪爐火，你可向HKU 舉報我冒名行騙。

事實上，經我把問題提出來後，最終學校已儘快作出改善。結果是校方、家長和同學都是得益者。請不要把我當作「仇人」或「罪人」來看待。

都是那句:任何政策都有改善空間，應要虛心接受批評和建議，才會進步。

作者: littlefaith 時間: 13-7-22 13:55

BB144 發表於 13-7-22 11:44
回復 big-boy 的帖子

此所以學校嘅訊息，我會傾向選擇在FB家長群組發放，或私下聯絡真道家長，話哂BK呢度始終太公開。

作者: JoJo 時間: 13-7-22 15:24

回復 BB144 的帖子

違規會員發現當日回應對像出錯而更改內容，亦已自行刪除部份人身攻擊內容，版主當日已作截圖作證，對方並無額外補充違規內容，已發出的警告不會回收，如有會員再發表違規內容，請通知版主處理。謝謝！

作者: BB144 時間: 13-7-22 15:53

JoJo 發表於 13-7-22 15:24
回復 BB144 的帖子

違規會員發現當日回應對像出錯而更改內容，亦已自行刪除部份人身攻擊內容，版主當日已 ...

立論矛盾。

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)