教育王國

標題: 關於Net 12男仔排位,請賜教! [打印本頁]

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-7 16:07 標題: 關於Net 12男仔排位,請賜教!

I have several questions, hope that someone could give me more info:

1.  If either WY or St. Jo is put as choice 1, which of the following schools, in your opinions, has better chance in choice 2 ,could you please indicate better chance from 1-4.

Hennessy Am
Hennessy Pm
St. James
Precious Blood

2.  Anyone knows if it is true that for St. James and Hennessy Am, if they're not put as choice 1, they won't accept me " knocking door"?  If this is true, then this means it is useless to put them as choice 2, right?

3.  Is Precious blood academically stronger (i.e. better secondary placement in the past) than 李賜豪小學  for boys?

4.  Are Hennessy Am and PM still having 聯係 relationship with QC?  Is this relationship remained unchanged after they are converted into full day school?  Is Hennessy Pm a traditional type of school?

5.  For filling out Central Allocation form, if I omit some of the schools (e.g. either WY and St. Jo is chosen, then Hennessy Am is useless to put as choice 2), is it true that the form would not be completely filled out?  Learnt from other ppl that it is highly recommended all choices should be filled in.

Thanks in advance.

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-7 17:22

1. 軒上要堅好運至有份, ST JAMES應該第一都入唔晒, 軒下或寶血機會大D
2.  你擺第2, 唔止係FOR叩門掛, 唔通無叩門機會=直接唔揀?
3.  答唔到, 近年李賜豪上位中, D卷都好深下
4.  聯係QC應該仲有, 而家都未轉全日, 我估無人答到你以後既事, 軒下係傳統
5. 填唔晒, 如果TOUCHWOOD真係咁黑, 咪是但派一間"剩蔗"LOR, 講真, 同你派20志願無分別架WOR........

作者: tommythumb 時間: 13-1-7 17:58

Charlotte_mom 發表於 13-1-7 17:22
1. 軒上要堅好運至有份, ST JAMES應該第一都入唔晒, 軒下或寶血機會大D
2. 你擺第2, 唔止係FOR叩門掛, 唔 ...

版主已經講左好多。
淨係想講：下午校搬左之後，同 QC 關係無變，一樣有番咁多聯繫位，因為如果係搬走左就無左連繫，咁就唔使搞咁耐要搵番同區校址先搬。不過，會唔會基於其他原因(除左搬校之外)而減少連繫位就唔敢講。
北角官小上下午校分家都無影響中學連繫。

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-7 21:07

本帖最後由 daisy17772 於 13-1-7 21:07 編輯

Charlotte_mom 發表於 13-1-7 17:22
1. 軒上要堅好運至有份, ST JAMES應該第一都入唔晒, 軒下或寶血機會大D
2. 你擺第2, 唔止係FOR叩門掛, 唔通無叩門機會=直接唔揀?

Charlotte_mom and others:

1.  Which means St.James is even more popular than Hennessy am?

2.  The situation is if I decide to put either WY or St. Jo as first, then for choice 2,  I have to choose a school that

a) it still has certain chance for getting in
b) in case of failure, it allows me to "knock door" as long as they have rule like "They're being put among my first 3 choices" or similar rule.

As such, if Hennessy AM doesn't accept "knocking door" application if it is not first choice, and the chance for getting in as choice 2 is zero / minimal, then it doesn't make sense to choose it as choice 2.  Same for St. James, since if it is true that even chosen as choice 1 doesn't guarantee a place, it shouldn't be in choice 2 either.

Any more comments?

4)  Heard that Hennessy pm is more activities approach, is this true only when comparing to Hennessy am?  Or I have mistaken something here.  Please correct me.

Thanks.

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-8 10:10

1.  如果我無記錯派位情況的話, 事實係咁
2.  如果你揀佢第2, at least you have a chance of getting in. 如果純粹因為無得叩門而直接放棄, 你唔覺得本末倒置嗎? 難道你寧願揀一間有得叩門而唔係心水既, 就只因為有得叩門?
4)  no, 軒下傳統過軒上

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-8 13:31

Charlotte_mom 發表於 13-1-8 10:10
1.  如果我無記錯派位情況的話, 事實係咁
2.  如果你揀佢第2, at least you have a chance of getting in. 如果純粹因為無得叩門而直接放棄, 你唔覺得本末倒置嗎? 難道你寧願揀一間有得叩門而唔係心水既, 就只因為有得叩門?
4)  no, 軒下傳統過軒上

Thanks Charlotte_mom:

Seems in recent years, St. James become similar to St. Jo and WY, if it's not First choice, chance for 2nd is zero, so it's not practical to put it as second choice, although I like it over Precious Blood and Hennessy. But I have to face the reality. If St. James is more popular than Hennessy am/pm, then it's more safe to put Hennessy as 2nd choice.

BTW, does Hennessy am have certain chance as 2nd choice? I used to think Hennessy am has better chance to go to QC for boys due to it's more traditional, so my impression was wrong. Is it the Hennessy pm has 精英 class then? Or both am/pm has got it? I actually prefer Hennessy am since its chance to QC seems better than pm, and am school is preferred. However, since in 2015, both will be chanced to full day, so the latter consideration becomes less essential. Is picking Hennessy pm as 2nd better than Hennessy am then?

Thanks again.

作者: BabyAndre 時間: 13-1-8 13:41

I think you have to consider the no. of seats available for lucky draw in each school as well. For Precious Blood, there are only 37 - 38 seats available. If there are more than 38 applications put the school as 1st choice, even you put it as 2nd choice chance is also slim though I won't say zero. If Henenssy am or pm have more seats for lucky draw, maybe it is better to put them as 2nd choice. My 2 cents only.

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-8 13:55

BabyAndre 發表於 13-1-8 13:41
I think you have to consider the no. of seats available for lucky draw in each school as well. For P ...

Are the no. of seats published yet on EDB? I wish to know the figures too. Thanks.

作者: BabyAndre 時間: 13-1-8 14:38

本帖最後由 BabyAndre 於 13-1-8 14:39 編輯

daisy17772 發表於 13-1-8 13:55
Are the no. of seats published yet on EDB? I wish to know the figures too. Thanks.

http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/TC/Content_1519/2013dpnet-12r1.pdf

You should have this during the 1st round application, rule is 50% of seats will be used for 自行收生， it means the number of seats available for June lucky draw of each school is same. Therefore number of vacancies available for lucky draw is 63 for both Hennessy am and pm, but if during 1st round 自行收生 they need more vacancies, it is possible that number of seats available for lucky draw will be less than 63. For Precious Blood and 李賜豪, they have 38 seats for 自行收生, but if these 38 seats cannot be filled up during 自行收生 stage, it means that more than 38 seats will be availabe for lucky draw. I do not know the case of 李賜豪, but I know for Preciou Blood, all 38 seats are already filled up at 自行收生 stage.

Hope this helps.

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-8 15:10

而家連寶血都咁搶手......哎, 遊戲越黎越難玩
有個網有講小一自行QUOTA VS實際收生 (睇完似乎仲心驚)
http://www.myschool.hk/education-2-15.php

樓主, 我UNDERSTANDING係軒上活動D, 軒下傳統+有精英班, 既然入QC機會一樣(因為有聯繫位原因), 咁緊係去間輕鬆D, 而且家長一般覺得上晝班時間好用D (有錯請更正)

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-8 19:44

本帖最後由 daisy17772 於 13-1-8 19:44 編輯

Thanks Charlotte_mom. This is what I wanna know, i.e. the exact number of places available for lucky draw. But will there be an official numbers from EDB available for public's view, so to plan for lucky draw? 李賜豪 is not there either. From the table, 番禺會所華仁小學 doesn't specify am/pm, I suppose it has am and pm session which run by gov't allotment independently, right? Even 寶覺小學 has no places left in first phase. Really hectic!

作者: cyhh 時間: 13-1-8 22:34 標題: 回覆：關於Net 12男仔排位,請賜教!

如果1. st jo，2.軒下，3.李賜豪，咁樣會太進取嗎？雖然我小朋友只係k1，但我心目中打算2年後係咁排。。。

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-9 13:27

Just found this info on EDB website: 二○一三年度各小一學校網內的官立及資助小學名冊

http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManage ... 19/2013canet-12.pdf

作者: darkbson 時間: 13-1-9 16:25 標題: 回覆：關於Net 12男仔排位,請賜教!

點解軒上有62個位，而軒下只得58個位用來抽獎？
應該軒上熱門過軒下！？

作者: cyhh 時間: 13-1-9 21:35 標題: 引用：點解軒上有62個位，而軒下只得58個位用來抽

原帖由 darkbson 於 13-01-09 發表
點解軒上有62個位，而軒下只得58個位用來抽獎？
應該軒上熱門過軒下！？

...

今年軒下世襲多d

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-14 20:12

I have a question, if I definitely won't want my son go to Buddhist school, should I still fill in them? Is it if I fail in getting a seat at my higher priority schools (e.g. Choice 1-5), and I don't fill in any other boys / co-ed schools Choice 5, then if I can't get a seat within choice 1-5, I will be getting a seat from a schools that's still have seats available in any of the areas in HK?

Thanks

作者: zeno1213 時間: 13-1-15 22:03

tommythumb 發表於 13-1-7 17:58
版主已經講左好多。
淨係想講：下午校搬左之後，同 QC 關係無變，一樣有番咁多聯繫位，因為如果係搬走左就 ...

基本上軒上同ST JAMES都唔會有CHANCE, 頭3位應該可試軒下李賜豪及寶血..

作者: zeno1213 時間: 13-1-15 22:06

李賜豪我覺幾好, 我仔自行收生己經入左! 佢自行收生全部38個位都FULL!

作者: zeno1213 時間: 13-1-15 22:08

daisy17772 發表於 13-1-14 20:12
I have a question, if I definitely won't want my son go to Buddhist school, should I still fill in t ...

如果你入左間唔想讀既學校, 只可去考其他仲有位既小學!

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-15 23:49

Even though I won't let my boy to go to these 3 schools: 寶覺、李陞、嘉道理, should I still fill in their names in the form?

作者: scbhongkong 時間: 13-1-16 01:52 標題: 回覆：daisy17772 的帖子

It doesn't matter. The system will assign an available place to your kid automatically even you didn't fill in.

作者: qoo_pooh 時間: 13-1-16 09:07

daisy17772 發表於 13-1-15 23:49
Even though I won't let my boy to go to these 3 schools: 寶覺、李陞、嘉道理, should I still fill in ...

如果你無填晒咁多間學校,
若不幸唔中你填的學校,
有機會派去其他區更差的學校
所以教署叫家長要填晒本區可選的學校,
否則派去其他區上學仲不便

但net 12夠學位, 可能都係派返本區差的小學

作者: Jen123 時間: 13-1-16 09:55 標題: 回覆：qoo_pooh 的帖子

qoo_pooh : 這 3 間，比也不會讀！

作者: qoo_pooh 時間: 13-1-16 10:59

回復 Jen123 的帖子

其實net 12, 有多少非華語的學生?
有無地方可以找到資料?
如果他們選晒這幾間為首, 次志願, 照計唔多香港人讀喎

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-16 17:24

Thank you.

作者: mickfan 時間: 13-1-16 17:53

Of course in net 12 must try 1. st jo，2.軒下，3.李賜豪

作者: Jen123 時間: 13-1-16 18:12 標題: 回覆：qoo_pooh 的帖子

qoo_pooh : 我不知道！

作者: fanny1600 時間: 13-1-17 04:51

點解好似沒什麼家長選擇華仁小的？如聖若瑟放第一，軒上、下放二、三，還是華小上、下放二、三好一點呢？不過華小得很小位。

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-17 08:39 標題: 引用：點解好似沒什麼家長選擇華仁小的？如聖若瑟

原帖由 fanny1600 於 13-01-17 發表
點解好似沒什麼家長選擇華仁小的？如聖若瑟放第一，軒上、下放二、三，還是華小上、下放二、三好一點呢？不 ...

軒上2機會微（吾敢肯定係咪零），軒下3機會更微。大抽獎要識「得些好意須回手」，好多衰左派到無雷公咁遠就係吾識放手，全部擺熱門（人地2、3已經開始揀二線，你4、5至揀，渣都無啦）

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-17 08:40 標題: 引用：點解好似沒什麼家長選擇華仁小的？如聖若瑟

原帖由 fanny1600 於 13-01-17 發表
點解好似沒什麼家長選擇華仁小的？如聖若瑟放第一，軒上、下放二、三，還是華小上、下放二、三好一點呢？不 ...

華小2、3，我寫包單機會係零

作者: joannechow1031 時間: 13-1-17 09:04

回復 mickfan 的帖子

我家姐個仔, 當年(好似2年前) , 就係咁揀, 同咁排, 最後排咗去金銀xxxx!

作者: Ting0329 時間: 13-1-17 09:29

李賜豪同寶血邊間熱門些? 放第二/三位邊間穩陣些? 派位如何? 活動或傳統教學? 普教中? 多謝賜教.

作者: ttacc36 時間: 13-1-17 09:36 標題: 回覆：關於Net 12男仔排位,請賜教!

乙部軒上，軒下，華仁上之後華仁下，這個陣式如何

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-17 09:44

早2年李賜豪擺3應該OK吧, 我仔好多同學入左都係擺4,5之類

作者: CoffeeCake 時間: 13-1-17 09:44

寶血應該熱過李賜豪

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-17 09:49

ttacc36 發表於 13-1-17 09:36
乙部軒上，軒下，華仁上之後華仁下，這個陣式如何

NO啦, 再講多次: 華仁上/下/ST JO只能2揀1, 亦一定要擺第1, 呢樣係200%肯定的, 我蒲BK咁多年, 從來無見過有人華仁/ST JO擺第2可以入到, 擺3,4等同"自殺"

近年ST JAMES極力追上, 加上CONFIRM搬新校, 亦成為12網大熱之一, 應該今年都一定要擺第一

小一抽獎排位, 點排都唔可以增加入首選機會, 但策略可以減低DAMAGE (如果號碼唔靚), 所以第1搏咩都好, 無分別, 但2,3,4真係要好小心, 如果2,3,4唔肯PLAY SAFE, 繼續擺大熱, 好可能"西"左去後面D唔知咩學校架!

作者: joannechow1031 時間: 13-1-17 09:59

Charlotte_mom : 咁女仔呢? 已經唔揀瑪利曼第一, 如果放st francis or st paul 第一, 機會大嗎? 邊間機會大d? 謝謝你不厭其煩等回答!

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-17 10:05

睇返過去幾年派彩結果, SF會比SP受歡迎, 可能係全日既緣故, 加上前年(?)SF出左個女狀元, 而SP公佈中學轉直資又令一D家長卻步, 所以SP機會會較大, 舊年有人上呢度話自己SP擺第2入左, 佢真係超級好彩, 今年間間都多人爭左, 我唔敢講得太實, 不過GENERALLY SP機會會較高

作者: k66 時間: 13-1-17 15:52

Charlotte_mom 咁我想問下wy 得咁少位, 咁計probability 係咪st.jo 機會大d

作者: loveDD 時間: 13-1-17 16:03

想請教下ST JO P1-3係唔係一路以來都定為下午班?

作者: cann5 時間: 13-1-17 16:14

Charlotte_mom : 請問華仁上下除了上課時間外，有乜分別？邊間易中d?

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-17 16:36

以我睇, 上下午一樣咁難中

作者: Anpanmama 時間: 13-1-17 18:53 標題: 引用：以我睇,+上下午一樣咁難中

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 13-01-17 發表
以我睇, 上下午一樣咁難中

上下是但中一個都要感謝主!

作者: fanny1600 時間: 13-1-17 22:02

回復 Charlotte_mom 的帖子

charlotte mom
謝謝你的提醒哦，我之前計分階段選了st jo，咁即是我依家只得一個選擇，就是st jo了。那麼，第二、三我可以怎麼辦呢？

作者: gigi812 時間: 13-1-17 23:26

St.jo 75個位，WY分開上下午各28位，所以都當獨立一間學校計，就算wy上下兩間加一齊計，才56位，st Jo 都多19個位，可况wy是分開上下班計，機會睇落st.jo大d。WY得28位機會真係好細, 賭運氣！我估今年st jame 和軒下放第二都好險，play safe 多左家長放st jame n 軒下第一 ! 其實net12都係博第一，二位.

作者: daisy17772 時間: 13-1-18 14:19

So, in Net 12, for boys seems 4 schools to be chosen as choice 1 : WY, St Jo, St James, Hennessy am. So If I choose WY, and I decide not to fill the rest, I should totally not to fill in these schools in the form, right?

作者: littlekkl 時間: 13-1-18 15:38 標題: 引用：1.+軒上要堅好運至有份,+ST+JAMES應該第一

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 13-01-07 發表
1. 軒上要堅好運至有份, ST JAMES應該第一都入唔晒, 軒下或寶血機會大D
2. 你擺第2, 唔止係FOR叩門掛, 唔 ...

請問軒小聯系係什麼意思?有priority定必入?有沒有地方可看聯系數據呢?

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 13-1-18 15:52

http://www.chsc.hk/psp2012/psp_content6d.php?lang_id=2

直屬及聯繫學校:
直屬及聯繫學校制度主要是容許中、小學教育保持較大的連貫性，以及促進參與此制度的學校建立本身的校風。在現行的升中安排下，經扣除自行分配學位及重讀生學位後，在中學學位分配辦法的統一派位階段，直屬中學可為其直屬小學保留最多餘額百分之八十五的學位，而聯繫中學可為其聯繫小學保留最多餘額百分之二十五的學位。直屬或聯繫小學的小六學生如屬學校網第一或第二派位組別，而又以直屬或聯繫中學作為按學校網的第一選擇，便有資格獲派保留學位。亦有部分直屬及聯繫中學選擇取錄學校網第三派位組別的學生。若符合資格的人數較保留學位多，電腦會按學生的學校網派位組別及隨機編號分配學位，直至保留學位額滿為止。

http://www.chsc.hk/psp2012/sch_d ... ype%3DGov%26page%3D

至於每年真正有幾多入到呢D中學, 當然每年唔同, 雖然話有PRIORITY, 都要同出面爭的

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)