教育王國

標題: 黄大仙區某中學入大學率之疑問? [打印本頁]

作者: wkkelvin 時間: 12-12-17 12:24 標題: 黄大仙區某中學入大學率之疑問?

黄大仙區某中學剛轉英中幾年,公佈其DSE入大學(學位)率為75%, 但同時公佈其 "5科平均4級或以上(包括4科核心科目)"為57%。在不同途徑得知本年大學入學要求起碼要 5科平均4級, 不明白此中學如何入大學人數比最低達標人數還多? 有沒有這方面專家解釋得到?

作者: Marco-ma 時間: 12-12-17 13:36

wkkelvin 發表於 12-12-17 12:24
黄大仙區某中學剛轉英中幾年,公佈其DSE入大學(學位)率為75%, 但同時公佈其 "5科平均4級或以上(包括4科核心 ...

"大學入學要求起碼要 5科平均4級" >> 是政府支助八大學位....

"公佈其DSE入大學(學位)率為75%" >> 會唔會有好多是私立自資學位 ?? 如樹仁/珠海/恆生果d....

作者: wkkelvin 時間: 12-12-17 13:44

回復 Marco-ma 的帖子

它的網頁是這樣寫的:
成功入讀本地資助大學學士課程百分率 : 75%

作者: Shootastar 時間: 12-12-17 15:22

If my memory is correct, the minimum points (for 5 subjects) to be admitted to HKU is 20. For other universities, the minimum is lower. So it is possible that that school has 75% admission rate yet the percentage of its students of score 20 or more is 57%.

作者: Shootastar 時間: 12-12-17 15:36

For example:

The average score for Lingnan's BBA program is 4.05 (5 subjects). That means a number of students who scored below 20 were admitted.

All median figures for all programme of Open U are 19 or below (for 5 subjects). The median figures for some program were 17. So, a number of students whose scores were below 20 were admitted to Open U.

The median figures for most programme of BU were around 20. The median figure for B Pharmacy was 20. So a number of students whose scores were below 20 were also admitted to BU.

For PolyU and CitiU, they used weighed formula. A rough estimation on the figures would review that a number of students whose scores were below 20 were also admitted to PolyU and CitiU.

In case of HKU, CU and HKUST, I think it is very marginal to be admitted if the score is 20.

作者: elbar 時間: 12-12-19 10:57 標題: 引用：回復+Marco-ma+的帖子它的網頁是這樣寫的

原帖由 wkkelvin 於 12-12-17 發表
回復 Marco-ma 的帖子

它的網頁是這樣寫的:

會否大部份都入嶺南和教院

作者: jessimm 時間: 12-12-19 11:52

至少詨校升學輔導做得好,計算到今年double cohort下四年制大學學位(三大以外)有極多位(因non jupas集中係三年制)

作者: Shootastar 時間: 12-12-19 11:55

回復 elbar 的帖子

The mean score of HKIE is between 18 to 19. For one or two hot programs, the mean score is 20. For Diploma course, the mean score is 17.

It appears that there is no inconsistency of the figures by the WTS school.

作者: Shootastar 時間: 12-12-19 12:04

Because there is no more double cohort effect, the competition for admission to local universities would be more fierce for JUPAS or Non-JUPAS applicants.

作者: jessimm 時間: 12-12-19 12:29

所以今年睇入U率會被誤導,反而level 5 or above會可靠些

作者: Shootastar 時間: 12-12-19 13:21

本帖最後由 Shootastar 於 12-12-19 13:21 編輯

I cannot say the school is misleading the parents as far as the admission rate and the percentage of students obtaining score of 20 or above are concerned. They are facts (which I believe).

However, it is true that from now onward, we should focus on the results of HKDSE instead of the admission rate if we want to find out the students' performance in HKDSE.

作者: elbar 時間: 12-12-19 15:23 標題: 引用：Quote:原帖由+wkkelvin+於+12-12-17+發表回

原帖由 elbar 於 12-12-19 發表
會否大部份都入嶺南和教院

還有演藝

作者: jessimm 時間: 12-12-19 15:39

如果睇埋該校網上公佈資料,英文是這樣表達
Percentage promoted to institutions funded
by University Grants Committee 75%

並不是 percentage promoted to degree program funded by University Grants Committee

作者: wkkelvin 時間: 12-12-19 18:00

回復 Shootastar 的帖子

Admission rate is definitely the important indicator indicating the quality of the school. Since this school doesn't announce the details of the DSE result, I can only consider the admission rate as the consideration factors. But the admission rate is quite contradict with the real situation.

作者: Shootastar 時間: 12-12-19 18:30

回復 wkkelvin 的帖子

It is true that admission rate is an important indicator of the school's performance. However, the admission rate would depend on a number of factors which are outside the control of the students or the schools. For example, if one whose result is fine for science (if he put it as his first choice) but he chooses medicine, If he is not admitted to medicine and is not admitted to science (due to the fact that it is his second choice). This may affect the admission rate.

On the other hand, if one does not want to take the risk and applies for less popular program, it would boost up the admission rate of the school.

The average scores of the students, in my view, is a good indicator of the school's performance. It would be more accurate with the assistance of the admission rate.

作者: TKO2040 時間: 13-1-14 23:55

wkkelvin 發表於 12-12-17 12:24
黄大仙區某中學剛轉英中幾年,公佈其DSE入大學(學位)率為75%, 但同時公佈其 "5科平均4級或以上(包括4科核心 ...

樓主是指何X堂, 如果真的7X%入8大, 甘佢真係好努力, 事關6年前佢收既係黃大仙BAND2學生, 就算現在入去讀的中1生, 都係BAND1中游學生.
但佢網講過有幾十個學生入中大喎? (好似40人左右, 希望無記錯.) 如果是真的, 甘何X堂好勁囉!

作者: cow 時間: 13-1-15 09:42

本帖最後由 cow 於 13-1-15 11:00 編輯

--- deleted ---

作者: ChiChiPaPa 時間: 13-1-15 10:12

本帖最後由 ChiChiPaPa 於 13-1-15 10:16 編輯

wkkelvin,

www.edu-kingdom.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=35057&do=blog&id=1881

平均仍是低過保良一中。

作者: khmama 時間: 13-1-15 14:02 標題: 回覆：TKO2040 的帖子

相信4x人入中大係包括高考嘅考生，對於75%嘅考生分佈似乎仍是一個謎.

作者: ~蜜柑~ 時間: 13-3-8 19:21 標題: 回覆：黄大仙區某中學入大學率之疑問

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: JL3 時間: 13-3-8 20:14 標題: 回覆：~蜜柑~ 的帖子

蜜柑姐

作者: ANChan59 時間: 13-3-8 23:00

回復 Shootastar 的帖子

HKIEd, not HKIE.

作者: Shootastar 時間: 13-3-9 11:59

回復 ANChan59 的帖子

Thanks for correcting the error.

作者: yantung2010 時間: 13-3-11 20:49

其实一间学校好吾好要局內人先知識有人係香港名校区开補习社廿年前已月入十几万大部分名校生集团式補习社其門如市帮左学校吾少忙

作者: ANChan59 時間: 13-3-11 22:00

yantung2010 發表於 13-3-11 20:49
其实一间学校好吾好要局內人先知識有人係香港名校区开補习社廿年前已月入十几万大部分名校生集团式補 ...

名校都有不少不用補習！

作者: sheepmydear 時間: 13-3-20 11:59

禁多補習社都唔知邊間好?

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)