教育王國

標題: 急: THink (MF) VS 方方(KLN TONG) [打印本頁]

作者: jdbkk 時間: 12-11-20 10:16 標題: 急: THink (MF) VS 方方(KLN TONG)

就黎要比REGISTRATION FEE 喇, 請問大家點選呀?
係咪真係THINK好啲呢????

作者: babakenji 時間: 12-11-20 12:43

I will select am offer first. if for me. but base on yours.

作者: tuelovefei 時間: 12-11-20 14:00

is it am really important for child??

作者: jdbkk 時間: 12-11-20 14:03

tuelovefei 發表於 12-11-20 14:00
is it am really important for child??

就本人而論,我會選學校先, 因為AM /PM 可以調教, 但學校好/ 唔好, 無得自己控制....同埋我又覺得小朋友適應能力強過我地大人 :)

作者: jdbkk 時間: 12-11-20 14:04

babakenji 發表於 12-11-20 12:43
I will select am offer first. if for me. but base on yours.

如果兩間都係PM, 點選?

作者: siushun 時間: 12-11-20 15:07 標題: 回覆：急: THink (MF) VS 方方(KLN TONG)

請問方方幾時deadline 交費？

作者: Jingle-Bell 時間: 12-11-20 15:08 標題: 回覆：急: THink (MF) VS 方方(KLN TONG)

24-Nov-2012 (Sat) A.M.

作者: hosuper 時間: 12-11-20 23:20 標題: 回覆：急: THink (MF) VS 方方(KLN TONG)

Funful campus is old, dark...

作者: tuelovefei 時間: 12-11-20 23:31 標題: 回覆：急: THink (MF) VS 方方(KLN TONG)

我仲未決定到揀唔揀方方！但我們應否想一想讀書不是讀環境呢？我唔放心佢D校車就真！

作者: jdbkk 時間: 12-11-21 01:04 標題: 引用：我仲未決定到揀唔揀方方！但我們應否想一想

原帖由 tuelovefei 於 12-11-20 發表
我仲未決定到揀唔揀方方！但我們應否想一想讀書不是讀環境呢？我唔放心佢D校車就真！

...

我有朋友係入面讀緊，佢話大部份老師都係嬸嬸輩，雖然有經驗，但通常缺乏熱誠！我有時唸halloween佢地扮白雪公主都幾好笑：）

作者: tuelovefei 時間: 12-11-21 10:16

回復 jdbkk 的帖子

對家長唔熱誠唔緊要...知唔知對小朋友有無愛心. tks..

作者: jjson 時間: 12-11-21 11:21

jdbkk 發表於 12-11-20 10:16
就黎要比REGISTRATION FEE 喇, 請問大家點選呀?
係咪真係THINK好啲呢????

If money is not a concern, definitely go to Think, I like Think in term of its teaching style, curriculum and teacher qualification.

Fong Fong is definitely not my cup of tea.

作者: babakenji 時間: 12-11-21 12:20

you need to know what u perfer your children learning. I recommend as below

THINK is N / K1 / K2 is cantoness + 45 mins English (K3 have chinese)

Funful if international class is N / K1 / K2 / K3 is english for 3 hours, 1 hours for chinese

so AM/PM is not important

the course is important

and match your time to carry children.

作者: iriskwokmama 時間: 12-11-21 12:44

回復 babakenji 的帖子

as far as i know there will be eng/pth for K3 in THINK.

作者: jdbkk 時間: 12-11-21 13:26

多謝咁多位意見......我唸我都係會選THINK......

作者: mamath 時間: 12-11-21 16:57

jjson 發表於 12-11-21 11:21
If money is not a concern, definitely go to Think, I like Think in term of its teaching style, curr ...

Can you tell why funfil is so bad? Older teachers may imply that better experience? Is their language very bad? I am not that concerned about the school renovation

作者: crg 時間: 12-11-21 17:06

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: jjson 時間: 12-11-23 12:27

mamath 發表於 12-11-21 16:57
Can you tell why funfil is so bad? Older teachers may imply that better experience? Is their langu ...

唔喺話方方好差而係我的朋友仔女讀think 都讚好, 因我會問家長口啤, 如果只答ok, 我就未必會考慮，因為他們可能有其他不滿故只答OK，而讚好就會問原因。我自己幫小朋友揀學校唔會take risk, 會收集資料,問有小朋友讀過的家長。反而方方我唔識人在哪裏讀, 故此若兩間比我揀，當然揀有人曾經讀過及好評哪間

年紀大的老師是否經驗一定好，很難說，我反以擔心做了很多年反以冇乜熱誠，我反以喜歡年輕有三數年經驗的老師，哪圑火還在，不過當然不可一概而論，不過我沒有接觸過方方老師，故此以上評論只是我的觀點，並非對方方老師的評價。

另外,我記得很多年前方方喺好出名，現在被後起了秀如KM, HKPS, LH趕上，我不知道是否方方校長想低調，還是有其他因素

作者: TeriAnla 時間: 12-11-23 12:38 標題: 回覆：急: THink (MF) VS 方方(KLN TONG)

我係方方幼稚園和小學畢業生，我意見係程度非淺，老師有愛心和耐性，小朋友讀得開心。小學畢業都上到好中學或到外國升學，我自己係瑪利曼中學畢業。小學行IB, 小四開始讀中一課程。

方方應該唔係後起個類標榜考到名校，英普班個啲。

校舍舊就冇辦法。我都畢業超過20年。
希望幫到你。

作者: babakenji 時間: 12-11-23 14:45

good and thanks for your information. I will go there to reserve and study this school for my daughty.

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)