教育王國

標題: 立法會十八題：學生服務車輛安全 [打印本頁]

作者: ha8mo 時間: 12-11-7 12:35 標題: 立法會十八題：學生服務車輛安全

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 工程佬 時間: 12-11-7 18:42

其實重點係,作為"學生服務"嘅車輛有部份係"兼職"(或者叫一車多用),根本無限定座位設計,上落及門口,安全帶數量設計,等等是否合適供學童使用,還有有關人員有冇巡查車輛?一大串問題都答唔到重點,淨係見到d所謂議員同所謂官員玩問答遊戲...悲哀

作者: winniepoon 時間: 12-11-9 17:36

咁即係三個K1 or K2 的小朋友坐在兩個座位上而扣不到安全帶是合法?

作者: tws2010 時間: 12-11-10 14:13

回復工程佬的帖子

That's why I chose a school near my place. In my good old days, I lived closed to the school. After I was all done (including doing homework, taking shower and taking snack), my classmates were still on their way back home. Imagine, there was no MTR at that time...so I know it's not funny at all sitting in the school bus travelling a long time. I prefer my kid having more rest. Who knows what kids will be even they go to a very top school or schools at the bottom level...

作者: ha8mo 時間: 12-11-11 07:30

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 工程佬 時間: 12-11-12 15:25

回復 tws2010 的帖子

My kid's school is very close to our home, no need to take long-ride on school bus. I just express my disappointment on government and those Legco councilors after reading the article.

作者: ha8mo 時間: 12-11-12 16:37

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: tws2010 時間: 12-11-12 22:50

回復工程佬的帖子

oops, sorry. My misunderstanding...

作者: kamtsk 時間: 12-11-12 23:51 標題: 回覆：立法會十八題：學生服務車輛安全

搭小巴都要佩戴安全帶，小朋友咁細個其實應該坐car seat才安全。而家仲要3個人坐兩個位，手腳又唔夠長，往往會坐不穩，實在太危險喇！草菅人命！

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)