教育王國

標題: 究竟副學士定係高級文憑出路好D? [打印本頁]

作者: claudiaho 時間: 12-10-6 14:22 標題: 究竟副學士定係高級文憑出路好D?

如題，請指教！

作者: Jayelle 時間: 12-10-6 16:26 標題: 回覆：究竟副學士定係高級文憑出路好D?

AD係academic oriented，for升大學，HD係occasional oriented，for出來做野，睇你想要咩

作者: claudiaho 時間: 12-10-6 16:53

本帖最後由 claudiaho 於 12-10-6 16:54 編輯

For direct-in to 2nd/3rd year of university, which queue (AD or HD) is easier ?

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-10-6 20:31

本帖最後由 ANChan59 於 12-10-6 20:31 編輯

Jayelle 發表於 12-10-6 16:26
AD係academic oriented，for升大學，HD係occasional oriented，for出來做野，睇你想要咩

...

I felt most parents have wrong impression about AD and HD.

AD not purely academic-oriented, it's unemployment rate reduction oriented. How many % AD students can get into degree programs?

HD is vocational-oriented, it's a stepping stone for both vocational and academic advancement. HD students get in degree programs can be easier and higher % than AD.

Both are going through non-JUPAS.

作者: claudiaho 時間: 12-10-6 22:24 標題: 回覆：究竟副學士定係高級文憑出路好D?

Thank you !

That's what I want to clarify especially when those DSE students who can't get a place in university will tend to apply for a AD instead for a HD, saying that AD is a hope for future entry to university.

Does anyone know what's the % of AD or HD for direct-in to university ?

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-10-6 22:56

For AD around 10%, all depends on subjects:

http://life.mingpao.com/htm/jupa ... =jupas_method10.htm

作者: claudiaho 時間: 12-10-6 23:40

great thanks

作者: yeungsir2012 時間: 12-10-7 00:32

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)