教育王國

標題: DGJS and St. Paul Co-ed 喜歡收哪類型的學生? [打印本頁]

作者: janicebbb123 時間: 12-10-5 09:09 標題: DGJS and St. Paul Co-ed 喜歡收哪類型的學生?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: DiamondHill 時間: 12-10-5 10:03

Let me share what I know. Maybe not true, just gather all of the voices personally.

DGJS - smart, bright with confidence. Parts of them are with good family background, parts of them are stronge in academic.

St Paul Co-ed - good family background.

作者: eyschoi 時間: 12-10-5 13:40

What is "good family background"?

作者: shevachevy 時間: 12-10-5 14:05

回復 eyschoi 的帖子

我有個朋友個仔而家讀緊st paul co-ed, 佢個仔好叻仔, 富好奇心, 18般武藝, 對新事物唔抗拒, 聽聞成績都好好, 年尾有得上台領獎果隻。
我朋友兩公婆都係律師, 算唔算good family backgrd 就大家自己解讀喇, 但肯定o既係佢地都好栽培阿仔~

作者: jackjet 時間: 12-10-5 18:10

我朋友兒子是st Paul co-ed 學生，他只是一個普通小孩，並無個人獨突之處，但他爸爸是上巿公司主席

作者: steven819 時間: 12-10-5 18:24

I think both school loves kids who are smart, bright with confidence except DGJS prefers girls only while SPCCPS likes both boys and girls. Both school have kids with good family background and some of them are stronge in academic.
Actually, if you have a second child who is a boy, choosing SPCCPS may be a better move. But it never gurantee the second child can get a place in future.

作者: interview 時間: 12-10-5 18:48

本帖最後由 interview 於 12-10-5 18:51 編輯

正常每間學校都有個mix的唔會只收一類，差在多與少，點可以pin point一個因素？

有些有人事／社會地位
有些有特殊技能
有些純粹人見人愛，受教又醒目型

有晒以上因素當然最好，但都要看臨門一腳interview表現

就算有人事／社會地位的人，都不會鬆懈而唔培養個小朋友，所以小朋友本身實力唔會太差

不過理論上，DGJS非人事位（舊生／弟妹）會多些，因為是女校。有社會地位的人，就兩間都會報。

作者: LuckyHH 時間: 12-10-5 22:02 標題: 回覆：interview 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: steven819 時間: 12-10-6 18:08

SPCCPS is also very famous for preferring full time mum though there are a lot of working mum with kids accepted. I think all these school prefers full time mum. They usually come from a better off family as only one father can support the family. Full time mum are suppose to have more time taking care of their kids. Also there is a high chance for full time mum to participate as voluntary work in school. However at the end of the day, I think the performance of the child is the single most important factor.

作者: CoffeeCake 時間: 12-10-6 20:08

有小朋友讀dgjs，唔係ftm都會變成FTm.
有朋友本身係麻醉科醫生，2個女入左去佢都轉做FTm!

作者: interview 時間: 12-10-7 00:35

有很多因素，包括是否家底好，FTM，都是不能改變的，無謂深究。可以控制的只有怎樣培育小朋友。。其餘是眼緣

我小朋友都是coed 學生，我是working mom，中產沒關係一族。當然唔敢講我小朋友好叻，只是有運氣吧。

作者: creamsicle 時間: 12-10-7 21:18

兩間都鐘意bright and smart的小朋友，不過base on身邊朋友的仔女，好似co-ed都會收D文靜／學術出眾的小朋友，比dgjs更著重family background, dg就prefer小朋友有佢學校一貫的personality.

作者: momochiu 時間: 12-10-7 22:08

小朋友不用去刻意迎合學校, 太強求不一定好。而且現在都已過1ST round, 已成定局。順其自然, 平日係點就點, 小朋友都掩蓋唔到多少本性, 自然點可能更好。

作者: jerry117 時間: 12-10-7 23:41 標題: 回覆：interview 的帖子

I agreed with interview, I myself working mom and my son also accepted by co ed. Also lucky only but I think all depending on how you spend the time with your kid. And how much you want to be involved with the school.

作者: eyschoi 時間: 12-10-8 08:28

Definitely there are lots of factors a school will consider. Personally, I don't think full time mom has high weight as I know quite a lot of working moms in these schools.

作者: happymum1 時間: 12-10-8 12:34

聽說Co ed不收細仔細女，是真的嗎？

作者: steven819 時間: 12-10-8 17:18

回復 happymum1 的帖子

That's another rumour just like the FTM. There are a lot of 細仔 in the school. However, since the kids is only five years old during the interview, a few months older do really have some advantage.. I think the principal has already answered this question in the 簡介會 every year.

作者: tumtum 時間: 12-10-8 17:26

I think another difference between the 2 schools is that Co-ed openly tells you that they will reserve up to 70% of the P.1 seats for kids with relationship with the school.

作者: interview 時間: 12-10-8 18:04

Coed:

我估以前會多D細仔，這兩年好少，要轉做超大

夠錢我都想做FTM啊。。

另外其實那個70％ limit，係not more than，唔係要reserve70％。

作者: CoffeeCake 時間: 12-10-8 18:45

interview 發表於 12-10-8 18:04
Coed:

我估以前會多D細仔，這兩年好少，要轉做超大

但估計果70%都會用盡吧!

作者: steven819 時間: 12-10-8 18:50

回復 CoffeeCake 的帖子

They said that they usually not use the whole 70%. Actually they don't have to please those belonged to the related groups. They just want more smart, talented well behaved kids whether you are related to the school or not.

作者: CoffeeCake 時間: 12-10-8 19:26

steven819 發表於 12-10-8 18:50
回復 CoffeeCake 的帖子

They said that they usually not use the whole 70%. Actually they don't have ...

不過都與我無關, 因為我志在參與咋!但我識有siblings讀緊既朋友, 佢地似乎十拿九穩入咁, 我有時都幾費解.

作者: steven819 時間: 12-10-8 21:16

回復 CoffeeCake 的帖子

This is just like all examinations. It is not difficult to get pass but easy to fail. If you really work your kids well, you certainly will have more confident. I think there are more kids deserved to be selected but somehow they failed because they performed poorly merely in the interview. However, it is unlikely that the kid is not good and performed brilliantly suddenly and get selected. Don't be disappointed so early and be confident with your kid. This is far more important.

作者: interview 時間: 12-10-8 22:46

本帖最後由 interview 於 12-10-8 22:50 編輯

CoffeeCake 發表於 12-10-8 18:45
但估計果70%都會用盡吧!

只有學校才知真相。我只係唔明點解明明黒紙白字寫明，用意增加透明度的指標，好多人浄係見70%就會有完全相反interpretation。

只是我的感想而已

我都有細跟尾，壓力大過第一個好多。我完全唔覺十拿九穩，反而不敢鬆懈

作者: CoffeeCake 時間: 12-10-8 22:49

interview 發表於 12-10-8 22:46
只有學校才知真相。我只係唔明點解明明黒紙白字寫明，用意增加透明度的指標，好多人浄係見70%就會有完全相 ...

等入唔到既好過d, 有個借口比自己嘛!出發點係好既! (講笑輕鬆下!)

作者: jerry117 時間: 12-10-8 23:00 標題: 回覆：CoffeeCake 的帖子

I don't think they use up all 70%, I agreed with steve819. The school only want bright kids, don't matter if you're related or not. This year my son is in P1 and in his class most of the kids is not related. We have no relationship with the school either.

作者: CoffeeCake 時間: 12-10-8 23:04

但我個女, interview後識左幾個朋友出來, 響入面一定無behave到了! wakakaaa...

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)