教育王國

標題: 分析各區以往派位數據 [打印本頁]

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:47 標題: 分析各區以往派位數據

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 15-2-9 08:30 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:48

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 15-2-9 08:31 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:50

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 15-2-9 08:31 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:51

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 15-2-9 08:31 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:51

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 15-2-9 08:32 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:51

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 15-2-9 08:32 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:51

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 15-2-9 08:32 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:52

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 12-9-21 17:19 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:52

本帖最後由 iantsang 於 12-9-21 17:20 編輯

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-21 16:52

Reserved Space

作者: 小曳人 時間: 12-9-21 17:42

ian, 其實我唔係好明第3張powerpoint係分類... 你响邊度rate呀？

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-23 17:49

小曳人發表於 12-9-21 17:42
ian, 其實我唔係好明第3張powerpoint係分類... 你响邊度rate呀？

Popular schools = schools which have completely utilized their discretionary places stage seats. This is a logical assumption meaning that these schools have more applicants than their seats available = drawing is needed. Those which have seats left after discretionary places stage are less popular as whoever applied will get a seat right-a-way (i.e. those rated 2 or 3, and some of the 4's)

Then I compare the seats available from these schools and check if those are enough to cover the first three allocation each year (provided by EDB annual's report).

作者: chinmary 時間: 12-9-24 23:26

it's very useful!!! great thanks!!!

作者: carriebaby111 時間: 12-9-24 23:35

作者: dollyyuki 時間: 12-9-25 01:30

作者: Parisienne 時間: 12-9-25 08:21

萬分感激

作者: sheffield 時間: 12-9-25 09:17

非常謝謝！

作者: Clearsky 時間: 12-9-25 09:27 標題: 回覆：分析各區以往派位數據

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: bb86 時間: 12-9-25 09:36

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-25 10:11

Clearsky 發表於 12-9-25 09:27
Ian, 請問少班即多少人，大班又多少呢？
多謝！

小班　２５人

大班　３０人

作者: elmo520elmo 時間: 12-9-25 10:43

Ian Tsang : 超級有用，多謝您呀 !!!!

作者: 已刪除用戶 時間: 12-9-25 11:23

多謝哂你！

作者: littlefish334 時間: 12-9-25 11:41

Thank you Ian

作者: lovelinda 時間: 12-9-25 11:58 標題: 回覆：分析各區以往派位數據

Ian, long time no see
Thx a lot!

作者: WinP1 時間: 12-9-25 14:51

作者: whychan777 時間: 12-9-25 16:55

THANKS A LOT

作者: glorio 時間: 12-9-25 17:55

For type 5 (not 5** or 5*), does it mean all 20分 can get in the school, and no need to 抽?

作者: Stone2007 時間: 12-9-25 18:41

IAN, thank you for sharing

作者: Christi 時間: 12-9-25 23:21

Ian 好耐冇見, 一見你發現你啲資料好過趙X德(雖然今年唔關我事)...

christi

作者: kenix_chan 時間: 12-9-25 23:27

Thank you so much

作者: gigi1227 時間: 12-9-26 00:20

謝謝分享

作者: Nightman 時間: 12-9-26 05:06

Thank you, Ian.

作者: BBcarrie 時間: 12-9-26 14:13 標題: 回覆：分析各區以往派位數據

謝謝分享

作者: B媽-Blue 時間: 12-9-26 15:02

VERY USEFUL
我上年都係睇你d表分析

作者: B媽-Blue 時間: 12-9-26 15:05

glorio 發表於 12-9-25 17:55
For type 5 (not 5** or 5*), does it mean all 20分 can get in the school, and no need to 抽?

都唔係架,For type 5,20分都可能要抽架

作者: Justmade 時間: 12-9-26 22:35

本帖最後由 Justmade 於 12-9-27 15:56 編輯

glorio 發表於 12-9-25 17:55
For type 5 (not 5** or 5*), does it mean all 20分 can get in the school, and no need to 抽?

5** = 過往3年,每年世襲 > 30%學額，只有20%計分位，競選最激烈
5* = 過往3年,1-2年世襲 > 30%學額，約只有20%計分位，競選也非常激烈
5 = 過往3年均收足自行收生，差不多一定要抽籤，分數各校不同這數據看不到
4 = 過往3年,1-2年收足自行收生，較大機會要抽籤但較大機會能收較低分數
3/2 = 過往3年均收不足自行收生，較大機會交表便能收但也反映學校較不受歡迎

>DalaDala 以我所知, 如果突左30%, 係用大抽獎d位而唔會影響計分果20%。如有錯請更正
無錯，所以5**只有20%計分位 (50%自行分配-30%世襲 = 20%計分位) 5*不是每年都過所以有可能20%-2X%計分位。

作者: melodylee113 時間: 12-9-26 23:55 標題: 回覆：分析各區以往派位數據

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-27 09:28

glorio 發表於 12-9-25 17:55
For type 5 (not 5** or 5*), does it mean all 20分 can get in the school, and no need to 抽?

Type 5 would means their applicants exceed the number of vacancies which in turn imply, there are not enough seats for all applicants. It doesn't really directly tie to the points required but it would means there are not enough space. Often times, this means some or even all 15 pointers cannot get in for some schools' case.

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-27 09:29

Christi 發表於 12-9-25 23:21
Ian 好耐冇見, 一見你發現你啲資料好過趙X德(雖然今年唔關我事)...

christi ...

Hi Christi,

I cannot be compared to him! I am just a parent only!

Glad to know they are useful for your reference. Good luck next year!

Ian

作者: iantsang 時間: 12-9-27 09:31

Justmade 發表於 12-9-26 22:35
5** = 過往3年,每年世襲 > 30%學額，只有20%計分位，競選最激烈
5* = 過往3年,1-2年世襲 > 30%學額，約 ...

very good wor!

you heard my explanation?

作者: Justmade 時間: 12-9-27 09:43

iantsang 發表於 12-9-27 09:31
very good wor!

you heard my explanation?

Your first post had already explain the rating meaning, I just add in some elaboration.

My son is K3 now and I need to know the rule of choosing school.

I read your posts for data analyse, which is very useful and I had recommended them to some other parents in our kindergarten.

Thanks for your great work!

作者: silverbell 時間: 12-9-27 10:40

Thanks Ian and the other members for the information and the analysis. My heart starts to beat fast and I feel sweat on this not-so-hot morning. The battle is about to start. Relax....

作者: katherinelum 時間: 12-9-27 11:37

Thanks

作者: LuLuKiuKiu 時間: 12-9-27 11:41

作者: eaubobo 時間: 12-9-27 12:36

作者: lynndang 時間: 13-7-26 15:59

感謝分享！

作者: tonymeg 時間: 13-7-26 17:34

amazing data analysis

作者: gudbb 時間: 13-7-26 19:43 標題: 回覆：分析各區以往派位數據

作者: Bigpig_2007 時間: 13-7-27 00:21 標題: 回覆：iantsang 的帖子

Hi~! 真的很好，很有用！

請問我想找小班教學band 1有愛心學校給囝囝。本身95但可用40， 41 ，20分抽邊區好d…?

作者: horwing 時間: 13-7-27 09:48

Bigpig_2007 發表於 13-7-27 00:21
Hi~! 真的很好，很有用！

請問我想找小班教學band 1有愛心學校給囝囝。本身95但可用40， 41 ，20分抽邊區 ...

妳確定自己有20分? 通常20分代表妳你某校舊生或者同宗教的學校, 咁已經大大限制左妳的選擇.

大部分名校都唔係小班教學, 論愛心亦未必係佢地的長處, 先確定妳的取向, 再作決定.

最後提醒一句, 常住地址應該只有一個, 請不要借用他人地址, 小心因小失大.

作者: iantsang 時間: 13-7-27 09:51

tonymeg 發表於 13-7-26 17:34
amazing data analysis

Thank you very much for all the support but please noted that this thread was posted ONE year ago!

作者: Bigpig_2007 時間: 13-7-27 13:09

本帖最後由 Bigpig_2007 於 13-7-27 13:12 編輯

回復 horwing 的帖子

本身基督教, 基督教學校就20分, 其他就只有15分吧~

Band 1 ok, 唔使一線名校, 最緊要校風, 師生好!

我係怕TKO中學校網唔得, 而且一定搬.... 所以會考慮搬轉網九龍區.

Bigpig_2007 發表於 13-7-27 00:21
Hi~! 真的很好，很有用！

請問我想找小班教學band 1有愛心學校給囝囝。本身95但可用40， 41 ，20分抽邊區 ...

作者: angie0828 時間: 13-7-27 13:50 標題: 回覆：分析各區以往派位數據

Thx for sharing

作者: iantsang 時間: 13-7-30 09:30

Bigpig_2007 發表於 13-7-27 13:09
回復 horwing 的帖子

本身基督教, 基督教學校就20分, 其他就只有15分吧~

Please note that being a Protestant doesn't apply to all Christian schools. Each and every one of them can decide individually on what are the criteria (e.g. same church) to be rewarded the 5 points. So, you might have made an assumption that you have 5 points for all of them but in reality this is not true.

On the contrary, all Catholics have 5 points for all Catholic schools.

作者: sadsam 時間: 13-7-30 09:57

想問下那虐數據是從何得知?同準確度高嗎?

作者: iantsang 時間: 13-7-30 11:23

sadsam 發表於 13-7-30 09:57
想問下那虐數據是從何得知?同準確度高嗎?

These are public data that are issued from EDB every year in the annual report. However, these data are only available for one year as the link to reports from previous year will be removed by the more updated one. So, they need to be collected over few years.

Of course there are further calculations and analysis being performed based on the raw data.

作者: sadsam 時間: 13-7-30 11:42

iantsang 發表於 13-7-30 11:23
These are public data that are issued from EDB every year in the annual report. However, these data ...

多謝你無私同我地分享呀!

作者: Eileenknn 時間: 13-7-30 11:55 標題: 回覆：iantsang 的帖子

:loveliness:

作者: mamath 時間: 13-8-1 11:09

iantsang 發表於 13-7-30 11:23
These are public data that are issued from EDB every year in the annual report. However, these data ...

請問有沒大途徑得知個別學校自行階段收取的學生是多少分(e.g. 30, 25、20)? Thanks.

作者: Harebellv 時間: 13-8-1 11:54

本帖最後由 Harebellv 於 13-8-1 11:56 編輯

iantsang 發表於 13-7-30 11:23
These are public data that are issued from EDB every year in the annual report. However, these data ...

我都想知有沒有途徑可知道每間學校自行收生25 / 20 / 15分所佔比率, 因為唔敢太博

作者: iantsang 時間: 13-8-1 11:57

mamath 發表於 13-8-1 11:09
請問有沒大途徑得知個別學校自行階段收取的學生是多少分(e.g. 30, 25、20)? Thanks.
...

sorry, 沒有

作者: king.bo88 時間: 13-8-1 13:33

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)