教育王國
標題: 請問有冇人知小學會唔會轉直資? [打印本頁]
作者: natalietyk 時間: 12-9-20 23:58 標題: 請問有冇人知小學會唔會轉直資?
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: y2kyiu 時間: 12-9-22 13:49
校長無講到，只講計畫2014轉全日，你可到學校網頁睇睇。
作者: avbee 時間: 12-9-26 12:54
i don't think so
作者: 七點半 時間: 12-9-27 11:16
回復 avbee 的帖子
我覺得遲早都會轉, 不過, 剛剛才向政府申請轉全日, 起碼都要完成這個project先......
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-9-27 20:09 標題: 回覆：請問有冇人知小學會唔會轉直資?
我就不睇好中小學轉直資！
除非喺教學上有好大突破及學費吸引！
作者: 七點半 時間: 12-9-28 00:31
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
無法啦，成日話係要攞返自主權
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-9-28 18:57
七點半 發表於 12-9-28 00:31 
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
無法啦，成日話係要攞返自主權
作者: 七點半 時間: 12-10-3 12:06
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
講係咁講, 但點解其他天主教學校(聖芳濟各, 聖心, 瑪利曼及其他等熱門學校)都暫時無轉制?
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-10-4 00:28
回復 七點半 的帖子
簡單啲講，中學嚴棄小學，要脫離關係！話就話提升！連第一輪自行都一個都唔比小學部就明啦！
聖心書院第一輪全收自己人（聖小）！
convent 主科合格就上番中學！
你會覺得 sp sec 會跟一樣？！
作者: 七點半 時間: 12-10-4 17:45
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
Oh No. 中學校長唔似咁樣.....我地小學d學生好差咩? 我唔覺wor......
只不過中小學都各自換左校長, 就搞成咁??
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-10-4 21:45
回復 七點半 的帖子
我不太認識中學，亦是純粹個人推斷！中學突然轉直資，都冇咨詢小學當期時嘅家長，及聽取各方意見！
令到很多家長醋手不及！可能部分一早收到風！
作者: princesscharnee 時間: 12-10-8 16:51
作者: daisy17772 時間: 12-10-8 19:39
pooh仔 發表於 12-10-4 00:28
回復 七點半 的帖子
連第一輪自行都一個都唔比小學
部就明啦！ ...
Could you please further elaborate? From which source that you had this information from? Thanks.
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-10-8 23:34 標題: 引用：Quote:pooh仔+發表於+12-10-4+00:28+回復+
原帖由 daisy17772 於 12-10-08 發表
Could you please further elaborate? From which source that you had this information from? Thanks. ...
http://www.edu-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2372738&extra=page%3D1
作者: daisy17772 時間: 12-10-9 11:02
I don't have much ideas about secondary gov't allocation. But it seems that even the Secondary takes students from other schools in 自行, but then most students from the Primary still got promoted to the Secondary ! Have you figured out how?
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-10-9 14:36 標題: 回覆：daisy17772 的帖子
以st paul sec 為例：
36p x 5classes =180seats
-5% repeat = 10
-30% 1st round 自行 = 54
- 85% 2nd round 大抽獎 = 99 (直屬位）
- 17 seats 非保留位
小學 4classes x 32=128p
99/128 = 77.34%
如中學一個都唔收小學，咁即係得99個位保證！基本band 1生喺入硬， band 2 生就要視乎有幾多，如多過剩餘保留位就要抽，話明抽即喺有人歡笑有人愁！奌解呢？！就喺好彩band 2c 抽入； band 2a 抽唔入！
如在第一輪中學部收多小小，咁喺咪皆大歡喜囉！
作者: Rattie 時間: 12-10-10 14:02
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
99 (直屬位）已經多過好多其他直屬中學
有 band1 學生升去其他學校
咁升唔返隔離其實真係好少數
作者: daisy17772 時間: 12-10-10 15:33
Rattie 發表於 12-10-10 14:02
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
99 (直屬位）已經多過好多其他直屬中學
Hope you can give me more info. So these 99 (直屬位）are in fact given out in 2nd round 大抽獎 right? As I'm not familiar with secondary gov't allocation. Can you tell me whether there're students from other schools join this 2nd round lucky? Or are these 直屬位 solely reserved for SPPCS? If this is so, then therefore students from SPPCS could be excluded from first phase discretionary placing?
Thanks
作者: Rattie 時間: 12-10-10 18:37
daisy17772 發表於 12-10-10 15:33
Rattie:
Hope you can give me more info. So these 99 (直屬位）are in fact given out in 2nd round 大 ...
經扣除重讀生及自行分配學位後，在統一派位階段，直屬中學可為其直屬小學保留最多餘額85%的學位，而聯繫中學可為其聯繫小學保留最多餘額25%的學位。
yes, 85% which = 99 seats are reserved exclusively for sppcs students during the 2nd round lucky draw stage
I first heard about this news that spss did not consider sppcs students in the discretionary stage were from a sppcs teacher 5 years ago when my girl was at p4
then this was further confirmed by parents who attended the S1 briefing from the principal of spss 2 years later
however, some parents and sppcs teachers insisted that spss in fact would take sppcs top students in the discretionary stage
whether this is true or not I'm afraid nobody knows except spss
there are over 100 sppcs students promoted to spss each year - well, to me, only this matters
don't you agree?
作者: piggy-ma 時間: 12-10-11 09:53
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
何解會認為SPSS嫌棄自己的直屬小學生呢？
每年 over 80% 同學升過隔離，有幾多間直屬中學會收如此高%？
還有些自願轉會的同學(Co-ed、英華、BPS)，計吓計吓，只有bottom 10%才碌唔入SPSS。
你囡囡幾年級？有去小五小六的家長會嗎？正副校長的 message 才 official 吧。
當日，我深深感到學校希望班小姐升過隔離的。
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-10-11 23:09 標題: 引用：回復+pooh仔+的帖子
何解會認為SPSS嫌棄自
原帖由 piggy-ma 於 12-10-11 發表
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
何解會認為SPSS嫌棄自己的直屬小學生呢？
小學校長引述中學校長話都喜歡我哋小學部嘅學生，但大前提喺成績叻！
我嘅感覺就喺講咗=冇講！（心裡十分不舒服）
作者: piggy-ma 時間: 12-10-12 14:00
回復 pooh仔 的帖子
校長希望學生成績叻，好正常啦，我們都希望女兒成績叻啦。
SPSS 是 Band 1 EMI，成績未叻，勉強入讀會辛苦呢。小學打好基礎，升中讀得順心又開心。
作者: Rattie 時間: 12-10-12 14:15
有時有啲老師會勸告家長／女女選擇第二啲學校
本意係唔想佢哋讀得太辛苦
但係又有幾多家長／女女願意放棄 spss 呢
自問自己都做唔到
始終希望佢入到去跟得上唔好冧班唔好學壞就算
學校傳傳轉直資都真係傳咗好多年
九年前小一家長會都已經有家長提問過
中學話轉就轉的確係令到好多小學家長企咗晌樹
唯一可以做嘅睇怕都係好好裝備女兒
希望個選擇權在自己手
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-10-12 14:33 標題: 引用：有時有啲老師會勸告家長／女女選擇第二啲學
原帖由 Rattie 於 12-10-12 發表
有時有啲老師會勸告家長／女女選擇第二啲學校
本意係唔想佢哋讀得太辛苦
但係又有幾多家長／女女願意放棄 s ...
作者: Rattie 時間: 12-10-12 14:51
pooh仔 發表於 12-10-12 14:33
我而家咪好好裝備女𠒇，讀得叻就話事權在自己手！
每間學校都有自己教學嘅一套
希望你相信學校，家長嘅配合幾重要吓
假若認為學校嘅教學唔適合女兒
咁不如早走早著，反正到升中到時隔離已轉直資
sppcs 唔易讀，spss 更甚
直屬中學要保持一定嘅水平，又要接收大量直屬小學嘅學生，唯一方法就係要求小學有番咁上下
我係奉行 no pain no gain 嘅
作者: daisy17772 時間: 12-10-17 16:24
Rattie 發表於 12-10-10 18:37
經扣除重讀生及自行分配學位後，在統一派位階段，直屬中學可為其直屬小學保留最多餘額85%的學位，而聯繫中學可為其聯繫小學保留最多餘額25%的學位。
yes, 85% which = 99 seats are reserved exclusively for sppcs students during the 2nd round lucky draw stage
I first heard about this news that spss did not consider sppcs students in the discretionary stage were from a sppcs teacher 5 years ago when my girl was at p4
then this was further confirmed by parents who attended the S1 briefing from the principal of spss 2 years later
however, some parents and sppcs teachers insisted that spss in fact would take sppcs top students in the discretionary stage
Rattie:
Thanks for your quick reply. I was terribly busy last week, didn't have time to reply.
With this rationale, then I understand why SPSS doesn't take much students from SPPCS in discretionary place as in central allocation, as they're allowed to reserve 85% of remaining places to its primary school in central allocation, so technically speaking, SPSS could still be able to take in most students' whose academics level are matched with SPSS. Since in discretionary phace, usually students would choose the most desired school in this phase, therefore SPSS would like to pick these top students from other schools (as they show 誠意).
Given this, I really don't see the point of saying SPSS doesn't "want" SPPCS students. Traditionally, they take its primary students as much as possible. They don't even want to provoke its top students to think of transferring to other school....(at least in my generation...I was among those. ha ha)
作者: aminafy 時間: 12-10-17 17:35
其實我都信SPSS唔係太想收SPPCS嘅學生.....
講緊嘅唔係話佢地成績差，而係品行差。
SPPCS 最出名嘅唔係D學生有幾叻 （當然學生成績中上啦）, 而係操行有幾好，D學生又純又乖巧。
但近幾年無可否認D學生質素係差咗，學生著住校服講粗口，行街shopping等我都見過，我諗SPSS轉直資都係想有番D自主權，唔想D質素再差落去囉！
我估萬一咁不幸過唔到隔離，只要唔係成績太差 ＋ 操行好，再加大量嘅誠意，ok啩
作者: pooh仔 時間: 12-10-17 17:48 標題: 引用：其實我都信SPSS唔係太想收SPPCS嘅學生.....
原帖由 aminafy 於 12-10-17 發表
其實我都信SPSS唔係太想收SPPCS嘅學生.....
講緊嘅唔係話佢地成績差，而係品行差。
小學生出親街都有父母在旁，品行唔可能咁差勁！
作者: aminafy 時間: 12-10-18 12:40
我嘅意思係中學部呀！
作者: snkwok 時間: 12-10-18 19:09
aminafy 發表於 12-10-17 17:35
其實我都信SPSS唔係太想收SPPCS嘅學生.....
講緊嘅唔係話佢地成績差，而係品行差。
我見的spss的學生都是好純品的。
作者: snkwok 時間: 12-10-18 19:10
我最喜歡spss學生品行好。
作者: aminafy 時間: 12-10-19 08:57
我响銅鑼灣番工..... 見到佢地嘅機會比較多，當然樹大有枯枝，呢樣我都明嘅....
作者: laumanwinnie 時間: 12-10-25 20:05
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: laumanwinnie 時間: 12-10-25 20:06
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: jentsoi 時間: 12-12-28 11:38
heard from some current parents that primary section will also be converted to DSS in around 3 to 4 years time, wonder if it is true......
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |