教育王國
標題: mid level tutor time [打印本頁]
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-4 17:17 標題: mid level tutor time
今日懷住好興奮既心情帶bb返學，但真係好失望，上90分鐘，實際上30分钟，其他时间自由活动，普通话老師ok, 但英文老師就好冇心，我過去自我介紹，佢只說ok,而且好hea......吖，交左2个月学费，唯有顶硬上，学费成500堂
作者: chansiub 時間: 12-7-4 17:48 標題: 回覆：karman888 的帖子
Who is your English teacher?
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-4 18:17 標題: 回覆：chansiub 的帖子
男，佢連自我介紹都冇，我都唔知佢叫吔名？你bb都響度返學？
作者: vio922 時間: 12-7-4 18:21 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
我都覺得語值，我都係因為普通話老師好好先讀往先。
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-4 22:45 標題: 回覆：vio922 的帖子
最惨就是報左先有朋友話比我知勁差，讵重話个个都係差，我都唔信，完來真是劲唔掂，重要報名费680都赔埋，出面个receptionist 態度又差
作者: marwai_1030 時間: 12-7-5 07:51 標題: 回覆：karman888 的帖子
近期我申請參觀mid level TT，佢地當我上賓咁招待⋯因為我有細女要報合適pg。好彩有真正用家講真實情況，多謝大家幫忙。
作者: hksunshine 時間: 12-7-5 12:16
not cheap ah
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-5 15:13 標題: 回覆：marwai_1030 的帖子
Marwai 1030: 唉！我都係一位媽媽，我寫出離，係佢地成1个锺自由活动，好似過份左，地方太小，英文老师唔洗2分钟講完个故事，个普通话个老师真係幾好，但都得15分鐘，冇理由比500上15分钟架
作者: irene_the_pooh 時間: 12-7-5 21:27
i would like to say: the comments on TT are quite extreme.
some would think it's really worth while the others would think it's too expensive and worthless.
for parents who are considering TT, they should know the format of TT is 活動教學, kids would learn by exploring but not sitting still and looking at flash cards, books, etc.
the fees in TT is quite expensive. but if the kids can learn happily then it would be worth. so, is it worth or not should be depends on the reactions of the kids but not only the amount of fee.
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-5 21:55 標題: 回覆：irene_the_pooh 的帖子
Irene: 我以前係教師黎，所以我比較睇到個老師有冇heart,活動教學冇問題，但係唔係成個鐘自由活動，我更加晤係用錢去衡量，怕貴就一早唔讀啦！我打算將來比自己bb讀出名既國際學校，唔通又用金钱去衡量，晤通又接受晤到讵地活动教学，如果你觉得TT 好，祝你好運！
作者: irene_the_pooh 時間: 12-7-5 22:24
karman888 發表於 12-7-5 21:55 
Irene: 我以前係教師黎，所以我比較睇到個老師有冇heart,活動教學冇問題，但係唔係成個鐘自由活動，我更加 ...
pls be calm. i'm just sharing my opinion, and this is also the purpose of this forum.
don't be so sensitive, i'm not saying u can't afford the fee.
my kid has joined its PG for almost 1 year. to be fair, i don't think it is 成個鐘自由活動. if the parents haven't joined it before, may be it's quite misleading.
btw, i can't comment on the teacher you met because i don't know him / her.
if the teacher is 有heart, do u think this PG is good?
if the answer is 'no', then i think the format of this PG is not suitable for u (not your kid);
if the answer is 'yes', then u may consider to change the class in TT.
finally, thank you so much for your blessing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-5 22:36 標題: 回覆：irene_the_pooh 的帖子
如果老師有heart, 我覺得ok, 普通話老師ok, 有心，英文老師真係好離譜，對住d bb好快用左幾分钟講完一个故事，好似趕收工。有个婆婆凑个孫女返左成年，一星期3日，佢同我話每次都是一個仲自由活動，佢上咁耐，係因為近（住隔离），讵个女唔想讵呀妈带得辛苦，我先sure TT真係1个仲free activity 架！！
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-5 22:45 標題: 回覆：karman888 的帖子
我第一日返學，上左15分钟普通话，就話开始free activity, 30分鐘后，英文又係上左15分仲，跟住又free,我以為攪錯左，先問個婆婆，婆婆話係咁。如果你上九尤塘個間，可能唔同，我唔敢講其他地方既TT係咪一樣，但堅道嗰間真是好多人都話唔掂，我報左先知。
作者: irene_the_pooh 時間: 12-7-5 22:53
the schedule of mine:
15 min: circle time
15 min: exploration time
15 min: snack time / play at playground
is it similar to yours?
作者: amywon 時間: 12-7-6 02:52 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
唉一早同你講話差啦，你都領教到企出面個位李小姐D態度有幾差呢？行入去就好似行咗入gucci咁，D態度一D水準都無，課室又細小朋友又多職員又亂，小朋友一D活動空間都無出面個戶外playground仲差過橋底D公園！你咁都幫小朋友報嘅？我坐l00蚊的士去讀第間都唔會讀呢間嘅野，你行遠少少有間W快D轉啦！！
作者: AL1987 時間: 12-7-6 08:56
回復 amywon 的帖子
"你都領教到企出面個位李你都領教到企出面個位李小姐D態度有幾差呢？行入去就好似行咗入gucci咁，D態度一D水準都無" - Absolutely Agree!
My kid studied there for 8 months, I agree that the PTH teacher (Ms. Tung) is very good, but the English teacher........
作者: peko5 時間: 12-7-6 10:36
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: bluigugub 時間: 12-7-6 15:33
本帖最後由 bluigugub 於 12-7-6 17:39 編輯
I have to say, I endorse all the negative comments on TT Mid-levels.
Indeed, we joined (and quitted) TT quite some time ago, but from the comments above, seems like they have not made much improvements.
Back then, the English teachers changed rather frequently, but most of them tended to have a tendency of rushing through the 15 mins. circle / story / singing time ... when reading story books, it was really "plain" reading... of course, she couldn't catch the attention of most, if not all, the kids who just ran here and there or just kept shouting / dreaming ... the next 15 mins on so called "exploration" is in essence "free play" time, it is just that they would have a sensory table set up (with e.g. sand, water, pasta etc for the kids to touch / feel / play ), then another table with paints / drawings stuffs for art and crafts, then some toys on the mats ... the kids and the care takers would then be left to wander here and there, touch this and touch that until 15 mins were passed ... we were then asked to go outside to the so-called "playground" which is such a small small tiny place where you couldn't even try to push your kids' bicyle too hard or else they might bang on the walls ... the teachers again would wander here and there without much interaction with the kids... throughout my 9 months there, there was only one time when the teacher played bubble and parachute with the kids ... all other times, the kids were again left with their care-givers ...
to be honest, i was stuck with TT for 9 months solely because of the need to secure a PN seat (in case she got no other offer as she is a small b). Once she got an offer from another kinder back then, I stopped the class immediately; instead we went on to such an extreme back then that we just let them forfeit one month of tuition fee (they required one month notice to withdraw) 'cos I simply didn't want to waste any more precious saturday morning there.
All in all, i woudl think this was not a playgroup that is up to the required standard, let alone the top-notch brand of "tutortime".
We subsequently changed to the playgroup at Victoria (Upper Kornhill) which, i would say, is soooo much better that TT. Both my girl and my helper shared the same view.
Just my sharing for the reference of those who may be of interest. Just to avoid any doubt, the above are merely my personal and subjective feeling which may not reflect the views of many others.
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-6 16:12 標題: 回覆：amywon 的帖子
Amywon: 我已經即刻報左w個間，至於出面自以為是個位小姐，我忍左佢好耐，等我最後一日串爆佢，但我已經知佢會扮唔識聼中文
作者: picture 時間: 12-7-7 00:07
Honest opinion:
Daughter attended TT in Tai Tam for a year so 52 classes approximate.
Forgot the exact schedule but never a minute "hea"
Activities include:
1) English and/or chinese story telling,
2) circle time (singing/dancing),
3) exploration (different activity sets for kids to rotate into),
4) playground time
5) snack time
6) some arts & craft (when not doing no. 3 above).
The teacher mainly English lead the above activities and the only times when your kid is left with unguided play is during playground time.
I guess you need to use some imagination and put yourself in the kids'shoes to make exploration fun for your kid.
My experience with TT in Tai Tam scored 90%.
They have a very interesting Mr. Tony (big Aussie caucasian who tells very good stories). We spent a year there and decided to try something else.
Overall, good experience. For those parents who wants TT, but not mid-levels, certainly go try Tai Tam. I am not sure how much their school bus services are but my friend told me, it includes the transportation for 1 kid + 1 adult.
Hope this helps.
作者: vio922 時間: 12-7-7 01:32 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
講得好，係有heart 同冇heart的問題。我㝝覺得好唔好係睇下有沒有遇到好老師。我覺得國語老師好好，有用心準備上堂的material. 講故事，會準同故事有關的毛公仔同玩具，扮唔同的聲音講故仔，連大人都被佢吸引，小朋都坐定定聽。自由活動時，會同小朋友互動。我個陣時個英文老師，好明顯打工，翻工等放工，教得好求其。冇辦法啦，好難保證個個老師都好。如果想要好的NET. Woodland 幾好，我後來轉去woodland, 佢地課程編得好，我遇過3-4老師都好好。不過playgroup冇國語，校舍冇TT新同乾淨。
作者: bluigugub 時間: 12-7-7 10:49 標題: picture 的帖子
as said, my earlier comment is on midland tutortime only. i also heard of very positive feedback on tai tam TT...
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-7 11:16 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
我唔敢話其他TT唔好，因為我未上過。但堅道間肯定麻麻，如果唔係，唔會有其他家長和應，我最後都轉去woodland
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-7 11:31 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
bluigugub 同vio922 講中晒我对mid level TT 既看法，我寫出來是希望多d人知道，令佢地有所改善，因為個英文老師真係不知所謂，我以前教書，教小朋友，最基本要有耐性，佢講故事快到打凰
作者: karman888 時間: 12-7-7 11:52 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
到free acticity時，我尊登帶我bb晌英文老師面前，睇下佢點同佢玩，前面有排顏色珠仔，佢衰到同我bb un un 聲就算，可能我係唐人，我見佢對外藉bb好d, 充心奉勸家長如果接受到比500上15分钟普通话（因普通話老师幾好就報，如果唔係，報其他学校好些
作者: chansiub 時間: 12-7-7 13:47 標題: 回覆：karman888 的帖子
我覺W一樣Hea. 仲要五至十分鐘前先准入。落大雨同熱都唔理你。所以唔好早到。若小朋友喊一定趕你走。Montessori可能係咁。有人可能成堂唔見人。去過嘅PG都係差不多。可能最啱唔想hea家長係明愛淩月仙。堅道明愛都有。但去邊都好最緊要係你同小朋友玩得開心。
作者: chansiub 時間: 12-7-7 13:54
仲有堅道浸信會都有PG。不果我就未參加過。
作者: amywon 時間: 12-7-7 14:29 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
嘩！間間都咁差
作者: chansiub 時間: 12-7-7 14:52 標題: 回覆：amywon 的帖子
W特別是暑假時老師轉得特別勁。我估係國際學校都係咁。所以我都係見小朋友開心就算。但明愛在淩月仙的PG不錯。需然不是什麼貴PG（廣東話）但老師有heart.
作者: novelle 時間: 12-7-9 12:01
回復 karman888 的帖子
Just want to share my experience in Kowloon Tong TT. My baby joined their playgroup for 3 months and so far he enjoys it. Both the Putonghua and English teachers are nice and patient, and able to capture the attention of kids.
Out of the 90 mins program, 15 mins is free time and 15 mins is snack time. For babies under 2 years, I think this is a reasonable arrangement as usually most of them can’t concentrate and sit in the same place for over 30 mins.
作者: irene_the_pooh 時間: 12-7-9 20:25
novelle 發表於 12-7-9 12:01
回復 karman888 的帖子
Just want to share my experience in Kowloon Tong TT. My baby joined their pla ...
agree!!
but strickly speaking, the attention span for babies under 2 may only be 5-10 mins!! so i do think the time allocation of TT PG is quite good!!
作者: flczy 時間: 12-7-9 22:18
What's the name of the English teacher? I think Teacher Ryan seems good.
作者: tofee 時間: 12-7-9 23:27 標題: 回覆：mid level tutor time
咦，九龍塘又ok架喎，我囡囡好鐘意返仲好enjoy！
作者: novelle 時間: 12-7-11 14:02
回復 flczy 的帖子
The English teacher is Nick, not bad...
作者: novelle 時間: 12-7-11 14:14
回復 irene_the_pooh 的帖子
Exactly! My baby wants to walk around after 10 mins in the same place :)
作者: AJH 時間: 12-7-11 15:03
Do you mean their PG? My kid attended another TT branch, i dont think it worths $500 per class!!!
作者: irene_the_pooh 時間: 12-7-11 17:44
novelle 發表於 12-7-11 14:14
回復 irene_the_pooh 的帖子
Exactly! My baby wants to walk around after 10 mins in the same place :) ...
yes!!
unless the story is really attrative to him!!!!
作者: oooasis 時間: 12-7-11 18:42
500蚊一堂，得15分鐘⋯⋯當家長水魚咩！
請個net返來1：1都唔駛500喇。
我覺得貴唔緊要，香港大把父母比得起，但要有返咁上下質素lor！
作者: winpuf 時間: 12-7-12 01:29 標題: 引用：今日懷住好興奮既心情帶bb返學，但真係好失
原帖由 karman888 於 12-07-04 發表
今日懷住好興奮既心情帶bb返學，但真係好失望，上90分鐘，實際上30分钟，其他时间自由活动，普通话老師ok, ...
作者: winpuf 時間: 12-7-12 01:31 標題: 引用：今日懷住好興奮既心情帶bb返學，但真係好失
原帖由 karman888 於 12-07-04 發表
今日懷住好興奮既心情帶bb返學，但真係好失望，上90分鐘，實際上30分钟，其他时间自由活动，普通话老師ok, ...
作者: chekchek 時間: 12-7-12 14:53
我覺得mid level 唔係錦差者!個receptionist 姐姐都好有禮貌,每次我問野佢都好helpful. 我個仔返左1年幾, 都好開心. playgroup我都唔係要求好多野, 不過bb返黎都有唱歌, 扮mr. dan 講老虎個樣. 我都好enjoy. 可能每個家長既expectation 唔一樣卦. 歲幾兩歲. 各位想小朋友學d咩黎返"playgroup"?
我都有教過書. 可唔可以講下個小姐點無禮貌令到要唔讀之後要串爆佢!?
作者: chekchek 時間: 12-7-12 14:55
有唔好既地方就係個campus 細d同埋有好多假期照扣堂錦囉.
作者: lymchau 時間: 12-7-13 09:59
har? my experience is ok wor! I studied there for my girl and son for 2 years. 90 mins is too intensive, everytime sleep after the class.
The schedule is like this, right?
1) PTH story time (15 mins)
2) PTH play time (15 mins)
3) PTH (playing outside garden) (15 mins)
4) Eng snack time (15 mins)
5) Eng story time (15 mins)
6) Eng play time (15 mins)
Please understand play time is also a training, they will provide/advise you to play 3 games either in PTH or Eng, must have arts work part and playing either water/sand..... very interesting and is also an important thing for children to learn/explore. Everything 15 mins only allow my kids to play 2 items, so normally not enough time as well! It is a very good learning opportunities!
Please understand you cannot let the kids to sit down and listen for 90 mins. Compared with Victoria, it is more "hea" as well, but "hea" doesn't mean bad, they are below 2, must be learn in leisure. Try to appreciate what they teach and what they provide you la!
作者: irene_the_pooh 時間: 12-7-13 11:17
lymchau 發表於 12-7-13 09:59
har? my experience is ok wor! I studied there for my girl and son for 2 years. 90 mins is too intens ...
yes, my kid also having not enough time to play at play time. usually he can only play / try two games. he especially loves the sensory table that he won't move once stayed!!!
may be many parents used to the way what adults learn / study - sit still and listen!!! but i don't think it's good / fruitful to kids. and as a result, the comments from the parents may be 'hea'!!!
作者: BBMT 時間: 12-7-17 11:30
I plan to apply Mid levels TT but the comment so far is not good. Would like to change to another campus in HK side. How about the comment of North Point - Braemar Hill TT? Thanks
作者: minna321@ 時間: 12-8-7 15:43
My son is studying at Braemar Hill TT and he enjoyed class a lot. My mum went with him to class and she told me both the English and PTH teachers are good and attentive to the kids.
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |