教育王國

標題: Good Hope vs SMC [打印本頁]

作者: Pretty2006 時間: 12-7-4 09:34 標題: Good Hope vs SMC

你會點選?

作者: pluto_yuen 時間: 12-7-4 09:37

Good hope because of its own secondary school

作者: TKO2040 時間: 12-7-4 09:56

SMC 是只指ST MARY, 定係深水步直資,如果係後者, 一定去德.
直資那間係用了很多外籍老師, 門面好, 但實際係咪甘好? 校長同辦學團體都好有問題.

作者: westjudith 時間: 12-7-4 10:05

TKO2040 發表於 12-7-4 09:56
SMC 是只指ST MARY, 定係深水步直資,如果係後者, 一定去德.
直資那間係用了很多外籍老師, 門面好, 但實際係 ...

ＳＭＣ應該是St. Margaret's Co-educational English Secondary and Primary School.
我會Good Hope

作者: JE0608 時間: 12-7-4 10:22

看佢地直係中學個BANDING, 兩間根本無得比!

作者: geminiwsl 時間: 12-7-4 10:52

Does SMC has secondary banding yet?

作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 12-7-4 11:10

JE0608 發表於 12-7-4 10:22
看佢地直係中學個BANDING, 兩間根本無得比!

Totally agree!!

作者: ilj 時間: 12-7-4 13:41

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: tko-parent 時間: 12-7-4 14:13

Good Hope.

作者: karen55407 時間: 12-7-4 14:19 標題: 回覆：Good Hope vs SMC

Good Hope

作者: c1234 時間: 12-7-4 14:58

回復 TKO2040 的帖子

校長同辦學團體都好有問題...can you share about it?

作者: kanahose 時間: 12-7-4 15:17

咁要問下自己同屋企人, 邊間學校通知你取錄嘅時候, 比較開心, 只要讀得開心, 成績就會好, 一年前我從KTS 和SMC 二選一, 選了SMC, 這是個人選擇, 亦感到滿意, 至少我小孩能覺得學習係自己嘅責任, 亦培養到喜愛閱讀的習慣。

作者: TKO2040 時間: 12-7-9 10:46

本帖最後由 TKO2040 於 12-7-9 10:54 編輯

回復 c1234 的帖子

1.政府有個學視報告出了, 內容睇完, 講到校長少參與學校行政. 可能成日掛著搞學校中國舞.
2. 校長, 校監, 與係學校簡介會出來講SHOW既喇沙舊生(係學校都有職位), 三個人同是舊那所深水步BAND5女校的搞手, 之前那間執了, 三人又從新出來搞現在這直資中小學, 買點係請了很多外籍老師, 收取直資來說, 學費不算平那種, 其實佢初期學費係好平千幾一個月, 見了多人報, 學費加得好快.

E+唔得閒, 遲些再講辦學團體.

作者: 仔仔錫錫你 時間: 12-7-9 11:02

SMC 都有其優點，但單以學術或運動來評論，相信GH都較為優勝

作者: c1234 時間: 12-7-10 13:44

回復 TKO2040 的帖子

thank you and wait for your sharing

作者: reei 時間: 12-7-10 13:58

definitely SMC

作者: kenzo 時間: 12-7-10 15:29

Good Hope of coz.

作者: MyAshley 時間: 12-10-11 15:27

Good Hope sure!

作者: dick923 時間: 12-10-11 15:50

Good hope of course

作者: wiskylo 時間: 12-10-11 15:55

Sure Good Hope....

作者: 人地既阿媽 時間: 12-10-11 16:33

小朋友有能力的話，我會揀Good Hope，始終Good Hope既中學banding 好好多。

作者: 亞Boo 時間: 12-10-11 17:50 標題: 回覆：Good Hope vs SMC

一定係GH

作者: 牛精仔 時間: 12-10-11 18:35

TKO2040 發表於 12-7-9 10:46
回復 c1234 的帖子

1.政府有個學視報告出了, 內容睇完, 講到校長少參與學校行政. 可能成日掛著搞學校中國 ...

如你得閒d, 請繼續, 謝謝

作者: luckyyiu0517 時間: 12-10-14 01:21

揀GH！有冇人知GH 2012的入本地大學率？請分享，謝謝！

作者: hongsamama 時間: 12-10-14 09:40

100% good hope, 仲洗諗?

作者: BBCoffee 時間: 12-10-14 09:58 標題: 回覆：hongsamama 的帖子

Please consider the distance as well! I had applied for both school and found put that if GH accepts my daughter, I will have to wake up at 5:xx every day! This is my main concern, I can't bear to shorten the sleeping time for the entire family for 12 years! Alternatively, I will choose SMC, this is the school that I think suitable for my daughter, personally I don't really care about the banding of school!

作者: tabo911 時間: 12-10-14 10:41 標題: 回覆：Good Hope vs SMC

Sure Good Hope

作者: helenli 時間: 12-10-14 15:04 標題: 回覆：TKO2040 的帖子

校長和辦學團體有何問題？講來聽聽。

作者: BBCoffee 時間: 12-10-14 15:55 標題: 回覆：helenli 的帖子

Good hope is good at primary school, my friend's daughter is studying secondary there and my friend is a doctor, however she plans to send her daughter to study abroad as they are quite disappointed with the new teachers there ( very young and fresh) and they regret to send their daughter to GH because this is a very 谷school . I just want to say I am not opposing GH, but we parents need to think about if this is a suitable school for your daughter, don't only look at the school banding or 'branding' of one school!

作者: ff_tt 時間: 12-10-14 22:55

當然是Good Hope啦!

作者: susuwai 時間: 12-10-14 23:03

Good Hope.

作者: kanahose 時間: 12-10-16 09:44

請問樓主有咗決定未？

作者: kanahose 時間: 12-10-16 09:49

其實GH比SMC，收生人數GH應該多過SMC，男女比例：GH女100%、SMC女6：4男(大約)，我覺得SMC會比GH難入。

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)