教育王國

標題: 蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school [打印本頁]

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-8 16:28 標題: 蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

Dear all mamas,

May I have your opinion on these 2 schools ? How you would choose between these 2
schools
?

作者: caramom 時間: 12-6-8 17:33

本帖最後由 caramom 於 12-6-8 17:37 編輯

112200 發表於 12-6-8 16:28
Dear all mamas,

May I have your opinion on these 2 schools ? How you would choose between these 2

我囡在SIS,冇考過CKY.
兩間都係考IGCSE+IB DP.
SIS Primary用singapore curriculum,中英雙語,有多d新加坡老師&學生.
CKY應該大部分香港人.
SIS用簡體;CKY繁體.
SIS annual tuition 2011-12 $91,250 + Debenture $120,000 + Capital levy $8,000; CKY annual tuition 2011-12 $59,400, no debenture & capital levy.
一間在南區 ,一間在九龍,睇下你住邊,車程太遠唔係咁好.

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-8 23:27

hi,
Thank you . may I know if the kids speak english outside the classroom in school ? I mean they speak in English while causal talk ? sometimes I heard SIS student got good standard of Chinese , may I know if it true ? how they can facilitate student chinese learning ? if u don't mind, kindly advise. many thanks.

作者: penguin_chick 時間: 12-6-9 19:40

My daughter studies in CKY while her best friend studies in SIS. They only talk in English.

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-10 13:33

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 已刪除用戶 時間: 12-6-10 14:02 標題: 引用：+本帖最後由+joanthony+於+12-6-10+13:41+

原帖由 joanthony 於 12-06-10 發表
本帖最後由 joanthony 於 12-6-10 13:41 編輯

我仔今年考左cky round1 已比人out, SIS 讀唔起, 因仔是ad ...

你仔同我仔情況好似，我仔係ADHD+非典型自閉+高iq(未到資優）。我建議向學校直接查詢支援問題，仲有平時課堂點配合，你講得岩，呢類仔轉數快記憶強，不過偶然又多手多腳俾人罰，如果老師吾俾心機教就真係「大鑊」，你同個仔都會好慘，仲浪費左一個聰明小朋友資質。我仔係幸運既一個，雖然老師成日罰佢不過我仔知老師好錫佢，其他老師見佢夠科學，仲俾機會佢拍短片扮科學家，見佢背台詞認真最近又叫佢做小司儀，所以我仔返學好開心。你講既學校，吾好意思我真係認識吾多俾吾到意見，不過衷心祝你小朋友入到一間真正適合佢既學校

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-10 14:13 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 已刪除用戶 時間: 12-6-10 16:22 標題: 引用：Tkx+n+my+son+was+rejected+by+HKUGA+also +

原帖由 joanthony 於 12-06-10 發表
Tkx n my son was rejected by HKUGA also

哎，競爭大無辦法！all my best wishes for your little one, 一齊努力啦

作者: lamtsuiyee 時間: 12-6-11 09:27

回復 joanthony 的帖子

我個仔同你個小朋友情況差不多, 佢讀緊SIS, 佢適應得十分好, 學業中上, 最重要有朋友, 跟人溝通及表達有改善, 十分喜歡返學..... 呢間真係一間好學校...

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-11 11:49 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lamtsuiyee 時間: 12-6-11 17:13

是, 差不多...英文同數都很不錯, 但專注力較差....

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-11 17:31 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: michellebaby 時間: 12-6-11 17:35

如果比我.. 我會揀 CKY ! 識人讀緊, 佢哋雙語發展得好平衡 !

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-11 17:54 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: HaYi 時間: 12-6-12 00:17

Don't know funful (it is an international school ?) , now your son will be P2 if go there? how about Think, P1 ?

Personally I will prefer think as my son studied in Think in N1 (long time ago), if samilar approach for their primary as the kinder, will be much fun for active boys

作者: 已刪除用戶 時間: 12-6-12 12:37

聽有其他秉位位家長分享(講明, 我聽架), 話cky要求一個小一生留班, 佢中英數都合格, 不過老師話佢社交未得, 所以要留, 係好事定壞事, 家長自己判斷吧

作者: caramom 時間: 12-6-12 12:50

本帖最後由 caramom 於 12-6-12 12:50 編輯

112200 發表於 12-6-8 23:27
hi,
Thank you . may I know if the kids speak english outside the classroom in school ? I mean the ...

From my observation, students mostly speak in English at school or in leisure time, some of them speak Mandarin but the majority should be English. The Chinese standard in SIS is relatively high compared with other IS.

作者: manmanchubb 時間: 12-6-12 14:32

回復 joanthony 的帖子

會唔會FULful 較合適妳兒讀?
老師既愛心同包容可有助妳仔仔發展,跟既進度都可以跟得貼 d ,
至於佢地多數係印,非藉口音方面,可安排他另上一些英文class,
如phonics 等都可執到,對於愛閱讀的他可有更長久既幫助...
而Think 始終多project, 一group 一group的合作,
當然進度跟到或夾到係好事,請問妳兒視成敢得失有多重?
而CKY 就沒這支援給妳兒,但若妳要求論語境同重閱讀就必合適妳兒
如果想在那方面比支援幫妳仔仔
其實官校會有足夠既支援幫妳仔仔的...睇妳認為邊樣重要

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-12 17:55 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: mingmingyinyin 時間: 12-6-12 18:33

想問你們會怎樣選? 蔡繼有(Choi Kai Yau School) 或啓新 (Renaissance College)??

作者: mingmingyinyin 時間: 12-6-12 18:44

回復 112200 的帖子

My preference would be CKY rather than SIS.

Actually both schools are good at academics with good IGCSE results for the first cohort of students last year.

Personally I prefer traditional Chinese to simplified Chinese. And singlish could be a problem. That's why I like CKY more than SIS.

作者: 已刪除用戶 時間: 12-6-12 19:03 標題: 引用：其實我都好難想像佢點樣可以同人做到projec

原帖由 joanthony 於 12-06-12 發表
其實我都好難想像佢點樣可以同人做到project (think), 我唔知應該更加要ong佢去學相處or避開? 定係去間所謂 ...

講返我仔：佢學習。全無問題，不過評估要獨立做，真係有on居居meet手指既時候，可能成績會超級低分，老師肯吾肯收貨先（知佢識但好低分）。要創作既，佢可以天馬行空，都仲ok的，又係果句啦，果下轉吾出牛角jim就可以坐一個鐘吾郁，係要大人幫下。功課基本上都係要三催四請，皇帝吾急太監急，不過佢又吾係吾識bor! 分組討論初時都幾九吾搭八的，不過練習得多會有幫助，我仔而家都進步左。我果時都有問幼稚園老師，應該「夾」佢嗎？老師語活動教學間中有d活動醒下神，對佢係好事wor,否則傳統果d, 老師講一個鐘我仔呆一個鐘，無意思lor

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-12 20:47

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: manmanchubb 時間: 12-6-13 12:32

回復 joanthony 的帖子

我都明,其實真係唔知點先最幫到佢,就係唔可以避,
但又唔可以太進取去幫佢令佢有任何壓迫感,真係要向有關機構點幫仔仔,
另外,都要上該方面課程...

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-22 01:12

hey, do you think simplified Chinese is the trend ? especially when reach our kids ' s generation ? I just thinking..... we live in hk, traditional Chinese everywhere, should that be a problem to understand it ? simplified Chinese is ending used all over the world; but traditional Chinese only used in hk, Taiwan and Macau. Is it logical ? pls comment all mamas...

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-22 08:39 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: michellebaby 時間: 12-6-22 09:17

112200 發表於 12-6-22 01:12
hey, do you think simplified Chinese is the trend ? especially when reach our kids ' s generation ? ...

問題係我識太多身邊既小朋友一學咗簡體就真係覺得繁體好煩。好難返轉頭囉, 相反, 你要一個由難去易既, 相信好多識繁體字既睇返簡體字都估到一半或以上。

再者, 我記得早前睇報紙講過點解有簡體字呢, 係因為以前有好多中國人無錢讀書咁就簡化啲字嚟比佢哋學。(如果有錯請更正 ^.^ thanks.) 咁如果我哋有機會, 係咪應該比佢哋去學咗繁體先呢 ? 佢住既地方都係四周圍都繁體喎。

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-22 09:58 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-22 10:01

wow... what a nice discussion here. I make myself as an example... I born and live in Hk, I can read & write 繁體 very well just like everyone here ( just that I cannot type chinese ,mthat why I write in english now). I tried to learn 簡體 when I have chance in daily life, at the end I think I can read it 60%. For those 簡體even I can read, but I cannot write indepently too. Are this applied to you guys ? I am thinking may this senerio applied to " 簡體 --> 繁體 " ?.........

作者: michellebaby 時間: 12-6-22 12:06

112200 發表於 12-6-22 10:01
wow... what a nice discussion here. I make myself as an example... I born and live in Hk, I can read ...

任何事都係由 ''難去易'' 會比較易的啦。正如 ''繁去簡'' 一樣。我都係學繁體大, 而家睇簡體都睇到 80% 啦, 至於寫就記得一個得一個 (我多數請 google translate 幫手, 哈)

但如果小朋友係一張白紙, 我一定會比佢學繁體。因為身邊有小朋友學開繁體但見佢哋睇內地版的喜羊羊都無問題呀。

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-22 17:10 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-22 17:22

what do you mean ?

作者: joanthony 時間: 12-6-22 17:29 標題: 回覆：蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-26 11:56

Dear Michellebaby, mingming yinyin and all,

yes, will thinkthink ... but if we put 繁簡體 aside, may I know CKY and SIS which one you prefer and why ? kindly share

作者: jilin1960 時間: 12-6-26 14:19

本帖最後由 jilin1960 於 12-6-26 16:11 編輯

我選CKY

原因﹕ 經濟因素﹐CKY 的學費要便宜過SIS。
         CKY是半傳統半國際的學校。認識一些人讀某些國際學校﹐他們上課太過自由﹐老師並不太理會。。(當然﹐我不是指SIS﹐我並不了解這間學校)
      中英平衡。CKY的中文相當不錯。認識某些國際學校小朋友﹐不會說廣東話﹐卻是地道的香港人。英文成為母語。CKY 的小朋友﹐很多在家都是講廣東話﹐但英文也很棒﹗
我相信SIS是一間相當不錯的學校﹐但我不了解該校﹐所以不能評論。

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-26 23:20

iyiu c . thank you.

作者: michellebaby 時間: 12-6-27 16:12

112200 發表於 12-6-26 11:56
Dear Michellebaby, mingming yinyin and all,

yes, will thinkthink ... but if we put 繁簡體 aside, ma ...

我的小朋友會於今年九月由國際學校轉到 CKY , 正正係因為 CKY 可以提供到英普的平衡。(上次CKY的演奏會, 我眼見到好多準小一生和家長間的交談都是英文, 我想今年入得的小朋友的英文亦不會太差)。
不過, SIS 我不太清楚, 因為我小朋友唔係讀呢間。希望幫到你啦~

作者: 橫風王道 時間: 12-6-27 17:26

joanthony 發表於 12-6-11 11:49
Lucky u, I can't afford SIS , n still struggling between funful n think, is ur daughter also very ou ...

what's the cost of funful?

作者: 112200 時間: 12-6-28 12:10

Thanks, michellebaby, . ic

作者: minirat 時間: 12-11-7 14:45

112200 發表於 12-6-22 10:01
wow... what a nice discussion here. I make myself as an example... I born and live in Hk, I can read ...

I happened to come across this old post and find this chat interesting. I am a Singaporean who was born and grew up in Singapore. I learnt Simplified Chinese since young. Honestly I cannot write all Traditional Chinese characters but is able read without difficulties. Traditional Chinese characters are more meaningful and thus easier to remember and understand. I have to point out that in Singapore education, English is our first language, and we only learnt Chinese in the one Chinese lesson daily, so maybe it is not on a fair basis to compare the Chinese standard of a Singaporean and a HK citizen of the same generation. It might be a different story if the same question is popped to someone from Mainland China.

作者: MCLIAN 時間: 12-11-7 16:16

回復 minirat 的帖子

Thanks for your sharing!

作者: 已刪除用戶 時間: 12-11-7 16:39

michellebaby 發表於 12-6-22 12:06
任何事都係由 ''難去易'' 會比較易的啦。正如 ''繁去簡'' 一樣。我都係學繁體大, 而家睇簡體都睇到 80% 啦 ...

嘻嘻, 我小朋友就係呢種, 佢地係讀本地小學, 學既都係繁體, 但我貪平, 走去買簡體字(有時D消閒書籍, 無所謂啦, 1/3價錢啊!), 我D細路全部照睇, 我身邊有朋友覺得不可思議, 點解返大陸會去書店掃貨, 我仔P3, 試過叫佢讀出黎俾我聽, 明白既程度同繁體差唔多

我自己果時都係上網睇小說學簡體的, 打字就係工作需要頂硬上打拼音, 我D細路拼音比我好多了, 我唔擔心

作者: minirat 時間: 12-11-7 17:02

Charlotte_mom 發表於 12-11-7 16:39
嘻嘻, 我小朋友就係呢種, 佢地係讀本地小學, 學既都係繁體, 但我貪平, 走去買簡體字(有時D消閒書籍, 無所 ...

其實拼音好好用。

作者: azwildcats 時間: 12-11-8 10:49

回復 minirat 的帖子

In my opinion, I think kids should learn Traditional Chinese at the beginning. First, traditional Chinese(TC) is the origin of our language. Second, TC is more meaningful since the words are created by its meaning. Third, TC is more difficult to learn. So if our kids learn the difficult one first, it is easier to switch to the simple one (simplified chinese-SC). However, I think kids should also learn Pinyin because they can use this method to input Chinese characters.

I grew up learning TC and learned how to read and write SC when I was in high school and college. I did not have any problem switching between these two types of characters.

作者: minirat 時間: 12-11-8 11:11

azwildcats 發表於 12-11-8 10:49
回復 minirat 的帖子

In my opinion, I think kids should learn Traditional Chinese at the beginning. ...

Honestly I think either way is fine, as long as the learner is comfortable. It is never too difficult to switch, be it Traditional to Simplified or vice versa. I agree wholeheartedly that Traditional Chinese is more meaningful and the characters are beautiful. However personally I think it might be easier for children to pick up from Simplified Chinee, especially if there is an option of both English and Chinese, they might have a tendency to take the easy way out and become resistant to learn a truly difficult language like Chinese. Just my 2-cent thought.

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)