教育王國

標題: 王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響? [打印本頁]

作者: van_517    時間: 12-5-18 21:59     標題: 王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響?

聽聞9月轉校長, 請問大家知道詳情嗎? 對學校同學生會有咩影響?

作者: weiwei    時間: 12-5-27 16:32

van_517 發表於 12-5-18 21:59
聽聞9月轉校長, 請問大家知道詳情嗎? 對學校同學生會有咩影響?

正 and 副校長 will leave.  I think not have a big effect caused Dr Will Chan will acting.

Don't worry.



作者: tong0919    時間: 12-5-29 20:18

请问知道校长走的原因吗?会去边度教和谁人来做?


作者: 22welldone77    時間: 12-5-30 15:56

小學部校長申請借調教育局, 暫未知申請結果, 總校長話此借調期間會由兩位主任(定科主任?忘記了)暫代喎.
作者: dada1020    時間: 13-1-24 21:13

How about Dr. Benjamin Chan?  Is he leaving as well?
作者: jql    時間: 13-1-25 09:24

Dr Benjamin Chan is in secondary school

作者: jasonpoon    時間: 13-5-9 10:54

Ms Din didn't  went to education department, she is director of Good Hope primary school and Mrs Tsui is principle at Yiu Chung International school.
作者: jasonpoon    時間: 13-5-9 11:30

correct:  Mrs Tsui is principle at Yew Chung International school
作者: kc_01k    時間: 13-5-15 09:58

jasonpoon 發表於 13-5-9 10:54
Ms Din didn't  went to education department, she is director of Good Hope primary school and Mrs Tsu ...

係呀, 我朋友在德望讀, Ms. Din 過咗去做統籌啦,  根本都無借去教育局呢件事.  唔知點解要咁樣同d家長講.
作者: terryhau    時間: 13-5-15 11:34

我自己小朋友讀過WKF。不過好多問題, 不便這裡講太多。學校話係借用教育處,其實Ms. Din去了德望。
現在讀的同學仔媽咪都話冇左校長行政十分混亂。 我本人唔讀係基於課程問題和都係行政混亂.
作者: mother904    時間: 13-5-15 13:15

學校一早講左Ms Din係離職唔係借調啦
作者: terryhau    時間: 13-5-15 15:15

如果有通知, 係咪有D人知, 有d人唔知, 真係證明行政混亂
作者: kc_01k    時間: 13-5-15 15:18

本帖最後由 kc_01k 於 13-5-15 15:24 編輯
terryhau 發表於 13-5-15 15:15
如果有通知, 係咪有D人知, 有d人唔知, 真係證明行政混亂

一早都話咗行政混亂啦, 事實樓上真係有人唔知道, 有人又話知(但我D朋友全部讀緊嘅都唔知, 只知學校講Ms. Din借調去教育局一段時間, 會返黎喎, 捽之, 原來根本走咗囉, 行政混亂) so我幾個朋友讀到好嬲, 當然當中仲有好多事啦, 佢地有些G3將會轉校了.
作者: hungchan1234    時間: 13-5-15 19:46

回復 kc_01k 的帖子

 我絶對覺得妳在抽水,妳咁睇低這間學校,為什麼還時常咁關心我們一班家長,學校老師,大多都教得很好,不要擔心我們,行政方面,新校長會與Dr Wil 去處 ,慢慢會有改善,謝謝!
作者: kc_01k    時間: 13-5-15 20:41

本帖最後由 kc_01k 於 13-5-15 20:52 編輯
hungchan1234 發表於 13-5-15 19:46
回復 kc_01k 的帖子

 我絶對覺得妳在抽水,妳咁睇低這間學校,為什麼還時常咁關心我們一班家長,學校老師 ...

Sorry,我並唔係關心你地,我係關心我仍然有小孩在WKF讀的朋友,與及我姪仔,and想講返比一D想知道的家長聽。如果我有講與事實不符的,你大可反駁我,而唔係暗示叫人唔好講一D唔好嘅事實出黎,呢度係open forum,從冇版規規定唔喺該間學校讀就唔比發言。而且,抽水為何解,或者你用D正當少少詞語我會明白一點的。thanks!
Ms Din 確係去咗德望,我朋友同哥哥都只知當初學校係通知佢地Ms Din係借調去教育局,咁,原來有D知佢唔會返,有D完全冇聽過,咁唔係行政混亂係應該點形容?做法不當?消息不通?。

另外,我邊句說話講過睇低學校?唔通係你自己睇低?既然你覺得我講行政混亂就係睇低學校,咁你作為家長,就要好似我朋友及哥哥咁,去向學校積極反映了。

作者: smart_bus    時間: 13-5-15 21:28     標題: 回覆:王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響?

正所謂咸魚青菜各有所愛,家長會為子女選最適合嘅學校,既然唔啱嘅,咪去轉校囉,去一間適合自己親友嘅學校,無謂大家痛苦。
至於行政混唔混亂,我相信每間機構,大至政府,小至舖頭仔,都有人話亂㗎啦。都係嗰句,唔啱就轉校啦,總有你認為啱你嘅地方嘅。(當然,其他學校收先算啦!)




作者: terryhau    時間: 13-5-15 21:28     標題: 回覆:王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響

其實大家只係理性討論,我曾經都係WKF家長,同現畤WKF的家長一樣愛錫自己小朋友!
不過我希望將自己經歷過同大家分享,並唔係刻意破壞!樓上的家長自己朋友兒女仍在讀,姪仔等當然會留意此校動向,而WKF確實行政混亂,課程有問題,而且今天小三年班的家長聽說學校有傳聞說DR.Will Chan 今年退休,所以他們更覺得學校將會越來越混亂,更擔心、希望這傳聞不是真吧!




作者: kc_01k    時間: 13-5-15 21:37

smart_bus 發表於 13-5-15 21:28
正所謂咸魚青菜各有所愛,家長會為子女選最適合嘅學校,既然唔啱嘅,咪去轉校囉,去一間適合自己親友嘅學校 ...
所以未入讀的家長要留意了。而且讀過WKF,想轉校確實比較難,可能你想講怕唔達標?
作者: kc_01k    時間: 13-5-15 21:40

terryhau 發表於 13-5-15 21:28
其實大家只係理性討論,我曾經都係WKF家長,同現畤WKF的家長一樣愛錫自己小朋友!
不過我希望將自己經歷過 ...
Agree !And please check PM
作者: Michelle_Dad    時間: 13-5-15 23:14

回復 terryhau 的帖子

理性討論?好!
「校方通報 Ms. Din 借調教局,但最後她去了德望」就能構成「行政混亂」的指控?這或有值得商榷的地方;但我倒想問 WKF 的課程有何問題呢?這才是家長應當關心的地方,不知 terryhau 有何高見?願聞其詳!

謝謝!

作者: jinjinchan    時間: 13-5-16 09:24

本帖最後由 jinjinchan 於 13-5-26 16:42 編輯

    .....................
作者: smart_bus    時間: 13-5-16 11:06     標題: 回覆:王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響?

都係嗰句,唔滿意就轉校啦。轉咗校嘅家長,其實好想知你轉咗幾耐?要知道好多嘢已經變咗,未必係你當年認識嘅課程。
如果真係有意見,應該「理性」地同學校反映。




作者: mother904    時間: 13-5-16 11:34

本帖最後由 mother904 於 13-5-16 11:35 編輯

WKF的課程在那裡有問題呢?不妨詳細說出來,大家討論。

個人來講,WKF的課程設計一開始就開宗明義,從沒有講一套做一套,不喜歡這套的便不要選好了。任何東西都有人喜歡,有人不喜歡,自己不接受不喜歡的,不代表是有問題。

還是那句,不喜歡旳不必勉強留下,轉了校的不如花心思在子女目前就讀的學校。始終每一間學校都有學生可以更上層樓,也有學生被其他人評為不達標,想轉校但轉不成的,與其花時間對學校指三道四,不如花時間檢討子女或親友那裡不夠好。以上說話向來我是我做人做事的宗旨。


作者: smart_bus    時間: 13-5-16 11:36     標題: 引用:WKF的課程在那裡有問題呢?不妨詳細說出來

原帖由 mother904 於 13-05-16 發表
本帖最後由 mother904 於 13-5-16 11:35 編輯

WKF的課程在那裡有問題呢?不妨詳細說出來,大家討論。
講得實在太好啦!




作者: mother904    時間: 13-5-16 11:39

WKF轉校比較難?我認識的WKF小朋友,已經有轉去了女拔、男拔和沙官中,這些小朋友的家長從來沒有說學校有問題。

轉校難的,是表現不甚標青的一群吧?這個現象從來在任何學校都會出現。入讀WKF前,一早知道它不是甚麼名校,與其不斷數落學校,不如花時間留意子女功課。
作者: iriskwokmama    時間: 13-5-17 16:00

回復 jasonpoon 的帖子

想問邊個mrs tsui? 我係耀中網頁搵唔到資料
作者: KristieMom    時間: 13-5-23 13:47

本帖最後由 KristieMom 於 13-5-23 13:55 編輯

我的女兒由小學小一開始讀到現在,今年已經是中一生了,我真的不覺得這裡的行政有什麼混亂,我很喜歡現在的中學,反而我在小學期間不太喜歡Miss Din當校長,她太大女人了,又太偏心了,太專制,去excursion又不准學生打電話報平安,Always said " No news is good news", 但在一個身為父母的小學家長來說不是這樣的,如在途中打了或接聽了電話便是犯大錯,回校要受罰,所以她的離去反而是一件好事,祇是離開得太遲了!
老實說現今的社會有那間公司的職員不是來來去去,出外看看這個世界,通常都比較死守在同一間公司的前途更好,校長和老師都是人,離開不是一件大事,我覺得對學生不是太大影響,大家應該要接受這個現實的社會。
作者: mother904    時間: 13-5-23 14:27

我問過Dr. Will Chan關於他今年退休的事,他親口證實這是謠言,學校運作會一切如常。他十分不明白為何會有此謠言。
作者: 22welldone77    時間: 13-5-24 23:18     標題: 回覆:terryhau 的帖子

請問課程有乜問題呀?我真係好想知道,可否講詳細小小。




作者: iris.shuen    時間: 13-6-14 08:05     標題: 回覆:王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響

我也想知道課程有甚麼問題/其他問題?請問WKF有那些優點/好的地方?請有小朋友就讀WKF之家長能分享多些具體意見,謝謝!




作者: terryhau    時間: 13-6-14 09:08

其實你地都見到好多WKF家長唔想有人對學校有唔好批評,似終係自己小朋友在讀,我不再會在此把自己遇過真實事件與大家分享, 想知道的家長都有PM我!
作者: uu175    時間: 13-6-14 09:33     標題: 回覆:terryhau 的帖子

真的嗎?




作者: dou-dou    時間: 13-6-15 11:05

回復 iris.shuen 的帖子

我小朋友在WKF讀G1, 將升G2. 我整體來說對學校是滿意的。我當初亦覺得學校收政府津貼,又收學費,應該多些net. 起初亦有些小不滿意,但讀下來,囡的英語發音實在很好,聽同講都不用懷疑。普通話亦是十分好,做到對答如流! 至於寫,開始時因教學模式的關係,開始時覺得比傳统學校慢,但讀下來,原來囡的書寫能力進步了很多,英文由最初半版紙寫I am……. I am five years'  olf. 到現在寫兩版A4紙,有connectives,有adjective, adverb, 寫得實在不錯,我平時不甚理她,到考試時幫她溫書,發現她是清楚明白各種類詞,如adjective, adverb的用處,對小一來說我是很滿意的。至於中文,開初教得很慢,但都期終考試,要他們寫一版A4紙的作文,雖然有數個生詞提供協助,但我囡寫得似模似樣,進步很多。我想說,家長讓子女讀這學校要預不是傳统學校般,死記便可,真要多看課外書,平時習學校所學,靈活運用所學的知識,才能應付到學校的考試。最後,我想表示讚賞學校的鼓勵創意,由英文作文'"use 5 senses to describe your magic wardrole", IS project 的"Use 3 kinds of materials to design your own piece of furniture", 中文看圖作文,都實在鼓勵小朋友多思考, 我個人是喜歡的,希望上面資料幫助一些有趣WKF的家長了解此校。
作者: mother904    時間: 13-6-15 11:31

terryhau 發表於 13-6-14 09:08
其實你地都見到好多WKF家長唔想有人對學校有唔好批評,似終係自己小朋友在讀,我不再會在此把自己遇過真實 ...
你搞錯了,不是WKF的家長不是唔想有人批評學校,而係希望係實事求事,唔係講一d放諸四海而皆準既既籠統說話,甚至係不實謠言,例如課程有問題,行政混亂,Dr Will Chan今年退休之類。

既然覺得有問題,為甚麼不能講得詳細一點,讓大家討論,反而是用一些無法引證的說話黎無的放矢?課程有問題,是甚麼問題?行政從何表現是混亂?如果不能詳細說出自己的理據,根本就無法討論,亦失去討論區的意義。

我個人十分相信你在學校有不快的經歷,但我相信學校是硬件和軟件的組合,除了硬件無法一時三刻更改外,軟件要講求人同人之間的交流和互動,同一個老師或者校長,都有人喜歡和討厭。就算是名校,也有不少家長不滿,鄧靄琳就是一個很好的例子。所謂甲之熊掌,乙之砒霜,除非是關乎一些原則性的問題,否則個人經歷是不能用來概括一間學校的水平或優劣。

不過,如果你願意,不妨和大家分享你的經歷,看看是那一方面出了問題,現在是否已經改善。這才是對學校、家長和學生公平的做法。

作者: tong0919    時間: 13-6-15 19:25     標題: 回覆:dou-dou 的帖子

你女女好叻呀進步得甘快真係好,我個女嘅寫作就有待改善啦!不過唔怕、我相信呢D只係能力先後嘅問題啫。令我開心又放心既係佢的英普能力,經過一年學習,佢英普已經能夠對答如流,而我十分相信WKF的每個學生都有這樣的能力。




作者: tong0919    時間: 13-6-16 00:43     標題: 回覆:王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響

其實我覺得好搞笑,人家的校長被我們挖走但人家都未擔心,反而我們擔心?真係得意。我覺得校長離開並不是問題,反而是新校長來自哪裏,作風與理念跟學校是否相同才是最重要,是嗎?新校長是來自激活英文小學,跟據激活嘅教學理念,他們和WKF極之相近,都是走全人發展、啟發、刺激學生思考的路線,所以向他們招手是十分合適的,同時亦証明WKF的教育理念沒有被沖擊而得以持續,喜歡WKF style的家長們大可以放心,讓子女繼續在爱的空間下成長和學習。哈哈




作者: Rayli    時間: 13-7-3 08:33     標題: 回覆:王錦輝轉校長,對學生有何影響?

My daughter will go to WKF this summer. The "news" that we heard of about this school is half good n half bad.  Besides, the feedbacks from friends when they learn of our daughter going to this good is also half half.  Some say good, some puzzle why when other school offers seem better.  Well, I try not to read BK sometimes because I found quite some bad words against the school but i don't know whether it's true or not.  I have given up all other offers n had no more choices.  I decided to give ourselves a chance to see if it fits my daughter n our families.  I am hoping for the best to come.  We are also expecting that the new school principal will give the school clear direction.




作者: mowaiyan11    時間: 13-7-5 13:43

本帖最後由 mowaiyan11 於 13-7-5 13:44 編輯
Rayli 發表於 13-7-3 08:33
My daughter will go to WKF this summer. The "news" that we heard of about this school is half good n ...

Hi, same as your daughter, mine will begin her study in WKF in September.  

Actually I do not concern too much on the impact arising from the change of principal of the school.  In fact, this happens in the government, private firms and any organizations.  The only thing we ought to focus on is that whether the vision and mission of the school can be upheld, to which I believe WKF is able to stick to them.

Regarding the comments on WKF, I observe a funny phenomenon.  Some people who have accusations against the school are actually quoting words from their friends. For instance, 'my friends say the administation of school is chaotic; my friends say ... ... etc'.  But what do the parents who have their children studying in WKF say?  My friend's daughter is studying in G1 of the school this year and he does not have any adverse comment on it.  For me, that is already fine.  I believe that while the school is capable of providing a pleasant environment to foster the children, why not give it a try?

I do not intend to say WKF is a school without any weakness.  Different schools are suitable to different children, and vice versa.  At the moment, I just want my daughter to learn happily and be proficient in English, and I reckon that WKF is the right choice.


作者: waiwaimam    時間: 13-7-5 20:38     標題: 引用:+本帖最後由+mowaiyan11+於+13-7-5+13:44+

原帖由 mowaiyan11 於 13-07-05 發表
本帖最後由 mowaiyan11 於 13-7-5 13:44 編輯
Couldn't agree more!




作者: GGmonster    時間: 13-7-5 22:26

My son will be promoted to secondary school in coming September. He had a very happy and fruitful school life in WKF in the past 6 years. He is able to speak fluent English and Putonghua. From my impression, students' English level is much better than Chinese. As the parents of WKF, I encourage all the parents provide concrete support to school activities such as being the volunteer in excursion. It is very important for the success of these activities.
作者: Doray    時間: 13-7-6 10:17

After considering all the pro and con of this school, I think both sides are talking about their own feelings, thus, no right or wrong comments.  I will take this school because:
a) as a DDS, it is allowed to select the students with its own criteria.  It would probably reduce (but still have) the diverse academic level among students in some extent, as compared to other gov't or subsidy school under the lucky draw allocation.
b) I didn't buy the duck feed education system, though to a parent, the traditional school of course has its own merits.  Especially it would be more easily to "know" the academic level with "marks" so that greater pressure can be exerted to the kids when they are not up to standard.  It can produce the kids who are good at exam.  Nonetheless, the presentation skill, confidence and independence are not well-trained in most of the traditional school.  I prefer that she has more time to read books.  That’s why I didn’t enroll any traditional school (of course due to my daughter’s character).

c) every school has good or bad students.  I have also visited the school and noted 3-4 students running at the street after school while a hundred of them were just behaved well.  When I rode on the KCR, an elder sister, and one brother (both of them were WKF students) got in with their maid but the brother was very naughty and kept moving and moving (quite annoying I must say) while the sister (about P4) was sitting down and reading an english chapter book quietly.  I am afraid I can't infer from this and tell whether this school's students in general are good or bad.  Of course, I will remind my kid that she is representing the school when she's in uniform.  She must be well behaved.
d) Some may accuse that the curriculum is too easy such that some parents required to provide supplementary classes for the kids to keep up their standard and start query why they need to pay the school fees but at the same time have to spend money in those extra classes.  For me, it's fine.  Even my friends with kids in DGS, St Paul, TSL, APS, etc, enrolled various supplementary classes just to meet up the "standard" but some are ok but some are so so.  That means, even not in this school, this likes a kind of "fixed" cost for me in order to tackle the "not left behind" myth.  You may not agree but this is what my peers are doing.

Every parent has the right to praise or blame the school.  During last one year, I’ve collected various “comments” from many different schools and at the end of the day, parent is the key support to your own kids and the selection is quite personal as no kid is the same.

In fact, the school’s development report has already pinpointed the weaknesses and threats of this school honestly.  I hope I will share what I “feel” later after my kid studying in this school for other parent’s reference.  

作者: jql    時間: 13-7-8 10:00

回復 Doray 的帖子

So glad we have some parents with crystal eyes.

For those left the school or hear say, thought they must have a reason behind and not able to tell.  I feel sorry for those attacking WKF in a negative way.

There is never a best school fro your kid but the most suitable...

Some parents they don't understand the teaching way in WKF will consider it is easy, not to the standard or "hee".... for those who know how to support the kids on self-learning and think out of the box, they will find the syllabus in WKF is so much encouraging the kids to have their own thought and point of view on expressing their knowledge from the learning....

And I'm so much appreciated to the teachers where they are really concerns about the kids' learning attitudes instead of the academic standard as the priority during the lower grade...  They all work with their hearts.

作者: sodisodi    時間: 13-7-8 11:18

> jpl : 借問聲, 書單上的兩本字典是否必須買 ? 雖則話optional, 到時是否需要帶回校使用 ( 因家中已有其他字典 ), 擔心要帶回校使用時, 囡囡同同學比有比較.
作者: jql    時間: 13-7-8 11:28

not compulsory... if you have your own, that's fine.  Also, no need to bring them back to school
作者: sodisodi    時間: 13-7-8 11:43

> jpl : Thanks!
作者: sodisodi    時間: 13-7-8 11:44

Sorry ! Should be " Jql ".




歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) Powered by Discuz! X1.5