教育王國

標題: 關於選修(經濟)科的問題 [打印本頁]

作者: HapptCAT888 時間: 12-4-27 16:32 標題: 關於選修(經濟)科的問題

小女正為選科而煩惱, 請問選

作者: HapptCAT888 時間: 12-4-27 16:33

Sorry, first time come here. Wrong ENTER.

作者: HapptCAT888 時間: 12-4-27 16:38

各位家長好!

小女正為選科而煩惱, 請問
1. (經濟)科難讀嗎?
2. 適合甚麽性格或志向的人去讀?

謝謝!

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-4-27 18:06

回復 HapptCAT888 的帖子

小女正為選科而煩惱, 請問
1. (經濟)科難讀嗎? (因人而已，如果鍾意，唔會覺得難。小兒覺得幾生活化，幾實用。)
2. 適合甚麽性格或志向的人去讀? (聽小兒說，內向及外向型既同學都有d ok, 有d 唔 ok。文科或理科都查唔多，但要留意，如果想大學會選經濟，要睇請楚學科要求，有d勁既大學要學生修讀數學M1/M2重要好成績。)

作者: hhma 時間: 12-4-28 16:28

BAFS vs ECON, what's your guys comments?

thanks in advance

作者: cowboymama 時間: 12-4-28 16:54

回復 hhma 的帖子

Hi hhma,

I prefer Econ.

Please also see below link especially the last entry of csy_ma about BAFS :

http://www.edu-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2361782&extra=page%3D2
選修科問題

作者: wilsonmun 時間: 12-4-28 21:48

本帖最後由 wilsonmun 於 12-4-28 21:54 編輯

hhma 發表於 12-4-28 16:28
BAFS vs ECON, what's your guys comments?

thanks in advance

我當年幫個仔揀咗ECON，當年我搵咗ECON同BAFS(之前有科係叫企業概論／商業概論之類---sorry，太耐唔記得）以前公開考試（CE／AL／ASL？太耐唔記得。）嘅年報睇，綜合呢幾年嘅觀察，我有以下嘅印象：
1）以前, ECON嘅公開考試優良比率同合格率都比BFAS(企業概論／商業概論)高，當然年年唔同，學生唔同，但也可以參考下，你去圖書館睇下啦，
2）早排報紙報導話BAFS嘅課程內容多，教唔晒書。我諗其中一個原因係呢科比較新，設計課程者同d老師都未必掌握得好好，目前應該係唔太容易讀，ECON係已經發展咗幾十年，大家已經知道個遊戲規則，所以，我估計無論係讀或者考試，ECON應該容易過BAFS。

作者: fullmama 時間: 12-4-28 22:07

HapptCAT888 發表於 12-4-27 16:38
各位家長好!

小女正為選科而煩惱, 請問

我阿女兩科都有讀....她 LIKE ECON 多過BAFS.......

作者: 孺子牛 時間: 12-4-29 00:28

For picking economics in a university, well versed in mathematics is indispensable. As you proceed to higher and higher level, you will find that the use of mathematics and statistics, sometimes, may suffocate an art student who is weak in mathematics and statistics.

In my viewpoints, economics lays emphasis on theories and although interesting; making good use of them take a lot of time because you need to digest the implications of those theories and to blend them with real life experience.

However, in secondary education level, I don't think the syllabus entails much mathematics. Personal interest, in this stage, may be the most crucial factor to be considered. If your kid shows his/her own preference in the subject, why not let he/she make his/her own decision? If one has interest in a subject, he will work hard for it.

作者: whooammii 時間: 12-4-29 01:30

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: goodwill 時間: 12-4-30 13:10

I would like to know that whether it is common to select 3 electives ( physic, Chem and Econ and M1 in S4 or option 2: Physic, Chem and Bio and M2. Which one is better and got higher chance to attain good grades? My son is good at Math, Science and IH and he is interetsed in Econ as compared with Bio, in that case, Will Econ a better choice than Bio, . Also, is it common in the other secondary schools, takes three electives +M1 or M2... will the workload too high?thank you in advance for your kind advice.

作者: CHAN-2 時間: 12-4-30 14:47

Both options are very common for students who are good at science subjects and Maths. For choices between M1 (calculus & statistics) or M2 (calculus & Algebra), it depends on your son's interest and learning capacity in the specific areas. My son's Maths teacher said M1 is easier than M2, so the workload for M1 will be less.

作者: goodwill 時間: 12-4-30 18:39

Dear Chan-2,
Thank you very much for your kind advice. I learnt that studying Bio required a lot of hard work and extra effort to get a good grade as compared with Econ, is that right? Is it make more sense to study M1 and Econ rather than Bio and M1. please advise. Thanks a lot!
Goodwill

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-4-30 19:43

回復 goodwill 的帖子

What's your kid's choice in university? If he/she aims for MBBS or BBA, the choice can be different, don't just focus on good grades.
I know some friend's kid, who aims for good grades, at the end his choices are limited.

作者: CHAN-2 時間: 12-4-30 20:11 標題: 回覆：goodwill 的帖子

From my son's personal experience, he can get high grades with quite certainty in phi, chem, bio and math, if he work hard, though he don't like bio. My son has no idea on econ, and i cannot expect the same result from him with econ, though I personally think Econ may be easier.
For some students, my son's most classmates, they opt for m2 and the math teacher said m2 is not more difficult than pure math (hkce).
My son choose m1, and your option 1.
I think if your son will consider studying engineering, then choose m2.

作者: CHAN-2 時間: 12-4-30 20:39 標題: 回覆：goodwill 的帖子

The above are my son's experience and his choice. Anchan59 is in better position to give you advice.

作者: goodwill 時間: 12-4-30 20:42

本帖最後由 goodwill 於 12-4-30 20:43 編輯

Dear Chan-2 and ANChan59,
The ;parents in baby kingdom are always kind and ;professional to give valuable advice to us. Yes, your advice inspires me... My son will prefer BBA rather than MBB, or even like engineering. when there is a will, there is a way. Once again, thank you very much! Cheers
Goodwill

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-4-30 21:02

回復 goodwill 的帖子

goodwill
According to your son's choice of programs, BBA or Engg, his choices of subject are:

BBA - Chem, Phy, Economics, no need for M1/M2
Engg - Phy, Chem, M1 >> M2

If you check with university admission requirements, 3 electives not necessary have better chances......

作者: goodwill 時間: 12-4-30 21:29

Dear ANchan59,
Yes, you are perfectly right and I am so...so happy that you respond so quickly as you are the master in the bady kingdom....and you always give valuable advice to others wholeheartedly. Thank you so much
Goodwill

作者: homama 時間: 12-4-30 23:04

回復 ANChan59 的帖子

Hi, ANChan59,

My friend's son is interested in MBBS or BBA. What subjects should he take in F.4?

作者: eandkanda 時間: 12-4-30 23:54 標題: 回覆：關於選修(經濟)科的問題

吾知你介吾介意聽岩岩考完文憑試既我既意見呢

我系讀econ phy&chem bio m1(dropped)
Econ本人認為系好生活化同有趣既一科。比會計軟少野背，同埋較少數字要處理。都算系一科一里通百里明的科目。所以要找個真糸講得好既補習老師去輔助，都有需要的。同埋無錯，經濟以往系一科易奪a的一科。今年文憑試都好似好多人勁有信心！

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-5-1 00:19

回復 homama 的帖子

homama
BBA's admission requirement is more general, BAFS and Economics are not compulsory, good command of English and Chinese is a must, get the subjects he can score well will be fine.

MBBS needs Chemistry as compulsory and one more Science subject as minimum. Biology, Physics, and Extended Module Maths and Combined Science are good options. If go for Maths, take M1 as it's much easier. Of course, 4 cores need to score good grades.

ANChan59

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-5-1 05:04

回復 eandkanda 的帖子

所以要找個真糸講得好既補習

老師

去輔助，都有需要的。
************************************

If it's easy to get A, why still need tutoring?

作者: whooammii 時間: 12-5-1 15:06

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-5-1 15:12

回復 whooammii 的帖子

Thanks for your clarification.
By tutoring to get an A, I won't say it's really A. In line with your comment, any more tutoring in University?

In another post, I also puzzled that students rely on Kumon for high school Maths (For M1 and M2.). May be I am those old school guy......

作者: whooammii 時間: 12-5-1 18:07

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Yb712 時間: 12-5-1 18:26

Totally agree with you，the education system is bullying our children and even our family！。 I heard a lot of 贏在起跑線，but recently someone told me the next sentence may be 輸在終點。 A lot of creative or bright kids will be ＂killed by our extreme 填鴨制度！:pity

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-5-1 18:29

I won't say we all blamed spoon feed education system. Students and parents also be blamed.

I am so glad my boy took the IB stream, it's tough but really challenging and learn how to learn. I can't imagine he works long hours during the holiday and prepare for the exam and related to predicted grades.

作者: ChiChiPaPa 時間: 12-5-1 18:32

4小時先1000元。都係做高檔，攪交流團，或做研究支援，論文潤色，好搵D。

你估幾時會有大學考試 pass paper，mock exam 和試題庫呢？

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-5-1 19:56

回復 ChiChiPaPa 的帖子

可能已經有架啦!!!!

作者: whooammii 時間: 12-5-1 20:41

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: ANChan59 時間: 12-5-2 21:48

回復 whooammii 的帖子

Don't let Oriental Daily knows it, they will automatically make up some fairy tales...... to entertain us.

作者: Unclejt 時間: 12-5-3 21:52

乜你地讀大學時無做 past paper 嘅咩？我有，圖書館有齊咁多年，衰在無答案。不過宜家 d 學會考試前派 past paper (連答案)，已經係指定動作喇。

作者: whooammii 時間: 12-5-4 00:57

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)