Joint Attention (Continued)
My another experience about joint attention. My son has average intelligence, average social skills and initiation. However, his joint attention is comparatively a bit below average as compared with kids in same age. Saying like his attention to lecturer in class wont exceed 10-15 mins, after that I need to remind him to pay attention to group focus every 10 mins. Mustn’t it be some other factors other than intelligence and social need.
Now, going back to my son's life experience in the beginning 4 years. He was fed with beast milk directly through body until 2 yrs. He was naturally born very cute and handsome (This is not a self-compliment and I said it coz it is relevant to this topic) He always has a smile in his face and not afraid of being taken by strangers, not afraid of unknown places or even darkness before 4, a natural born explorer with vast interest over many different things. Adults come to him voluntarily and he don’t even need to ask for people's attention for most of the time. School teachers & staff voluntarily assist him that I even need to remind them to stop since many of those tasks he could complete by himself. In a nutshell, his overall sense of security has been exceed average and having a vast interest over different issue also being ahead of other kids in same age.
Our sense of security & interest in our society provide us a fundamental platform for understanding task and group life. These two senses have developed in every kid since infancy. If these two components are under developed, it means a person has worried or even panic over the environment like an aniaml in wild life and/or a low self-esteem over the society. Of course, such person will no longer pay attention to the group both consciously and unconsciously since the environment or the people are actually endangered or hostile to him. He/she might even try method to escape from group or society or being busy to pay consistent and selective attention to those danger rather than paying attention to the group. In this case, his joint attention will be easily under developed. On the contrary, if a person has an over development in sense of security and interest, he will also easily not pay attention to group since return from group attention will not be treasured in his mind as he will get such return easily. He will be easily unconsciously pay not much attention to group direction. So, my son…
As I said before different components of attention is dependent to each other. More clearly, I should say they are interlocking with each other. Simply saying one goes up, others go up too and vice versa. Joint attention is also interlocking with other components of attention such as consistency, selectivity, convertibility, multiplicity of a person over a task especially on the part of consistency, selectivity and convertibility of a person over a focus. So, if you could help your kid to make improve on other areas, his joint attention would also be affected in the same direction generally.
It is funny that most people knew that our sensory integration plays an extremely vital role in our overall attention level. To be fair, our sensory integration did play a part in our joint attention, but compared with consistent, selective and convertible attention, the importance of our sensory integration to our joint attention may not be as significant as others. Perhaps let me explain the relationship between our sensory development and attention later if we have a chance.
Lastly, some minor issues over the development of our joint attention, such as speech ability, sickness, environment, age/timing, even motoring might also have some impact over the development of joint attention of a kid from time to time.
Perhaps let me get you a mathematical approach to calculate the level of joint attention of your kid out of these components in next passage since each component has its own weight over its development of a kid if u are interested. (For example, intelligence might be the most important part, followed by social need, etc) After that, we will move to share the ideas to improve your kid’s joint attention in later passages.
Joint attention (Continued)
Here is the calculation matrix and 2 REAL cases for your reference including my son.
As I said, the 7 main factors (intelligence, social need, sense of security, interest, other attention, sensory integration & other minor factors) and its weights (importance) are listed below.
Originally, sensory integration should divide into somatic, frontal, touching, visual, auditoral, smell & taste. Since joint attention seems not having very high importance in sensory integration (unlike other attention bits), I believe an overall general score is good enough. So did other attention components (which should divide into conistency, convertibility, multi-task & selectivity)
| Weight | Sample 1 (My son) | Sample 2 | |||||||
| Score | E-score | A-factor | A-score | Score | E-score | A-factor | A-score | ||
| Intelligence | 12 | 7 | 8.4 | N/A(12) | 8.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 500%(60) | 9 |
| Social need | 8 | 7 | 5.6 | N/A(8) | 5.6 | 7 | 5.6 | N/A(8) | 5.6 |
| Sense of security | 4 | 5 | 2 | N/A(4) | 2 | 8 | 3.2 | 80%(3.2) | 2.56 |
| Interest | 4 | 5 | 2 | N/A(4) | 2 | 4 | 1.6 | 200%(8) | 3.2 |
| Other attention | 5 | 5 | 2.5 | N/A(5) | 2.5 | 4 | 1.6 | 200%(8) | 3.2 |
| Sensory integration | 4 | 5 | 2 | N/A(4) | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | N/A(5) | 2 |
| Other factors | 3 | 7 | 2.1 | N/A(3) | 2.1 | 2 | 0.6 | 500%(15) | 3 |
| Total | 40 | 41 | 24.6 | N/A | 25.1 | 31.5 | 16.4 | N/A | 26.8 |
| Adjusted total/ Percentile | 40 | 62.75% | 108.2 | 24.8% | |||||
Score (Score):
It is range from 0 – 10.
If your kid has an overdevelopment of a category, please mark it LOWER and NOT HIGHEST since an overdevelopment should mean an obstacle rather than a gearing to the relevance of "joint attention". Of course, if there is an underdevelopment of a kid for a category, please just mark as it is accordingly.
Effective score (E-score):
Score X weight X 0.1
(Saying like my son’s intelligence E-score is 8.4 instead of 7 since it weight is 12)
Adjustment factor (A-factor):
There are 3 adjustment factors
1)If you mark any category a score >8 (out of 10), its importance should reduce to 80% since its excellence should be no longer relevant to “Joint attention” over certain level.
2)If you mark any category a score 3-5 (out of 10), its importance should increase to 200% since the delay in such category will burden the development in “Joint attention” to some extent.
3)If you mark any category a core <3 (out of 10), its importance should increase to 500% since the serious delay in such category will significantly burdent the development in “Joint attention” to a large extent.
The mark in blanket () under A-factor is the weight of a category X the adjustment factor (A-factor) if any. For example, in sample 2, its weight of intelligence should be 60 instead of 12 since the adjustment factor increased to 500%
Adjusted score (A-score):
E-score X A-factor (if any)
Adjusted total and Percentile
Sum up all adjusted total in blanket () and added up all A-score
Percentile = Total A-score/adjusted total
RESULTS and my opinion
Over 75%
Such kid reached the average level of joint attention of a kid. Not much work is necessary.
50-75%
Such kid's "joint attention" is below average but not serious. Attention and some work is necessary to improve.
30-50%
Such kid's joint attention is seriously below average. Fierce work should be carried quickly to bring him back the joint attention level and other category which he has delay asap.
<30%
Such kid is probably having a serious delay and doing a serious program for improvement. Joint attention, on the contrary, may not even a priority for him to improve.
Next passge we should probably share the tactics to improve a kid's joint attention , mostly probably unde categories 30-50% & 50-75% if you are interested.
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) | Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |