教育王國

標題: Sfa vs Kts [打印本頁]

作者: porkma    時間: 11-12-15 22:46     標題: Sfa vs Kts

How should I make a choice between these two school?
作者: xanax1mg    時間: 11-12-15 23:35

sfa
作者: manyui    時間: 11-12-16 00:38

If u look for academic, choice SFA. If u look for school net in kln city, choice KTS. I chose SFA too
作者: ha!    時間: 11-12-16 00:51

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: miutang    時間: 11-12-16 08:37

SFA無咩研究, 因為出名深.  反而KTS我係欣賞學校除左學生, 亦重視家長教育, 如何兩方一起培育小朋友.
作者: tkyy    時間: 11-12-16 08:59

SFA of course !德行可以自己教(作為家長應該的),但academic我估點都係學校先做得好d!
KTS都是好學校,如果我無SFA offer, 我一家會選KTS
作者: Gerard    時間: 11-12-16 09:06

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: hyatt    時間: 11-12-16 09:30

其實講深係咪SFA深過KTS呢? 覺唔覺得SFA好似剩讀書多D,但KTS就多D活動? 這個只係我感覺,唔知係咪真?
作者: KikiDaddy    時間: 11-12-16 10:58

KTS has a beautiful campus while SFA is strong in academic training (maths in particular).

In fact, both schools together with APS are all very schools. You can't go wrong with any one of them. I'll choose them over most of the thru train DSS schools except the top tier ones like SPCC, DGJS and DBS.

Since these schools will only call the candidates on waiting list in Jun next year, I suggest you holding the offers for a while and get some first hand information from the parents of existing students before making the decision.
作者: waiwai1234567    時間: 11-12-16 11:17

Both is good school
作者: twobirds    時間: 11-12-16 11:42

SFA of course !
作者: ha!    時間: 11-12-16 12:09     標題: 回復 8# hyatt 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: hyatt    時間: 11-12-16 12:25

原帖由 ha! 於 11-12-16 12:09 發表
Can go to SFA's homepage, and there are some sparkling icons at right corner, you can see their ECA this month.  SFA should have ECA as other schools, which are good enough for choosing.  Becoz SFA is ...


Tks, will take a look~
作者: baekdoosan    時間: 11-12-16 14:58

SFA
作者: bnmr200    時間: 11-12-16 15:28

剛比較KTS, SFA 和 APS 的升中派位結果,學生考獲Band 1的百份比如下:

                KTS        SFA        APS
Band 1A                32.54        40.27        43.42
Band 1B或以上        58.73        61.74        67.11
Band 1                81.75        77.85        78.95

三者比較,APS 拔尖培養比較好,KTS 補低功夫比較好。
作者: bnmr200    時間: 11-12-16 15:30

剛比較KTS, SFA 和 APS 的升中派位結果,學生考獲Band 1的百份比如下:

                                KTS         SFA         APS
Band 1A                   32.54        40.27       43.42
Band 1B或以上        58.73        61.74       67.11
Band 1                      81.75        77.85       78.95

三者比較,APS 拔尖培養比較好,KTS 補低功夫比較好。
作者: tkyy    時間: 11-12-16 15:57

奇怪!好多人會評價sfa 教得深、又谷;但係aps 程度差吾多甚至高少少,但吾多話谷、大壓力咁?請賜教
作者: flyda    時間: 11-12-16 16:59     標題: 回復 16# bnmr200 的帖子

APS在網頁以兩年公佈一次,你如何得知每年派位情況
更何況每間學校都沒有公布總參加人數,百分比如何計算出來
作者: ha!    時間: 11-12-16 17:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: manyui    時間: 11-12-16 20:00

ha!, r u choose APS for your child?
作者: flyda    時間: 11-12-16 20:43

http://www.apskt.edu.hk/index.ph ... 55-56&Itemid=49

我只想帶出其如兩間小學公佈年度是2010-2011年度,但aps則是2009-2011年度,這只有兩個可能性,一是佢地將兩年度學生派位結合一起公佈,另一方面可能佢地admin搞錯年份。這樣會誤導家長,錯覺派位很強,若真的admin打錯年份,那麼家長要考慮將來子女就讀會否成績表的分數都搞錯。
作者: miutang    時間: 11-12-16 21:15

2009-2011寫法是無問題,有其他學校如沙呂都是這樣寫,因五年級開始呈分,故兩年來算。
作者: kennyklt    時間: 11-12-19 18:31

flyda 發表於 11-12-16 20:43
http://www.apskt.edu.hk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=220:2009-09-02-10-01-38&catid=6 ...

You should make sure whether it is your own misunderstanding or the school's mistake.


作者: joeyxlma    時間: 11-12-19 22:34

I'll choose KTS as I buy its approach.
Also it is in Kowloon Tong net.
作者: lingling06    時間: 11-12-19 23:37

回復 joeyxlma 的帖子

Same to me.  I will opt for KTS
作者: evacalbee    時間: 11-12-20 09:24

見過sfa功課, 小一已經要做research. 去公園搜集資料 / 統計咁
有料又捱得到應該會好勁, 捱唔到父母同小朋友都辛苦.
作者: waiwai1234567    時間: 11-12-20 21:06

I CHOOSE KTS
作者: joeyxlma    時間: 11-12-20 21:48

Some more explanation for why I support KTS, however, all of the following are personal views and may not be correct:


1. SFA:is very good at training on academic but I feel that somehow the training is more machanical.  My child is not that type.  I also afriad that my child will be get used to machanical academic training and has less development in analyticl mind.  For KTS, I believe it is also push but less machancial then SFA.

2. KTS emphasis the co-operation between parents and school and also as good bonding among parents.  It is very good as you no longer has to worry about what the child's classmates will be as you do not only know his/her classmates and also their parents.  

3. Parents are highly selected by KTS (2nd interview is mainly on the paretns I can say) and that is the main point for sending children to a private school than a gov't school - not for their living standards but for the fact that all of them are very committed to nurish their child.

4. KTS is at Kowloon Tong net.

5. SFA is also good as it is an English school.  but I think I can be convinced to give this up for the other points (actually I found English is much easlier than Chinese if the child starts to learn both language at the same time)




歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) Powered by Discuz! X1.5