教育王國

標題: Marymount 瑪利曼 [打印本頁]

作者: mmhchung 時間: 11-11-16 10:23 標題: Marymount 瑪利曼

有家長可以分享下 Marymount 谷嗎？跟SFA 比較邊間谷D？

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 11-11-16 10:25

我識人讀MARYMOUNT嫌功課少

作者: CandyTheMom 時間: 11-11-16 11:21

Of course SFA 比較谷 ( a lot more)! You go to older discussions threads and you will read lots about SFA.

原帖由 mmhchung 於 11-11-16 10:23 發表
有家長可以分享下 Marymount 谷嗎？跟SFA 比較邊間谷D？

作者: ericter 時間: 11-11-16 11:35

有說MARYMOUNT中學升中第一階段不收本校學生,是否真呢?那第二round是否又會真的收呢?

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 11-11-16 10:25 發表
我識人讀嫌功課少

作者: Ving 時間: 11-11-16 11:49

Just wonder for school like MaryMount, if the students admission is through counting marks and luck draw and small amount "knock door", then how can it make sure the students up to school standard. Is it common some students are required or advised to leave the school due to not up to standard from P1 to P6?

作者: mmhchung 時間: 11-11-16 12:02

聖心（私立部）與Marymount 相比又如何？邊間谷D？

作者: 輝輝的媽媽 時間: 11-11-16 13:03 標題: 回復 5# Ving 的帖子

學校是用來"教好""學生", 而不是專用來"教""好學生" 吧, 我相信瑪利曼有這個能力令每個小朋友都進步

作者: Vickymouse 時間: 11-11-16 15:05

瑪xx內某老師心目中的"好學生"是巳學識課本，不用向老師發問指教。如有不明白就叫學生問補習老師或父母。學校會"教好"學生啊？還是小朋友要先做到"好學生"？..........最终

追唔上嘅會自動流失

作者: tiggger 時間: 11-11-16 15:46

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: avbee 時間: 11-11-25 22:46

第一階段不收本校學生.....many schools are like this....

for the first round, the school try to pick some elite student.....and the2nd round for the school students

作者: avbee 時間: 11-11-25 22:47

by the way, i guess聖心（私立部） is abit better

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-26 11:16

In terms of '谷',
SFA = 聖心（私立部) > MPS

作者: CandyTheMom 時間: 11-11-26 11:36

agreed agreed.

also they are very '谷'

原帖由 leeleelumlum 於 11-11-26 11:16 發表
In terms of '谷',
SFA = 聖心（私立部) > MPS

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-26 14:11

原帖由 CandyTheMom 於 11-11-26 11:36 發表
agreed agreed.

also they are very '谷'

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-26 22:46

If 谷=good, then DG, DB are not good.

In terms of '谷',
SFA = 聖心（私立部) > MPS [/quote]

作者: PCMW 時間: 11-11-27 00:10

聖心我唔知,但我識一個瑪利曼女學生,英文GOOD GOOD GOOD,流利,好聽!我覺得佢小六的英文程度同好多中三學生有得比.
但中文就真係麻麻了.

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-27 00:29

中英文都叻梗係好啦，好多時英文強，中文好自然就稍遜，如果二揀一，咁我情願英文好，有d學校到中學英文都唔得，
見到鬼佬都驚，咁中文叻到識飛又點？

作者: lafayette 時間: 11-11-27 16:55

咁中文叻到識飛又點？

唔通係時代廣場招呼大陸佬咩？英文好，d，係老蘭招呼鬼佬，點都high d ！

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-27 17:38

同埋讀書又好，出黎做野都好，我只係聽過人講「嘩！佢英文好勁！」未聽過「嘩！佢中文好勁！」囉！
所以點解Marymount中文弱仍然能成為灣仔網
最多人揀第一位既女校。

作者: ukodelechan 時間: 11-11-27 18:51

As far as I know, Marymount's english and chinese are quite good. And in MSS, they even offer PUTONGHUA class to teach Chinese. I'm sure that the girls are going to be even much brighter in the near future.

Compared with SFA, I think Marymount seems to have less hw and tests or exams. Yet, SFA is no way compared with Marymount, whichever you are talking about, like academic, reputation, brand name, ECAs, network etc. But of course, the competition that your girl will be facing and encountering will be accordingly higher.

Also aware of the family support both physically and financially that you can give to your girl. Think about some of dr. Stanley Ho's daughters and many other famous people also studied there, and you will know the demand Marymount girls are being expected of.

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-27 19:00

Agreed, and as far as I know, children studying in SFA with good results will change to e.g. DG, DB, Maryknoll, Marymount, La Salle etc...But I've never heard of anyone studying in Marymount change to SFA.

作者: avbee 時間: 11-11-27 22:41

中文 is very important.......please don't think that 中文 is not as important as English. Alot of my US & Europe's clients are learning chinese because they told me that China has more potential than their countries!!

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-27 23:08

冇話中文唔重要，所有傳統學校既中、英、數都係主科，不過如果小朋友讀嗰間學校係英文小學，大部份科目用英語教授，咁英文較強係好正常，中文又唔會差到溝通唔到。If u think that Chinese is soooo important then u better choose a 中小& 中中for yr kid. On the contrary someone may really can't even hold a simple conversation with foreigner if his/her English is very poor.

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-28 00:32

SFA 應該比較谷喎, 教得又深
我識有家長因頂唔住 SFA功課, 插班入 LaSalle
MPS 又相對輕鬆, 插班入 SFA有d難度~~~

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-28 00:40

原帖由 mmhchung 於 11-11-16 12:02 發表
聖心（私立部）與Marymount 相比又如何？邊間谷D？

聖心 (私立部) ~~~

作者: season_sincere 時間: 11-11-28 00:41

Actually I think both are good schools, but when compared of course Marymount is much better.

And I don't think Marymount girls will go to SFA?

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-28 10:31

But please don't think that MPS is so relax that you can release yourselves from your kids' school life. On the contrary, the parents of MPS students might need to closely monitor the progress of your kids and take certain remedies when necessary.

In MPS, it depends much on the parents not the school.

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-28 12:36

Hi leeleelumlum,

想請教你，小女今年有幸插班入了瑪利曼，成績尚好也暫無須補習，因小女上堂很留心，但如你所說我有些擔心，是否很多東西學校不教又expect小朋友識，咁大家就要自己去補習？

quote]原帖由 leeleelumlum 於 11-11-28 10:31 發表

But please don't think that MPS is so relax that you can release yourselves from your kids' school life. On the contrary, the parents of MPS students might need to closely monitor the progress of your ... [/quote]

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-28 12:44 標題: 回復 8# ukodelechan 的帖子

It is true that MPS 's English standard is high, but their HKCEE exams in terms of scoring A grades are pretty low.

Its Blue blood name, which to me only equates to pupils from the Rich Circle, and this situation more or less is for the past, given a high proportion of candidates are from the allocation system.

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-28 17:47

[quote]原帖由 smsss 於 11-11-28 12:36 發表

Hi leeleelumlum,

想請教你，小女今年有幸插班入了瑪利曼，成績尚好也暫無須補習，因小女上堂很留心，但如你所說我有些擔心，是否很多東西學校不教又expect小朋友識，咁大家就要自己去補習？
quote]

If your girl actually has been a very attentive person, then your burden would not be so heavy. MPS would not push the girls too much, but the parents would do so. It does not mean that the teachers of MPS would not teach but test only.

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-28 17:52

原帖由 VincentL 於 11-11-28 12:44 發表
It is true that MPS 's English standard is high, but their HKCEE exams in terms of scoring A grades are pretty low.

Its Blue blood name, which to me only equates to pupils from the Rich Circle, and t ...

Pardon me, I do not quite agree with you. The standard of MPS and MSS is relatively high, also their students are very smart and presentable. Not just the blue blood name....

作者: season_sincere 時間: 11-11-28 17:58

原帖由 VincentL 於 11-11-28 12:44 發表
It is true that MPS 's English standard is high, but their HKCEE exams in terms of scoring A grades are pretty low.

Its Blue blood name, which to me only equates to pupils from the Rich Circle, and t ...

May I know where did you get these information, as far as I heard, Marymount is strong academically and in ECAs and quite blue-blooded even for nowadays. For example, my friend's daughterwas in the same class as Dr. Stanley Ho's daughter .

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-28 18:21 標題: 回復 30# leeleelumlum 的帖子

Thank you so much leeleelumlum.

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-28 23:24 標題: 回復 2# season_sincere 的帖子

Very simple, MPS did not produce a single 10A students for the past ten years. If your conclusion is drawn mainly based on Stanley's Ho daughter was studying there, then there is nothing too much I can say.

But as I said before the School's English standard is really high

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-28 23:33 標題: 回覆 4# leeleelumlum 的文章

Perhaps u hear me wrong, I never say MPS is not good and their students are not presentable. But its academic record can not be compared to SPPC, DGS, QC, St Joseph, etc or put it in another way, it is more like a hybrid of Local and international school.

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-28 23:37

Very true no 10A fm MSS but in general their academic results are good, and the school train up all MPS and MSS students to be all-rounded and confident.
You can sat that no 10A means not good, but if a school produce one or two students with 10A but the rest are with zero credit, does this school very good?

作者: tiggger 時間: 11-11-28 23:40 標題: 回覆 1# smsss 的文章

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-28 23:48 標題: 回復 1# smsss 的帖子

If you are a parent of MSS, I think you should already know they dun have too many 6A students also, and the alumni are only some Singers ( please do a wikipedia search and do a comparison on DGS, SPPC, St .Joseph, QC, etc )

作者: hophopbunny 時間: 11-11-28 23:58 標題: 回復 1# VincentL 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 00:23 標題: 回復 1# hophopbunny 的帖子

Agreed, and I think MPS or MSS is particularly suitable for parents who intend to send their daughters to study abroad.

And more importantly, I think at end of the day, it is the own effort of the student that really matters, a good school only provides a better environment, and a red-blooded student can not become a blue-blooded student by attending a blue-blooded school. So when choosing a school for the kid , it is like choosing a wife , we should pick the one which is most appropriate to us, rather than blindly go for the most pretty and richest woman

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 04:01 標題: 回復 2# season_sincere 的帖子

Very simple, MPS did not produce a single 10A students for the past ten years. If your conclusion is drawn mainly based on Stanley's Ho daughter was studying there, then there is nothing too much I can say.

But as I said before the School's English standard is really high

作者: daisy17772 時間: 11-11-29 09:15

原帖由 season_sincere 於 11-11-28 17:58 發表

May I know where did you get these information, as far as I heard, Marymount is strong academically and in ECAs and quite blue-blooded even for nowadays. For example, my friend's daughterwas in the ...

Dr. Ho's another daughter went to St. Paul's Primary, did that give ppl impression that SPPCS was a blue-blood school? Rather Marymount attracts lots of families from upper-middle income stream whose children did not get admitted to the top tiers, or their parents prefer gov't schools.

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-29 09:50 標題: 回復 41# VincentL 的帖子

我相信你對MSS不太暸解, 據我所知, MSS 並不鼓勵HKCEE考 10科, 那就何來10A 呢:loveliness:

作者: traeh 時間: 11-11-29 11:39

原帖由 season_sincere 於 11-11-28 17:58 發表

May I know where did you get these information, as far as I heard, Marymount is strong academically and in ECAs and quite blue-blooded even for nowadays. For example, my friend's daughterwas in the ...

政府推行大抽獎之後，津校其實都好難blue blooded，好多blue blood都唔想玩計分同抽獎，所以直資、私校、國際學校會多好多。

作者: traeh 時間: 11-11-29 11:43

原帖由 daisy17772 於 11-11-29 09:15 發表
Dr. Ho's another daughter went to St. Paul's Primary, did that give ppl impression that SPPCS was a blue-blood school? Rather Marymount attracts lots of families from upper-middle income stream whose children did not get admitted to the top tiers, or their parents prefer gov't schools.

何生真係好多女，好似有個讀聖心。咁聖心都唔算好貴族掛？

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 11:50 標題: 回復 1# whl3868 的帖子

As I said b4, MSS or MPS is no doubt a very good school, or put it in another way, they dun train their students like exam machine.

In fact, I did some research on MSS, ans suprisingly, its ranking is very underated compared to its name.
Perhaps , your all supporters need to reclaim it from the Statistic providers.

Please us google search to type "香港中學排名" and u try to click from 2001 to 2010 one by one, its ranking is as low as 70th sthg in 2005.

In fact , my daughter nearly went into MPS this year, but at the end we chose SFA, but thank god in the dying second on 30th August, she managed to get into our all time 1st choice, that is why I have a little bit knowledge about MPS.

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-29 12:05

所以, 網上既資料有幾準, 係有一定嘅懷疑, 佢地d資料何來???

作者: hophopbunny 時間: 11-11-29 12:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-29 12:08

仲有, 好多中學一去到F3-F5 已經很多學生出國讀書, 單憑HKCEE成續去評一間學校, 已有一定差異

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-29 12:35 標題: 回復 46# VincentL 的帖子

Their ranking in 2010 is 14th.

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 14:10 標題: 回復 1# smsss 的帖子

I think apart from 2010, its ranking is very low, particularly from 2005 to 2008.

And pls see this statistics as below , which is purly using Scoring A as the only criteria to rank,
http://www.milliondollar.com.hk/bestschool.html

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 14:14 標題: 回復 3# whl3868 的帖子

But u mean no students from DGS, DBS , SPPC etc will leave the school from F3 to F5 to study aboard????

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 14:16 標題: 回復 1# VincentL 的帖子

Anyhow, it ia a good school and its English standard is no doubt in the 1st tier.

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-29 14:40

估唔到呢類網呢咁多人信....

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 15:18 標題: 回復 11# traeh 的帖子

Agreed, so the trend is the DSS will get stronger and stronger

作者: hophopbunny 時間: 11-11-29 15:20 標題: 回復 2# whl3868 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 15:35 標題: 回復 1# hophopbunny 的帖子

So u all mean the fact that DGS , SPPC , La Salle and DBS, consistenly on the top 10 are all fake from the statistic?

Please be confident, if you kid is smart, no matter which school they study, they can score good results, if they are not hard working, they will fail even though they are from DBS or La Salle.

作者: hophopbunny 時間: 11-11-29 15:44

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: season_sincere 時間: 11-11-29 17:06

Actually I have got two girls in DGJS and of course this is an excellent school !! However I don't personally believe in those lists of school rankings. Think back to the days when my girls were applying to Primary one, DGJS was my very first choice, and MPS was my second choice. I have checked very carefully through every single aspects as I really want something best for my girl, so I'm pretty confident and sure that MPS is quite similar to DGJS.

作者: smsss 時間: 11-11-29 17:26

Both yr girls got into DGJS, they must be very very smart!

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-29 19:53

原帖由 season_sincere 於 11-11-29 17:06 發表
I have checked very carefully through every single aspects as I really want something best for my girl, so I'm pretty confident and sure that MPS is quite similar to DGJS

Not only your two girls are so smart, but also you...

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-29 20:00

原帖由 VincentL 於 11-11-28 23:33 發表
Perhaps u hear me wrong, I never say MPS is not good and their students are not presentable. But its academic record can not be compared to SPPC, DGS, QC, St Joseph, etc or put it in another way, it i ...

No, I did not hear it wrongly.... you implied that MPS & MSS only with high English standard but nothing else.

No matter whether you have chosen MPS to be your kid's school or not, it is upto yourself, but please don't distort the performance of the school.

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 20:38 標題: 回復 1# leeleelumlum 的帖子

No la, I only said their academic standard is not as good as DGS, SPPC, etc. It is quite surprising, it is put on the same rank as those schools in the forum, this again could send misleading information to parents who target heavily on academic achievement.

作者: daisy17772 時間: 11-11-29 20:42

原帖由 traeh 於 11-11-29 11:43 發表

何生真係好多女，好似有個讀聖心。咁聖心都唔算好貴族掛？

yes yes ah :)

作者: lugano 時間: 11-11-29 20:49

Marymount在我心中, 絕對係一間很有份量的名校

我對一間學校的分析不會只參考 Khmama的中學成績排名去睇, 因當中資料不太齊存, 如果只係純論成績, 不如Go for 鄧顯和林護, 駛乜讀有濃厚歷史背景的傳統名校吖, 分析一間學校, 我會從多角度去睇, 縱觀以下 criteria, 我覺得 MSS依然好好

(1) 學校歷史
(2) 過往成績
(3) 現今成績
(4) 校風
(5) 校譽
(6) 舊生社會成就
(7) 舊生 Network
(8) 辦學團體理念
(9) 對現校學生觀感
(10) 個人認識的舊生

觀察於微, Marymount 能夠培養出女學生整體上有氣質, 同時態度亦很低調, 這也是該校成功之處

作者: lugano 時間: 11-11-29 21:07

何鴻燊子女就讀的名校

St Paul's Convent: 何超瓊, 何超鳳, 何超蕸, 何超儀

HK Wah Yan: 何猷龍, 何猷啟, 何猷亨, 何猷君

Marymount: 何超盈, 何超欣

Sacred Heart: 何超雲, 何超蓮

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-29 21:37

原帖由 lugano 於 11-11-29 20:49 發表
分析一間學校, 我會從多角度去睇, 縱觀以下 criteria, 我覺得 MSS依然好好

(1) 學校歷史
(2) 過往成績
(3) 現今成績
(4) 校風
(5) 校譽
(6) 舊生社會成就
(7) 舊生 Network
(8) 辦學團體理念
(9) 對現校學生觀感
(10) 個人認識的舊生

觀察於微, Marymount 能夠培養出女學生整體上有氣質, 同時態度亦很低調, 這也是該校成功之處

agree

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-29 21:42

如果要睇 academic achievement, 一早都講左 SFA 比 MPS 強啦, 你揀對了

但切勿將 MPS 說得那麽不濟, 很多港島區12網既家長就係喜愛 MPS既教學模式, 唔係純從academic achievement出發, MSS 亦很難產生10A狀元 (往績計)

作者: VincentL 時間: 11-11-29 22:03 標題: 回覆 1# whl3868 的文章

No, in fact I was very confused at that point in the time, because I know SFA is really really exam oriented, and I really hope my daughter to have a memorable childhood and i wish I could have a balance between Mary mount and SFA. And it is true that I asked 10 out of ten mothers advised me to go for Marymount. But at the end , I chose SFA, because I am staying in the Kowloon side, and it is really tiring for my daughter to spend 2 and half hrs traveling everyday. So I would consider my case as really exceptional.

作者: daisy17772 時間: 11-11-29 23:50

原帖由 lugano 於 11-11-29 21:07 發表
何鴻燊子女就讀的名校

St Paul's Convent: 何超瓊, 何超鳳, 何超蕸, 何超儀

HK Wah Yan: 何猷龍, 何猷啟, 何猷亨, 何猷君

Marymount: 何超盈, 何超欣

Sacred Heart: 何超雲, 何超蓮 ...

Not all correct ah.

作者: lugano 時間: 11-11-30 09:43

原帖由 daisy17772 於 11-11-29 23:50 發表

Not all correct ah.

daisy17772

已盡力解答

請留意下面我連續出的 4 段 Post 分享..... 謝謝

[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-11-30 17:01 編輯 ]

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-30 10:27

原帖由 whl3868 於 11-11-29 21:42 發表
如果要睇 academic achievement, 一早都講左 SFA 比 MPS 強啦

Pardon me. May I know from what data you can draw such conclusion?

作者: whl3868 時間: 11-11-30 14:37

個人認為及所知.....無依據....可以不理~~~

作者: leeleelumlum 時間: 11-11-30 15:07

原帖由 whl3868 於 11-11-30 14:37 發表
個人認為及所知.....無依據....可以不理~~~

Thank you

作者: bblovebb2 時間: 11-11-30 15:45 標題: 回復 66# lugano 的帖子

其實共通點係全是天主教學校，因澳門以天主教為主！因賭王一家是天主教徒，所以只選天主教學校。我也認識一些天主教徒，只為子女選天主教學校，連基督教都不可！我覺得賭王子女讀的當中有好學校，但現在未必全是頂級啦！個人覺得當中St Paul's convent 是最優秀。

作者: lugano 時間: 11-11-30 16:15

(1) 聖保祿學校: 何超瓊

[url=http://singtao.com/archive/fulls ... keyword1=&keyword2=]http://singtao.com/archive/fulls ... keyword1=&keyword2=[/url]

http://singtao.com/archive/fullstory.asp?andor=or&year1=2004&month1=9&day1=23&year2=2004&month2=9&day2=23&category=all&id=20040923g06&keyword1=&keyword2=

聖保祿直資新貌慶百五周年
“………前行政局首席議員鄧蓮如勳爵、信德集團董事總經理何超瓊 …… 都是該校的知名校友 ……”

(2) 聖保祿學校: 何超鳳

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20100423/00176_087.html

中環出更：超鳳撐愛女母校出錢出力
“……卓妮同Daisy傾開，發現佢原來唔係拔萃舊生，當年就讀聖保祿學校……”

(3) 聖保祿學校: 何超儀

http://hi.baidu.com/xiaoyujimes/ ... bfbb30359bf7f2.html

http://www.dashuhua.com/boke/60075694.html

"..... 小學時代的超儀，肥妹仔一名，但輪廓已經度，留意(相片中) 套St.Paul 小學校裙仔。....."

(4) 聖保祿學校: 何超蕸

我之前網上睇過, 不過搵唔翻篇報道

[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-11-30 17:48 編輯 ]

作者: lugano 時間: 11-11-30 16:17

(5) 香港華仁: 何猷龍

http://paper.wenweipo.com/2004/06/23/NS0406230003.htm

何猷龍打骰新濠信心爆棚
“.......1985年：於華仁小學就讀至3年級，在母親陪同下赴加拿大繼續升學.......”

(6) 香港華仁: 何猷啟

http://www.hkheadline.com/ent/ent_content.asp?track=&contid=32215&srctype=g

何鴻燊虎父無犬女
"........香港華仁和九龍華仁的舊生會前晚為華仁一家基金舉行慈善籌款晚宴，校友、嘉賓如何鴻燊、胡應湘 …….. 賭王與女兒何超雲同來，他笑謂本來想帶在華仁讀過書的猶啟來，不過猶啟怕羞不來了......."

(7) 香港華仁: 何猷亨

http://www.kui.name/element/%E6%A2%81%E5%AE%89%E7%90%AA/2007-02

“.......賭王四太梁安琪兒子何猷亨曾經華仁書院讀過書，只不過依家轉到外國升學........”

(8) 香港華仁: 何猷君

http://www.worldclassarena.hk/tc/whatsnew/news21.htm

http://news.sina.com.hk/news/1299/3/2/2257713/1.html

賭王乖仔好數口
".......就讀番禺會所華仁小學六年級的何猷君（Mario），是連續兩年以雙優成績獲邀參加精英邀請賽的3名學生之一......."

[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-11-30 17:38 編輯 ]

作者: lugano 時間: 11-11-30 16:18

(9) 瑪利曼:何超盈

http://the-sun.on.cc/cnt/finance/20111119/00436_006.html

跑馬地　精英薈萃
“ ........區內老牌名校瑪利曼中學……學校舊生名人輩出，包括歌手林憶蓮、蔡卓妍、富商趙世曾千金趙式芝及賭王四太千金何超盈等......”

(10) 瑪利曼: 何超欣

http://www.eastweek.com.hk/index.php?aid=8715

英國玩出禍　賭王下旨回歸何超欣超市掃平貨
“..... 賭王何鴻燊與四太梁安琪所生的孻女何超欣，原定今年八月到英國升學，可是去了一個月，人細鬼大的她被報章刊登與男同學去街街照片，賭王得悉後立即急召超欣返港。超欣返港後，隨即被安排返回瑪利曼小學繼續升讀小六......”

[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-11-30 16:45 編輯 ]

作者: lugano 時間: 11-11-30 16:18

(11) 聖心: 何超蓮

http://dailynews.sina.com/bg/ent/hktwstar/sinacn/20100131/15341158832.html

http://www.vivaphoto.com/wai81/wai81_015/wai81/MUF_HqW2Jb.html

“.......中學：曾就讀香港嘉諾撒聖心書院......家庭背景：賭王何鴻燊三房陳婉珍的次女........”

校服相片都有......

(12) 聖心: 何超雲

http://www.hkheadline.com/ent/ent_content.asp?track=&contid=32215&srctype=g

http://gamed.tw/book/doc-view-4857.html

何鴻燊虎父無犬女
“.......何鴻燊認同「萬般皆下品，惟有讀書高」的道理，對於子女的要求是：希望子女先努力讀書，將來考進劍橋、牛津。他曾誇讚何超雲：「所以她很拚命，讀書不錯。讀聖心時曾參加公開比賽得到第二，我自然有獎。虎父無犬女。」........”

[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-11-30 17:46 編輯 ]

作者: hophopbunny 時間: 11-11-30 16:37

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: daisy17772 時間: 11-12-1 23:03

原帖由 lugano 於 11-11-30 09:43 發表

daisy17772

已盡力解答

請留意下面我連續出的 4 段 Post 分享..... 謝謝

You really paid a lot of effort to find out their school background. Anyway, I did not need to know them thru news from newspaper ga! And I didn't need to be clarified.

作者: lugano 時間: 11-12-2 11:50

原帖由 daisy17772 於 11-12-1 23:03 發表

You really paid a lot of effort to find out their school background.

Anyway, I did not need to know them thru news from newspaper ga!

And I didn't need to be clarified.

我只係用左 10 分鐘的 Googling 時間, 就搵哂所有資料, 不用費多大的力

當別人發表一些認知的事情, 而你就發表"偉論"話別人發言有誤

當別人逐一拿出傳媒報道來引證其實是你一知半解, 亂噏當秘笈, 然後你就扮失憶, 當正自己之前冇發問過, 一副事不關己的態度

本來, 何鴻燊子女讀乜學校這些無聊事我都冇乜好回應, 我只係回應你識少少, 扮代表, 跌左落地, 拿翻揸沙的態度, 明冇?

作者: daisy17772 時間: 11-12-2 12:12

原帖由 lugano 於 11-12-2 11:50 發表
我只係用左 10 分鐘的 Googling 時間, 就搵哂所有資料, 不用費多大的力

當別人發表一些認知的事情, 而你就發表"偉論"話別人發言有誤

當別人逐一拿出傳媒報道來引證其實是你一知半解, 亂噏當秘笈, 然後你就扮失憶, 當正自己之前冇發問過, 一副事不關己的態度

本來, 何鴻燊子女讀乜學校這些無聊事我都冇乜好回應, 我只係回應你識少少, 扮代表, 跌左落地, 拿翻揸沙的態度, 明冇?

Quote:扮失憶..跌左落地, 拿翻揸沙的態度...亂噏當秘笈...只係回應你識少少.(ha?) Unquote. Sounds so mysterious that you would write this to someone you totally don't know. What a behaviour...ha ha.... !

[ 本帖最後由 daisy17772 於 11-12-2 12:14 編輯 ]

作者: hophopbunny 時間: 11-12-2 14:15 標題: 回復 1# daisy17772 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: daisy17772 時間: 11-12-2 19:16

原帖由 hophopbunny 於 11-12-2 14:15 發表
唔好爭論啦。。大家醒目家長都是想verify吓D資料。。。。

最怕信埋D網上不明來歷資料來揀學校仲講到言之鑿鑿。

True, it's not uncommon that even newspapers give wrong info, not to mention other sources from internet.

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)