原帖由 lovelyteresa 於 11-11-8 18:08 發表
因報了ESF K1, 女女暫時是CAT1,但相信在香港過兩年會變成CAT2懂廣東話,想請問有否CAT2 ESF Kindy家長分享考進/落選ESF的原因及過程?因想入ESF K1其實只是最終想入KGV, 所以很希望得到過來人意見,謝謝幫忙!...
原帖由 elmostoney 於 11-11-9 14:57 發表
我個女讀緊港島small world,之前佢地好多學生都入ESF,但聽講近一兩年,即使係cat 1 small world學生都入唔到esf. small world係明年九月會開小學,學制跟nis,都係五歲入小一,22人一班,大家如果驚esf冇位,可以問下.佢地今年過度期, ...
原帖由 tomintoul 於 11-11-9 00:36 發表
今年 CWBS 暫只計算 siblings /舊生/職員工及 ESF Cat 1 學生已經爆凸, ESF Cat 1 學生都有機會要 waiting. KGV 更加不可能有本地學生位, 單收番 waiting list 學生已經足以新 school term 開班
...
原帖由 lovelyteresa 於 11-11-9 08:49 發表
So that means there will be quite a lot of Cat2 esf k2 kids can't have any esf yr 1 offer unless they have island catchment? Poor poor...anyone know more if QBS can absorb the Cat2 from TY esf if they ...
原帖由 lottieclee 於 11-11-19 09:37 發表
I got an email that was sent out by BHS, not the central admission office. And another email from RC saying literally the same thing. A letter is mailed to us informing us regarding status of interv ...
原帖由 karenchan99 於 11-11-19 10:39 發表
BHS is also heavy oversubscribed this year? My friend's kid was in other kinder, but got an offer from BHS last yr.
CoP 18-5 | Admissions Policy and Procedure |
| The Head of Student Support provided an update on the ESF admissions policy and procedure to members. Current prioritisations include applicants’:
Members asked how the decision was made as to whether a child was Category 1 or 2. The Head of Student Support said that this was done the basis of the statement about the language spoken at home made by the parent on the application form as there was no way to effectively test an applicant’s primary language. In light of press reports, members were concerned that false declarations were being made by parents during the application process, however it was argued that there was no evidence to prove so. If there was good reason to doubt a parent’s statement, follow-up action could be taken to revise a child’s category and this did sometimes happen. It was suggested that the applicant’s parents should sign a document stating that all the information they provided was truthful. If it could be proved that there was false information provided, applicants would immediately be removed from the waiting list. It was pointed out that Board members are aware of the controversy regarding the lack of spaces within ESF schools and that the application process would be reviewed during the subvention process. It would be for Board members to decide whether changes should be made to the policy, but it was the officials’ ambition to eventually remove the category system altogether. Statistics on the number of students who were permanent residents versus non-permanent residents were provided. Permanent residents were defined as children with one parent in the family holding a permanent Hong Kong ID card. Across ESF schools, the numbers varied, but on average, 68% were permanent residents and 32% were non-permanent residents. Private independent schools do not currently have a category system in place, but permanent resident status is considered during the application process. It was questioned as to whether ESF primary and secondary schools could consider the system used by the private independent schools, as an alternative to categorisation. It was clarified that ESF’s ordinance states that it exists to educate children in the medium of English who can benefit from such an education, and does not discriminate based on ethnicity. It was pointed out that the category system was in place to simplify the admissions policy and it was questioned whether the interview process could be enhanced in order to validate the information that was provided. It was noted that the problem with enhancing the interview process is the logistics of time as the interview process is quite extensive and requires the participation of teachers which may remove them from the classroom. Members agreed that the current admission policy and category system would need to be redefined as there were problems with the system’s validity and workability. It would be desirable to remove the categories. Members agreed that one solution would be to enhance the interview process. |
原帖由 jamhappybobo 於 11-11-21 14:53 發表
I hope the ESF primary such mom can answer my doubt regarding the cat 1 and cat 2.
Now my son is at ESF K1 and he cannot understand Cantonese at all because I grow up in Singapore and both my husband ...
原帖由 lottieclee 於 11-11-21 22:39 發表
Mind you... I think they do test the categories declared by parents during the interview. They said if they found out the parent lie on the application form, the child would be put at the end of the ...
原帖由 cissyc 於 11-11-14 16:26 發表
I was really shocked coz I just got the call from KJS that my daughter who is now studying in TY K2 will not be offered a place at KJS despite I got an elder one now studying at KJS !!
madscientist 發表於 12-2-21 00:56
Because RC/DC are fully IB and it seems most ESF schools are not IB yet?
madscientist 發表於 12-2-21 00:48
It is not just strange, DC's location does not make sense if their target children are local.
歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) | Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |