教育王國

標題: 請教ian: 九龍區傳統幼稚園 [打印本頁]

作者: iris5a 時間: 11-10-11 14:40 標題: 請教ian: 九龍區傳統幼稚園

想請教一下, 有那些九龍區的幼稚園是比例傳統, 適合守規矩, 服從性強, 不是太有創意的小朋友?

其他媽媽又可以幫下我嗎?
謝謝!

[ 本帖最後由 iris5a 於 11-10-11 15:41 編輯 ]

作者: iantsang 時間: 11-10-11 16:37

The first one that come to my mind would be Kentville.

作者: iris5a 時間: 11-10-11 16:47 標題: 回復 2# iantsang 的帖子

Thanks Ian, it's my honor to have your reply.

To be honest, I prefer those K with voucher. A bit depressed that Munsang has changed the mode starting from 2012-13.

Any recommendation to me please?

Thanks so much to have your advice and help.

作者: yan817 時間: 11-10-11 16:48

但我想問kentville, 是不是很悶, 沒有outing?

作者: iantsang 時間: 11-10-11 17:13

原帖由 iris5a 於 11-10-11 16:47 發表
Thanks Ian, it's my honor to have your reply.

To be honest, I prefer those K with voucher. A bit depressed that Munsang has changed the mode starting from 2012-13.

Any recommendation to me please?

...

But the idea behind this voucher system, is they have to follow the guidelines of EDB in order to maintain the status to receive voucher.

I am aware a few voucher-receiving kindergartens may not follow this guidelines completely, but I certainly wouldn't want to make this public. They will also faces challenges during the QA process, but usually they can rectify this and continue to walk on the thin line.

So if you are looking for voucher receiving kindergartens which are traditional, I will have to say no. But I guess what you described can still fit into most of the regular kindergartens. So no need to worry too much!

作者: iris5a 時間: 11-10-11 17:26 標題: 回復 5# iantsang 的帖子

Thanks a lot! Totally understood.

It seems that the trend of changing mode to non-voucher receiving K might on-going.

Selfish speaking, the voucher system is

作者: iantsang 時間: 11-10-11 17:45

原帖由 iris5a 於 11-10-11 17:26 發表
Thanks a lot! Totally understood.

It seems that the trend of changing mode to non-voucher receiving K might on-going.

Selfish speaking, the voucher system is

Throughout the history of HK education, there are series of back and forth movement to centralize and de-centralize.

Another issue is under inflation, many voucher-receiving kindergartens are facing the pressure from the increase of costs which cannot be covered by the max allowable tuition fees. There are some discussions on raising it already.

作者: BeBeMa1012 時間: 11-10-11 18:00

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 小山竹 時間: 11-10-11 19:28

我覺得學校由收學券轉至唔收學券
同出生率跟經濟環境都有關

幾年前, 經濟唔好, 出生率又低.
好多學校都收學券.

現在出生率又高, 經濟又好.
一般學校都唔會收生不足.
只要是"好"學校, 更加搶崩頭.
根本學費幾貴都大把人讀. 要是我是辦學的, 我都轉唔收學券同轉直資. 點都FLEXIBLE好多.

作者: iris5a 時間: 11-10-12 12:01

True~ Not much choice indeed.

原帖由 iantsang 於 11-10-11 17:45 發表

Throughout the history of HK education, there are series of back and forth movement to centralize and de-centralize.

Another issue is under inflation, many voucher-receiving kindergartens are facin ...

作者: iris5a 時間: 11-10-12 12:19

好同意~ 反正都咁多人申請, 唔收多d都對唔住自己

原帖由 小山竹 於 11-10-11 19:28 發表
我覺得學校由收學券轉至唔收學券
同出生率跟經濟環境都有關

幾年前, 經濟唔好, 出生率又低.
好多學校都收學券.

現在出生率又高, 經濟又好.
一般學校都唔會收生不足.
只要是"好"學校, 更加搶崩頭.
根本學費幾貴都大 ...

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)