教育王國
標題: St. Paul College [打印本頁]
作者: CHOYPLJOLI 時間: 11-6-23 00:57 標題: St. Paul College
What is the branding of St Paul College? If St Paul College admitted your son, will u accept it or find another place like St Joseph, Queen's College?
作者: kenfu 時間: 11-6-23 09:51 標題: 回復 1# CHOYPLJOLI 的帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: khmama 時間: 11-6-23 22:04
原帖由 kenfu 於 11-6-23 09:51 發表 
Don't compare with St Jo or QC, not same banding.
St. Paul ... band 2 only. (14 points in HKCEE is 49%)
St. Paul 應該起碼都有BAND1尾既.
作者: kenfu 時間: 11-6-23 22:47
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: johnnywalker 時間: 11-6-24 12:21
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: CJma 時間: 11-6-24 23:15
我也在關註這間學校。之前見到BK上有個自稱SPC的舊生刻意要告訴人們母校近年來HKCEE成績不理想，band 2 only，自己當年在學校的境遇很不好。我不介意所謂BAND1尾or band 2 頭，因為關乎學生自己是否能刻苦讀書。不過舊生對母校的認同就很重要了。有沒有其他SPC的舊生分享回憶?
[ 本帖最後由 CJma 於 11-6-25 07:55 編輯 ]
作者: CJma 時間: 11-6-24 23:24
在BK上看過壹篇：
關於名校... (傳統男校回憶)
http://kursk.xanga.com/736685807/
讓我羨慕不已，逼兒子也從頭看到尾，只可惜平靚正的學校競爭太大，雖然我很以兒子為自豪，但是自選連in的機會也沒有。
如不論成績, SPC有QC的境界嗎(如那篇文章中的學習壹二三)？
[ 本帖最後由 CJma 於 11-6-25 08:10 編輯 ]
作者: LittleKidult 時間: 11-6-25 02:02
唉~點解一切都要以成績作比較?
作者: CJma 時間: 11-6-25 08:44
我認為學生還是要論成績的，其他也要。
我所謂不在意BAND1尾or band 2 頭，是因為BK升中版近來指中學BANDING均以14 points in HKCEE比率而言,太狹隘又太具偶然性。例如，SPC改直資時,
全港經濟低迷，如果收生遇到困難,就會反映到若幹年以後的HKCEE成績下降,卻不代表這一情況會持續。
況且，我一直有個疑惑，不知這麽看14 points in HKCEE比率，去年明報的升中攻略就說14 points in HKCEE比率大於50%就認為是成績理想，但細想又卻如樓上所言, 一半PASS又怎說成績理想？
作者: Teresa 時間: 11-6-25 12:58 標題: 回復 8# LittleKidult 的帖子
係囉!
如果真係咁不唔鐘意SPC, 咪去搵另一間囉. 每間學校都有其長短, 無謂為左HKCE 14分有幾多%就話學校水平比唔上甲校乙校.
以前讀書, 真係講分數講會考幾多個A, 而家, 唔同哂啦, 一個淨係讀書叻攞全A只係喺成績上叻, 其他方面唔一定比人叻.
如果你地諗住個仔會考/高考既目禁做狀元, 咁我諗SPC真係唔係你杯茶喇.
作者: kenfu 時間: 11-6-25 14:23
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: hohoho2003 時間: 11-6-25 22:12
成績下降急速.可能代表學生質量或學校管理能力多方面?補助學校中已出現九華!
作者: LittleKidult 時間: 11-6-26 00:28
原帖由 kenfu 於 11-6-25 14:23 發表
唔係要個仔做狀元; 14分係入預科的基本成績. 讀完5年中學也達不到這基本水平, 你會有什麼感受??
大學也有基本收生要求, 負責任的中學起碼要幫到學生達到此水平. 官津如是, 更何況要俾錢的直資. 若不然, 自己俾錢找 ...
合資格讀S6係6分, 唔係14分, S5到大學重有兩年時間, 當中結果有20分入唔大學, 有11~12分博命入到水泡科....
如果有個成績好而人格唔好, 如不可一世等或不懂世情既, 我會選擇成績較差而人品好d既.....
作者: johnnywalker 時間: 11-6-26 00:52
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: LittleKidult 時間: 11-6-26 12:37
原帖由 johnnywalker 於 11-6-26 00:52 發表
我想大家取個平衡吧，任何一邊太極端都不是好事。但有個問題是事實，就是聖保羅近年公開試的成績真的退步了不少，學生人格是否大幅改善，外人較難知道。外人看的，最客觀就是看成績，這也不能怪人膚淺啊。老實說，我要是付出學費 ...
每個人(家長)睇法會唔同, 但相信大部份家長都係睇成績, 如果該學生有能力入讀king's, 我估佢都唔會揀spc吧......(不過我大仔當年老師有叫我地試King's, 不過我唔太鍾意, 去左間成日跑山, 空氣清新, 地方大, 環境清靜等既學校)
作者: MLMaMa 時間: 11-6-27 11:32
我認為個point 係 - 如果可以入梗St. Joseph's or Queen's. 我相信唔好講SPC, 就算DBS/SPCC 都可能有人會放棄. 但可惜, 個決定權係在學校or攪珠上.
我想這個亦係令到我地這班家長咁緊張; 咁無耐的原因. 所以我成日都同"阿少主"講 - 俾心機讀, 考好D. 唔係你爹娘肯俾錢你就有好學校收.
作者: CHOYPLJOLI 時間: 11-6-28 21:04
My son would like to try to apply St. Joseph and DBS again after the result has been announced.
作者: CJma 時間: 11-7-1 10:15
各位，
有兩點我已知道，，需要學費及近年的成績不是最TOP的，但是始終還是中上（BAND1尾）。
而我想知道的是百多年的歷史在學校的承傳?學校對孩子個性的熏陶？
如那QC舊生所讲：
學校提倡XX Boys之間要有brotherhood，要努力維護學校百多年的傳統，…讓學生們勇於爭取機會表現自己，…男校有個傳統，就是活動不應只在學校裡面攪，而是要跟別的學校一起攪…
家境通常不會是同學的話題，也沒有什麼歧視問題。…人人都有很強烈的自我意識，大家都認為自己是特別的，是somebody，…
至少在中學階段，學生有被充權的感覺，對於他們建立自信和自尊感是有幫助的。（聽來自其他傳統男校的朋友說，他們也有很強的議論校政的傳統）
這是我心中的理想學校！但是QC沒有給我的兒子interview的機會,所以我不奢望能不花錢而讀這樣的理想學校。
我就是不想兒子唯讀書至上,而希望他真的有能力。要有男孩或男人的傲氣，有自信。
我想知道的是SPC雖在學術成績上遜於QC,但是風骨上是否相似?
如是,就合我心意！
[ 本帖最後由 CJma 於 11-7-1 10:40 編輯 ]
作者: lugano 時間: 11-7-1 13:12
awful sad news 這老師人格很有問題, 一定不可讓他教壞 St Paul 仔, must be fired
聖保羅書院Sir 涉與女童車震奪貞操
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20110629&sec_id=4104&subsec=11867&art_id=15385574
2011年06月28日 (05:40 pm)
一名在聖保羅書院任教數學的29歲男教師，被控一項與16歲以下女童非法性交和兩項非禮罪，案件今日在粉嶺法院開審，並播放女童的落口供錄影片段。
案情透露，29歲告於09年與女事主X女童在網上認識。X女童表示，2010年10月9日，她因要去中文大學參觀開放日，而她又得悉被告在中大讀碩士課程，於是便相約被告在中大會面。
X女童說，在中大的訪客巴士上，被告先後摸了她數次大髀，有次更摸至大髀內側。X女童叫他不要這樣做。
其後，X女童說要回何文田的學校開會，被告提議用私家車載她前往，X女童便上了他的私家車。X女童憶說，當私家車駛至大圍時，`她因太累而睡著。期間她感到被告用左手摸她的大髀和私處。X女童醒來時，發覺已到達太子，並叫被告不要這樣做。
由於趕不切回學校開會，X女童便陪被告到深水埗購物。途中被告說感`到有點冷，叫X女童攬著他。X女童說是以朋友的方式攬著他，但被告企圖吻她。X女童其後叫被告載他她到黃埔花園，途中被告問事主是否很久沒和男友做愛，更問她可否跟他做愛，X女童說這些說話令她很反感。
其後，X女童向女友投訴事件，女童更將事件告知母親。在母親陪同下，2010年11月到警署報警。落口供期間，女童更爆出在09年12月至10年1月其中某日晚上，她與被告吃完晚飯後，被告將她載至屯門龍鼓灘，並要求X女童在車上跟他做愛。
X女童表示，因當時已是凌晨2時，又下著雨，加上地方偏僻，她擔心拒絕被告，會被他趕下車，於是在半推半就的情況下，兩人在前排座位以女上男下的方式做愛。X女童說，大慨做了2至3分鐘後，她感到痛楚便停下來，但她看到座位上有一些液體，她並不肯定是否被告的精液。X女童強調，這次是她首次發生性行為。案件明天繼續在粉嶺法院續審。
[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-7-1 14:59 編輯 ]
作者: lugano 時間: 11-7-1 14:22
原帖由 Teresa 於 11-6-25 12:58 發表
係囉!
如果真係咁不唔鐘意SPC, 咪去搵另一間囉. 每間學校都有其長短, 無謂為左HKCE 14分有幾多%就話學校水平比唔上甲校乙校.
以前讀書, 真係講分數講會考幾多個A, 而家, 唔同哂啦, 一個淨係讀書叻攞全A只係喺成績上叻, 其他方面唔一定比人叻.
如果你地諗住個仔會考/高考既目禁做狀元, 咁我諗SPC真係唔係你杯茶喇.
...
十分同感....學業成績不代表一切
要知道每間學校都有好有壞, 男拔萃都有作曲家演奏大福佳另類音樂....騎騎..... 咁唔通代表所有 DB 仔都係咁冇品?
男拔萃學生作歌狂小陳廷佳
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAlie9LAy0g
有 D 野如要了解清楚, 可以親身去下間學校開放日, 睇下/了解一下個校風, 冇人叫你盡信網上人講野, 人地冇責任負的, 自己要有 individual thinking
[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-7-1 14:37 編輯 ]
作者: mrsfungfung 時間: 11-7-1 19:16
Oh! From the news, this school teacher is so poor! The school discipline is not good. Some parents say that the teachers do not concentrate on teaching academic subjects. I totally agree. They just want to get good marks students. You can check the teachers' qualificiation are not good enough to train students. So the academic results are not good. Only give money to buy the name. Now St Paul is different from before. I think even St lousis is better than st paul now.
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-1 21:10
From the news, this school teacher is so poor! The school discipline is not good.
do you mean the school discipline is not good because there is a teacher under prosecution? What is the logic? or do you mean the school discipline is not good in general sense? Can you elaborate on this? Again, this is also totally different from what I experienced. I find it just the opposite - parents can rest assure the discipline of this school. One can actually go to the school and observe by themselves, instead of putting some hearsay comments.
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-1 21:13
I think even St lousis is better than st paul now.
What do you mean by this? St louis has always been a good school. Do you mean St Louis has been worse than SPC before? In what sense? Pls enlighten.
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-1 21:20
原帖由 lugano 於 11-7-1 13:12 發表
awful sad news 這老師人格很有問題, 一定不可讓他教壞 St Paul 仔, must be fired
聖保羅書院Sir 涉與女童車震奪貞操
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20110629&sec_id=4104 ...
Hi lugano
long time no see, here we meet again. Well, for this case, may be it's more appropriate for us to make final judgement on the teacher, when the court has made its decision. Under the common law, he's not a criminal yet. Don't you agree? Cheers.
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-1 21:27
任總師弟 轉投恒商望接師兄棒
蘋果日報
2011年07月01日
【本報訊】他們是聖保羅書院的師兄弟，師兄任志剛曾任金融管理局總裁，號稱「金融沙皇」；師弟黃廣安雖尚未出身，但昨日於高考一舉拿下 6A，獲狀元名號加身。師兄弟從未相見，但小師弟立志要當「任總第二」，打算修讀金融相關學系，日後擴闊國際視野，為出任未來金融管理局總裁一職鋪路。
曾就讀聖保羅書院的他，視校友任志剛為偶像，「母校聖保羅書院其中一位校友係任志剛先生，正朝住佢呢個目標進發，希望跟佢嘅腳步，可以加入金融管理局」。香港社會越來越國際化，他希望修讀該兩個學科「累積多啲國際視野，先可以勝任金融管理局呢個職位」。
作者: johnnywalker 時間: 11-7-2 00:29 標題: 回復 25# diversity 的帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mrsfungfung 時間: 11-7-2 01:46
diversity, No need to elaborate.
Don't be explained clearly. Just my feeling. My friend was a staff there a year before. What he sees and what he tells me that st paul is not good as before. How the school choose a good teacher? How is the academic result of this school ? Just for reflection! I don't like it so I would not choose this kind of school. Remember I need to pay much!
作者: lugano 時間: 11-7-2 11:31
原帖由 diversity 於 11-7-1 21:20 發表
Hi lugano
long time no see, here we meet again. Well, for this case, may be it's more appropriate for us to make final judgement on the teacher, when the court has made its decision. Under the common law, he's not a criminal yet. Don't you agree? Cheers....
Diversity 你好, good to see you around
司法制度上, 我絕對同意你的論點, 但法律是硬磞磞的, 家長感受才是活的 !!
人心肉造, 為人父母有兒有女, 個受害女生都有阿爸阿媽生的, 就算最終法庭判呢個阿 Sir 同當時 15 歲受害人少女之間係 "自願" 發生性關係, 個阿 Sir 在倫理上, 道德上, 行為上, 人格上都有好大的問題, 尤其是被告職業應該在道德高地之上, 再者, 受害人當年係未成年, 得 15 歲 !!
How could a teacher did such thing to a 15 years old kid.....2:00am, purposely drove her to 屯門龍鼓灘 and had sex.
其實試下換個角度看呢件案件, 就明白我作為 St Paul's 家長感受到的嚴重性
如果個新聞係....
聖保羅書院阿Sir 涉與"男"童車震奪貞操
如果個受害人係"男童", 你估作為聖保羅"男"校的家教會/家長們會點孝敬校方 ??
[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-7-2 13:48 編輯 ]
作者: Teresa 時間: 11-7-2 13:51
只能說: 好事不出門, 壞事傳千里.
就算有"好事"都好快會被人遺忘, 但係"壞事"呢, 幾年甚至十幾年後都仲會有人拎返出黎講.
個人自身都係好緊要, 名校學生(邊間學校我都唔再提喇) 都有人去打劫偷野非禮. Band 3學校學生亦唔係一面倒唔讀書去曠課打機. 名校與品學兼優絕唔係必然. 自己唔長進, 為人師表唔諗後果去做D不道德既事, 就算係掛住個"名牌", 有高學歷亦都係冇用. 正如父母係高級紀律部隊高官亦唔代表佢既仔女一定係well-disciplined.
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-2 15:37 標題: 回復 27# mrsfungfung 的帖子
that's what exactly I am referring to as making hearsay comments. By the way, why don't you use your old account ah??
作者: kenfu 時間: 11-7-2 17:59
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: HuiTung 時間: 11-7-4 09:48
他來工作, 難道份履歷會寫上“我喜歡上網結交未成年少男少女嗎?” 我也只能說: 學校唔好彩.
有人會將這些事怪責學校, 我亦想反問: 家長自己有沒有好好教導子女適當的性教育去減少這些事的發生? 有沒有給子女解釋上網結交朋友的風險? 如果我有女, 我更加用十倍的心力去給她提點, 減低她做這些蠢事的機會.
誠言那位老師的確很錯, 亦明白很多事都防不勝防, 但做家長的不想想怎樣去把這第一關, 卻算在學校的頭上, 又怎能做個負責任、理性的父母?
作者: aryee 時間: 11-7-5 12:54
原帖由 LittleKidult 於 11-6-26 12:37 發表
每個人(家長)睇法會唔同, 但相信大部份家長都係睇成績, 如果該學生有能力入讀king's, 我估佢都唔會揀spc吧......(不過我大仔當年老師有叫我地試King's, 不過我唔太鍾意, 去左間成日跑山, 空氣清新, 地方大, 環境清 ...
可否講講即係邊間﹖
另想問，spc係咪即係st paul boys?
到底有幾多間st paul﹖邊間打邊間﹖頭都暈埋...
作者: johnnywalker 時間: 11-7-5 13:46 標題: 回復 33# aryee 的帖子
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: ElizaW 時間: 11-7-5 18:20
Every one know that St Paul already Brand 1 尾, 但為何仍天天駡它點差點衰,只為need to pay HK$3,800? If no need to pay , 是否順氣些?鬼唔知入Queen's, La Salle, St Joseph, St Paul co-edu, 入唔到是否要死?= no career? Last year SPC also have two 8A students, 讀書靠自己不是靠名氣. St Paul students多数乖, 多有錢人, 好多叻人F3去留學,after school you can see many Benz and private driver 接學生.Ying Wa HK$1,500就唔駡?
作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 11-7-5 19:07
原帖由 ElizaW 於 11-7-5 18:20 發表
Every one know that St Paul already Brand 1 尾, 但為何仍天天駡它點差點衰,只為need to pay HK$3,800? If no need to pay , 是否順氣些?鬼唔知入Queen's, La Salle, St Joseph, St Paul co-edu, 入唔到是否要死? ...
作者: namanyi 時間: 11-7-5 19:08 標題: 回覆 1# ElizaW 的文章
同意你所說的
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-5 22:06
其實只要细心觀察, 不難發覺一有spc的thread出, 便必有幾位中堅份子+幾位新加入国民出現, 內容論点誠如eliza所说, 所quote的HKCEE成績也always是某–年的推算成绩 (因spc並沒publish会考成績). 要知道会考己成為歷史, 將來的成績便靠現在學生的努力. 轉了直資, 收生的水平亦相應提高,相信學校在新學制下有充份準備, 我们作為家長的亦充滿期待. 話雖如此, 作為中學生, 除了成績, 整体人格的全面成長, 對社会的责任和投入感同樣重要, spc是要train他的boys成為勇於承担的男子漢, 这点我至為滿意!在这日益多元化的社会, 擁有開放的視野及靈巧的人際関係比單純的成績掛帥更有積極意義.
作者: lindalowailing 時間: 11-7-7 11:13
同意35#ElizaW 和 38#diversity 兩位嘅講法。
SPC 舊年已經轉咗全部自行收生了，相信學校亦會積極提升學生的成績，話咁快囝囝已完成中一了，我覺得今年中一學生的成績真係一D都唔差。
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-7 11:32
聖 保 羅 書 院 校 長 透 露 「 精 英 方 程 式 」
今 期 專 訪 聖 保 羅 書 院 兩 校 校 長 ， 分 析 轉 制 後 如 何 緊 守 教 育 使 命 ， 令 學 生 成 為 品 學 兼 優 的 精 英 。
高級程度會考剛放榜，其中一位就讀恒生商學院的六優狀元黃廣安，正是畢業於《親子王》今期「封面故事」介紹的聖保羅書院。
中西區著名男校聖保羅書院，今年創校一百六十周年，是本港歷史最悠久的英文中學，多年來培育無數人才，包括香港金融管理局前總裁任志剛、立法會主席曾鈺成、聖公會榮休大主教鄺廣傑等。聖保羅書院一直是男生家長心儀的熱門學校，該校早在一九九二年已申請由津貼學校轉制為直資辦學，結果要到二○○二年才成為全港首批成功轉為直資的傳統英中名校。同年創立的聖保羅書院小學於二○○三年亦轉為直資，它跟聖保羅書院雖然不屬「一條龍」學校，只是直屬關係，但有九成學生直升中學部，故每年小一收生競爭十分激烈
，該校希望取錄不同性格和興趣的學生；面試時會留意學生的應對，以及跟陌生人接觸的基本禮貌、創意、反應和專注力等。
《星島日報》 2011-07-06
作者: ElizaW 時間: 11-7-7 13:53 標題: 回覆 2# lindalowailing 的文章
Thank you for yours support, this year DBS, DGS, Queen's, SPCC, La Salle also no 6A or 5A in HKALE. This two years St paul Headmaster want to 造好成績, 收生好嚴, Last year 考50 - 60的學生都收, But this year, i have 6 friends 入SPC, 個個在小學都頭十名, English & Mandarin very good, if you have friends study in Queen's , La Salle, pls look their past paper, SPC standard is
相似 as this two school. 尤其Maths & Science. Some one said that St Paul's teacher very Hea, but do they know that Maths subject teacher Mr. XX willing every week help one 盲同學補習?
SPC三十年來都收肓人, 這顆心有幾間名校做到?透過盲同學, all of the students 更學會互助和知道自己的幸福
作者: mrsfungfung 時間: 11-7-8 01:32
My friend studies in a University and know that this math teacher in SPC helps the blind student to study because he is doing his research, for himself, not as you think! Teacher should help all students. He only helps this blind student? Why he cannot accept the one with poor result. You know this school cannot accept all the students in his Primary school. What is the purpose of the education?
[ 本帖最後由 mrsfungfung 於 11-7-8 01:46 編輯 ]
作者: hogwarts 時間: 11-7-8 07:42
Dear mrsfungfung,
When comparing to some other top schools, SPC, yes, SPC might not be qualified as top school, but SPC does take a higher percentage of students from their primary school.
Regarding student support, the school has special arrangements for low performance students, such as Christmas special class by retired teacher, sufficient or not, is really up to one's own judgement.
For vision disability student, one to one is a better arrangement, having a research alongside, will not only benefit the teacher and the student in question. The research should be able to allow other teaching professional to have insight about teaching physical disadvantage children. I am more than happy that the teacher, who helps the student with vision disability, can have some other gains from the work and, hopefully, through his/er research, more from the society can be benefitted.
Going back to the question of not taking all the students from the PS, some of those students might not reach the requirement in joining the secondary section or going to a better school, in my son's year, only 3-4 boys could not reach the requirements in joining the secondary. The requirements then were, an overall fair pass with no fail in the 4 major subjects and without conduct issue. When the system still allows some degree of freedom of choice for both side, it was a fair arrangement from my humble point of view. Might be you can share your experience with us?
Education is a very difficult subject, however, your pointing finger to people giving support to disadvantage student is, to be honest, shameful.
Yours,
hogwarts
[ 本帖最後由 hogwarts 於 11-7-8 08:22 編輯 ]
作者: redkoni 時間: 11-7-8 08:18
原帖由 hogwarts 於 11-7-8 07:42 發表
For vision disability student, one to one is a better arrangement, having a research alongside, will not only benefit the teacher and the student in question. The research should be able to allow other teaching professional to have insight about teaching physical disadvantage children. I am more than happy that the teacher, who helps the student with vision disability, can have some other gains from the work and, hopefully, through his/er research, more from society can be benefitted.
我非常同意.
如果人家事實確是做了好事,就是好事,若然每件好事都以甚麼陰謀論去惴測行善者的意向,這種小人的思維可以簡單用一句說話總結:"損人不利己".
以一間香港最老歷史的傳统名校,轉咗直資還撥出資源照顧盲人學生,我只可以說她比較其他直資名校經營得唔夠"商業化",但反映出其受人讚頌的校風依舊未變.
作者: Yanamami 時間: 11-7-8 08:46
Yes, I also pay my respect to that Maths teacher.
原帖由 redkoni 於 11-7-8 08:18 發表
我非常同意.
如果人家事實確是做了好事,就是好事,若然每件好事都以甚麼陰謀論去惴測行善者的意向,這種小人的思維可以簡單用一句說話總結:"損人不利己".
以一間香港最老歷史的傳统名校,轉咗直資還撥出資源 ...
作者: diversity 時間: 11-7-8 14:58
singtao smartparents
http://iread-st.com/smartparents/
2011-07-07 issue
作者: CHOYPLJOLI 時間: 11-7-12 22:23
Today I visit St Paul's College, the students look very politie and smart.
作者: lugano 時間: 11-7-29 20:19
原帖由 ElizaW 於 11-7-5 18:20 發表
Every one know that St Paul already Brand 1 尾, 但為何仍天天駡它點差點衰,只為need to pay HK$3,800?
If no need to pay , 是否順氣些?鬼唔知入Queen's, La Salle, St Joseph, St Paul co-edu, 入唔到是否要死?= no career?
Last year SPC also have two 8A students, 讀書靠自己不是靠名氣. St Paul students多数乖, 多有錢人, 好多叻人F3去留學, after school you can see many Benz and private driver 接學生.Ying Wa HK$1,500就唔駡?
...
首先跟其他 SPC 家長講唔好意思, 借個位俾我發表一下對 ElizaW 的意見, 多多得罪
今天有幸, 無意中再回到這貼, 拜讀到你呢兩篇大作, 見你又燒到其他學校個叠, 所以想回應一下
(1) ElizaW 說: ".....只為 need to pay HK$3,800?
If no need to pay , 是否順氣些?...... St Paul students多数乖, 多有錢人……. after school you can see many Benz and private driver 接學生. Ying Wa HK$1,500就唔駡?....."
Lugano 回應: 多有錢人!! 多 Benz!! 有 Chauffeur來接送!! 又代表甚麼?
你的價值觀是否用錢來衡量? 就是要有錢學生家長/相同背景聚在一起? 有錢仔才讀得聖保羅男校? 又或者代表自己屬於"高等華人"? 推崇貴族男校文化?
我對此很反感, 據我所知和認識的 SPC家長, 很多都不是你形容的, 很多都是務實謙厚型的, 請不要讓大家覺得 SPC是有錢人階級的小圈子, 我都是 SPC 家長, 但我不會用錢來衡量其他同學
(2) ElizaW 說: ".....好多叻人F3去留學...."
Lugano 回應: 好多名校的學生也是中五前去留學, 津貼的喇沙亦如是, 官立的皇仁亦如是, 直資的聖保羅男女亦如是, 但人家的成績卻是……
What is your point? 你係咪想講 SPC所有最叻的學生永遠都在 F3 走哂, 所以成績一直未如理想?
你的講法只會讓人覺得無稽
[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-7-29 22:55 編輯 ]
作者: lugano 時間: 11-7-29 20:29
原帖由 ElizaW 於 11-7-7 13:53 發表
Thank you for yours support, this year DBS, DGS, Queen's, SPCC, La Salle also no 6A or 5A in HKALE.
This two years St paul Headmaster want to 造好成績, 收生好嚴, Last year 考50 - 60的學生都收,
But this year, i have 6 friends 入SPC, 個個在小學都頭十名, English & Mandarin very good, if you have friends study in Queen's , La Salle, pls look their past paper, SPC standard is
相似 as this two school. 尤其Maths & Science.
Some one said that St Paul's teacher very Hea, but do they know that Maths subject teacher Mr. XX willing every week help one 盲同學補習?
SPC三十年來都收肓人, 這顆心有幾間名校做到?透過盲同學, all of the students 更學會互助和知道自己的幸福
...
(3) ElizaW 說: "...... SPC三十年來都收肓人, 這顆心有幾間名校做到? ........"
Lugano 回應: 數學老師的事當然值得敬佩, 讓我更感動的反而是一間專為窮人服務 "非名校" 鮮魚行梁校長千百個溫暖人間的故事
(4) ElizaW 說: ".......this year DBS, DGS, Queen's, SPCC, La Salle also no 6A or 5A in HKALE......"
Lugano 回應: 見你挪揄喇沙, 皇仁, 聖保羅男女, 男女拔 A-Level 高考成績未如理想 !! 你真的很天真, 唔知你知不知道什麼是中六拔尖?? 未聽過? 不認識? 好多叻人一早拔尖去也, 看看喇沙和皇仁的拔尖人數吧
http://www.takungpao.com.hk/news/11/07/01/JX-1384442.htm
【大公報訊】2011年高級程度會考昨日放榜。由於中六拔尖計劃令皇仁, 喇沙等多間傳統名校高考狀元幾乎絕跡，造就恒生商學書院蟬聯「奪A工廠」，不但囊括全港四名六優狀元，更在十七名五優生中獨佔其九。今年唯一的六優女狀元李泳枬..........
http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=2289167&page=1#pid33667629
| 2010排位 | 學校 | BAND | 拔尖人數 | 6科14分百份比 | 各科平均優良率 | 人均優良率 |
| 1 | 喇沙書院
| 1A | 32 | 74.70 | 63.96 | -- |
| 2 | 皇仁書院
| 1A | 25 | 83.30 | -- | 6.09 |
| 3 | 聖公會林護紀念中學
| 1A | 20 | 84.00 | 59.52* | 5.34 |
[ 本帖最後由 lugano 於 11-7-29 23:17 編輯 ]
作者: boyu 時間: 11-9-11 22:57
我个仔刚入中一班,发·现SPC肯定是很強傳統名校。有法文等学,平均80以分上分合格,5%要留班,音樂有教堂風琴也可,暑假可去冰島…如他能升到中六肯定阿仔很掂。
作者: gloriafu2009 時間: 11-9-12 00:00
Oh my God! 有法文學, 有風琴學,去冰島就等於好強......
作者: gloriafu2009 時間: 11-9-12 00:07
不是否定SPC是好校, 但不是用有法文,風琴,冰島去衡量吧! 若是這樣,恕我直言,有些家長真的好好呃啦!
作者: boyu 時間: 11-9-12 00:32
It means that SPC do a lot things to train your son being great !! as a well-round player in the society.
The school is willing to takes time and smartly apply the govt's fund for students' summer tour.
SPC = 160 years' history = HKU + CU
Go to their home page. see what is famous school.
作者: gloriafu2009 時間: 11-9-12 00:55
Calm down!
I do think SPC is a good school but some parents only focus on whether there are French lessons, what musical instruments the students learn and where they go for their study tour in summer. Actually, I don't think all these are the key point to judge a school.
作者: kenfu 時間: 11-9-12 10:55 標題: 回覆 52# gloriafu2009 的文章
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: BearBearD 時間: 11-9-12 11:00 標題: 回復 54# gloriafu2009 的帖子
Absolutely agree!
If an average of 80% is considered to be the passing score, then what is the total score? 100 or 160? If it is 80 out of a 100, would it seem a bit odd?
Beside, 5% of the students have to be repeated is strange, the criteria of requesting a student to repeat is not up to the academic standard, then what is the point of setting the 80% as the passing score.
The only possible explanation is 95% of the students would get a scoring of 80% and above on the safe side. And there must have a poor 5% (not more, not less) to fulfill the gap.
作者: yph2005 時間: 11-9-12 22:23 標題: 回復 50# boyu 的帖子
學法文好似係課外活動之一, 要比$
去冰島都係要$,加埋好似係某個學會便可以去, 另外，學校考試時要考埋樂器及樂理，以上種種, 要同學仔願意付出及 勤於练習才才唯之掂.
作者: boyu 時間: 11-9-14 00:47
SPC is absolutly good school and very traditional british school. I believe that the bad result in HKCEE was occasional case in the past near year. Try to think that the subject passing rate is over 80 marks and over 18 students cannot promote nearly to S2 this year. General students' public exam result will be improve very significantly.
作者: kenfu 時間: 11-9-14 14:14
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |