教育王國
標題: ISF vs CIS [打印本頁]
作者: hamachi 時間: 11-3-29 10:51 標題: ISF vs CIS
Hello everyone,
My son is accepted by both ISF foundation year and CIS reception year for 2011/12. Do you have any suggestions for me on how to choose? ISF will have the first year 12 graduates in 2011/12. Does anyone know their academic results and chinese level? Thank you.
作者: Jackeylwfd 時間: 11-3-29 12:06
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: hamachi 時間: 11-3-29 12:49 標題: 回覆 2# Jackeylwfd 的文章
Any reasons?
作者: Jackeylwfd 時間: 11-3-29 13:25
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: kfy 時間: 11-3-29 17:25 標題: 回覆 4# hamachi 的文章
Congratulations ! Your son is very smart !
Both schools are my dream schools. My kid applied for both this year; eventually got offer from ISF and rejected by CIS.
If I were you, I think I will choose CIS because of the track record on university placement. I also had a friend's daughter graduated from CIS. She is very smart and respectful.
In terms of Chinese level, my friend told me that ISF should have a higher level of Chinese than CIS. It's understandable because ISF is really a local independent school. But CIS's Chinese level should be good too.
作者: hamachi 時間: 11-3-30 10:37 標題: 回覆 5# kfy 的文章
thank you kfy. I don't think my son is particularly smart and there may be some luck for being accepted by CIS. Have you heard of any bad comments on CIS? Are you going to accept the offer by ISF?
作者: Pooh_Pooh 時間: 11-3-30 11:08 標題: 回覆 6# hamachi 的文章
can't PM.
sent u e-mail.
作者: hamachi 時間: 11-3-30 11:28 標題: 回覆 7# Pooh_Pooh 的文章
yes. you can email me.
作者: kfy 時間: 11-3-30 18:06
原帖由 hamachi 於 11-3-30 10:37 發表 
thank you kfy. I don't think my son is particularly smart and there may be some luck for being accepted by CIS. Have you heard of any bad comments on CIS? Are you going to accept the offer by ISF?
Yes, I have accepted the ISF offer.
I have not heard any bad comments about CIS. Personally our team had a summer intern who was graduated from CIS. She was very smart and responsible. She said that CIS was a very good school.
歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |