教育王國

標題: del............................................ [打印本頁]

作者: lawhyc 時間: 11-3-9 23:44 標題: del............................................

本帖最後由 lawhyc 於 16-1-1 19:22 編輯

----------------------------------------------------

作者: eggmama 時間: 11-3-10 10:50

只是愚見：GH中學是否咁好呢？HY轉DSS相信日後更好。如在你所提及的三所小學最top students,入DG應OK

作者: w_y 時間: 11-3-10 11:33

係囉..我都同你同期. 但GH 應該從未Tier 1 過喎. 反而 St Paul Convent 雖然唔係頂尖成績, 但果陣貴氣真係幾迫人下.

個人意見三間若不計地區, 點睇都係SPK! 同埋你都唔使太在意幼稚園, 講到升中, 若不是一條龍/直屬, 根本幼稚園幫唔得你幾多. 幼升小都唔係 100% 的話, 無謂自尋煩惱啦, 而且你講有好幾間都係津小/中, 入唔入到都要睇下運氣呢!

作者: Cutemom0808 時間: 11-3-10 11:53

原帖由 lawhyc 於 11-3-9 23:44 發表
1) 我在80年代尾中學畢業、那個年代既中學
Tier 1: DGS, Goodhope, Maryknoll, St. Paul Co-ed, 庇利羅仕 etc
Tier 2: Heep Yuun, St. Paul Convent, 聖心
現在有冇變?

2) 自覺小女資質中上, 2011入K1;目標入現在的 ...

點解冇Marymount同St Mary?庇利羅仕及GH好像從來不在Tier 1. Heep Yuun、庇利羅仕、女英華都係同一Tier但係咪去到Tier 2我又唔覺呢

(不喜勿插)

作者: 小曳人 時間: 11-3-10 11:55

原帖由 w_y 於 11-3-10 11:33 發表
係囉..我都同你同期. 但GH 應該從未Tier 1 過喎. 反而 St Paul Convent 雖然唔係頂尖成績, 但果陣貴氣真係幾迫人下.

同意~
GH從來唔係tier 1, 不過近年小學好多人都爭住入！

嗰個年代，升中四要睇往年中3試成績，GH F.4係要收外來生架！即刻自己嗰d成績唔夠好，要去差d嘅學校，收其他band 1唔要嘅學生 (即5 banding計，GH唔係 band 1 school!)
我自己學校6班升5班F4, 有一個同學俾派GH讀F4

其實，好多地區中學嘅會考成績係好過傳統名校架，唔係一定要讀呢d傳統名校啫~

我會揀SPK~

[ 本帖最後由小曳人於 11-3-10 11:57 編輯 ]

作者: w_y 時間: 11-3-10 12:05

我覺得庇利羅士肯定係 tier 1, 仲要咁多年無咩跌過Watt!!

原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 11:53 發表

點解冇Marymount同St Mary?庇利羅仕及GH好像從來不在Tier 1. Heep Yuun、庇利羅仕、女英華都係同一Tier但係咪去到Tier 2我又唔覺呢

(不喜勿插)

作者: Cutemom0808 時間: 11-3-10 12:11

原帖由 w_y 於 11-3-10 12:05 發表
我覺得庇利羅士肯定係 tier 1, 仲要咁多年無咩跌過Watt!!

唔會掛，同DGS差遠，Tier 1只有DGS

作者: mosibaby 時間: 11-3-10 12:19

原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 12:11 發表

唔會掛，同DGS差遠，Tier 1只有DGS

唔係掛? (我都忍唔住講左呢句

,唔係有心抄襲,請原諒)

bps可能與dgs有一點點距離, 但點都在mcs, gh之上, ying wah應該與bps同grade?

我諗她們的分別在於直資與津校, 直資始終氣勢逼人, 不過bps或ying wah收我我真係leng飯應呀...

作者: Cutemom0808 時間: 11-3-10 12:29

原帖由 mosibaby 於 11-3-10 12:19 發表

唔係掛? (我都忍唔住講左呢句 ,唔係有心抄襲,請原諒)

bps可能與dgs有一點點距離, 但點都在mcs, gh之上, ying wah應該與bps同grade?

我諗她們的分別在於直資與津校, 直資始終氣勢逼人, 不過bps或ying wah ...

所以我咪話HY, YW同bps同一tier, 但點定義tier 1-3大家有不同見解吧！我覺得tier 2係St. Paul Convent / St Paul Co-ed果d呢

同埋大家都係用"覺得"，所以都係冇絕對啊，唔好插我啦

[ 本帖最後由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 12:33 編輯 ]

作者: mosibaby 時間: 11-3-10 12:33

原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 12:29 發表

所以我咪話HY, YW同bps同一tier, 但點定義tier 1-3大家有不同見解吧！我覺得tier 2係St. Paul Convent / St Paul Co-ed果d呢

SPC我就唔知，不過斷估St Paul Co-ed唔會係tier２掛？小心一陣co-edu大聯盟入黎掃射呀，我都係匿埋先

不過在我心目，dgs同co-edu應該係同tier既．．．

作者: happymami 時間: 11-3-10 12:42

我都覺得 GH 唔係你講既咁勁....點解而家咁多人讀佢既幼稚園/小學...因為大家都想有個保障, 但並不等於呢間學校係最好....當然佢一定好過一般學校, 都係 band 1 既學校, 但一定唔係 band 1 頭. 女校黎講我覺得應該係 DGS > st mary> SPK >庇利羅仕>Marymount>heep yuun>Maryknoll>女英華>GH>德雅>聖母>...
以上學校因有直資/有政府, 所以很多人想要保障, 大多數都會選直資既學校入讀.

作者: anteater 時間: 11-3-10 12:47

邊間最多LES?

作者: Cutemom0808 時間: 11-3-10 12:56

原帖由 happymami 於 11-3-10 12:42 發表
我都覺得 GH 唔係你講既咁勁....點解而家咁多人讀佢既幼稚園/小學...因為大家都想有個保障, 但並不等於呢間學校係最好....當然佢一定好過一般學校, 都係 band 1 既學校, 但一定唔係 band 1 頭. 女校黎講我覺得應該係 ...

How about SH、St Stephen Girl and St Francis?

[ 本帖最後由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 12:58 編輯 ]

作者: ramen 時間: 11-3-10 12:58

本帖最後由 ramen 於 15-2-5 09:43 編輯

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

作者: w_y 時間: 11-3-10 13:22

雖然唔鍾意同d 學校排名, 但一定要排, 我同你會一樣. 至於spcc 點都一定係 tier 1. 如果以樓主認為 maryknoll 都屬 tier 1, 小白菜有咩可能無份..

可能因為佢無自己小學少D 人係幼稚園階段就去注意佢啦.

點都好, 入到是旦一間都好好, 讀書除左學校, 自己都要努力.

原帖由 happymami 於 11-3-10 12:42 發表
我都覺得 GH 唔係你講既咁勁....點解而家咁多人讀佢既幼稚園/小學...因為大家都想有個保障, 但並不等於呢間學校係最好....當然佢一定好過一般學校, 都係 band 1 既學校, 但一定唔係 band 1 頭. 女校黎講我覺得應該係 ...

[ 本帖最後由 w_y 於 11-3-10 13:28 編輯 ]

作者: kfy 時間: 11-3-10 13:27

咁選擇小學又不同選擇中學的。小學始終入了名校打好基礎，就算校內成績只是中上也會不錯了。所以一條龍的小學一定最多人選。
不過到中學成績又不同了，反而沒有小學的名官津校的成績可能更好。例如庇理羅士、英華女校我就覺得比聖保祿好，因為要入庇理羅士、英華女校一定是小學校內成積最好的，例如在中西區，救恩、聖彼得、般官，成績好的首選英華女校，在灣仔區東區，軒小、St. James、衛理、St. Michael，成績好的首選庇理羅士，但聖保祿就始終要收哂小學直升的，我不是說聖保祿小學不夠好，但要同咁多間名津小的精英比就不是一定贏。所以聖保祿就一定比較 Blue Blood，但整體成績(包埋課外活動）就不及庇理羅士、英華啦。

作者: busy_penny 時間: 11-3-10 13:34

原帖由 小曳人 於 11-3-10 11:55 發表

同意~
GH從來唔係tier 1, 不過近年小學好多人都爭住入！

嗰個年代，升中四要睇往年中3試成績，GH F.4係要收外來生架！即刻自己嗰d成績唔夠好，要去差d嘅學校，收其他band 1唔要嘅學生 (即5 banding計，GH唔係 band 1 school!)
...

我讀中學的年代，與你一樣，升中四會有一班學生派去其他中學。
很懷念以前的制度，能讓家長清楚知道學校的banding，而且學校能夠更加做到因材施教，壞的學生不會帶壞好的學生。所謂學壞三日，學好三年啊！！
現在，很多band 1的學校收了一批band 2的學生，整體成績也越來越差。據我所知，很多band 1的中學（每級五班）只有兩班學生成績真的屬band 1的材料，至少有一班特別差。真的是良莠不齊！！！

作者: siden 時間: 11-3-10 14:36

Ha?! 唔通我好老？我個年代GH 係好好出名ge學校，成績好,music/sports攞獎無數。當年我讀一間依家呢個forum好多人爭嘅港島名校，出外比賽都不知幾admire GH d女仔。
原來so much change after these years...

作者: 小曳人 時間: 11-3-10 14:44

原帖由 siden 於 11-3-10 14:36 發表
Ha?! 唔通我好老？我個年代GH 係好好出名ge學校，成績好,music/sports攞獎無數。當年我讀一間依家呢個forum好多人爭嘅港島名校，出外比賽都不知幾admire GH d女仔。
原來so much change after these years... ...

我講緊8x年喎~
無乜理由有人老過我好多架!

依家嘅GH中學，成績大不如前 (去小一嗰邊望望就知) 希望只係一年係咁，之後會回復正常成績啦！

作者: wootaitai 時間: 11-3-10 14:46

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Cutemom0808 時間: 11-3-10 14:51

原帖由 wootaitai 於 11-3-10 14:46 發表
其實這些都很主觀，排名都是自己估吧。。。
同埋要看看你是"香港人"還是"九龍人"。。我覺得看法都不同。

o甘又係，我住九龍一直覺得HK間間名校而九龍得DGS, Maryknoll同St Mary。

作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 11-3-10 14:55

原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 12:29 發表

所以我咪話HY, YW同bps同一tier, 但點定義tier 1-3大家有不同見解吧！我覺得tier 2係St. Paul Convent / St Paul Co-ed果d呢

唔係掛? (我都忍唔住講左呢句

） SPCC 系 tier 2?

系我(同埋好多 BK member)心目中, DGS SPCC 應該同 grade。

作者: wootaitai 時間: 11-3-10 15:00

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 11-3-10 15:03

原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 11:53 發表

庇利羅仕及GH好像從來不在Tier 1.

BPS 系龍頭官校，今年120 周年。

俾我女入到，我一定‘略’飯應呀.

作者: Cutemom0808 時間: 11-3-10 15:05

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 14:55 發表

唔係掛? (我都忍唔住講左呢句） SPCC 系 tier 2?

系我(同埋好多 BK member)心目中, DGS SPCC 應該同 grade。

o甘SPK係咪有不少學生prefer升DGJS??

作者: Cutemom0808 時間: 11-3-10 15:07

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 15:03 發表

BPS 系龍頭官校，今年120 周年。

俾我女入到，我一定‘略’飯應呀.

任何一間我都‘略’飯應呀

作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 11-3-10 15:31

原帖由 Cutemom0808 於 11-3-10 15:05 發表

o甘SPK係咪有不少學生prefer升DGJS??

一定有人出去考 DGJS / SPCC。

都聽聞去年有一個小朋友考到 DGJS, 但都選擇升讀 SPC。

都系果句，最主要找間適合小朋友即學校。

[ 本帖最後由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 16:26 編輯 ]

作者: w_y 時間: 11-3-10 16:53

但我係港島人都覺得呢邊grass greener 喎! BPS 條裙咪綠gum gum 啦.

作者: siden 時間: 11-3-10 17:46

I'd rather study at BPS than SPC because much cheaper. BPS is definitely a good school. Ha, but both difficult to enter!

有時我覺得大家有少少鑽牛角尖。就算A校比B校好一些，其實他們學生的成績有好多overlap!
Assume B校的第一名is equivalent to A校的第三十名。
除非你谷到女兒做A校最top嗰30個，否則女兒的overall level不會因為你讀了B校而有輸蝕。
如果B校又近你屋企或學費又平一些，why not let her study at school B??
太苟黎於只是相差不太遠的名氣，只會給自己太大壓力，也容易令那相差不大的名氣影響決定，忽略甚麼才最適合自己的女兒和自己的家庭。
在其thread看見有些家長有幾個很好的offer,名氣學術都很出色，煩惱揀一間最好的。她們都是很好的媽媽。但其實那些學校相差不太大。我覺得最要緊都是how the parents teach the children. Even the most elite school would have students with poor performance.
I would rather become the top or average student of school B, then the worse student of school A.

作者: lawhyc 時間: 11-3-10 18:18

本帖最後由 lawhyc 於 16-1-1 19:23 編輯

原帖由 w_y 於 11-3-10 11:33 發表
係囉..我都同你同期. 但GH 應該從未Tier 1 過喎. 反而 St Paul Convent 雖然唔係頂尖成績, 但果陣貴氣真係幾迫人下.

個人意見三間若不計地區, 點睇都係SPK! 同埋你都唔使太在意幼稚園, 講到升中, 若不是一條龍/直屬 ...

[ 本帖最後由 lawhyc 於 11-3-10 18:21 編輯 ]

作者: iantsang 時間: 11-3-10 18:53

support!

原帖由 siden 於 11-3-10 17:46 發表
I'd rather study at BPS than SPC because much cheaper. BPS is definitely a good school. Ha, but both difficult to enter!

有時我覺得大家有少少鑽牛角尖。就算A校比B校好一些，其實他們學生的成績有好多overlap!
Assume B校的第一名is equivalent to A校的第三十名。
除非你谷到女兒做A校最top嗰30個，否則女兒的overall level不會因為你讀了B校而有輸蝕。
如果B校又近你屋企或學費又平一些，why not let her study at school B??
太苟黎於只是相差不太遠的名氣，只會給自己太大壓力，也容易令那相差不大的名氣影響決定，忽略甚麼才最適合自己的女兒和自己的家庭。
在其thread看見有些家長有幾個很好的offer,名氣學術都很出色，煩惱揀一間最好的。她們都是很好的媽媽。但其實那些學校相差不太大。我覺得最要緊都是how the parents teach the children. Even the most elite school would have students with poor performance.
I would rather become the top or average student of school B, then the worse student of school A.

作者: 熊貓BB 時間: 11-3-11 11:08

so happy too see that....

BPS is my alma mater! http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/images/smilies/default/bb34.gif

When i was in secondary school, i have never felt that DGS/St. Paul are superior or better than us in academics but surely our school is not a high profile one. We don't have 9As/10As as we only took 8 subjects in HKCEE and we don't have very very famous alumli but most of us are doctors/accountants/lawyers or other professional and quite a number of us works at ibank.

My impression on DGS is that they like to recruit interschool competition award winner to join their school (my cousin won inter-school table tennis award and DGS teacher immediately approached her and asked if she was interested to study there).
However, the education system has changed and seems that DGS has taken more and more top students and is becoming more and more 'superior'....

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-3-10 15:03 發表

BPS 系龍頭官校，今年120 周年。

俾我女入到，我一定‘略’飯應呀.

作者: KK07 時間: 11-3-11 11:39

Yes, BPS has been an excellent school for many many years..... back to my old days.....only top students will be admitted. I just feel a bit worry that under the current 'smart' govt officials' management, govt schools will become less attractive....sigh.....

原帖由 熊貓BB 於 11-3-11 11:08 發表
so happy too see that....

BPS is my alma mater!

When i was in secondary school, i have never felt that DGS/St. Paul are superior or bette ...

作者: iantsang 時間: 11-3-11 11:56

The issue as reflected by recently graduated BPS girls are the change from 5 bands to 3 bands. Although it is quite clear that they have all the band 1 girls, however, even so, the top band 1 and bottom band 1 girls have great differences already. And due to the allocation method, it is all by chance.

原帖由 KK07 於 11-3-11 11:39 發表
Yes, BPS has been an excellent school for many many years..... back to my old days.....only top students will be admitted. I just feel a bit worry that under the current 'smart' govt officials' manag ...

作者: twinsstar1 時間: 11-3-22 23:42

Talking about the old system. As far as I know, all subsidised schools need to have "enough" F4 students, if not, they have to take in F.3 students from other schools (so usually it is the ones with poor academic results). Correct me if I'm wrong!

GHS has 6 classes of F.1-5 even back to the old days, it never "kicks out" any "low achievers" after F.3. Moreover, since many students went overseas (for study and migration) , it did not have enough F4 students (information from past student) and that's why they had to accept students from other school to fill up the "quota".

If my understanding about the F4 allocation system is correct, whether a school needed to take in outsiders in F.4 or not couldnt really tell it was band 1/ 2 that time. Of course, you can say it did take in a few non-band one students in F4 due to the "system" set.

Regarding to the situation you mentioned, one needs to look at the class structure of the school as well. (i.e. if a school had the same no. of classes through out F.1-5 or not) Guess it is the system that created the results you mentioned to some Band 1 schools.

Anyway, there's no such kind of allocation system now :)

原帖由 小曳人 於 11-3-10 11:55 發表

同意~
GH從來唔係tier 1, 不過近年小學好多人都爭住入！

嗰個年代，升中四要睇往年中3試成績，GH F.4係要收外來生架！即刻自己嗰d成績唔夠好，要去差d嘅學校，收其他band 1唔要嘅學生 (即5 banding計，GH唔係 band 1 school!)
...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-23 11:19 編輯 ]

作者: peachcreamy 時間: 11-3-23 00:49

忍不住要搭嘴。我係港島人，90年代讀中學；妹妹千禧年代讀中學。BPS從來都係我們呢邊的tier one 。

樓主話女兒2011入k1，咁請問係咪有晒談及的kg offer?

作者: twinsstar1 時間: 11-3-23 09:44

yes yes .. v good public exam results records!!!

原帖由 peachcreamy 於 11-3-23 00:49 發表
忍不住要搭嘴。我係港島人，90年代讀中學；妹妹千禧年代讀中學。BPS從來都係我們呢邊的tier one 。

樓主話女兒2011入k1，咁請問係咪有晒談及的kg offer? ...

作者: lawhyc 時間: 11-3-23 17:58

本帖最後由 lawhyc 於 15-8-15 00:22 編輯

..........................................................

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)