教育王國
標題: 選讀拔萃女小學,還是讀瑪利諾修院小學 [打印本頁]
作者: mamafans 時間: 11-2-9 14:49 標題: 選讀拔萃女小學,還是讀瑪利諾修院小學
考到拔萃女小學,你會因為有一個細妹而要女兒讀瑪利諾修院小學嗎?
如果選讀瑪利諾修院小學, 如何向大女兒交代??
[ 本帖最後由 mamafans 於 11-2-9 15:44 編輯 ]
作者: angrybirds 時間: 11-2-9 14:59
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: icbb1230 時間: 11-2-10 00:03
要向大女交代什麼？
if it happens on me, I will go for Maryknoll. Even though I think DGJS is more famous and might be higher in term of academic and student performance, but competition is too keen nowadays,Maryknoll is very good la.
原帖由 mamafans 於 11-2-9 14:49 發表 
考到拔萃女小學,你會因為有一個細妹而要女兒讀瑪利諾修院小學嗎?
如果選讀瑪利諾修院小學, 如何向大女兒交代??
作者: nicolemummy 時間: 11-2-10 06:28
if it happens on me, even without a younger sister, I will also go for Maryknoll. DGJS and Maryknoll are both famous but different in style. You can feel the styles by observing those who are studying in them. My girl is more suitable to Maryknoll. Moreover, MCS is within walking distance with our home.
BTW, if your kid is selected by DGJS, she normally is very outspoken and confident. She may be more suitable to DGJS. If in case she is not this style and be chosen by DGJS in other reasons, e.g. you are great person in society etc, she may need to reconsider it. Most of the kids there are confident and thus like to compete - strike for excellence. If your kid is not that kind of style, she may experience hard time.
Let her visit the schools and let her choose.
原帖由 icbb1230 於 11-2-10 00:03 發表
要向大女交代什麼？
if it happens on me, I will go for Maryknoll. Even though I think DGJS is more famous and might be higher in term of academic and student performance, but competition is too keen no ...
作者: angrybirds 時間: 11-2-10 09:40
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Martina 時間: 11-2-10 12:18
有朋友入讀的告訴--去年只有４個不能直升, 我相信壓力不比沒有直屬中學的高 !
原帖由 angrybirds 於 11-2-10 09:40 發表
From Maryknoll primary to secondary, you will get a lot of pressure. I don't prefer.
作者: lamtsuiyee 時間: 11-2-10 13:28
我們的家庭醫生的女兒, 小一至六都是Maryknoll, 中學就考入了女拔. 現在中六, 成績中上, 佢話小學唔讀女拔, 自己的英文唔夠小女拔上來的強, 佢話D同學的英文真的好勁. 但真的好大競爭. 同學出去補習班都唔會講你知. 佢話有得番轉小六, 佢會留係Maryknoll.
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-10 15:27
我覺得小朋友模仿和語言能力是比大人想像的高,學語言是越細越容易適應,我老細兩個女都係女拔小上女拔中,聽過細女講英文,真係好鬼(好好聽),老細雖然在英國生活十幾廿年,但都帶著港音;我有果朋友個女係協恩F1轉過去女拔F2(當然成績係好過去),活躍份子,但過左去女拔,都覺得自己英語唔及女拔果D同學正,人地聽得出,F6了,讀得好好,好鍾意.
唔識人瑪利諾讀,但兩間比外人感覺都係轉統名女校;我覺得你只需考慮兩間活動配唔配你囡囡強項,及地點便可,每間實有佢地捧場客.
作者: AlanShirley 時間: 11-2-10 20:19
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: TMMA 時間: 11-2-10 22:00
我覺得如果學校有收生(自選)學生的能力，學生的素質或其他各方面都會比較平均d。
作者: 小天使kiki 時間: 11-2-10 22:05
乜原來讀瑪利諾全英小d英文出到來都同DGJS差咁遠，咁德望有無得比？因為好多人都話德望d女仔講英文好好聽
作者: lauerica 時間: 11-2-10 23:29
原帖由 小天使kiki 於 11-2-10 22:05 發表
乜原來讀瑪利諾全英小d英文出到來都同DGJS差咁遠，咁德望有無得比？因為好多人都話德望d女仔講英文好好聽
其實好主要係從小開始搵外國人教英文，聽得多自然學會外國人既口音，所以發音出來既英文係會好聽好多，如果從小導師都係中國人就好難講到好似外國人既口音，除非個中國人導師從小都係受外國人教英文，咁口音就冇問題，所以如果想自已仔女講英文口音好聽，而家自已應該識得點簡啦。
作者: kenmay 時間: 11-2-11 09:36
我會選DGJS, 我絕對不會因為妹妹而浪費姐姐的機會. 妹妹他日自然有自己的路要行.
原帖由 mamafans 於 11-2-9 14:49 發表
考到拔萃女小學,你會因為有一個細妹而要女兒讀瑪利諾修院小學嗎?
如果選讀瑪利諾修院小學, 如何向大女兒交代??
作者: wootaitai 時間: 11-2-11 09:44
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lauerica 時間: 11-2-11 10:14
當然名校請D老師,校長都會揀D口音好的。
咁點解會口音好？咪就係從小跟外國人學英文，港式英語點都講唔到外國人口音。
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-11 10:29
我見老細平時同個囡(電話)傾計都係廣東話,無聽過佢用英語交談,點解我又可以聽過佢細囡用英語?因為老細有同事用英語問佢細囡野,所以聽到;我都唔明點解D細路用英語用得甘好聽?我睇DGS又唔係全部外語西人,就算係西人,但D細路文法又甘好,好多西人D文法真係唔係太好,好文法只是少部份,通常中國人著重文法多些(當然不能以偏全概);我舊同學果女當年在協恩時(F1)成績是最top,但聽說去到DGS時英語仍比佢地本土生有不足,而家唔知,上年攞了6A入場卷,所以話啦!如果成績叻的不需担心轉去強學校會下沉,遇強越強,不能低估小朋友適應力,佢地比大人強!亦不怕死!
作者: wootaitai 時間: 11-2-11 10:47
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: shalaladream 時間: 11-2-11 12:09
對於樓主嚟講佢心目中只有DGS, 要"委屈"大女讀MCS係對佢唔住,所以先要向大女交代.
將D大家公認係好既學校比較嚟比較去, 食魚翅好定熊掌呢?
其實係咪應該唸吓自己係咪啱食呢?
作者: wh0709 時間: 11-2-11 14:20
agree, we should respect kids and treat them fairly.
However, 12 study plan is not an individual plan, it's really a family plan:
location, $$$, parental involvement, social-relationship, etc.
Personally I prefer DGJS, new campus and may be more powerful social network.
原帖由 kenmay 於 11-2-11 09:36 發表
我會選DGJS, 我絕對不會因為妹妹而浪費姐姐的機會. 妹妹他日自然有自己的路要行.
作者: cherrieshum 時間: 11-2-11 14:52
我選Maryknoll，因為女拔不是我這些中產讀的，入得女拔大多是非富則貴，又或者是名人，除非自問家境很好，否則讀女拔可能會讓小孩自卑。另外，Maryknoll已經非常棒了，何必一定要選女拔。
作者: brian61950 時間: 11-2-11 15:08
agreed & same same.
原帖由 cherrieshum 於 11-2-11 14:52 發表
我選Maryknoll，因為女拔不是我這些中產讀的，入得女拔大多是非富則貴，又或者是名人，除非自問家境很好，否則讀女拔可能會讓小孩自卑。另外，Maryknoll已經非常棒了，何必一定要選女拔。 ...
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-11 15:12
終於知樓主點解有trouble了!原來係甘!
我都唔明點解有孖的孩子一定要細跟大,又或者大要舖定條路比細的(學校)?可唔可以當番佢地係2個獨立個體呢?當然第2時可能在讀書選校上,父母要煩多次,但兩個人就係兩個人,有唔同性格和資質,唔一定要讀同1間學校,讀同1間學校只係方便父母接送....
財政許可,交通唔係問題,選校就要睇小朋友和學校配合否?不是在學校"名氣"問題,如果樓主認為"女拔小"適合大女,去又何妨?到細女時,可能有更好選擇等著她!雖然女拔是直資,但大囡入到去,細囡都好大機會入番去(以我老細為例),女拔我又唔覺甚麼名門望族,中學部學費亦不是太高,1年3萬幾(好似唔過3萬5),SPCC還攞命,6/7千1個月(直資學校),我都識D唔係太富貴小朋友係到讀.
講晒1句,要衡量家庭財政和人手先,就算心儀,但條件不許可,亦要放下心頭好,去官/津學校,一樣會出人頭地.
原帖由 shalaladream 於 11-2-11 12:09 發表
對於樓主嚟講佢心目中只有DGS, 要"委屈"大女讀MCS係對佢唔住,所以先要向大女交代.
將D大家公認係好既學校比較嚟比較去, 食魚翅好定熊掌呢?
其實係咪應該唸吓自己係咪啱食呢? ...
作者: fanwong29 時間: 11-2-11 15:22
Both are good schools, give the daughter to choose.
作者: InitialD 時間: 11-2-11 15:28
DGS girls are too aggresive and indenpent. They are very successful in career in general but have problem in marriage. MCS is better choice.
原帖由 fanwong29 於 11-2-11 15:22 發表
Both are good schools, give the daughter to choose.
作者: w_y 時間: 11-2-11 16:14
基本上你講我都同意. 我自己兩個小朋友都唔係同一間學校, 仲要唔係DGJS/MCS 呢D咁高級數. 不過返學唔係單單接送咁少事, 仲有課外活動/補習/考試等等, 時間安排有時唔係咁容易架, 尤其兩間學校唔同區仲大件事. 至於舖路, 玩過升K升小呢個遊戲, 都唔想得閒身痕玩多次啦, 第二位兒女仲要少埋首名五分, 果種擔心勞累, 長期作戰, 大家係過來人應該都明.
不過我見娛樂圈好多M校女星, 婚姻生活都 呢d 都係睇人同埋緣份啦. 揀間適合先係最重要, 樓主個CASE 俾著我都R 爆頭, 可能擲公字決定算啦. 如果我係有錢有名望支援就應該會揀DGJS.
點都好, 有得咁揀, 小朋友既有運又有本事, 點揀都唔會太差.
我都唔明點解有孖的孩子一定要細跟大,又或者大要舖定條路比細的(學校)?可唔可以當番佢地係2個獨立個體呢?當然第2時可能在讀書選校上,父母要煩多次,但兩個人就係兩個人,有唔同性格和資質,唔一定要讀同1間學校,讀同1間學校只係方便父母接送....
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-11 16:39 標題: 回復 25# w_y 的帖子
我都明2個小朋友所花的時間/心力係雙倍,如果1個媽咪帶2個小朋友好辛苦,同1間學校時間上好安排,識朋友都係2個,孖仔來,亦識男女配,男女配容易知點選校,比孖仔/女考慮少少甘多!
Case1:孖仔,同1間小學,但孖仔唔同資質,大孖屬band1,細孖屬band2,讀小學前分野不大,上到小學開始明顯和分得出,選中學了!朋友竟然為了方便,"想"揀同1間直資中學(相比津/官band2學校好少少,因為直資中學一定係全英中),我話大孖係band1,1定入到band1津/官校(唔計頭中尾),點解為求方便,放棄免費就學機會(band1),媽咪朋友都知,我話代其他人多謝你囉!
Case2:大女細仔同1間小學,後來大女入了庇理羅士女中,細仔P6,當然1定唔係大女果間!到頭來味又係分開2間啦!
作者: mamafans 時間: 11-2-11 18:07 標題: 回復 1# Sherryko9 的帖子
多謝各位意見，真係心大心細，大女係似DG女的類型，但對住個細又真係好苦腦，佢太細啦，未定型，但真係俾小朋友自己選？
作者: tumtum 時間: 11-2-11 18:25
I have a question - how can you expect a 5/6 year old kid to decide which school suits her better?
I am an MCS alumni. If I have a daughter and she gets admitted by both schools, I will send her to DGJS, it is a no-brainer. Simply because DGJS is DSS, school has more automony in everything, including the ability to screen and choose which students they want to take in.
作者: wootaitai 時間: 11-2-11 20:25 標題: 回覆 2# mamafans 的文章
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: wootaitai 時間: 11-2-11 20:31 標題: 回覆 2# mamafans 的文章
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: lauerica 時間: 11-2-11 22:57
原帖由 cherrieshum 於 11-2-11 14:52 發表
我選Maryknoll，因為不是我這些中產讀的，入得女拔大多是非富則貴，又或者是名人，除非自問家境很好，否則讀女拔可能會讓小孩自卑。另外，Maryknoll已經非常棒了，何必一定要選女拔。 ...
似乎自卑既係父母自已，中產好失禮咩？唔多覺喎！點解要為的咁既無形枷鎖而放棄女拔？老實講，如果經濟唔係問題，老虎加隻蟹都簡女拔，應為子女選擇最好，張來出路都會順暢好多，人家知你女拔畢業，咀臉待遇都不會差吧！
[ 本帖最後由 lauerica 於 11-2-11 23:34 編輯 ]
作者: lauerica 時間: 11-2-11 23:02 標題: 回復 27# mamafans 的帖子
我幫你簡女拔，唔係你一世後悔。
作者: 小天使kiki 時間: 11-2-11 23:21
梗係女拔啦，咁難都考到，唔好抹殺家姐可以係最top嘅女校接受教育嘅機會，細妹再行自己嘅路喇，可能細妹都可以抽到好學校or考埋入女拔呢，除咗經濟問題，如果唔係，一定揀DGJS
作者: AlanShirley 時間: 11-2-12 12:26
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: cherrieshum 時間: 11-2-12 13:44
原帖由 lauerica 於 11-2-11 22:57 發表
似乎自卑既係父母自已，中產好失禮咩？唔多覺喎！點解要為的咁既無形枷鎖而放棄女拔？老實講，如果經濟唔係問題，老虎加隻蟹都簡女拔，應為子女選擇最好，張來出路都會順暢好多，人家知你女拔畢業，咀臉待遇都不會差吧！ ...
中產不是失禮，不過讀女拔小孩之間會比較，父母大多是商人，家境富裕。自問只是打工仔階層，恐怕小孩會自卑或者變得勢利。
你不信就算了。
作者: lauerica 時間: 11-2-12 16:11
原帖由 cherrieshum 於 11-2-12 13:44 發表
中產不是失禮，不過讀女拔小孩之間會比較，父母大多是商人，家境富裕。自問只是打工仔階層，恐怕小孩會自卑或者變得勢利。
你不信就算了。
其實唔係講繄信唔信問題，做父母應該教導子女乜野係價值觀，要佢地知道呢個世界上，每個人都係一個獨立個體，你叻永遠有人叻過你，你有錢咩？重有人富有過你，你窮咩？重有人窮過你，所以係冇得比較，做好自已本份已足夠，至於怕有錢同學會睇唔起自已個小朋友，或驚小朋友變得勢利，相信不用擔心，全是家教問題，如果真係遇到的富貴學生而佢又真係睇你唔起，祇係佢本身家教出左問題，我們又有何好擔心，別杞人憂天吧！
作者: MrsBunBun 時間: 11-2-12 16:14
我會揀DGJS。
[ 本帖最後由 MrsBunBun 於 11-2-12 17:15 編輯 ]
作者: lauerica 時間: 11-2-12 16:27
插班入的,因為家境的問題,學費全免
咁特別？學校因你家窮免學費？窮既標淮係點？學校根據乜野而唔收你學費？(唔係窒你)，最好可以八埋邊間學校咁有良心？相信大家都好想知？
作者: MrsBunBun 時間: 11-2-12 17:12
我會揀DGJS。
[ 本帖最後由 MrsBunBun 於 11-2-12 17:17 編輯 ]
作者: MrsBunBun 時間: 11-2-12 17:38
我當年唔係自己本身申請學費全免的(高中插班,所以原本要交學費),所以唔清楚標準。呢間學校係港島區一間聖公會辦的學校,真係好有良心(當年,而家唔知)。我係因為成績而收我讀的。
由於不是這地方的討論內容,亦有私隱因素在內,所以已刪去較早前的留言。
不過,我好認同你之前的留言,好認同你講,"家長的價值教育是重要的,任何地方都有有錢或窮人"
人雖窮,志不要窮!
原帖由 lauerica 於 11-2-12 16:27 發表
插班入的,因為家境的問題,學費全免
咁特別？學校因你家窮免學費？窮既標淮係點？學校根據乜野而唔收你學費？(唔係窒你)，最好可以八埋邊間學校咁有良心？相信大家都好想知？ ...
[ 本帖最後由 MrsBunBun 於 11-2-12 17:40 編輯 ]
作者: twokidsmum 時間: 11-2-12 22:33
DGJS有很多中產家庭, 並非所有家庭都非富則貴．
我認識Maryknoll的家長, 似乎Maryknoll無論功課, 測驗/考試次數都較DGJS多. DGJS在中期考試(12月頭)後的兩個長假期內, 沒有測驗考試, 所以學生有較多空間．
不過, 我都有聽聞不少細妹入不到家姐的學校!
作者: steamball 時間: 11-2-14 09:28
DGS for sure
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-14 13:31
身邊有很多從MCS小學考上DGS的例子。但反過來的真是微乎其微！
我曾看過DGS及MCS的公開考試成績。DGS領先很多！今年MCS已不公開了!
如果是學費的原因，入了DGJS後申請減免學費吧。
其實不用太考慮小朋友的什麼性格，能不能跟上….，如果她不適合, Mrs. Dai不會選她的。但如獲選中, 根本不用擔心她的能力!
[ 本帖最後由 DGJS 於 11-2-14 13:36 編輯 ]
作者: cherrieshum 時間: 11-2-14 13:36
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-2-14 13:31 發表
身邊有很多從MCS小學考上DGS的例子。但反過來的真是微乎其微！
我曾看過DGS及MCS的公開考試成績。DGS領先很多！今年MCS已不公開了!
如果是學費的原因，入了DGJS後申請減免學費吧。 ...
家庭收入不多於多少可以申請學費減免？
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-14 13:53
我不知道具體數字，但我在網上找到DGS的中一新生入學申請，有申請學費減免。我也知道有人申请DGJS的, 但我找不到网页。
http://www.dgs.edu.hk/popup/important_dates_c.htm
原帖由 cherrieshum 於 11-2-14 13:36 發表
家庭收入不多於多少可以申請學費減免？
作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 11-2-14 14:05
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-2-14 13:31 發表
其實不用太考慮小朋友的什麼性格，能不能跟上….，如果她不適合, Mrs. Dai不會選她的。但如獲選中, 根本不用擔心她的能力!
其實，想問好耐...你系唔系 Mrs. Dai?
作者: LesMis99 時間: 11-2-14 14:27
It is really an honor for less better-off students to be able to study in elite schools like DGS, etc. It is very common for top universities like Harvard, MIT, Cambridge, Oxford, etc to subsidy bright students with financial problems.
I will definitely encourage my daughter to make friends with them and to learn how one can make something possible from being impossible.
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-14 15:27
:tongue: ..............................系都唔錯!
原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-2-14 14:05 發表
其實，想問好耐...你系唔系 Mrs. Dai?
作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 11-2-14 15:44
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-2-14 15:27 發表
:tongue: ..............................系都唔錯!
叫得自己 DGJS, 唔該以后分享多 DGJS or Mrs. Dai o即o野. 
p.s. 今年我女要考小學。
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-14 16:41
我系Deliver Good Japanese Sushi 楂!
你女都對DGJS有興趣? 我不是說sushi!
原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-2-14 15:44 發表
叫得自己 DGJS, 唔該以后分享多 DGJS or Mrs. Dai o即o野.
p.s. 今年我女要考小學。
作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 11-2-14 16:49
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-2-14 16:41 發表
我系Deliver Good Japanese Sushi 楂!
你女都對DGJS有興趣? 我不是說sushi!
嘻嘻，我無入過 DGJS 校園， 都想見識下。
我第二個系仔，得哩次機會咂。
作者: cherrieshum 時間: 11-2-14 16:59
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-2-14 13:31 發表
身邊有很多從MCS小學考上DGS的例子。但反過來的真是微乎其微！
我曾看過DGS及MCS的公開考試成績。DGS領先很多！今年MCS已不公開了!
如果是學費的原因，入了DGJS後申請減免學費吧。
其實不用太考慮小朋友的什麼性格，能不 ...
你好像掌握很多女拔的資料，能否多多透露！女拔鍾意收取哪所幼稚園的學生？基督堂？國際？面試內容主要是什麼？用什麼語言面試？
[ 本帖最後由 cherrieshum 於 11-2-14 17:01 編輯 ]
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-14 17:19
我所知也有限度。可能以下的LINK可以帮你。
http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=2247873&extra=&page=14
原帖由 cherrieshum 於 11-2-14 16:59 發表
你好像掌握很多女拔的資料，能否多多透露！女拔鍾意收取哪所幼稚園的學生？基督堂？國際？面試內容主要是什麼？用什麼語言面試？
作者: cherry_sd 時間: 11-2-15 00:51
我識人有此遭遇 : 大女考到了 DGJS , 同時又於首輪入到 MCS , 但為了妹妹而放棄了 DGJS , 奈何世事難料 , 幾年後妹妹考小一時又被 DGJS 取錄了 , 兜了個大圈 , 最後 HAPPY ENDING , 因家姐考插班也成功了, 現兩姊妹一起讀 DGJS
這故事給我的啟發 : 很多事情也不輪到我們籌謀得那麼多 , 每個孩子都有他的"讀書命" , 把握你認為"最好的"已足夠 , 孩子終會明白母親的苦心
在此祝願天下所有媽媽 : 兔年身體健康 , 子女聽教又聽話 !
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-15 10:54 標題: 回復 50# DGJS 的帖子
我初初都以為你係DGJS fans!
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-15 11:05
我係DGJS fans! 起初選名, 個個名都有人用左, 誰不知DGJS, DBS 或 SPCCPS 等等全都 available! o甘
我想我用都好過比人用。
原帖由 Sherryko9 於 11-2-15 10:54 發表
我初初都以為你係DGJS fans!
作者: 大家樂 時間: 11-2-15 11:54
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-2-14 13:31 發表
身邊有很多從MCS小學考上DGS的例子。但反過來的真是微乎其微！
我曾看過DGS及MCS的公開考試成績。DGS領先很多！今年MCS已不公開了!
如果是學費的原因，入了DGJS後申請減免學費吧。
其實不用太考慮小朋友的什麼性格，能不 ...
真的領先很多嗎？
08-09會考 6科14分
MCS 91% 23個尖子
DGS 94% 20個尖子
作者: hellokitty2002 時間: 11-2-15 12:57
如果唔係經濟問題既話...一定選女拔
作者: GAT 時間: 11-2-15 13:50
I will give up DGJS for MCS. MCS is also a very good school that many people want to go. To difiine the strategy for the whole family is my responsibility as the mother and to make sure both can go to a good school is 向佢地交代!
作者: GAT 時間: 11-2-15 13:52
而且兩姊妹讀同一間學校有助他們感情成長!
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-15 15:05
但你的大孩子是仔哦!:loveliness:
原帖由 GAT 於 11-2-15 13:50 發表
I will give up DGJS for MCS. MCS is also a very good school that many people want to go. To difiine the strategy for the whole family is my responsibility as the mother and to make sure both can go to ...
作者: YongXin 時間: 11-2-15 22:49
DGJS。收得家姐就即係適合，媽咪你自己都覺家姐似DGJS女喇。
從來唔認同個大既要帶挈個細既。唔係粤語片時代，做大既茅得讀C供0的細既0個挺。
至於話有得跟家姐去MCS妹妹就唔水煩，煩？生幾多個就要煩幾多次，個個都係自己仔女，每個都要爲企挣取到最好。爲0左煩少次就没刹家姐既機會，唔公平，因此媽咪都話要向家姐交代啦。
作者: Crabmeatsoup 時間: 11-2-15 23:39
樓主﹐根本唔駛揀﹗真係無理由入到DGJS而唔讀﹗
至於德望﹐我相信學生的英文水準應該唔差﹐但同DGJS比﹐應該還是無得比。
原帖由 小天使kiki 於 11-2-10 22:05 發表
乜原來讀瑪利諾全英小d英文出到來都同DGJS差咁遠，咁德望有無得比？因為好多人都話德望d女仔講英文好好聽
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-16 09:26
Good Hope都是一間很不錯的學校。只是最近一年（2009-2010）的入U率真的讓人擔心！
P。9
http://www.ghs.edu.hk/plans_reports/Annual_School_report_09-10.pdf
原帖由 Crabmeatsoup 於 11-2-15 23:39 發表
樓主﹐根本唔駛揀﹗真係無理由入到DGJS而唔讀﹗
至於德望﹐我相信學生的英文水準應該唔差﹐但同DGJS比﹐應該還是無得比。
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-16 09:52
贊同,理念一樣.
原帖由 YongXin 於 11-2-15 22:49 發表
DGJS。收得家姐就即係適合，媽咪你自己都覺家姐似DGJS女喇。
從來唔認同個大既要帶挈個細既。唔係粤語片時代，做大既茅得讀C供0的細既0個挺。
至於話有得跟家姐去MCS妹妹就唔水煩，煩？生幾多個就要煩幾多次，個個都係自己仔 ...
作者: GAT 時間: 11-2-16 10:10 標題: 回覆 61# DGJS 的文章
I was just giving opinion if I were her who has two girls.
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-16 10:29
:loveliness: :loveliness:
原帖由 GAT 於 11-2-16 10:10 發表
I was just giving opinion if I were her who has two girls.
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-16 11:11
早幾年有單新聞,話有個大仔讀LaSa小,但大仔畢業時間細仔未升小,所以阿爸想大仔留級等細仔有資格升La小(current student, 細路可以被帶挈升小1),La小校長話唔容許甘情況出現.
有D父母有男女小朋友,如果有樓,緊係話層樓要留番比男仔,女仔會嫁出去,男仔要結婚生仔.....但如果個女唔嫁呢?留番間房比女?----呢D味舊時思想囉!成日話要對仔女有交代,交代D物?話媽咪爸爸衰,生左佢出來受苦?大的又要和細佬妹交代,大家都唔知欠左大家D物?除非在不義下搶左人地原有的野就話要交代傘!
發完嗡風!
原帖由 YongXin 於 11-2-15 22:49 發表
DGJS。收得家姐就即係適合，媽咪你自己都覺家姐似DGJS女喇。
從來唔認同個大既要帶挈個細既。唔係粤語片時代，做大既茅得讀C供0的細既0個挺。
至於話有得跟家姐去MCS妹妹就唔水煩，煩？生幾多個就要煩幾多次，個個都係自己仔 ...
作者: chingchingb.ma 時間: 11-2-16 12:02
我會咁諗囉....既然家姐考到DGJS,又係DGJS嘅格,如經濟許可嘅話,點解唔試呢?
冇錯...要家姐留守喺MCS的確可以guarantee個位比亞妹,但係又有冇人估到亞妹到時是否適合讀MCS,係咪MCS格呢?如果亞妹到時要選擇另一間學校又或者好似之前個case咁考到DGJS,咁家姐今日為個妹做嘅嘢會唔會有d...........
既然冇人會知將來家姐喺呢2間讀/發展成點,亦冇人知亞妹將來適合讀乜嘢學校,點解唔喺目前已睇到嘅嘢去決定呢?
當然,DGJS及MCS都係好學校,樓主要考慮清楚。
作者: mosibaby 時間: 11-2-16 12:27
我都係2女之母, 容許分享一下!
而家出生率一年高過一年, 今年大女好彩抽到mcs唔代表到時細妹都有這個luck!
最重要係, 為人母親, 我極不希望見到2個女所得到的東西差太遠! 在同一環境成長下, 一定會有比較! 如果大女入左dgjs, 到時細女咁岩一個唔好彩, 考唔返一d好既私校/直資, 又因為係細女唔夠分而抽唔到好既津校, 最後入左一間普通學校, 同dgjs差唔止一個grade, 咁樣推斷下去, 細妹在各方面一定比大女差好多! 當然可能大大下細妹發揮小宇宙都唔定, 但係你敢唔敢搏呢? 如果結果係咁樣既話, 我一定會後悔到死個日! 唔係誇張, 只係做母親既點都唔想其中一個小朋友會差得太遠! 而呢個結果係因為當年母親做錯一個決定!
作者: cat_house 時間: 11-2-16 15:30
其實﹐公說公有理﹐婆說婆有理。姊妹讀埋同一間學校有好有唔好。為個細放棄人人都趨之若鶩的名校是對是錯亦很難說。人的命運是靠自己﹐你兩個女兒也是﹐就算兩個都上得了名校亦未必保證將來一定有成就﹐必定要自己努力﹐怪不得父母。所以﹐take it easy﹐兩所都是好學校。
作者: Lilo 時間: 11-2-16 15:45
樓主，或者講下我朋友個case比你參考。朋友有兩個細路，大女細仔差三年，大女當年考到一間有埋中學女子私校同時派到一間好好男女津校(係家長爭崩頭個種)，佢因為怕個仔第日派得唔好又考唔到好直資/私校，終於放棄個女間私校，個女知道個原因係因為個細佬，佢好唔開心，什至好憎個細佬，但朋友話個大係要為細佬/妹犠牲，如果係間津校讀得出色，到細佬入左小學就同佢插番之前個間私校。到左去年細佬考到間名直資唔使入家姐間津校，朋友真係幫個家姐考插班，終於都入番之前個間女子私校。雖然朋友覺得係大團圓結局，不過我地外人始終覺得佢地兩姐弟感情唔係太好，多多少少同家姐覺得當年佢被犠牲有關。
作者: DGJS 時間: 11-2-16 16:30
如果大女考到醫科，到個細時, 她考不上，是否要個大吾讀? 這樣兩姐妹便不會相差太遠?
又或者反過來，姐姐考不上大學，要出來工作了, 妹妹發揮小宇宙能入大學, 你不讓妹妹讀? 公平呀?
如果父母有能力培養大的給DGJS取錄。我相信就算小的不能入DGJS，她能入BAND 1 小學的可能性也很高。
原帖由 mosibaby 於 11-2-16 12:27 發表
我都係2女之母, 容許分享一下!
而家出生率一年高過一年, 今年大女好彩抽到mcs唔代表到時細妹都有這個luck!
最重要係, 為人母親, 我極不希望見到2個女所得到的東西差太遠! 在同一環境成長下, 一定會有比較! 如果大 ...
[ 本帖最後由 DGJS 於 11-2-16 16:51 編輯 ]
作者: Sherryko9 時間: 11-2-17 10:01
係囉!你估行街街就大的要睇住果細,小心過馬路傘!
小朋友各有自己資質,獨立個體,未來的事大家都唔知,最緊要把握現在機會,公平些對待小朋友,出街行慢兩步就話前面果個停一停等吓後面果個傘,讀書還是靠自己吧!
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-2-16 16:30 發表
如果大女考到醫科，到個細時, 她考不上，是否要個大吾讀? 這樣兩姐妹便不會相差太遠?
又或者反過來，姐姐考不上大學，要出來工作了, 妹妹發揮小宇宙能入大學, 你不讓妹妹讀? 公平呀?
如果父母有能力培養大的給DGJS取錄。 ...
作者: ac119 時間: 11-2-17 19:36
我帶女兒去DGJS面試時，有一位義工家長，她的女兒已很大了，她告訴我女拔是一所可以令小朋友讀得很開心的學校。
而我暫時認識會入讀女拔的，都是一般中產家庭，當然我亦相信也有富裕家庭入讀。我們家長是不是可能想多了?
作者: ABTreasures 時間: 11-2-18 11:51
I heard a case this year: The elder sister admitted to St Stephan Stanley 2 years ago (failed in SPCC and DGJS). The younger sister get places on all three schools (St Stepahn Stanley, SPCC and DGJS) this year. Her mom choose the St Stephan Stanley for the younger sister finally.
作者: 4eyesDad 時間: 11-2-18 12:35
DGJS or MCS? If you cannot decide, why don't you ask your daughter's preference?
On the other hand, DGJS, SPCC and St Stephen's Stanley are all excellent primary schools. If I had a choice, I too would send my daughter to St Stephen's Stanley.
作者: ahtan 時間: 11-2-18 23:10
I will choose DGJS for a few reasons:
1) It is a "thru-train" school to secondary school. There is no need to stress about not being able to get admitted because the score is not top 5 or top 10 of the class. I got a friend's niece who studied in MCS primary, and she got many awards for swimming. Her score is slightly above average, but still can't get admitted to MCS secondary in the beginning. She has to "beg" and finally got admitted. But she already went thru the stress of interviewing with many other schools.
2) If you are planning on sending your daughter abroad to study in the future, DGS has a MUCH better reputation and all the good prep schools and universities know about the standard of the girls from DGS. It will be much easier for your girl to get admitted.
3) I don't know the principal for MCS but I really like DGJS's principal Mrs. Dai. She is very down to earth and is a whole hearted educator that works for the good of the school.
4) For your second one, she might be able to get into DGJS too. Siblings has priority, although not a sure thing like MCS. But if your elder one is given such a good chance to go study in DGJS, personally I will worry about the second one when the time comes.
原帖由 mamafans 於 11-2-9 14:49 發表
考到拔萃女小學,你會因為有一個細妹而要女兒讀瑪利諾修院小學嗎?
如果選讀瑪利諾修院小學, 如何向大女兒交代??
作者: pizzapan 時間: 11-2-18 23:30
I choose DGS!
作者: angrybirds 時間: 11-2-19 20:46
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: prettyrabbit 時間: 11-2-19 23:40
2間都是好學校, 任選其一都不会错!
作者: kfy 時間: 11-2-19 23:48
如果是我，我也會選 MCS。因為我比較喜歡 MCS。我自己有些朋友是畢業於 MCS, SH, SGCC, DGS, BPS, YW。。。如果選女生的氣質我會選 MCS 多過 DGS。英文方面，MCS 的英文怎算差呢？
當然，我是用我自己的朋友來比較，現在可能是有所改變。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 11-2-20 00:13
Sorry, can't agree with you in comparing DGJS to those world class institutes. Most of these world class institutes such as Harvard, are practising Need-blind admission policy in selecting students. However, DGJS asks the P1 applicants to provide original AND copy of bills for residential proof. They check them twice during 1st & 2nd interviews. What is the rationale behind, a rational personal will know, need not to explain. The chance of you meeting those Bright but less better-off new comers is very slim.原帖由 LesMis99 於 11-2-14 02:27 PM 發表
It is really an honor for less better-off students to be able to study in elite schools like DGS, etc. It is very common for top universities like Harvard, MIT, Cambridge, Oxford, etc to subsidy br ...
作者: AlanShirley 時間: 11-2-20 12:33
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: 4eyesDad 時間: 11-2-20 20:21
Lawsonmoon: You have a point. I really don't like the fact that DGJS asks the P1 applicants to provide original AND copy of bills for residential proof. They check them twice during 1st & 2nd interviews. I find it very uncomfortable.
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 11-2-20 22:46
Thank you.
其實2nd in 之後我已經post過佢地作為教會學校做呢個動作係好肉酸和不對，但有啲家長可以話學校可能怕你填錯地址和方便安排校車^.^
有啲甚至話我報假地址被他們發現、所以.......；HK有啲家長真係好得人驚，我個point係教會學校做呢個動作都不對。小女其實直升CAIS的、報DGJS係俾佢玩吓啫、中文都未講得掂。
原帖由 4eyesDad 於 11-2-20 08:21 PM 發表
Lawsonmoon: You have a point. I really don't like the fact that DGJS asks the P1 applicants to provide original AND copy of bills for residential proof. They check them twice during 1st & 2nd intervie ...
作者: k.kung 時間: 11-2-21 10:07
羅生門,
如果DGJS interview真係俾阿女玩吓, 又何須動氣呢?
Post 番條link俾其它人睇下究竟邊D家長得人驚。
http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=2257031&extra=&page=1
原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 11-2-20 22:46 發表
Thank you.
其實2nd in 之後我已經post過佢地作為教會學校做呢個動作係好肉酸和不對，但有啲家長可以話學校可能怕你填錯地址和方便安排校車^.^
有啲甚至話我報假地址被他們發現、所以.......；HK有啲家長真係好得人 ...
作者: LesMis99 時間: 11-2-21 14:32
原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 11-2-20 00:13 發表
Sorry, can't agree with you in comparing DGJS to those world class institutes. Most of these world class institutes such as Harvard, are practising Need-blind admission policy in selecting students. ...
Let's put some suggestions to the selection committee of DGJS and ask them to use email address instead of the physical address. Would that change the outcome of the interview?? I really doubt it! Sometimes, why don't we accept the fact that we are just being bad luck and fail through a selection process without any reasons at all given that the chance is only 4.6% to be accepted by DGJS this year???
作者: angrybirds 時間: 11-2-21 15:04
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: LesMis99 時間: 11-2-21 15:27
原帖由 angrybirds 於 11-2-21 15:04 發表
People with some background can still use email addresses like [email protected]
I meant an email address for each kid, not the parents.
1. [email protected]
2. kidName_[email protected]
.
.
.
3000. kidName_[email protected]
From my own experience, I think the selection process of DGJS is very fair as there is not a single chance that parents can speak on half of the children. It is the competition among the girls involved. I guess the girls and only they will tell you how fair the process is all about! The winner takes it all! That's life, isn't it?
[ 本帖最後由 LesMis99 於 11-2-21 16:23 編輯 ]
作者: LesMis99 時間: 11-2-21 15:48
lawsonmoon,
But I am sure the chance should be higher than that of being accepted by DGIS this year ....
原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 11-2-20 00:13 發表
... The chance of you meeting those Bright but less better-off new comers is very slim....
作者: 4eyesDad 時間: 11-2-21 16:26
LesMis99: Should the suggestion to DGJS selection committee be "Drop the scrutiny of address at the interview stage"?
作者: LesMis99 時間: 11-2-21 16:35
I totally disagree with any claims that 'address' is the key factor to be considered for the selection into DGJS. This looks totally absurd to me. It appears to be more convincing to use 'luck' to explain one being failed than using the address argument. Excuse my reasoning.
If I were Mrs Dai, I would be foolish enough to use address to pick girls into my own school. Such a riduculous thing I have really never heard of it! Remember that HK is a free society and people do allow to move around all over the places .....
原帖由 4eyesDad 於 11-2-21 16:26 發表
LesMis99: Should the suggestion to DGJS selection committee be "Drop the scrutiny of address at the interview stage"?
[ 本帖最後由 LesMis99 於 11-2-21 16:38 編輯 ]
作者: 4eyesDad 時間: 11-2-21 17:32
Many people agree that using "applicant's address" as one of factors, whatever the weight attached to it, in admission selection or screening is not right. That's why some people find it uncomfortable and that's why some private schools do not subscribe to the practice of scrutiny of applicant's address at all.
The recommendation to abandon the dubious practice of "addresss scrutiny" is sound.
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 11-2-21 23:52
The problem is that many parents in HK feel that's not a problem. They think you and I have a problem!
Just like asking somebody's monthly income is very rude in western world, but many people in HK do not think it's a problem.
In fact, they don't have the concept of Need-blind policy.原帖由 4eyesDad 於 11-2-21 05:32 PM 發表
Many people agree that using "applicant's address" as one of factors, whatever the weight attached to it, in admission selection or screening is not right. That's why some people find it uncomfortable ...
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 11-2-22 00:05
I also presume DGJS not using applicants' address as selection criteria, that's why I was saying even asking for somebody to provide copy and then original address proof is inappropriate and absurd. What would you think if Harvard practicing this procedure? Probably get sue because they are practising Need-blind policy!
Ask yourself honestly, if you are applying a job, the employer asks you to provide copy and then original of your address proof. What would you think?????? The employer should ask for the proof of your education and working history, but not your address!
But I think if DGJS admits they are not practising Need-blind policy, that it's okay to getting address proof as they are private school, they can do that. It's just a moral issue as they are christian school.
原帖由 LesMis99 於 11-2-21 04:35 PM 發表
I totally disagree with any claims that 'address' is the key factor to be considered for the selection into DGJS. This looks totally absurd to me. It appears to be more convincing to use 'luck' to exp ...
作者: mamafans 時間: 11-2-22 00:08
真係多謝各位的意見，唔知有無女兒讀女拔的家長呢? 我真是很想知真實的學習情況，而我事實上係比較傾心女拔。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 11-2-22 00:18
Just want to say school really not necesary to collect personal information which is not going to be used. Not necessary to check applicants' original bills (presuming applicants lie??? If school not consider it, what is the motive for applicants to lie).
原帖由 LesMis99 於 11-2-21 04:35 PM 發表
I totally disagree with any claims that 'address' is the key factor to be considered for the selection into DGJS. This looks totally absurd to me. It appears to be more convincing to use 'luck' to exp ...
作者: LesMis99 時間: 11-2-22 07:38
Mamafans,
We were facing a similar situation like you. Our decision process was very simple as we believed that the more competitive a school is, the more one could be trained to face up to the ever changing and complicated world, let alone other minor things such as A+B+C .... So what else you are thinking as it is a very straightforward decision indeed!
原帖由 mamafans 於 11-2-22 00:08 發表
真係多謝各位的意見，唔知有無女兒讀女拔的家長呢? 我真是很想知真實的學習情況，而我事實上係比較傾心女拔。
作者: LesMis99 時間: 11-2-22 08:39
Under the Discretionary Places Allocation for P1 of HK Education Bureau, parents apply to one school of their choice. When you hand in the application form to the school, one needs to bring in the "ORIGINAL" as a proof of address as well. As we all know, address is not taken into account in the selection process at all (0% weighting). But why don't they bother to change the protocol? I think this is quite a common practice among schools, including DGJS, as they've just inherited the procedure directly from Education Bureau. No policy risk involved! Who should bother thinking to change it ????
原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 11-2-22 00:18 發表
Just want to say school really not necesary to collect personal information which is not going to be used. Not necessary to check applicants' original bills (presuming applicants lie??? If school not ...
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |