教育王國

標題: 梁錦松二仔獲男拔小取錄 [打印本頁]

作者: traeh 時間: 11-1-10 09:50 標題: 梁錦松二仔獲男拔小取錄

之前有網友想知梁錦松、伏明霞仔女讀邊間，今日報紙寫咗啦：

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20110110/00176_082.html

阿松、小伏之前為二仔報讀男拔，原來已經收到取錄信，今年九月升小一，阿松話其實有為囝囝報埋聖保羅男女中學附屬小學，結果未知，不過已經一心畀囝囝讀男拔，皆因大女已經讀緊聖保羅男女，佢唔想囝囝讀同一間，怕佢「活在家姐的陰影下」，果然係父母愛子女之心，無微不至。

作者: Furbymao 時間: 11-1-10 10:18

Thanks for sharing. Just wonder if his wife will wear a mask wherever she attends school function, as what she did at the briefing session...

作者: share123 時間: 11-1-10 10:39 標題: 回復 2# Furbymao 的帖子

佢做左d咩呀?

作者: vaga 時間: 11-1-10 11:24

1) 「活在家姐的陰影下」~~~  咩理論？

2)  Co-ed已經有結果啦...點會未知？

3) 「父母愛子女之心，無微不至」  ~~  有幾無微不至?

作者: appleycma 時間: 11-1-10 11:29

1) 「活在家姐的陰影下」~~~  咩理論？

2)  Co-ed已經有結果啦...點會未知？
   會唔會 waiting list???

3) 「父母愛子女之心，無微不至」  ~~  有幾無微不至?

作者: artroboy 時間: 11-1-10 11:39 標題: 回復 1# appleycma 的帖子

1) 「活在家姐的陰影下」~~~ 咩理論？
謬論

2)  Co-ed已經有結果啦...點會未知？
   會唔會 waiting list??? sure  is on waiting la , 我個 friend's kid 上個月己經收到信收佢.

3) 「父母愛子女之心，無微不至」  ~~  有幾無微不至?

作者: share123 時間: 11-1-10 11:42

2) Co-ed已經有結果啦...點會未知？

之前已經有人post左話係wait list喇

既然學校甘無誠意,梗系要講個1)甘既理由唔讀喇

[ 本帖最後由 share123 於 11-1-10 11:44 編輯 ]

作者: fanwong29 時間: 11-1-10 12:41

DBS最喜歡這類小朋友嗱

恭喜哂!

[ 本帖最後由 fanwong29 於 11-1-10 12:43 編輯 ]

作者: kenmay 時間: 11-1-10 14:25 標題: 回復 2# share123 的帖子

在DBS甘高調, wait list 咪比面佢la, 活在家姐的陰影下, 同買車事件一樣, 無智慧! 今次co-ed 加分, DBS耍扣分. 人地當年話, 讀邊間學校都一樣, 梗系拉, 人地的仔女就邊間都一樣, 又唔見你將你仔女去讀屋村學校.

作者: lauerica 時間: 11-1-10 15:45

買車識偷步，入校唔通唔識咩？預左架啦，入唔到先出奇。

作者: hui916 時間: 11-1-10 18:17 標題: 回覆 1# lauerica 的文章

梁生自九十代初開始已被委任為教育統籌委員會主席, 整個香港教育制度的改革, 這二十年來香港教育系統的翻天覆地, 包括三三四, 都是他一手策劃出來. 雖然他脫離了公職, 但他對教育可能仍然有情意結, 所以想給三個子女試不同學校, 體驗一下不同的風格及教學模式.

他大女在Co-ed, 大仔去DBS, 二仔會去邊間呢? 會不會去他母校英華, 或且試一下國際學校.

作者: hui916 時間: 11-1-10 18:25

不過我認為梁生應安排其二仔去入讀一間有殺校危機的Band 3小學, 才能感受一下民眾的疾苦.

原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:17 發表
梁生自九十代初開始已被委任為教育統籌委員會主席, 整個香港教育制度的改革, 這二十年來香港教育系統的翻天覆地, 包括三三四, 都是他一手策劃出來. 雖然他脫離了公職, 但他對教育可能仍然有情意結, 所以想給三個子女 ...

作者: kenmay 時間: 11-1-10 18:31

Support x 2

原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:25 發表
不過我認為梁生應安排其二仔去入讀一間有殺校危機的Band 3小學, 才能感受一下民眾的疾苦.

作者: kenmay 時間: 11-1-10 18:38

你估佢真系唔想"活在家姐的陰影下", 只不過以他在DB甘高調, co-ed又點可以甘順攤, 不過他的智慧系甘上下. 正如買車一樣, 邊有諗得甘周到.

原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:17 發表
梁生自九十代初開始已被委任為教育統籌委員會主席, 整個香港教育制度的改革, 這二十年來香港教育系統的翻天覆地, 包括三三四, 都是他一手策劃出來. 雖然他脫離了公職, 但他對教育可能仍然有情意結, 所以想給三個子女 ...

作者: GoodGrief 時間: 11-1-10 19:05

我想提出另一觀點。

梁錦松先生和伏明霞女士是“公眾人物”，這是事實，他們不能改變這點。若學校因他們的名人身份而收了他們的子女，這是他們的問題還是學校的問題？

若梁先生真的“走後門”，但是收定唔收梁先生的子女的決定權在學校，那麼，誰人應負更多的責任？

社會多是批評高官將子女送到國際學校或外國讀書，為甚麼梁先生將子女送到直資學校，如一般香港中產家庭，也要受到批評？真的要梁先生將子女送到Band 3 才會不受批評嗎？但我想問，那一位香港家長會這樣做呢？己多不欲，勿施於人。

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-10 19:10

原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:25 發表
不過我認為梁生應安排其二仔去入讀一間有殺校危機的Band 3小學, 才能感受一下民眾的疾苦.

Do you think he will do exactly what you said?

I don't think so, because when he promoted the educational reform(s), he didn't have kids yet. He promoted any non-sense and he wouldn't the receiving end in the past.

Now, he is the player, a father and fully understand the importance of education and the quality of traditional famous elite school. I can guarantee he won't send his kids to Pui Kiu, International schools, and some new approaches DSS....

His change of attitude provides a useful path for local parents. The shaper of educational reform in HK still believes what ........

                              My prediciton

Mother languages?    Of course not, bi-lingual
DSS?                         Yes, but traditional elite only
HKDSE vs IB?             IB (both schools have IB
                              stream)

His sensible choice ........................

作者: Student123 時間: 11-1-10 19:19

Please stop the atmopshere of attacking.

If he didn't show up during the briefing & interview process & get admitted to DBSPD, BK Parents will attack in another version, right?

If he send his son to international school, also will be attacked in another version.

If he send his son to LS or st Jos or WY (subsidised schools), another version of attack will be there.

Kids & his wife done nothing wrong. Even Mr. Leung's fault was already past tense.

作者: kenmay 時間: 11-1-10 19:32

公眾人物沒有錯, 他受批評不是因為他是公眾人物, 而是他的行為. 他子女入名校有沒有走後門是他與學校之間的事,
實際有沒有走後門或是真的是其子女的能力, 沒有人知道, 永遠不會有答案, 只是當年推行教改時的不設實際理論令人反感, 唯獨是今天他有子女, 但我們平民家庭受到教改深遠的影響. 而今天他子女就可以置身事外, 他當年不是說過讀邊一間學校都一樣咩, 為何今天他要按排子女入名校...

原帖由 GoodGrief 於 11-1-10 19:05 發表
我想提出另一觀點。

梁錦松先生和伏明霞女士是“公眾人物”，這是事實，他們不能改變這點。若學校因他們的名人身份而收了他們的子女，這是他們的問題還是學校的問題？

若梁先生真的“走後門”，但是收定唔收梁先生的子女的 ...

作者: appleycma 時間: 11-1-10 20:33

原帖由 kenmay 於 11-1-10 14:25 發表
在DBS甘高調, wait list 咪比面佢la, 活在家姐的陰影下, 同買車事件一樣, 無智慧! 今次co-ed 加分, DBS耍扣分. 人地當年話, 讀邊間學校都一樣, 梗系拉, 人地的仔女就邊間都一樣, 又唔見你將你仔女去讀屋村學校. ...

同意,佢本身係英華old boy,大家認為佢會in英華嗎?(我是指英華在深水埗區,不是指英華唔好,請大家不要誤會)

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-10 20:42 標題: 回復 11# kenmay 的帖子

Wait, isn't he the one who pushed so hard for school to use "mother tongue" to teach back in the days of Tung Chi Wah ? If that is true, why is he putting his son in an English school now ? So other ppl's children should learn in mother tongue (i.e. cantonese) while his children should learn in English ?

作者: Zhaiba 時間: 11-1-10 20:53

You guys so sad.

He alone cannot build the current education system so please don't criticise anymore, he is also just a parent like us.

He is so successful in his career isnt it "normal" that these elite school will definitely accept his son? Where is back door?

作者: hogwarts 時間: 11-1-10 20:55

HoHoMon,

Yes, he is the "ONE". Also, He is also member of a number of advisory bodies of our Central Government. You see, the elites know what is the best for themselves and the commoners la.

Ah, the family might think SPCC still having a Chinese section and sent the girl by good faith.

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-10 21:11

Not sure what's so sad about pointing out the fact that he is the one who strongly advocated teachign in mother tongue, yet sending his son to an English school. Those are just objective facts.

Successful in his career ? .......well, depends on who you speak to. He and his fans would probably agree with that.

原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-10 20:53 發表
You guys so sad.

He alone cannot build the current education system so please don't criticise anymore, he is also just a parent like us.

He is so successful in his career isnt it "normal" that these ...

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-10 21:13

原帖由 hogwarts 於 11-1-10 20:55 發表
HoHoMon,

Yes, he is the "ONE". Also, He is also member of a number of advisory bodies of our Central Government. You see, the elites know what is the best for themselves and the commoners la.

Ah, ...

作者: kenmay 時間: 11-1-10 21:35

(己多不欲，勿施於人), 套用在他身上最適當.
GoodGrief, 請不要誤會, 我不是反對你的論點, 只是借用你的佳句.

原帖由 GoodGrief 於 11-1-10 19:05 發表
我想提出另一觀點。

梁錦松先生和伏明霞女士是“公眾人物”，這是事實，他們不能改變這點。若學校因他們的名人身份而收了他們的子女，這是他們的問題還是學校的問題？

若梁先生真的“走後門”，但是收定唔收梁先生的子女的 ...

作者: hogwarts 時間: 11-1-10 21:37

Other interesting fact about Mr. Leung.  He is also founder of UGA, the NGO which runs the DSS UGA.

Yes, Mr. Leung is only one of the ruling elite, and should not be responsible to all the good or wrong doings of the system.  It is their deeds making you feel being betrayed and treated like fools.

Yes, as a parent, I can understand their choice as parents but I cannot forget and forgive their high sounding policy and salesmanship in the past.

As quoted by Billy Joel in his song "Honesty":

"If you search for tenderness
it isn't hard to find.
You can have the love you need to live.

But if you look for truthfulness
You might just as well be blind.
It always seems to be so hard to give.

Honesty is such a lonely word.
Everyone is so untrue.
Honesty is hardly ever heard....."

Yes, we can give tenderness to our children but do not look for honesty from our leaders.

We should just enjoy Billy Joel's "Honesty"

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/sy-13406455/billy_joel_honesty_official_music_video/

[ 本帖最後由 hogwarts 於 11-1-10 22:00 編輯 ]

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-10 21:51

A kind reminder, my initial post just persume Mr. leung's attitude and direction of his third kid's education path only.

No intention against his family......

I am so glad most parents are very considerate and limited the discussion just on policy level and based on objective facts.

作者: Zhaiba 時間: 11-1-10 22:33

If Asia chief of Blackstone is not successful then I donno what is.

He made a mistake in buying a car, he was wrong and he resigned, paid his price. But of course you can keep critising this foreever.

作者: hogwarts 時間: 11-1-10 22:39

Asian chief of BlackStone, without doubt, is a benchmark of great success.

Well, the good performance of the fund and the investments of our Central Government ................

Yes, one has paid the price, while some of us are still paying the price, but of course, we will share the leaders' vision and live with their strategies for the benefit of our future generations and not the least - our city.

Yes, we should be patient and be grateful.

[ 本帖最後由 hogwarts 於 11-1-10 23:19 編輯 ]

作者: Zhaiba 時間: 11-1-10 23:06

原帖由 HoHoMom 於 11-1-10 21:11 發表
Not sure what's so sad about pointing out the fact that he is the one who strongly advocated teachign in mother tongue, yet sending his son to an English school. Those are just objective facts.

Succ ...

What a funny logic. If he choose DBS does that means he needs to convert every school to DBS for the general public?

作者: sadsam 時間: 11-1-11 09:54

同意。不要人身攻擊。

好似葉劉咁咪係一樣，佢宜家都唔support政府啦！打工既，冇計 >_<

原帖由 Student123 於 11-1-10 19:19 發表
Please stop the atmopshere of attacking.

If he didn't show up during the briefing & interview process & get admitted to DBSPD, BK Parents will attack in another version, right?

If he send his son t ...

作者: caa 時間: 11-1-11 11:05

How sad we are being HK people! If those government officers at the very top don't buy some policies, why didn't they fight for the good but instead pushed forward those arguable policies to our general public? All of them are considered successful and it should be easy for them to find another job and quit if they were really "forced" to put forward something they couldn't agree.

The general public's children are put in the test lab first. If it turns out right, maybe the gov officers' children will then go for it.

原帖由 sadsam 於 11-1-11 09:54 發表
同意。不要人身攻擊。

好似葉劉咁咪係一樣，佢宜家都唔support政府啦！打工既，冇計 >_<

作者: sadsam 時間: 11-1-11 11:29

真係好sad架。

作者: sadsam 時間: 11-1-11 11:32

係囉，應該仲要試下唔同既banding，由第一身家長既親身感受最好不過。名校要試，就殺既校都要試，殺唔死既也要試。

原帖由 hui916 於 11-1-10 18:25 發表
不過我認為梁生應安排其二仔去入讀一間有殺校危機的Band 3小學, 才能感受一下民眾的疾苦.

作者: judy 時間: 11-1-11 12:55

I don't think so, because when he promoted the educational reform(s), he didn't have kids yet. He promoted any non-sense and he wouldn't the receiving end in the past.

Now, he is the player, a father and fully understand the importance of education and the quality of traditional famous elite school. I can guarantee he won't send his kids to Pui Kiu, International schools, and some new approaches DSS....

我想問吓，拔褲，唔係教改之產物麽？教改的其中一項，就係鼓勵拆墙鬆。提供更多選擇。有人喜歡培僑那類學校，有人喜歡拔褲較傳统喲，各花入各眼。所有進步社會無不如此。何 non-sense之有呢？

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-11 20:38 標題: 回復 6# Zhaiba 的帖子

But your logic is far funnier. And the question isthe what's so sad about stating objective facts ?

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-11 20:44

If to act against what one preaches is not hypocracy and irresponsibility, I dunno what is.

Anyone here cares about that car incident anymore ? You are the one bringing it up.

原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-10 22:33 發表
If Asia chief of Blackstone is not successful then I donno what is.

He made a mistake in buying a car, he was wrong and he resigned, paid his price. But of course you can keep critising this foree ...

作者: PoorParent 時間: 11-1-11 21:23 標題: 回復 37# HoHoMom 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: happyland001 時間: 11-1-12 00:02

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Zhaiba 時間: 11-1-12 00:04 標題: 回復 37# HoHoMom 的帖子

Is it so difficult to understand? The government set policy which it thinks is best for the general public but there is no policy which can possibly satisfy everyone. The official definitely have their rights to choose what they think are best for them which may not be suitable for the general public, or what the government cannot provide.

e.g. most of the parents want to send their kids to DXS (or whatever elite school they want), can the government change all the government school to the elite school? No! no government can possibly do that so why keep critising this man who is just a parent like us who want to give a better education to his kid......that is the sad thing.

作者: bobbbby 時間: 11-1-12 00:30

你咁肯定，唔通你係校董會成員？

原帖由 happyland001 於 11-1-12 00:02 發表
This kind of school just concerns about the parents community reputation and background disregarding the capability of the applied child!

作者: cellojoyce 時間: 11-1-12 00:44 標題: 回復 40# traeh 的帖子

One of my friends also prefer to put his sons in Dbspd and his daughter in co-ed, his reasons are:
DBS is less demanding academically (as those who get offers because they do well in music or sports may not achieve well in academics) p.s. I know a few students scored 0 marks in Hkcee
2. for girls, as dgjs and co-Ed are equally demanding in academics, he prefers co-ed as the personality for girls trained up in the two schools is totally different
Just want to point out an example, no offense!

[ 本帖最後由 cellojoyce 於 11-1-12 14:54 編輯 ]

作者: sadsam 時間: 11-1-12 01:02

其實d學校都係為左自己既學生既學業成績著想既~

http://forum.baby-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=3633162

原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-12 00:04 發表
Is it so difficult to understand? The government set policy which it thinks is best for the general public but there is no policy which can possibly satisfy everyone. The official definitely have th ...

作者: babyqueendom 時間: 11-1-12 10:12

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: cellojoyce 時間: 11-1-12 11:45

但對有司機的家庭就影響唔大la

原帖由 babyqueendom 於 11-1-12 10:12 發表

One school is in Kowloon. One school is in southern district. Would average parents consider that it is not ideal in terms of transportation?

If I have an elder daugther study in co-ed, I would no ...

作者: TRYTOBEHOMAMA 時間: 11-1-12 12:35

The fact is that there are different considerations in making official and family decisions. It is not really surprising for any difference between these decisions (for example, how would you know the respective weightings of Mr and Mrs Leung's preference?). One could only fairly judge Mr Leung if he/she is for sure that Mr Leung has not adhered to his own views on the language of schools, belief in choice in schools, etc. in arriving at the school choice for his son.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-12 12:59 標題: 回覆 46# TRYTOBEHOMAMA 的文章

Agreed.

So Leung's family decision reflects many families preference.

If more educational officials as Leung's family, our educational reform can be much better from users view(s).

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-12 19:32 標題: 回復 10# PoorParent 的帖子

Oh, I see now......got you.

"It is normal that BK parents protect their kids' school or the schools offer them hope i.e. pending final result.

For this reason: her comments towards Mr. Leung seem different in this thread & YW's Result thread

I think this is understandable."

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-12 19:35 標題: 回復 9# Zhaiba 的帖子

What is so difficult to understand is where the following idea come from ??

" can the government change all the government school to the elite school? "

作者: hogwarts 時間: 11-1-12 19:59

Ha, ha, as said by one of the then senior official in the Educational Bureau, those families could send their kids to DSS already had school voucher.  This policy formulated then was by the group of elite with Leung as a main player.  Then they really knew how to create room for themselves, so that they can make official and family decisions in their own convenient way.

The logic becomes, once you are successful, then you can have the privilege to make official and family decisions in a different manner, while the mass must only live with your official decision, just because you are not successful.

No, Leung cannot make every school as good as DBS, but as leader, did he try or just push forward a policy that he won't even accept when he applies his own family value?

Most likely honesty is a forgotten word for some of our then policy makers.  Will our current policymakers learn a lesson or two?  Or just enjoy the privilege in making policy with official value which won't be allowed at home?

Although we are not successful character as Leung, as a stakeholders of the HK education system, we do have the right to question the policy makers' integrity even they are not elected by us.

[ 本帖最後由 hogwarts 於 11-1-12 20:28 編輯 ]

作者: diversity 時間: 11-1-12 20:23 標題: 回復 46# TRYTOBEHOMAMA 的帖子

"The fact is that there are different considerations in making official and family decisions. It is not really surprising for any difference between these decisions"
- wow, what a generous person you are!! I would accept this if he is just a civil servant, but the fact is he was the policy maker (political post). How can he sell a policy without his own belief in it?? Split personality??

作者: diversity 時間: 11-1-12 20:42 標題: 回復 21# Zhaiba 的帖子

[quote]原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-10 20:53 發表

"You guys so sad." - How sad are we??

"He alone cannot build the current education system so please don't criticise anymore, he is also just a parent like us."
Of course the system machinery cannot be built by one person, not even Mr. Tsang. But Leung was the major policy advocate in revamping our educational system that time. Being fulfilling a political post, he should have the integrity and own belief in what he was promoting so as to convince the general public. This should be evidenced by what he behaves, even as a parent. But now... is it fair to our children by being the white mouse of the reform??

"He is so successful in his career isnt it "normal" that these ... "
This makes me even more confused. Does an able father = able child?? what's the logic??

作者: acer1 時間: 11-1-12 22:00

叻人生叻仔，自然考到叻學校。點解咁多人輸咗又唔抵得人，係都話人走後門？安慰下自己!

作者: tzehin 時間: 11-1-12 22:09

Can't agree more with Diversity.
Leung was the main figure in charge of education reform at the time of Tung ruling. We all remember the drastic, unpopular and chaotic education reform e.g. supressing the elite schools in terms of compulsory Mother-Tongue Chinese as Medium of Instruction, changing the 5 banding system to 3 banding and what not.....
Yet now he behaves like he is the supporter of EMI school!! So ridiculous!!
Do as you would be done by.(己所不欲,勿施于人)

作者: PoorParent 時間: 11-1-12 22:13

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PoorParent 時間: 11-1-12 22:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: acer1 時間: 11-1-12 22:26

protect自己學校係正常嘅事，學校好就自然有歸屬感，如果間學校真係好似考唔到班人講到咁衰，我估都應該有退學潮，而且一定無人報讀。

作者: Zhaiba 時間: 11-1-12 22:27 標題: 回復 52# diversity 的帖子

quote]原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-10 20:53 發表
"You guys so sad." - How sad are we??
- because of the ruthless critism of a parent's choice.

"He alone cannot build the current education system so please don't criticise anymore, he is also just a parent like us."
Of course the system machinery cannot be built by one person, not even Mr. Tsang. But Leung was the major policy advocate in revamping our educational system that time. Being fulfilling a political post, he should have the integrity and own belief in what he was promoting so as to convince the general public. This should be evidenced by what he behaves, even as a parent. But now... is it fair to our children by being the white mouse of the reform??

- In case you have not notice my whole discussion is not about the education system, while I may also have a lot of dissatisfaction about the current education system i am not interested to discuss here and this forum is also not a right place.

Let me use another analogy - what about the official incharge of the government hospital, does that means he cannot use private hospital? Cause this way we will be saying the same critism.  The official may "honestly" believe the government hospital is already the best that the government can offer to the general public, but if he can afford a better one he can still choose the private one.  No disbelief at all, it is just everyone's choice.

"He is so successful in his career isnt it "normal" that these ... "
This makes me even more confused. Does an able father = able child?? what's the logic??

I absolutely agree with you, but who said all primary principal are looking for able child for their school?  Some principal may actually be looking for able father, whom they think will be a better asset for the school..........it is a sarcastic comment with the "    " on normal.

作者: Zhaiba 時間: 11-1-12 22:39 標題: 回覆 50# hogwarts 的文章

Don't get me wrong. You have every right to criticise the education system which obviously can be improved.

Rich or successful people do not necessarily are happier but unfortunately they very often will have a bit more choices than the others.

作者: 4in1family 時間: 11-1-12 22:41

梁錦松教改的政策真係好多壞影響，我自己都唔係好認同佢係教育政策的決定。但係同佢個仔入到DBS唔應該夾埋一齊講, 佢都有權揀學校比自己個仔，DBS差不多係全港最出名的男校，作為家長，佢比個仔考無可厚非，佢考到又唔係好出奇，未必一定係黑箱作業既。如果要comment就comment佢果D爛鬼政策，話佢個仔backdoor就好似有的unfair. 講真，梁錦松就算唔報DBS，佢報其他，其他學校都會收，呢個係現實。

作者: Zhaiba 時間: 11-1-12 22:46 標題: 回復 55# PoorParent 的帖子

So I really didnt notice you are talking about me.

If so I am sorry I really do not know what you are talking about or trying to say. If there is anything you want to address please say it clearly.

作者: PoorParent 時間: 11-1-12 23:34

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Student123 時間: 11-1-13 00:02

人之常情
有意無意的也好
，反映潛意識的心態
現象是這樣
有時就下了些主觀意見
男拔永逺是最熱門的對象
如果小孩入不了的家長的心情是可理解的。

作者: Student123 時間: 11-1-13 00:24

再者教改、大學普及化、母語教學，5 bands merge into 3 bands 都領學生及老師受苦
如繼續討論下去，不如去另一版
這是小一選校版

作者: RRNG 時間: 11-1-13 12:56

小朋友叻唔叻就唔知, 不過父母就肯定係叻人.

作者: HoHoMom 時間: 11-1-13 20:45 標題: 回復 16# hogwarts 的帖子

hogwarts, can't agree more.

Amazing to see how the behaviour of trading integrity for personal benefits is being rationalised.

作者: ahtan 時間: 11-1-13 23:29

做人父母都是想子女好的，梁生想個仔讀 DBS, 同你我他她的心態有什麼不同? 街邊賣魚蛋那位爸爸去報 DBS, 你就不批評?大家也是想子女有好的教育。董建華，陳方安生等等的孩子，孫子，也是在名校畢業和現正就讀的, 那你又有甚麼意見?如果要所有高官或前高官的子女也要讀非名校, 那太不講理由吧? 就算當初教改有什麼做得不好，他已不是政府中人那麼多年了,不可能一世也要背著這個「陰影」而不去做自己認為對的事。
至於他說不想兒子和家姐有比較，這個是很 valid 的 point. 我有朋友甚至把一對 twins 分開不同學校，就是因為兩入常常比較。

原帖由 kenmay 於 11-1-10 19:32 發表
公眾人物沒有錯, 他受批評不是因為他是公眾人物, 而是他的行為. 他子女入名校有沒有走後門是他與學校之間的事,
實際有沒有走後門或是真的是其子女的能力, 沒有人知道, 永遠不會有答案, 只是當年推行教改時的不設實 ...

作者: ahtan 時間: 11-1-13 23:31

TOTALLY AGREE!!!

原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-12 00:04 發表
Is it so difficult to understand? The government set policy which it thinks is best for the general public but there is no policy which can possibly satisfy everyone. The official definitely have th ...

作者: hogwarts 時間: 11-1-13 23:37

HoHoMon,

Allowing different value judgements and having freedom to express are universal rights for everyone, unless we are living in society where one will go to jail just because he or she is defending the consumers' rightful interests.

I am happy that on BK and in HK, we can still debate with one another without too much exchange of heated language, and with no "river crabs" patrolling fiercely to maintain order.

Final word in this thread, it is my great pleasure to have you as soulmate.

hogwarts

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)